• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NES, SNES, GEN and GBA Emulator Made on the UWP (Xbox Support) Now in Certification

That's spot-on, Don.

Nintendo will mount a legal challenge that will require a defense and Microsoft just won't want to deal with lawsuits and a strain in third-party publisher relations.
This emulator is going nowhere, unfortunately.

There's no legal basis or precedent. It wouldn't be hard or expensive to defend.
 

b4mv

Banned
Huh. I can't wait to see where this goes. If anything, I want dolphin to come over.. I've ripped all of my GC games already. Hope this opens the flood gates
 
even more hilarious:

Are Game Copying Devices Illegal?

Yes. Game copiers enable users to illegally copy video game software onto floppy disks, writeable compact disks or the hard drive of a personal computer. They enable the user to make, play and distribute illegal copies of video game software which violates Nintendo's copyrights and trademarks. These devices also allow for the uploading and downloading of ROMs to and from the Internet. Based upon the functions of these devices, they are illegal.
Basically everything about emulation and roms is illegal from Nintendo point of view... so i don't think that Microsoft want to clash with Nintendo in a court because an random app. Is not going to happen.
 
Can't believe MS allow this on Win store...

It (and every other emulator on Earth) is already freely available to use on every version of Windows, so... what would keeping it out accomplish, really?

MS could go to court and win, but what's their incentive to do so?

Not letting a direct business competitor push them around with phony bullshit lawsuits?

It's not really as simple as just saying "Emulators are not illegal so this will be allowed".

Are you certain there is nothing illegal about emulators?

Yes. Don't carry water for the "copyright means whatever I want it to" lobby, please.

Nintendo about emulation, also the ROM part is really important.

This is literally just a bunch of bullshit Nintendo lawyers made up which has no basis in copyright law or caselaw. There is absolutely no legal basis past wishful thinking for this position.

nintendo actually downloaded a smb rom from the internet and sold it to us on virtual console?

why isn't this more well known?

It's not even really notable. Many, many retro re-releases have been new wrappers put around scene-release ROMs. And, I mean, really: if you're a Nintendo dev, why bother manually re-ripping SMB when a perfect digital copy already exists and you're the copyright owner so there isn't even anything questionable about copying it?
 
Basically everything about emulation and roms is illegal from Nintendo point of view... so i don't think that Microsoft want to clash with Nintendo in a court because an random app. Is not going to happen.

Yawn. When is chickenshit Nintendo going to sue Steam and Google Play for the emulators on their services?
 

Anth0ny

Member
It's not even really notable. Many, many retro re-releases have been new wrappers put around scene-release ROMs. And, I mean, really: if you're a Nintendo dev, why bother manually re-ripping SMB when a perfect digital copy already exists and you're the copyright owner so there isn't even anything questionable about copying it?

of course there's nothing really wrong with it, but it's kinda laughable that an official nintendo product being sold to millions of people basically has some rom ripper from the 90s' signature deep inside of it
 

Synth

Member
Why Nintendo only went after an emulator on iOS and not Android?

iOS software is controlled by Apple (unless the user jailbreaks), Android software is not controlled by Google. It's similar to the Windows Store, in that they own a distribution platform, but everyone can just ignore it if they want to, and install the software directly.
 
iOS software is controlled by Apple (unless the user jailbreaks), Android software is not controlled by Google. It's similar to the Windows Store, in that they own a distribution platform, but everyone can just ignore it if they want to, and install the software directly.

There are emulators on the Play store.
 

LewieP

Member
Yes. Don't carry water for the "copyright means whatever I want it to" lobby, please.
I'm not saying I think emulators are or should be illegal, just that Microsoft's lawyers could reasonably want to avoid having to answer that question in court.
 

Alchemy

Member
All the hardware is public domain at this point right? Thats why we can get knock off retro consoles like the Retron 5 that can play NES/SNES/etc carts and one of the reasons why we're waiting on N64 support I think... I wonder how this extends to software emulation of hardware.
 
All the hardware is public domain at this point right? Thats why we can get knock off retro consoles like the Retron 5 that can play NES/SNES/etc carts and one of the reasons why we're waiting on N64 support I think... I wonder how this extends to software emulation of hardware.

All the NES patents have expired.
 

petran79

Banned
Basically everything about emulation and roms is illegal from Nintendo point of view... so i don't think that Microsoft want to clash with Nintendo in a court because an random app. Is not going to happen.

Because they did not bother reading law changes of the past 15-20 years, judging from their answers.
 

Synth

Member
He said Android software is not controlled by Google.

It is on the Play store.

Yea, and I'm saying that the Play store is one of many distribution options for Android, just as the Windows Store is one of many for Windows. Removing the app from either doesn't prevent even the average user from installing it to their device, whereas removing the app from the Xbox store or iOS store does.

Not all Android devices even access the Play store out of the box. Nobody fully controls either in the way that Apple does iOS or MS does Xbox.
 
Yea, and I'm saying that the Play store is one of many distribution options for Android, just as the Windows Store is one of many for Windows. Removing the app from either doesn't prevent even the average user from installing it to their device, whereas removing the app from the Xbox store or iOS store does.

Not all Android devices even access the Play store out of the box. Nobody fully controls either in the way that Apple does iOS or MS does Xbox.

Irrelevant. Google owns a platform called the Play Store. Google controls the content in that store and has removed many apps from it. NES emulators are sold on it for real money and Google gets a percentage of that real money. Any legal recourse that Nintendo would have against Microsoft they have against Google right now.

They don't have any recourse, though. The NES patents are expired. An emulator that doesn't include Nintendo's copyrighted games isn't anything they'd succeed at stopping in a court. And they know this, I assure you.
 

oti

Banned
Maybe a stupid question but I don't own an Xbox. How would you get ROMS onto the system? Does the OS allow you to copy any files to the system regardless of their type and extension?

Maybe with OneDrive or some other cloud service.
 

guybrushfreeman

Unconfirmed Member
Apple technically disallows emulators because they run arbitrary code. Of course this also avoids other issues as well. In theory it might be possible to use the emulator to then run other programs or code that wouldn't normally be allowed. These days Apple allows emulators with only pre-packed ROMs in certain cases to avoid the arbitrary code issue. Microsoft may use the same reasoning here side stepping the whole rom emulation issue entirely. It will be interesting to see what they decide.
 
Apple technically disallows emulators because they run arbitrary code. Of course this also avoids other issues as well. In theory it might be possible to use the emulator to then run other programs or code that wouldn't normally be allowed. These days Apple allows emulators with only pre-packed ROMs in certain cases to avoid the arbitrary code issue. Microsoft may use the same reasoning here side stepping the whole rom emulation issue entirely. It will be interesting to see what they decide.

I don't actually think MS will release this. All I'm saying is that if they don't, it won't be over legality or litigation expense.

Remember, Sony had to buy Connectix to keep the VGS emulator off the market.
 

KingBroly

Banned
I don't actually think MS will release this. All I'm saying is that if they don't, it won't be over legality or litigation expense.

Remember, Sony had to buy Connectix to keep the VGS emulator off the market.

If they allow one emulator on Xbox One, that'd open up the door for other emulators as well. I don't think they want to go down that road.
 

LordRaptor

Member
The problem isn't emulators and it never has been emulators.

It's the ROMs / ISOs those emulators run, because emulators inherently strip away any form of copyright protection and anti-piracy mechanisms.
 

FZW

Member
Hmm. I was just looking at the application certification process for Windows apps and apparently they say that


Granted this is for the regular Windows Store but this app was submitted for certification on September 2nd, so Microsoft is definitely taking their time on this one.

cause they are bombarded with apps since uwp was allowed for xbox only a couple days ago. All apps are taking long in certification right now.
 

Jrs3000

Member
Hmm. I was just looking at the application certification process for Windows apps and apparently they say that


Granted this is for the regular Windows Store but this app was submitted for certification on September 2nd, so Microsoft is definitely taking their time on this one.

Monday was a holiday so Thursday would be 3 business days if they aren't overloaded.
 
There's no legal basis or precedent. It wouldn't be hard or expensive to defend.
Easy, Nintendo is going to target the Devs of the Emulator, like they did with the IOS emulator devs... I dont think that a small group of guys want to mess with Nintendo in a court...
 

Lazaro

Member
If you have Windows 8/10 device already, I think you can grab the current NesBox WinRT app now from the Windows Store.

Once it's updated to UWP with Xbox Support it should appear in your ready to install list on Xbox.

EDIT: Unless the dev uploaded NESbox as a brand new app.
 

MacTag

Banned
Apple technically disallows emulators because they run arbitrary code. Of course this also avoids other issues as well. In theory it might be possible to use the emulator to then run other programs or code that wouldn't normally be allowed. These days Apple allows emulators with only pre-packed ROMs in certain cases to avoid the arbitrary code issue. Microsoft may use the same reasoning here side stepping the whole rom emulation issue entirely. It will be interesting to see what they decide.
They do allow audio emulators though. You can play sound files from ripped from games on NES, C64, SMS, SNES, MegaDrive, Game Boy, Game Gear, MSX, PC Engine, PlayStation, N64, GBA, DS and other systems direct from apps on the AppStore.
 
Yea, and I'm saying that the Play store is one of many distribution options for Android, just as the Windows Store is one of many for Windows. Removing the app from either doesn't prevent even the average user from installing it to their device, whereas removing the app from the Xbox store or iOS store does.

Not all Android devices even access the Play store out of the box. Nobody fully controls either in the way that Apple does iOS or MS does Xbox.
Actually xbone is not as jailed as ios. You can enter dev mode which is essentially jail breaking, thought I don't know if you can run sideloaded games when not in game mode.
 
Top Bottom