• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Kaldaien's Nier Mod has an anti-piracy check - People got mad

QisTopTier

XisBannedTier
Edit: I guess it seems like the argument you're posing is that someone who steals something should have full, convenient access to the product they stole and any extensions, and that seems ridiculous.

His argument is "yaaar". People who don't pirate don't make arguments like that

Hell people who pirate for "demo" purposes dont even make arguments like that
 

Ruff

Member
This thread is a total trainwreck. I can't believe some of the posters here. Gonna be a lot of grey names soon.
 

jacobeid

Banned
He invented then.

He is completely free to do so for his own peace of mind, whether backed by case law or not.

What people aren't free to do is steal games. We do have case law about that.

This thread is a total trainwreck. I can't believe some of the posters here. Gonna be a lot of grey names soon.

Yup, I'm out. No point in arguing with schmucks who like to steal. "and his ignore list grew three sizes that day."
 

MUnited83

For you.
At least from what I understand it's not that their entitled it's more that he put the effort into setting up DRM for essentially no reason.



I bought it so I'm on the other side of things, I'm just defending others who might have not bought it. It's not really the right thing to do to gimp someone's experience like I mentioned before because you personally don't like it. Sure you don't need to support them when they ask questions, or anything like that. But please don't go out of your way to sabotage the people who didn't buy the game. That's just malicious.



If you're comparing what I'm saying here to what reddit and 4chan might be doing. Let's step back for a second. 4chan is most likely going to dox him because of this, and sure maybe if you make a decisions like this, and aren't ready for any backlash then I mean there's not much else to say other than just let it blow over.
People who don't buy the fucking game can, you know, just use the fucking mod? Like holy shit, what a terrible destiny, pirating a whole big game completely for free but not be able to use a mod boo fucking hoo. Shit man, those idiots have the goddamn fucking internet at their disposal, they Google some basic coding lessons and they will be able to recompile the kid's code without the restriction pretty easily.
 
People who don't buy the fucking game can, you know, just use the fucking mod? Like holy shit, what a terrible destiny, pirating a whole big game completely for free but not be able to use a mod boo fucking hoo. Shit man, those idiots have the goddamn fucking internet at their disposal, they Google some basic coding lessons and they will be able to recompile the kid's code without the restriction pretty easily.

Afaik its already available for pirated copies...
 

Blam

Member
Before anything else I'd like to be clear that I was using a hypothetical "you" and wasn't accusing you, personally, of anything. Just so we're clear, since I see the way I phrased it could be misinterpreted.

But, how is it malicious? Why are you defending those that haven't bought the game? What is logically wrong with punishing thieves in a mod that you personally developed, provide for free and have as open source? He's not going out of his way to sabotage anybody, because the mod isn't mandatory. There's no targeted attack here, just inconvenience for people without valid copies of the game. I guess the question at the root of it all is, what is the logical argument against what he's done? I'm seeing a lot of "he shouldn't do this" but not reasoning to back it up.

No worries didn't think you were talking about me, but I responded like that just in case you had been. Well it's malicious under the fact that he has blacklisted people before, as much as it might just be 2 trolls. He did it either way. If 'you' let him get away with this then who knows what else he'll add to the compiled version of the .dll (Who knows if those are even the same as the code on git.) It's not up to him to decide who isn't able to use the mod and play the game. If it was really a huge problem then Nier would have had much more rigorous anti-crack measures, but it doesn't.

But I'm not blaming the Nier devs either. I'm just saying it's not his call to do something like this. He sorta did go out of his way because it's not needed to have the mod working and it wasn't something that was providing an obstacle to updating the mod. It's pretty much targeted at all pirates. Yeah it's an inconvenience sure, and sure it's an easy fix. But like I just mentioned he wasn't one of the developers who made the game, so it's not his call to make. For example lets say Platinum Games publicly said that they don't care if you pirated or not. Would his decision be right? Sure this example might never happen it's just like I mentioned it's not his call to make who should and shouldn't be able to play a game with mods.

Sure it's only tied to his mod, and you can play fine without it, but what if more and more people start doing something similar to this? If I couldn't mod Skyrim I'd probably have never bought it multiple times. If i was locked out of modding on a pirated copy of Skyrim I would have probably never even installed the game to be quite honest with you. But thankfully I was able to mod it, and they got quite enough money out of me from buying the legendary edition 4 times (gifted to friends), and the remaster on consoles.
 

MUnited83

For you.
Very talented guy but he is a well known major cunt

Dont dare get into any argument with him
And use his fixes

He can add your information to a blacklist in the software code and God's knows what else he can do with it.
Jesus Christ stop with the 4chan FuD dumbasses spreading already.
 
He can be a shit person but I don't see how pirates are entitled to anything that anyone writes, regardless of the attitude of the writer.



He's not going "out of his way" to do anything to pirates, he just doesn't want pirates to be able to use his mod. Pirates can play the vanilla version of the game just fine, he wasn't doing anything to do those people. All you're doing is arguing that pirates are entitled to his mod for no reason other than you "feel" it's right, but you haven't actually articulated why that is.

Yeah that's understandable but the reality of the matter is. As soon as something hits the public Internet. It's going to be got at. Whether it's Nier or Game of Thrones or whatever else, it's going to be got at by communities that have been around longer than I've been gaming.

We may not like it, but that's the reality. Denuovo stalls the inevitable that's about it.

This has been the case for at least 3 decades now. Denuvo and secuROM will come and go piracy will remain.

And on some levels that's a really good thing.

But once you accept that piracy is an unstoppable reality. Then what you have left is a vigilante modder, stanning for a set of unproven beliefs that wants to take on a certain subset of the internet that are already cranky about denuvo.

So yeah there'll be some drama.
 

nynt9

Member
No worries didn't think you were talking about me, but I responded like that just in case you had been. Well it's malicious under the fact that he has blacklisted people before, as much as it might just be 2 trolls. He did it either way. If 'you' let him get away with this then who knows what else he'll add to the compiled version of the .dll (Who knows if those are even the same as the code on git.) It's not up to him to decide who isn't able to use the mod and play the game. If it was really a huge problem then Nier would have had much more rigorous anti-crack measures, but it doesn't.

But I'm not blaming the Nier devs either. I'm just saying it's not his call to do something like this. He sorta did go out of his way because it's not needed to have the mod working and it wasn't something that was providing an obstacle to updating the mod. It's pretty much targeted at all pirates. Yeah it's an inconvenience sure, and sure it's an easy fix. But like I just mentioned he wasn't one of the developers who made the game, so it's not his call to make. For example lets say Platinum Games publicly said that they don't care if you pirated or not. Would his decision be right? Sure this example might never happen it's just like I mentioned it's not his call to make who should and shouldn't be able to play a game with mods.

Sure it's only tied to his mod, and you can play fine without it, but what if more and more people start doing something similar to this? If I couldn't mod Skyrim I'd probably have never bought it multiple times. If i was locked out of modding on a pirated copy of Skyrim I would have probably never even installed the game to be quite honest with you. But thankfully I was able to mod it, and they got quite enough money out of me from buying the legendary edition 4 times (gifted to friends), and the remaster on consoles.

It literally is up to him who isn't able to use the mod. It's his mod. Doesn't matter what platinum thinks. He made the mod. If you wanna pirate the game, you can't use the mod. Sorry. If you have any other issues regarding his code, you can't use the mod. Sorry. End of story. But it's open source, and the same 4chan people trying to doxx him have already released a version of the mod without his stuff.

Wait Kal's source code, when compiled, will still work for people on his banlist?

... Then what the heck is Blam & co's argument here?

"if 4chan doxxes him it's his fault"

No, really:

4chan is most likely going to dox him because of this, and sure maybe if you make a decisions like this, and aren't ready for any backlash then I mean there's not much else to say other than just let it blow over.
 
No worries didn't think you were talking about me, but I responded like that just in case you had been. Well it's malicious under the fact that he has blacklisted people before, as much as it might just be 2 trolls. He did it either way. If 'you' let him get away with this then who knows what else he'll add to the compiled version of the .dll (Who knows if those are even the same as the code on git.) It's not up to him to decide who isn't able to use the mod and play the game. If it was really a huge problem then Nier would have had much more rigorous anti-crack measures, but it doesn't.

But I'm not blaming the Nier devs either. I'm just saying it's not his call to do something like this. He sorta did go out of his way because it's not needed to have the mod working and it wasn't something that was providing an obstacle to updating the mod. It's pretty much targeted at all pirates. Yeah it's an inconvenience sure, and sure it's an easy fix. But like I just mentioned he wasn't one of the developers who made the game, so it's not his call to make. For example lets say Platinum Games publicly said that they don't care if you pirated or not. Would his decision be right? Sure this example might never happen it's just like I mentioned it's not his call to make who should and shouldn't be able to play a game with mods.

Sure it's only tied to his mod, and you can play fine without it, but what if more and more people start doing something similar to this? If I couldn't mod Skyrim I'd probably have never bought it multiple times. If i was locked out of modding on a pirated copy of Skyrim I would have probably never even installed the game to be quite honest with you. But thankfully I was able to mod it, and they got quite enough money out of me from buying the legendary edition 4 times (gifted to friends), and the remaster on consoles.

To the bolded though, it absolutely is up to him to decide who can use his mod, which is a fundamental difference of opinion we seem to have. I also don't think it would be a problem if future modders offering free services chose to do this.

I appreciate your continued willingness to respond in an even and thoughtful manner. I simply can't agree with your point, and I think it's overly supportive of people I can only classify as thieves and a harmful influence, but it was nice to be able to actually converse about it without things devolving or taking a turn for the worse. I'll probably bow out on the discussion here since I think we've just got some fundamental differences and I don't have a lot more to add.

Edit: Oh. I see there was a ban. Kind of a shame.
 
"if 4chan doxxes him it's his fault"

No, really:

KyIU51m.gif


This thread is too much. Great deal of respect for anyone trying to debate these guys, hoo boy
 

MUnited83

For you.
No worries didn't think you were talking about me, but I responded like that just in case you had been. Well it's malicious under the fact that he has blacklisted people before, as much as it might just be 2 trolls. He did it either way. If 'you' let him get away with this then who knows what else he'll add to the compiled version of the .dll (Who knows if those are even the same as the code on git.) It's not up to him to decide who isn't able to use the mod and play the game. If it was really a huge problem then Nier would have had much more rigorous anti-crack measures, but it doesn't.

But I'm not blaming the Nier devs either. I'm just saying it's not his call to do something like this. He sorta did go out of his way because it's not needed to have the mod working and it wasn't something that was providing an obstacle to updating the mod. It's pretty much targeted at all pirates. Yeah it's an inconvenience sure, and sure it's an easy fix. But like I just mentioned he wasn't one of the developers who made the game, so it's not his call to make. For example lets say Platinum Games publicly said that they don't care if you pirated or not. Would his decision be right? Sure this example might never happen it's just like I mentioned it's not his call to make who should and shouldn't be able to play a game with mods.

Sure it's only tied to his mod, and you can play fine without it, but what if more and more people start doing something similar to this? If I couldn't mod Skyrim I'd probably have never bought it multiple times. If i was locked out of modding on a pirated copy of Skyrim I would have probably never even installed the game to be quite honest with you. But thankfully I was able to mod it, and they got quite enough money out of me from buying the legendary edition 4 times (gifted to friends), and the remaster on consoles.
Jesus fucking christ just go away with your dumb conspiracy theories already. Nobody is entitled to a motherfucking free mod. You are not entitled to have access to anything that someone writes for free. It's his software and he can block whoever he motherfucking wants from it, it's his right and always will be.

"HURR DURRRRRRR WHAT IF OTHER MODDERS START DOING THIS HURRR DURRRRRRR" are you that dense or you honestly think this will magically start a wave of people restricting their mods? Are you not capable of rational thought?
 

theultimo

Member
Wait Kal's source code, when compiled, will still work for people on his banlist?

... Then what the heck is Blam & co's argument here?
Its about ethics in mod creation.


Thats the only thing i can think of, if i made a mod to something but requires a legitimate check on ownership its in my own right to do that. Maybe im wanting to support the developers, maybe i have a stance on pro-drm, who cares. it is every right for someone to create whatever they want and nobody if forcing anyone to play with it.

In niers case there are other mods that do the same thing, its just he made an easy ui and combinations of others work in a streamlined package.
 
But once you accept that piracy is an unstoppable reality. Then what you have left is a vigilante modder, stanning for a set of unproven beliefs that wants to take on a certain subset of the internet that are already cranky about denuvo.

So yeah there'll be some drama.

Wait. "Unproven beliefs" that stealing is wrong? Am I reading that right?
 

Ascheroth

Member
"Pirates need to be able to get the best experience too, because EQUALITY" is the dumbest argument for anything I've heard in a looong time.
Like holy shit. And the thing in question is freaking open source and anyone can modify and change it however they want.

...This is literally an outcry and harassment by butthurt, lazy pirates, because they're too lazy to put a little work into getting their stolen game working like a paying customer.

I think I've had enough internet for this month.
 
Wait. "Unproven beliefs" that stealing is wrong? Am I reading that right?

No the unproven belief being piracy hurts sales, and destroys companies profits. It's always and forever will be an assumption.

Yet it's been happening for 30 years and if anything gaming on PC has never ever been stronger.
 

Yarbskoo

Member
I probably wouldn't even notice it's there, but if there's a version of the mod without the DRM I'd use that instead since it's less likely to cause issues later on.
 
No the unproven belief being piracy hurts sales, and destroys companies profits. It's always and forever will be an assumption.

Yet it's been happening for 30 years and if anything gaming on PC has never ever been stronger.

Regardless of whether or not it hurts sales, I think taking something you have not paid for is pretty ethically clear, especially when we're talking a luxury item like a game. I also think the idea that 100% of said pirates would never have spent even a penny on the game otherwise is likely to be pirate rhetoric and not actually indicative of truth, and if piracy hurts sales even slightly there's no room for grey area.

Like seriously, stealing is wrong. Piracy is the theft of luxury entertainment products. How is it defensible?
 

Yarbskoo

Member
Regardless of whether or not it hurts sales, I think taking something you have not paid for is pretty ethically clear, especially when we're talking a luxury item like a game. I also think the idea that 100% of said pirates would never have spent even a penny on the game otherwise is likely to be pirate rhetoric and not actually indicative of truth, and if piracy hurts sales even slightly there's no room for grey area.

Like seriously, stealing is wrong. Piracy is the theft of luxury entertainment products. How is it defensible?

Piracy is not theft.

It's copyright infringement.
 
Would you take the same stance if a commercial game used Steamworks to target specific users the studio took issue with ? They could just not buy the game.

I would not take the same stance if people payed a cent for any hypothetical product, because then he's contractually obligated to provide a service and unable to rescind it unilaterally without good reason. Money didn't change hands, he owes them absolutely nothing. What about this concept is hard to grasp?

I don't even know why people are talking about piracy. He could ban people for having names starting with letters he dislikes and he'd be 100% within his right to do so.
 

theultimo

Member
No the unproven belief being piracy hurts sales, and destroys companies profits. It's always and forever will be an assumption.

Yet it's been happening for 30 years and if anything gaming on PC has never ever been stronger.
That could be a valid argument if the main issue was piracy and sales. Its not important to a discussion where a mod breaks if you pirate the game.

Regardless of your stance on piracy concerns, the modder can require a licence check if he so chooses. It has nothing to do with sales.
 

phant0m

Member
Lol.

Publisher adds DRM: "Fuck them, I'm pirating just to spite"

Modder adds DRM: "Good on him, support PC!"

FWIW, I think it's pretty funny, and overall a decent move on the modder's part.
 

Yarbskoo

Member
Semantics, and not in any way an invalidation of the point made.

There's a pretty big difference between taking something from someone and copying something without permission.

That's why you said "Stealing is wrong" instead of "Distributing unauthorized duplicates is wrong." One sounds worse because it is worse.

Both are illegal in most western countries...

As it should be.

They're still not the same thing though.
 

Ascheroth

Member
Lol.

Publisher adds DRM: "Fuck them, I'm pirating just to spite"

Modder adds DRM: "Good on him, support PC!"

FWIW, I think it's pretty funny, and overall a decent move on the modder's part.
The difference here is that the mod is free, optional and open-source.
I can dislike Denuvo in a prdocut I paid for while at the same time not caring about what a modder does with his freetime-work (that anyone with the knowledge can even modify to his liking).
 

Dec

Member
The difference here is that the mod is free, optional and open-source.
I can dislike Denuvo in a prdocut I paid for while at the same time not caring about what a modder does with his freetime-work (that anyone with the knowledge can even modify to his liking).

Ya, if you dislike having denuvo in a product you paid for the logical next step is to fix a bug in it by adding a mod to it that also has online DRM.
 
Erm, more power to the modder?
I don't see the purpose of making your mod have drm, but as long as he is not charging for anything, it's all fair game.
 

Ascheroth

Member
Ya, if you dislike having denuvo in a product you paid for the logical next step is to fix a bug in it by adding a mod to it that also has online DRM.
There is no online DRM, stop spreading FUD.
All it does is a check if the SteamAPI.dll is unmodified.

And even if it had, it's open source I could remove it myself and compile another version.
 
Lol.

Publisher adds DRM: "Fuck them, I'm pirating just to spite"

Modder adds DRM: "Good on him, support PC!"

FWIW, I think it's pretty funny, and overall a decent move on the modder's part.

Completely and utterly different situations. I still don't like that Nier has Denuvo. For me, the less DRM for a game I bought the better. But FAR? As already said again and again and again and again and again and again and again in this thread the project is free -AND- open source.
I sincerely can't see a lick of a problem with his decision. -IF- the mod was closed source and you couldn't see what he was doing, I could see some problems with it. But it isn't.

Seriously, a mod should change the title to " Kaldaien's Nier FREE OPEN SOURCE Mod has an anti-piracy check".
 

MUnited83

For you.
Lol.

Publisher adds DRM: "Fuck them, I'm pirating just to spite"

Modder adds DRM: "Good on him, support PC!"

FWIW, I think it's pretty funny, and overall a decent move on the modder's part.
The whole thing is open source so anyone that wants to use it on pirate copies can just code the DRM out.

Ya, if you dislike having denuvo in a product you paid for the logical next step is to fix a bug in it by adding a mod to it that also has online DRM.
There is no online DRM on the mod whatsoever.
 

ghostjoke

Banned
Lol.

Publisher adds DRM: "Fuck them, I'm pirating just to spite"

Modder adds DRM: "Good on him, support PC!"

FWIW, I think it's pretty funny, and overall a decent move on the modder's part.

Difference (at least to me) is the mod is open source and can easily be remedied. My fear with extreme DRM is a lock out or complication with no solution. It's not ideal but let them have their peace of mind once I know certain bays have my back if everything goes screwy. Also, it's free.
 

Mivey

Member
Honestly, nothing he did here is outside his rights as a mod maker. And since it open source, anyone can simply create a fork and keep it up to date with any future versions. Not really hard to do.

This reminds that Kaldaien fixed quite a few games that I enjoyed with his mod tools so far.
Does he have a public account where he accepts donation?
 
Honestly, nothing he did here is outside his rights as a mod maker. And since it open source, anyone can simply create a fork and keep it up to date with any future versions. Not really hard to do.

This reminds that Kaldaien fixed quite a few games that I enjoyed with his mod tools so far.
Does he have a public account where he accepts donation?

This whole situation makes me want him to setup a Patreon or something. Although stupid people could use this as an argument
"WAAAAAAAAAAAH I -GAVE MONEY- TO HIM SO HE NEEDS TO REMOVE THE PIRATECHECK!"
 

Izuna

Banned
This whole situation makes me want him to setup a Patreon or something. Although stupid people could use this as an argument
"WAAAAAAAAAAAH I -GAVE MONEY- TO HIM SO HE NEEDS TO REMOVE THE PIRATECHECK!"

When did gamers become communists?

...

The outrage here seems to attracting a lot of people who want to make a statement on DRM as a hole, despite the many options they have to circumvent what he did.
 
What precedent? Are you insane? You think the dude invented a completely new way of blocking people from using software or something? You think it's a magical virus every modder will use now?

This is not a fucking commercial game, it's a goddamn free mod that you are not entitled to use in any fucking way. If he wants to ban you from it, it is his goddamn right.

Do you cry about TF2 and CS community servers using the API system to ban you from their servers too? Why the hell aren't you crying about that?

Because there's a difference banning someone from a server and writing code specifically to target someone you don't like (while distributing that code on the discussion board that the mods/Square Enix themselves stickied at the top). Again, you think Valve and Square Enix would approve?

The implications of people targeting each other using SteamIDs to target people they don't like and take their toys away from each other is pretty dangerous. Especially within modding communities for stuff like Bethesda games and Arma.

We don't need more shitty behavior from modders. Trust me.
 

jacobeid

Banned
Because there's a difference banning someone from a server and writing code specifically to target someone you don't like (while distributing that code on the discussion board that the mods/Square Enix themselves stickied at the top). Again, you think Valve and Square Enix would approve?

The implications of people targeting each other using SteamIDs to target people they don't like and take their toys away from each other is pretty dangerous. Especially within modding communities for stuff like Bethesda games and Arma.

We don't need more shitty behavior from modders. Trust me.

We don't need more shitposts from people like you on this topic. Trust me.

Just stop. seriously.
 

QisTopTier

XisBannedTier
Because there's a difference banning someone from a server and writing code specifically to target someone you don't like (while distributing that code on the discussion board that the mods/Square Enix themselves stickied at the top). Again, you think Valve and Square Enix would approve?

The implications of people targeting each other using SteamIDs to target people they don't like and take their toys away from each other is pretty dangerous. Especially within modding communities for stuff like Bethesda games and Arma.

We don't need more shitty behavior from modders. Trust me.

The only thing they lose access to is the mod. Once again, boo fucking hoo territory.

And if you annoyed the fuck out of the guy enough to be on his blacklist then you were probably not going to be using the mod in the first place.

So many ungrateful pricks holy shit.
 
There's a pretty big difference between taking something from someone and copying something without permission.

That's why you said "Stealing is wrong" instead of "Distributing unauthorized duplicates is wrong." One sounds worse because it is worse.

Just because it's not a physical good doesn't mean you can't steal it, even if it isn't under the law called stealing. I don't believe there's as much of a distinction between stealing and piracy as you're trying to imply. Whether it's a manufactured good or a digital good, there was a great deal of time and cost sunk into the production of said product. The only real difference I see is manufacturing cost. And again, quibbling about the semantics of it all fails to address the actual point that was in the post you quoted.
 
Top Bottom