Gotta love it when ppl just takes a number bigger than another and then call it a day.
I don't know what I said to warrant this response.
You said.
We don't know how many PCIe lanes they are using, but since the GPU isn't taking up any, they have a few to pick from.
I was primarily talking about the DMA lanes from the SSD controller to the nands.
Sony probably used cheaper smaller nands, but used more of them, so wider bus = higher perf at a reasonable cost.
and I correct you, on all that false information. APU GPU's do use PCI-E lanes, the PS5 is 4x PCI-E, the DMA lines are called channels. and you don't know the NAND sony is using so how do you know how cheap it is.
What does taking a bigger number has todo with anything. so weird.
Rather than acknowledging the corrections, you mention a bunch of random stuff. soooo weird.
What about all the other hurdles the data has to "leap over" on PC?
Like software decompression, storage -> system ram -> gpu ram, driver latencies etc.. the list goes on.. And oh.. your number is just a theoretical one too.
now we're on to the PC. ok.
The hurdles exist
this is what DirectX12 Ultimate is trying to equalize, with DirectStorage. didn't we go through this a few posts back?
The PC has always had an efficiency handicap vs consoles, having faster hardware on the PC helps and I'm sure DirectX12 ultimate and whatever other middleware pops up will overcome these inefficiencies.
There is money to be made and someone will rise to the occasion.
What are you even talking about here? PCIe with embedded SRAM? Where?, for what?
I don't know what you don't understand here. current IO controllers have SRAM in them
you said
Too few DMA lanes for starters. You can basicly just see what Sony did. Lot's of custom I/O transistors in the APU (inc. ESRAM cache)
I said there are controllers out now with SRAM built into them and it's a given for PCI-Ec gen4 IO controllers.
Again just comparing numbers, you WILL be surprised when Sony shows their 1st party games in a few days, and see with your own eyes what their "inferior" console can do.
Where did I say the PS5 is inferior? Facts are the GPU and CPU is slower than XBSX, and the storage solution is Faster on PS5, no need to develop a complex over the facts.
Why do I have to wait to know that PS5 will have great 1st party games? news flash I don't have to wait,
they will. and it will not be because of
MAGIC. the hardware is guaranteed to the solid.
As a matter of fact, why does it have to be superior for it to be good?
you just need to get you facts straight and your facts are not.
When you have enough power to render as many polys as there are pixels on the screen and match that with using all your GPU budget on what's inside your frustom, it enables a greater gen-leap than many previous console gens. And the star of the show, that enables all this? Yep, Sony's storage solution.
Judging for the number of things you got wrong so far and by not displaying the ability to acknowledge them
should anyone take your proclamation seriously?
We don't have to wait long, I can guarantee all you PC enthusiasts will have your hands full trying to "debate" how all that shit Sony showed would be possible on a PC
and there we have it another one breaks.
in the absence of facts you just say what's on your mind. you want sony to stick it to PC enthusiasts.
I just want them to have good games.