Governmental censorship is very different than a company not wanting to sell a product, and conflating the two in order to make a general "argument against censorship" is disingenuous. Especially when company "censorship" is totally within their own control to either ignore or listen to their customer base. Apparently in your world a company having any sort of quality control is actually "censoring" (shitty bad) games - that should tell you how meaningless that word becomes when used in this context. They can ignore the complaining groups or listen to them. If you don't like their choice, than find a different company. Maybe if a bunch of free speech purists like you abandon steam they'll change their mind (/s). They are, again, under no obligation to support products that are as bad as a PUA dumpster fire game in order to pass some free-speech purity test.
If you want to be on Steam, don't make a shitty misogynist live-action ego inflating PUA game who's entire goal is to spread a real-life shit ideology to gullible young men. It's that simple. Steam also wouldn't allow a altrighter to make a game about harassing Jews online to exist. Would you cry censorship if a Nazi themed game of working a gas chamber was banned from Steam? I doubt it. At some point people draw the line, because very few are actually "free speech" purists despite pretending to claim as much. Stream draws their lines sooner than you would - so what? They see it as beneficial to their company image and their bottom line, and they're probably not wrong.
How full of yourself can you be? Impressive. A whole lot of words, yet one sentence following the next one amounts to no more than 'if you don't share my opinion, you're wrong'.
Censorship is when speech, art, creativity or any product are forcibly altered in terms of their meaning. There is no 'conflating' censorship from the government and censorship from companies, because both amount to the same. You hide behind the argument that companies 'listen to their customer base' and are 'in full control'. You know exactly that's not true, so stop being disingenuous yourself instead of making hollow call-outs against others.
Companies these days don't listen to their customer base. If that were true, Tokyo Mirage Sessions wouldn't have been censored. The boob slider in Xenoblade Chronicles X wouldn't have been removed. Gal Gun would be releasing in Germany. And so on (and if those aren't the best examples, there's better ones. Don't you dare dismiss everything because of that). Companies (and fortunately not all of them) listen to the complaints of a very vocal minority that hardly overlaps with their customer base. It's never the customers when some ignorant, morally close-minded jerks are outraged over some anime-game. These are people that hate anime in its entirety. Yet, companies HAVE TO listen to them or feel they have to, because otherwise the harassment will start and the combined campaign efforts of websites like Kotaku, Polygon and a certain forum will make sure to brand the company as racist, sexist, homophobe or whatever discriminative buzzword is en vogue that moment. These companies don't have the courage to stand up to these terrible bullies and censor their games - someone coined the fitting term 'culturalization', because what happens isn't mere localization. Although censorship exists beyond Japanese games coming to the West, of course.
The point is: censorship is a real thing in gaming and it's even more perverse than government censorship. When the government censors something, it's because it sees the need to protect people from something. Which I don't support, as censorship is always wrong, but I can understand their line of thinking. However, when companies are censoring their own products, it's not because of any sort of noble cause. It's cowardice, bowing to the pressure of an obnoxious small group of people that never had any intention to buy their product. This group's goal only is to forcibly change the world to fit to its authoritarian, ignorant, small ideas. And thanks to Twitter and the aforementioned websites, as well as the fact that minorities are untouchable in the current climate no matter how wrong they might be, companies adhere to these people. And commit censorship.
So don't you dare tell us what is and isn't censorship. You know full well what the problem ist, but you gleefully choose to ignore it. Because your own ideology isn't 'shit ideology', huh. And you care so much about young men, huh? You don't. You never did. But you didn't expect to get called out yourself or maybe you did, and you'll reply with a 'this place has really gone to hell' (EDIT: I see you already did that. Yes, clearly there are no more people of this left on NeoGAF. Clearly, as the political compass thread demonstrates. Lol) - because those who don't share your 'shit ideologies' are wrong, alt-right, neonazis, misogynists, harassers, racists, gamergators, and whatever else catchphrase you can come up with.
Don't like this game? Don't buy it. What a novel idea, I know.