• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Next Xbox is ‘More Advanced’ Than the PS5 according to Insiders.

I hate their attitude. I know something you don't and I ain't telling nana :pie_confounded:

It's all an act.

If they want the full details, negotiations must be done via the meeting area. Sensitive information isn't given away for free.

immg]
 

shark sandwich

tenuously links anime, pedophile and incels
SonyGAF was hyped as fuck when we found out how much more powerful PS4 was compared to X1. Now it’s “well nobody cares about power, what matters is the games!!”

Honestly don’t care who wins the power war, but this is making it pretty entertaining to watch.
 

Croatoan

They/Them A-10 Warthog
I will buy both and still play mostly pc, but I hope Xbox smokes ps5 power wise, and comes out with some killer games, just to spite you sony fanboys. The absolute arrogance some of you are showing in this thread, and on this forum, is disgusting and makes it hard to read neogaf.

The competition between these companies should be fun to watch and discuss, but the obnoxious fanboyism on all sides ruins it for us grownups who love the industry.
 

onQ123

Member
One of the Xbox insiders on the other forums claims that PS5 fast loading times is just GPU Decompression & that both next gen Xboxs will have it but he/she neglected the fact that the wired interview said that PS5 storage raw bandwidth is going to be faster than the fastest PC SSDs that's out now. we know that the leaked Xbox Scarlet specs say that it will have a 1GB/s NVMe & that's not faster than the fastest PC SSDs on the market now.
 

Stuart360

Member
Power is a factor for some people, one of a few factors though. Price imo is the no'1 factor for the majority of gamers (especially ones that dont have fanboy loyalty to one company), and if the next Xbox is more powerful BUT $100 more expensive, we will have a similar situation with the PS4 and XB1, with PS5 winning the early sales imo.
 

Dabaus

Banned
Microsoft insiders are on full blown damage control. The ps5 wasnt supposed to be talked about this early and it wasnt supposed to be this powerful. Having backwards compatibility is just another dagger. MS got sucker punched and it hurt bad.
 
Microsoft insiders are on full blown damage control. The ps5 wasnt supposed to be talked about this early and it wasnt supposed to be this powerful. Having backwards compatibility is just another dagger. MS got sucker punched and it hurt bad.
"this powerful"?

You have no idea how many CU's the GPU has or its frequency, you have no idea what RAM it has, what capacity or how much bandwidth it has, you have no idea what variant of Zen2 it is or its operating frequency...

Literally a bunch of vague nothingness...
 
I will buy both and still play mostly pc, but I hope Xbox smokes ps5 power wise, and comes out with some killer games, just to spite you sony fanboys. The absolute arrogance some of you are showing in this thread, and on this forum, is disgusting and makes it hard to read neogaf.

The competition between these companies should be fun to watch and discuss, but the obnoxious fanboyism on all sides ruins it for us grownups who love the industry.


Amen, it's inevitable what you typed and Phil ain't @#$% around, there will be very AAA salty downplays but they'll be a laughing stock anyways.. can't wait to se tables get turned around just in spite off all the ignorance and hate 😁🤣
 

Shin

Banned
They lost me with trust Xbox insiders.
Follow AMD Arcturus as well as how Microsoft have been engineering their console since the first Xbox, just their design philosophy in general (even Inc kinect or always online).
I posted a video earlier today about Navi that gives a better understanding of it all.
Don't need an insider, the clues have been there since Xbox E3 2018, AMD CES 19, Digital Foundry laughing 2x in the PS5 video, the rumors that Navi was made for PS5 and the list goes on.

Also while on that note Navi is confirmed via via to be the last in the GCN line so max 64CU for PS5. Arcturus breaks that limitation and I guess that's how it might end up being stronger. So I wonder if the exclusive deal was real or Microsoft paid more like they did with XO, I'm guessing it's the latter. Would it be strange? No because they need it as a selling point due to software catalog or lack thereof.

Here watch the whole video:
 
Last edited:

SonGoku

Member
It would also mean Sony somehow knows how powerful the next Xbox is which seems unlikely do to Ms usually running a tight ship. Or the fact it's not likely finished yet.
What do you think?
It sounds like bs, why would MS be privy to secret info on Sony but not the other way around
Its one think to aim to make the most powerful console but there is no way to guarantee that without having control over your competition

The only way they can is by launching a year later giving them time to improve upon whatever the competition has in stores that or decide in advance to lose millions, possibly billion/s subsiding hardware
 
It would be rather amusing if the Xbox Next came with a faster CPU and GPU combo, but the PS5 came with more RAM.

Some would argue that the PS5 would then have a speed advantage due to the RAM.
 
Missed the story about reorganising the entire company around those same woke principle (whether right or wrong they are in isolation and together as a whole) and going heavy handed with tons more HR people announced by Sarah Nadella the other day? What do you think?

Do you Not think the hiring strategy has been affected / is being affected (see Bonnie Ross’s / 343i too boss article a few weeks ago)?
I can't say I'm surprised - and I wonder how these giants will do in 5 to 10 years.

The ideology is about power, how to take it from people by making them feel guilt, and shame... so far it seems to work. If you assume that a good number of students coming out of the top universities are part of the cult, when they get the big jobs they push that agenda because they feel that this is the "right thing to do", they are on the right side of history, etc. Yet in reality this group of people show so much bigotry, just coming from a different angle.

And if that was only the tech giants, they do their best to take away big open source projects (the kernel from Linus! and countless other smaller ones) with the implementation of a "code of conduct" in many of them.

This is the visible part of it, even politicians who are apparently going against the wave often pander to the SJW crowd, probably because of the perceived size of it? I mean in Canada, even the Conservatives sometimes adopt the victim narrative, or they won't push back when SJW policies are implemented by other parties.

Then you have most people in the population who just don't get what's going on, in discussion with old friends, family etc. they are just like: "where are all the trans related policies coming from?", "how come we are told that the society is more racist?", etc. or a friend who work in IT told me he stopped using FB because he was worried that he may say something his employer may not like (and believe me this guy is a serious lefty)... So I stopped voting, I don't feel represented, and I don't want to encourage any of it.
 
We know they said the 1X was going to be more powerful than the Pro and it certainly lived up to that.
The Pro does 1440p while the 1X actually does native 4K.
I wouldn't paint things so black and white, realistically the Xbox One X can do native 4K but the reality is it's more of an 1800p system on average. The Pro is a 1440p system on average.
 

KINDERFELD

Banned
I wouldn't paint things so black and white, realistically the Xbox One X can do native 4K but the reality is it's more of an 1800p system on average. The Pro is a 1440p system on average.

I know it runs quite a few current gen games at native 4K.
The Pro is yet to do that in any current gen game.
 
Last edited:

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
One of the Xbox insiders on the other forums claims that PS5 fast loading times is just GPU Decompression & that both next gen Xboxs will have it but he/she neglected the fact that the wired interview said that PS5 storage raw bandwidth is going to be faster than the fastest PC SSDs that's out now. we know that the leaked Xbox Scarlet specs say that it will have a 1GB/s NVMe & that's not faster than the fastest PC SSDs on the market now.

GPU compression excuse seems like not knowing what Sony are doing damage control. You’re not going to go from 15 seconds to less than one second based on that alone.

We have it in real world models now to test with Nvidia and it does not do that level of performance increase, at all.
 
Last edited:
I know it runs quite a few current gen games at native 4K.
The Pro is yet to do that in any current gen game.
It did it with Shadow of Mordor to an extent, but the Xbox One X is by no means a native 4K console, it just makes a substantially better overall attempt at it.
 

KINDERFELD

Banned
It did it with Shadow of Mordor to an extent, but the Xbox One X is by no means a native 4K console, it just makes a substantially better overall attempt at it.

Its more a 4K console than the Pro and that's undeniable.

Shadow of Mordor was a PS3 game and not current gen however I can mention more than 1 game for the 1X that is current gen and runs at native 4K.
 

Dabaus

Banned
That's not entirely true because Navi has intrinsic limitation tied to GCN and CU count, if Microsoft is using a variant of Next-Gen they'd by default have a better GPU.
If Microsoft is skipping to a next next genration gpu how much do you realistically expect that to cost?

We know they said the 1X was going to be more powerful than the Pro and it certainly lived up to that.
The Pro does 1440p while the 1X actually does native 4K.
The 1x was a year later and 100 dollars more, it HAD to be more powerful.
 

tr1p1ex

Member
these things are going to be rather identical in power unless someone comes in at $100 and $100 higher price will hurt them.
 

KINDERFELD

Banned
If Microsoft is skipping to a next next genration gpu how much do you realistically expect that to cost?


The 1x was a year later and 100 dollars more, it HAD to be more powerful.

Well the Switch is the same price as the base PS4 and more expensive than the base Xbox, came out after both of them and is significantly weaker than them both.

The point is, we can trust that the next gen Xbox will indeed be more powerful than the PS5. They made the same claim with the 1X and delivered on that claim.
 
If Microsoft is skipping to a next next genration gpu how much do you realistically expect that to cost?


The 1x was a year later and 100 dollars more, it HAD to be more powerful.
Well here's the thing, it seems now that Sony is going to pivot for a Spring 2020 launch using Navi, they're releasing information which for them seems a bit early to make a Fall 2020 push. If Microsoft simply held out for fall that extra 6-7 months could bode them a better GPU not just in terms of power but also features for possibly the same cost.
 
The more powerful the consoles become, the smaller the percent delta becomes. Here's an example:

Console A has 2TF of power and Console B has 4TF. The absolute gap is 2TF and Console B is 100% more powerful than Console A.

Console A has 12TF and Console B has 14TF. The absolute gap is the same, but this time, Console B is only 16.7% more powerful than Console A.
 

ANIMAL1975

Member
Follow AMD Arcturus as well as how Microsoft have been engineering their console since the first Xbox, just their design philosophy in general (even Inc kinect or always online).
I posted a video earlier today about Navi that gives a better understanding of it all.
Don't need an insider, the clues have been there since Xbox E3 2018, AMD CES 19, Digital Foundry laughing 2x in the PS5 video, the rumors that Navi was made for PS5 and the list goes on.

Also while on that note Navi is confirmed via via to be the last in the GCN line so max 64CU for PS5. Arcturus breaks that limitation and I guess that's how it might end up being stronger. So I wonder if the exclusive deal was real or Microsoft paid more like they did with XO, I'm guessing it's the latter. Would it be strange? No because they need it as a selling point due to software catalog or lack thereof.

Here watch the whole video:

Thanks, can't watch right now I'm on mobile, but saw your post on this yesterday in the other thread. Yes that's a possibility, with that information of course the insider could say Xbox is more advanced than PS5, knowing only its arch. We'll have to wait and see, i think it depends also on the planing ms has for the Nextbox release.
 
If Microsoft is skipping to a next next genration gpu how much do you realistically expect that to cost?


The 1x was a year later and 100 dollars more, it HAD to be more powerful.
I thought they were launching 2 Xbox models. Base and premium. Or has that been debunked
 

SonGoku

Member
One of the Xbox insiders on the other forums claims that PS5 fast loading times is just GPU Decompression & that both next gen Xboxs will have it but he/she neglected the fact that the wired interview said that PS5 storage raw bandwidth is going to be faster than the fastest PC SSDs that's out now. we know that the leaked Xbox Scarlet specs say that it will have a 1GB/s NVMe & that's not faster than the fastest PC SSDs on the market now.
The way it was phrased i think it meant faster than most conventional SSDs on PC
Just like when Cerny said the PS4 onion (or was it garlic) bus that connects GPU/CPU at 20GB/s its faster than the PCI connection on most PCs
 
SonyGAF was hyped as fuck when we found out how much more powerful PS4 was compared to X1. Now it’s “well nobody cares about power, what matters is the games!!”

Honestly don’t care who wins the power war, but this is making it pretty entertaining to watch.

What difference can there be? 2-3TF? for 100+~$?

Unless microsoft has some new design like they did in the 360 era with the revolutionary unified shaders, there's not much room to surpass the ps5. Given they are likely to be on the same process, substantially greater performance demands either vastly higher energy consumption or radically more efficient architecture.
 

Shin

Banned
We'll have to wait and see,
Yea, as excited as I am about technology I'd rather be realistic than get carried away.
We'll see in 7 weeks what the plan is, still a better first impression about PS5 than when PS4 was announced.
AMD was more prepared this time also I bet and that's the biggest win/take away from it all, one hand washes the other.
 

ruvikx

Banned
I want both manufacturers to first & foremost make sure third party developers release games with a stable framerate on their consoles (60 is better, but 30 can also be passable in the right game). All the 2013 obsession over the PS4 versus Xbox One power debate turned to literal ash in the latter part of this generation because the framerate on both consoles is... passable at best & fucking atrocious at worst. God of War for example on the base ps4 performs like crap, even when simply rowing a boat.

Anthem? (aka one of the latest blockubusters)? It's a turd on the base consoles because of the framerate. Resolution means diddly-squat when stutter creates an eyesore.
 

Gamernyc78

Banned
Title is misleading, Sony hasn't even locked down a clock speed on the CPU or GPU yet. Microsoft has made it clear they don't want to be caught short again, but as both parties are also using very similar chipsets, it's less about "special sauce" and more about how much they are willing to charge for the console and when.

Both Sony and Microsoft are very much tied down to AMD's product cycle, and so they'll likely have roughly the same spec in terms of CPU and GPU. Sony might be launching 6-8 months later, but that isn't enough time for them to jump in on the next product cycle.

So there are basically two options.

- Either be the more powerful console by being the most expensive.
- Be the most powerful console at the expense of other functionality.

For the latter there are a load of options available, such as dropping the disk drive, a smaller SSD drive or a hybrid-drive, reducing the number of ports, heck - even shipping without a controller and using the current gen controller again. But I feel Sony is actually being smart here by focusing on load-time improvements etc over pure graphical grunt, and Microsoft would be making a mistake not to follow suit.

Now to be fair to Microsoft, they promised to have the most powerful console with the 360 (which also released first) and in retrospect, I think most would agree they achieved it.

Either way it's fucking great to see Sony and Microsoft going at it again for making a powerhouse console, as an old fart with disposable income I want some insane £600 beast that dims the street lights when I turn it on.

"Now to be fair to Microsoft, they promised to have the most powerful console with the 360 (which also released first) and in retrospect, I think most would agree they achieved it"

That isn't a consensus at all. 360 in the opinion of many was not more powerful. The multi-player games tht were inferior on ps3 were inferior because devs weren't familiar with the cell. Ps3 first party games from Uncharted and on were graphical benchmarks in most of their genres from Uncharted looking better than Gears to Killzone looking better than Halo and doing stuff ppl couldn't believe. So this notion is far from true for many. I mean lens of truth, Digital Foundry, etc were constantly giving the graphical nod to ps3 exclusives.

Microsoft can say all they want like they always seem to do but their record isn't helping them from kinect, to milo, to crackdown and the cloud, etc... All which had high promises but disappointed.

I am not saying Microsoft can't or won't have a slightly stronger console. What I'm saying is just because thy say it it isnt a given. Sony are watching and will not allow themselves to be 1uped overall. If it's more powerful they'll do something to diminish tht edge like price ps5 cheaper or add some special feature like the SSD talk.
 
Last edited:

SonGoku

Member
Would it be strange? No because they need it as a selling point due to software catalog or lack thereof.
I think so yes, there's no way Sony is settling with a obsolete arch if there is a vastly superior arch in the same release timetable
Unless the Xbox launches one year later or more i dare say its imposible it will have a better arch.
 

shark sandwich

tenuously links anime, pedophile and incels
What difference can there be? 2-3TF? for 100+~$?

Unless microsoft has some new design like they did in the 360 era with the revolutionary unified shaders, there's not much room to surpass the ps5. Given they are likely to be on the same process, substantially greater performance demands either vastly higher energy consumption or radically more efficient architecture.
1. PS4 and X1 used the same GPU and CPU architectures, yet PS4’s GPU was twice as powerful

2. Some of the rumors here suggest that Xbox WILL indeed use a different architecture (Arcturus vs Navi)

3. That’s all beside the point. Wasn’t my intention to predict the magnitude of the power difference. I was remarking how funny it is that the prevailing attitude on GAF shifted from “OMG PS4 is a beast, it’s gonna be so awesome!!” to “power doesn’t matter, right guys?” as soon as we heard rumors about next Xbox being more powerful than PS5.
 

Javthusiast

Banned
Even if it is slightly more powerful. The ps brand name, the huge ps4 install base and the fact that your already purchased ps4 library will probably be easy playable on ps5, gives sony a huge edge going into next gen. They will probably continue with their success and xbox will still be second fiddle.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom