• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Nintendo Switch Expansion Pass priced at $49.99 a year, increasing the price by $30 a year

A monthly option would be fair

  • Exactly, you're smart and precious.

    Votes: 30 27.3%
  • No, you're dumb... bastard!

    Votes: 80 72.7%

  • Total voters
    110

nordique

Member
Nintendo can straight up go to fucking hell on this one. 5-10 bucks I could hold my nose on even if I didn't like the price increase. This? Now I'm considering just canceling my NSO altogether.

NSO is same price…

this is the NSO + Expansion Pack price.
Still too much but normal online price is the same
 

Omnipunctual Godot

Gold Member
So, 20 dollar online is staying and people are up in arms over an optional upgrade? What is the big deal?
The same reason people laugh at that game store offering a $700 PS5 after trading in your PS4 or get pissed off at scalpers. It's an insulting offer, but if you want what's in it, they're the only game in town.

it also paints a sad picture of Nintendo essentially viewing their customers as lemmings who will buy anything they put out, and it sets a precedent for even more scummy and greedy practices going forward. Remember when we got three games in the Mario 3D Collection for the price of one? Now they're "remastering" Zelda games and selling them for $60 each. Because they know people will buy it, even though the improvements don't come close to justifying the price.
 

Dr. Claus

Vincit qui se vincit
The same reason people laugh at that game store offering a $700 PS5 after trading in your PS4 or get pissed off at scalpers. It's an insulting offer, but if you want what's in it, they're the only game in town.

it also paints a sad picture of Nintendo essentially viewing their customers as lemmings who will buy anything they put out, and it sets a precedent for even more scummy and greedy practices going forward. Remember when we got three games in the Mario 3D Collection for the price of one? Now they're "remastering" Zelda games and selling them for $60 each. Because they know people will buy it, even though the improvements don't come close to justifying the price.

Seems more like you are projecting onto Nintendo and want a reason be up in arms. It’s optional. You don’t need it to play online, you can just use the same price you have had since launch. You can completely ignore this option.

If Nintendo forced the upgrade on people then I could understand the ire. But they aren’t.

As for “remastering” Zelda games, that is entirely subjective. For you it wasn’t worth the price. For others the QOL features were. All of thr major publishers/consoles do this. Sony had tons of this last gen as did XBox. Games like TLoU1 and Gears of Wae remastered.

Did you also bitch about those?
 
Last edited:

Punished Miku

Gold Member
Single person accounts

Base plan = $20
N64 expansion = $50

Family account

Base Plan = $35
N64 Expansion = $80

Sorry but no?
The Splatoon online tax for me then. $1.60 a month. I have like 400 hours in Splatoon 2.

Sucks, but it's just base plan for me to play online. Oh well.

Maybe if people rave about the framerate of Ocarina of Time being improved I'd consider 1 year, but I have that on 3DS still. I have all these games already.
 

MacReady13

Member
Thats some serious bullshit. First of all where is our option to BUY these old games? Secondly, if you are going to be charging that much you damn sure should have more games that what is there now. Typical greedy Nintendo.

Not having a virtual console on switch sucks.
Yeah but dude, this is the future! Sub services and "renting" games! Let's just keep renting what we should have a right to own ourselves and play offline whenever and wherever we like. But yes, the future is sub services...
 

Xaero Gravity

NEXT LEVEL lame™
Underpriced for what? Using your cell phone in order to have voice chat? Outdated basic online features by more than a decade?
It's crazy to think that the Xbox 360 in 2005 had a better online service, with private voice chat, messages, and game invites, in comparison to what the Switch currently offers in 2021. Sure it's cheaper, but I still think it's overpriced for what you're getting. I'd much rather have a Wii/Wii U like Virtual Console and pay for games individually than be drip fed a bunch of games j don't care about once in a blue moon.
 
Wait, the deal as per the picture in the OP, is the normal Online sub ($35) + the new n64 controller ($50 of value alone given here with the sub) + n64 games + AC: NH dlc + genesis games = all these for $50?!

This is incredible value by the looks of it. Why are guys not liking it?
Because paying $50 a year is not good value for a glorified emulator. Obviously your mileage may vary but to me it's a galling price hike, especially due to the fact there's no inbetween for those who may not care for Animal Crossing DLC.
 

Punished Miku

Gold Member
It's crazy to think that the Xbox 360 in 2005 had a better online service, with private voice chat, messages, and game invites, in comparison to what the Switch currently offers in 2021. Sure it's cheaper, but I still think it's overpriced for what you're getting. I'd much rather have a Wii/Wii U like Virtual Console and pay for games individually than be drip fed a bunch of games j don't care about once in a blue moon.
Not only that but MiiVerse was actually fantastic and in many ways far more advanced than Xbox.

People all ignored it.
 

twerkouting

Banned
I'm indifferent about base tier NSO; $20 for access to old games I'll play every so often and online gameplay? That's fine.

But please gtfo with the expansion. I'm sincerely interested to see if people are really going to fork over $50 a year for a service where the main draw is old games and ZERO online features your competitors have for a comparable price.

I have no idea who this service is for. I mean really? We can all go on and on about how we want all these old games but at the end of the day, do people really play these games with any regularity? Keeping that in mind, with a enough regularity to justify paying a yearly (and now, exorbitant) access fee to play them? I can maaaaaybe see this getting new subscribers the first year but dropping off afterward. There's no solid audience for this, right? People who are hardcore about their old games are going have them on their PCs, younger players will have no connection to these games and won't care, any hobbyist will collect the old games or would have wanted to outright buy them VC-style. This feels an earnest attempt at seeing what they can get away with and I sincerely hope it doesn't work out for them.

Excuse Me What GIF by Curb Your Enthusiasm
 

NeoIkaruGAF

Gold Member
I was hoping for €30, but I knew it'd be too cheap for them.

Waiting to see how N64 emulation performs and how legit that controller is. I may bite for a year and play only N64 games for all that time :cry:
 

bender

What time is it?
Do you keep access to the Animal Crossing/"Other" DLC once the Expansion Pass subscription lapses. How are they aligning the Expansion Pass subscription dates to existing NSO members?
 

22:22:22

NO PAIN TRANCE CONTINUE
I'm indifferent about base tier NSO; $20 for access to old games I'll play every so often and online gameplay? That's fine.

But please gtfo with the expansion. I'm sincerely interested to see if people are really going to fork over $50 a year for a service where the main draw is old games and ZERO online features your competitors have for a comparable price.

I have no idea who this service is for. I mean really? We can all go on and on about how we want all these old games but at the end of the day, do people really play these games with any regularity? Keeping that in mind, with a enough regularity to justify paying a yearly (and now, exorbitant) access fee to play them? I can maaaaaybe see this getting new subscribers the first year but dropping off afterward. There's no solid audience for this, right? People who are hardcore about their old games are going have them on their PCs, younger players will have no connection to these games and won't care, any hobbyist will collect the old games or would have wanted to outright buy them VC-style. This feels an earnest attempt at seeing what they can get away with and I sincerely hope it doesn't work out for them.

Excuse Me What GIF by Curb Your Enthusiasm
Mr Rogers Clown GIF
 

shoplifter

Member
Hahahahah

$45 extra for a family membership? All so my kids can not play the N64 and Genesis games included, just like they refuse to play the NES/SNES games?

Brady Bunch Jan GIF by MOODMAN


This is a terrible value for parents that *want* the emulated games with kids that do not.
 

Hinedorf

Banned
For me this absolutely sucks. I hate the retro gimmick, all those games I ALREADY PLAYED THEM, I want new adventures not retreads.

Really bummed out with Nintendo right now as I currently pay for Online and only reason being Splatoon 2, makes me think I'll skip Splatoon 3 and forego Online altogether.

It'd be great if this were my one and only option, but this feels like a big fuck you to the folks who've been handing over plenty of money to Nintendo already
 
You don’t get the N64 controller, you have to buy it separately.

I feel like such a dumbass right now. Thanks for calirying lol

Because paying $50 a year is not good value for a glorified emulator. Obviously your mileage may vary but to me it's a galling price hike, especially due to the fact there's no inbetween for those who may not care for Animal Crossing DLC.

Don't mind me, I made an embarrassing assumption in my post, will edit it now.

No, I'm with you and everyone criticizing the $30 hike for N64 games + AC: NH dlc + Genesis games, for a single user and $80 for the family, and my mileage doesn't vary.

It's stupid fucking pricing, and terrible value.
 

Derktron

Banned
There is no one behind you holding a gun demanding you must buy this ..
And there is no one behind you holding a gun in not allowed criticisms ................................................................................................................................................................... okay? I can say whatever I feel like now go off someone --- into my ignored list you go
 

Ezquimacore

Banned
Damn Nintendo need the extra cash for drugs or something? 50 a year should be a service with every Nintendo console and classic games not a few games that everyone has on their phones since 2010.
 

alf717

Member
This is gonna make the family plan more enticing for more people. $10 a year from 8 people and bam online with expansion pass.
 

Dr. Claus

Vincit qui se vincit
And there is no one behind you holding a gun in not allowed criticisms ................................................................................................................................................................... okay? I can say whatever I feel like now go off someone --- into my ignored list you go

You aren’t making criticisms. You are throwing a temper tantrum.
 

93xfan

Banned
So they know their online can’t is nowhere near as good or valuable as some re-re-re-releases from 25 years ago. The online is 33% less valuable, even with cloud saves and NES/SNES games.
 

DrAspirino

Banned
I think I'll keep my basic NSO subscription. No way in hell I'm gonna pay US$30 more for some N64 games that I actually emulate better on my potato PC.
 

Omnipunctual Godot

Gold Member
Seems more like you are projecting onto Nintendo and want a reason be up in arms. It’s optional. You don’t need it to play online, you can just use the same price you have had since launch. You can completely ignore this option.

If Nintendo forced the upgrade on people then I could understand the ire. But they aren’t.

As for “remastering” Zelda games, that is entirely subjective. For you it wasn’t worth the price. For others the QOL features were. All of thr major publishers/consoles do this. Sony had tons of this last gen as did XBox. Games like TLoU1 and Gears of Wae remastered.

Did you also bitch about those?
Seems like you didn't read what I said.
No one is "forced" to trade in a PS4 and buy a $700 PS5. No one is "forced" to buy consoles from scalpers at inflated prices. But some people choose to, even though the value proposition is shit, because they're the only game in town and can dictate the price. This is why they get away with such greedy practices.
Nintendo's $20 online service is missing basic features that have been around for at least 15 years now on other consoles. This is why they tried to supplement the value with a handful of S/NES games and priced at $20, much lower than the competition.
At $50, they still don't offer anything close to the value you get from Gold or PS+, even though the price difference is now negligible.
I KNOW it's optional. I also know it's greedy, and I'd rather they offered a better value instead of a garbage one. Same goes for these "remasters."
 
This is the most Nintendo shit ever
I agree that this is complete bullshit, but this is the first time they have done something like this. Let's not go spouting "classic Nintendo", this is and has been 2017 onward for their company. Why do people forget so easily.
 

Omnipunctual Godot

Gold Member
Edit - Made a laughable assumption that the standalone N64 controller is being given away with the expansion pass, and thought it was amazing value.

Yeah, this expansion pass pricing, and particularly the family membership being $80 is abhorrent value.
I honestly can't fathom the fact that they're selling a single Sega Genesis wireless controller for $50. And people are actually going to buy it at that price.
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Can I just have the option to flat out digital purchase old games I want to keep on my Switch? That would be better IMO.

This is where I'm confused now at this point. Why won't Nintendo just allow people to purchase old games? Even at inflated prices....
 

IntentionalPun

Ask me about my wife's perfect butthole
Huh?

It's $50 for all of it for an individual.. including the N64 + Genesis expansion.

I'm pretty sure the normal thing is still $20.
 
I saw this and thought, "finally Nintendo did something even the hardcore Nintendo posters won't try to rationalize". I guess, I was wrong. I wonder if that line even exists.
 
Top Bottom