Papa
Banned
I disagree with a lot of Geki's opinions, but I absolutely respect them. I just feel he's can be a bit too hostile and abrasive when he presents them while showing a lack of respect for differing opinions.
I disagree with a lot of Geki's opinions, but I absolutely respect them. I just feel he's can be a bit too hostile and abrasive when he presents them while showing a lack of respect for differing opinions.
Please explain
I do not understand. Can you clarify, please?
Soon... Sooooon...I don't get it
You're abrasive at times yes, but you've at least shown you can respect an opinion regardless of whether or not it differs from yours, so I think you're being unfair to yourself Matt.I was just showing a lil bit of self awareness ok can we pls move on
You're abrasive at times yes, but you've at least shown you can respect an opinion regardless of whether or not it differs from yours, so I think you're being unfair to yourself Matt.
BUT FUCK THE MOTHERFUCKER CLIPPERS![]()
I take back everything I said, except for fucking the Clippers.this opinion sucks
I strongly disagree with Geki D’s 1 month ban. Extremely disappointing to see it take place.
I sense you may be disagreeing purely on ideological grounds. The guy is incapable of debating honestly with people, just waffles and deflect and bullshits until people lose their rag. He makes no useful contribution.
![]()
Was this a """sleeper agent"""?
I see you're a man of culture.BUT FUCK THE MOTHER
I strongly disagree with Geki D’s 1 month ban. Extremely disappointing to see it take place.
We have many people that do this though.The man consistently spergs out whenever the term “SJW” is mentioned.
We have many people that do this though.
Not a fan of (actual) internet detective stuff myself, but isn't the context relevant here? Katsura was claiming Geki-D was lying when he said that Katsura was portraying his views as less harmful than the opposing views on gender & representation, which would require Geki-D to either accept being called a liar wrongfully or to provide evidence to his claim, which can only be supported by quotes that display that behaviour. The post before that, where he quoted old postings of Katsura, he was quoting discussions he recently had with Katsura, so no detective work required here. I can understand having issues with the tone, but Geki-D did not just dig up some dirt on someone to fling it at him, but merely provided evidence when challenged about his claims. How would you want him to react in the above situation going forward?That said, ifGeki-D pulls that internet detective smearing on anyone here again, it'll be an automatic perm.
I’d say they’re very much birds of a feather.Is Geki another one of your e-lovers, Yoshi?
Cute. #DockingBros4LyfeI’d say they’re very much birds of a feather.
It was a question about general policy, in fact I think I have not interacted with Geki-D much yet.Is Geki another one of your e-lovers, Yoshi?
The latest permanent ban. Thank you mods
Except he was lying and he was trying to reframe my posts in other topics as something they were not. I opted not to defend anything because that would have further derailed the thread. Why are you even mentioning me? I wouldn't have discovered your post had you not specifically @at me. Seems like a strange decision. I wonder what your motivation for doing that wasNot a fan of (actual) internet detective stuff myself, but isn't the context relevant here? Katsura was claiming Geki-D was lying when he said that Katsura was portraying his views as less harmful than the opposing views on gender & representation, which would require Geki-D to either accept being called a liar wrongfully or to provide evidence to his claim, which can only be supported by quotes that display that behaviour. The post before that, where he quoted old postings of Katsura, he was quoting discussions he recently had with Katsura, so no detective work required here. I can understand having issues with the tone, but Geki-D did not just dig up some dirt on someone to fling it at him, but merely provided evidence when challenged about his claims. How would you want him to react in the above situation going forward?
And I assume the same also holds for all of us, right? Because to my best knowledge, this would be a new policy.
Since I was talking about those two and did not link, I will just add:Geki-D
Katsura
EDIT: To be clear, this is not discussing whether it is fine to misrepresent something by e.g. quoting selectively in a way to completely change what one has said, because I do not think that this is what you mean when you say detective smearing.
A strange one indeed. When people started getting in his throat he went cussing and all that. That’s the doing of the weakHe was a strange one. Seemed to be making up a weird story to get a reaction out of people on the economy thread.
I mentioned you because I felt it was unfair to talk about something that involves you without @-ing you, because, after reading the posting, I made more than just fleeting mention of you.Except he was lying and he was trying to reframe my posts in other topics as something they were not. I opted not to defend anything because that would have further derailed the thread. Why are you even mentioning me? I wouldn't have discovered your post had you not specifically @at me. Seems like a strange decision. I wonder what your motivation for doing that was
Fair enoughI mentioned you because I felt it was unfair to talk about something that involves you without @-ing you, because, after reading the posting, I made more than just fleeting mention of you.
Wot?Tyler seemed to have a hard on for Burp.
Wot?
AltWot?
He was looking to martyr himself and got what he wanted.
Yeah I likeI guess, but it’s possible he regrets it and could make up for it with a second (or third or whatever it is) chance.Kagey K has made similar overtures and been talked down from the ledge and I think many of us are glad he’s still here.
Rick and Portly fanTyler seemed to have a hard on for Burp.
I’m pretty sure there are a few that aren’t happy I’m still around. I don’t know whatI guess, but it’s possible he regrets it and could make up for it with a second (or third or whatever it is) chance.Kagey K has made similar overtures and been talked down from the ledge and I think many of us are glad he’s still here.
We were probably the only friends he's got...lol
To the dog?he's married too right?