• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Windows Central: Microsoft exploring bringing back catalog to Nintendo and PlayStation

Stuart360

Member
You mean the ones consisting of non-interactive MP3 and MP4 files? Okay...
article-0-1A2B262D00000578-818_636x382.jpg


Lets just wait and see what happens. I hope i'm wrong but i feel the only thing i could be wrong about is the timeline. It certainly IS going to happen though.
 

Chastten

Banned
I think some poeple need to accept that we have maybe 2 more hardware generations after this one, and thats talking like 20 years into the future. I'll be very surprised if one, or both, Xbox and Playstation are not streaming only by then.
Nintendo live in their own dream world so who knows what they will do.

You just have to remember how bad internet was 20 years ago to how it is today, then think what the internet will be like in 20 years from now.

Imo both Xbox and Playstation will be streaming subsciption services that you play on pretty much any of your devices. So slowly bring exclusive games to new players over the coming years, well that could certainly give you a head start when everything goes streaming only.

Just my personnal take of course. Its part of the reson why i'm PC only as no one owns PC and PC gamers simply wont accept a streaming only future when hardware is such an important part of gaming to them. And obviosly the gpu and cpu makers wont be pushing for a streaming only future on PC when hardware is their main business.
While I agree that we'll eventually go to an all streaming future, I personally think PC will get there long before consoles will stop existing.

PC gamers were the first to accept digital only, and they will be the first to accept streaming only. The handful of people who care about graphics are just that, a handful. The rest of the PC crowd will happily play their Roblox, MMO's, CounterStrike and Fortnite as a stream.
 

diffusionx

Gold Member
Poor TimDog..I get so much joy seeing these shilling bitches get a reality check. All that whoring and shilling for a brand that has delivered nothing substantial or moved the market has gotten them nothing.
wgqyYIn.jpg
Microsoft just shot themselves in the foot.

I don't know how much the rest of you know about American culture (I'm an expert), but being an asshole is a huge part of it. It's not like it is in Japanese culture where you can become successful by being honorable. If you honor someone over in America, you bring weakness to yourself, and the only way to get rid of that weakness is to be an asshole.

What this means is the American public, after hearing about this, is not going to want to purchase Hi-Fi Rush for either system, nor will they purchase any of Microsoft's games. This is HUGE. You can laugh all you want, but Microsoft has alienated an entire market with this move.

Microsoft, publicly apologize and cancel Hi-Fi Rush for Nintendo Switch or you can kiss your business goodbye.
 
Last edited:

sendit

Member
As much as Microsoft has been horrible for the past decade of Xbox under Phil. This would be a bad thing for consumers, and pushing price per performance limits with every generation.
 
Last edited:

JohnnyFootball

GerAlt-Right. Ciriously.
This makes sense from a buisness standpoint because microsoft bought so much shit and to have it not sell well and locked to 3rd place xbox doesnt seem like good buisness
Not to mention there is no indication that all the console discounts for the holiday moved the needle in any meaningful way. If it had, MS would be screaming through the rooftops about it. Instead? Crickets.
 
I really do think Microsoft is going to redefine what it means to be a platform holder moving forward.

They aren't abandoning their platform/hardware but they also aren't going to be afraid to publish games on rival platforms.

Poor summer child... as soon as Microsoft starts putting titles on PS5, the Xbox sales will dry up further than they have.

There are R&D and production costs related to developing, producing, manufacturing, and distributing consoles... They won't sell enough to justify this.

You don't think Nintendo knows that they could sell 100 million copies of Mario Kart 8 if they put it on Steam, PS5, and PS4?
 

JohnnyFootball

GerAlt-Right. Ciriously.
Microsoft just shot themselves in the foot.

I don't know how much the rest of you know about American culture (I'm an expert), but being an asshole is a huge part of it. It's not like it is in Japanese culture where you can become successful by being honorable. If you honor someone over in America, you bring weakness to yourself, and the only way to get rid of that weakness is to be an asshole.

What this means is the American public, after hearing about this, is not going to want to purchase Hi-Fi Rush for either system, nor will they purchase any of Microsoft's games. This is HUGE. You can laugh all you want, but Microsoft has alienated an entire market with this move.

Microsoft, publicly apologize and cancel Hi-Fi Rush for Nintendo Switch or you can kiss your business goodbye.
Their Xbox business has been gone for a while. This move at least allows them to recover some revenue.
 
Last edited:

Daneel Elijah

Gold Member
I think some poeple need to accept that we have maybe 2 more hardware generations after this one, and thats talking like 20 years into the future. I'll be very surprised if one, or both, Xbox and Playstation are not streaming only by then.
Nintendo live in their own dream world so who knows what they will do.

You just have to remember how bad internet was 20 years ago to how it is today, then think what the internet will be like in 20 years from now.

Imo both Xbox and Playstation will be streaming subsciption services that you play on pretty much any of your devices. So slowly bring exclusive games to new players over the coming years, well that could certainly give you a head start when everything goes streaming only.

Just my personnal take of course. Its part of the reson why i'm PC only as no one owns PC and PC gamers simply wont accept a streaming only future when hardware is such an important part of gaming to them. And obviosly the gpu and cpu makers wont be pushing for a streaming only future on PC when hardware is their main business.
Streaming is the future. Even dedicaced gaming hardware like consoles will have to adapt. But somehow PC, who is under a monopolistic Microsoft who openly want to make their next Windows a subscription service, won't accept a streaming only future. Somehow PC, with offers like Stadia(too soon) Geforce Now and Gamepass, will resist it better than Playstation? Somehow Nvidia, who is a IA provider now, will fight for gaming when they let them die to the crypto boom? And AMD will just let Sony go away for a cloud based offer that don't need their tech at all when they are one of their biggest clients?
I am not against some of your points. But man, if the consoles are soon to be dead, PC will die too. Phones are taking over a lot of what we used PCs for. Use your phone and link it to your TV, or use your TV if it is good enough, and a lot of PC uses are gone. So please think about it instead of just looking at consoles like time is up, because PC have not a much better future if you look at it with enough pessimism.
 

JohnnyFootball

GerAlt-Right. Ciriously.
As much as Microsoft has been horrible for the past decade of Xbox under Phil. This would be a bad thing for FANBOYS, and pushing price per performance limits with every generation.
Fixed it for you. It’s really Xbox only more at this point. Had they not held onto incompetent jackssses like Matt Booty and Phil Spencer for so long we could (and should) be looking at a very different picture.
 
It would be advantageous for Microsoft and Bungie to work together again on Halo. Bring some hype and prestige back to the franchise and help Bungie out with their pipeline that is too dependent on GaaS.

Microsoft and Bungie get revenue and Sony gets a version on PS5, maybe even ports of MCC.

Microsoft as a Publisher needs to completely evolve from Microsoft as a platform holder. Similar to what they did with Rare and Nintendo in order to get Goldeneye.
 
They have to thread that needle carefully. Media and the community are not on Xbox side and will amplify every negative thing. Xbox is already by itself not the "hot" item, that people buy by default so each time they suffer the negative PR, it affects them. Though the situation with japanese market is very odd - even if they acquire SE or Sega, they won't make anything exclusive anyway (they even indicated that in their documents).

Though I don't expect them porting anything side smaller titles anyway. We saw that with Amazon Luna for example getting old Bethesda catalog games. Even PS+ got some old games. Maybe Pentiment is coming? I would double dip Hi Fi Rush on Switch 2 for sure as I was planning to buy Switch 2 though.
 
Last edited:

GHG

Member
Poor TimDog..I get so much joy seeing these shilling bitches get a reality check. All that whoring and shilling for a brand that has delivered nothing substantial or moved the market has gotten them nothing.
wgqyYIn.jpg

Someone explain to me why he's supporting Xbox now (and his whole life) then?
 
Last edited:

MarkMe2525

Member
Interesting enough it was MS who didn't want crossplay in the 360/PS3 days

As cool as this sneak peek was, Trion can't let the finished Xbox 360 game connect to the PS3. "Microsoft won't let Sony players play against them," Rodberg said, before suggesting we change the topic to something less sensitive. Presumably the barrier is a corporate and/or technical incompatibility between the Xbox 360's Xbox Live and Sony's PS3/PSP PlayStation Network. Those services are separate enough that people who play, say, Call of Duty on one, can't play that game against owners of the other, rival console.

I checked with Microsoft to be sure Rodberg wasn't maybe just mis-hearing them. Maybe Microsoft wanted to break the barrier too? Here's a Microsoft spokesperson saying "no," while promoting how awesome the Xbox 360's online service is: "Xbox Live delivers the best entertainment experience unmatched by anyone else, with 35 million actively engaged members. We have a high level of expectation for our game developers to ensure that all Live experiences remain top notch. Because we can't guarantee this level of quality, or control the player experience on other consoles or gaming networks, we currently do not open our network to games that allow this cross-over capability."

https://kotaku.com/i-saw-the-playstation-3-wired-to-play-against-an-xbox-3-5813740
As I don't dabble in much multiplayer, I have not really heard anything on the matter since 2019-2020 when MS was publicly flogging Sony for the crossplay policies. Topher Topher clarified to me that the situation has changed.

In saying that, I do remember MS hard stance on the matter back in day. It made more sense back in the Xbox and PS2 days when playstation players could be hooked up to a dialup connection. MS was in the wrong by the time the 360 and PS3 was around as I believe (I could be absolutely misinformed) the PS3 required broadband connection. I think it was a 128kb minimum if my memory is correct.
 

Agent X

Member
Throughout the years, there have been numerous instances of a video game console manufacturer publishing games for competitors' consoles.

During the period from 1982 to 1984, the three biggest console makers were Atari, Mattel, and Coleco. All of them published games for rival consoles, as well as for home computers.
 
It would be advantageous for Microsoft and Bungie to work together again on Halo. Bring some hype and prestige back to the franchise and help Bungie out with their pipeline that is too dependent on GaaS.

Microsoft and Bungie get revenue and Sony gets a version on PS5, maybe even ports of MCC.

Microsoft as a Publisher needs to completely evolve from Microsoft as a platform holder. Similar to what they did with Rare and Nintendo in order to get Goldeneye.
too much ego from Bungie to work on a Halo game again
 
Throughout the years, there have been numerous instances of a video game console manufacturer publishing games for competitors' consoles.

During the period from 1982 to 1984, the three biggest console makers were Atari, Mattel, and Coleco. All of them published games for rival consoles, as well as for home computers.
ok?
 

Killjoy-NL

Member
I really do think Microsoft is going to redefine what it means to be a platform holder moving forward.

They aren't abandoning their platform/hardware but they also aren't going to be afraid to publish games on rival platforms.
Redefine "platform holder", or "3rd party publisher"?
Quite some mental gymnastics there.

But this is inevitable. Xbox as a brand is becoming irrelevant and 3rd party publishing is the only way forward.
Xbox console sales are dying fast.
 
Last edited:

Fredrik

Member
My point is I would separate the XBOX branding from PC entirely and as much as possible. If indeed they want to exit the console space I would lose the XBOX branding entirely and I think they will eventually do this. You'll see.
Why? Dropping the Xbox name and X logo would be like Sony dropping the Playstation name and PS logo. Makes no sense. A logo is important for brand recognition, would be better to remove PC from PC Gamepass because nobody talk about it that way and eventually the launcher will be the same no matter where it’s launched.
 

Ar¢tos

Member
As much as Microsoft has been horrible for the past decade of Xbox under Phil. This would be a bad thing for consumers, and pushing price per performance limits with every generation.
Consumers?
MS (or any other company) doesn't care about consumers.

This is about the amount of time it will take for Zenimax and ATK to pay back the 80bn if they don't start releasing games on every possible platform.

After the drop in sales and Xbox hardware reaching near global irrelevance I guess Spencer got a spanking and was ordered to start doing multiplatform games.
 
too much ego from Bungie to work on a Halo game again

That's like saying Bungie would never let another company own them again because of their ego.

The reality is never say never in life.

I think we can assume that Microsoft will still keep supporting Xbox Series for the rest of the generation, but by the end of the year they'll largely be a 3rd party publisher, with maybe some of their highest profile games coming to Xbox before PS5 and Nintendo systems.
 

Quasicat

Member
My main console is my Series X, but when that stops working, I’m half tempted to buy a Pc and dual boot SteamOS onto it. I have more control over the hardware and both Sony and Microsoft support it…not to mention the other 3rd parties whom are on board. My Nintendo system is for Nintendo exclusives, which is how it will probably always be.
 
That's like saying Bungie would never let another company own them again because of their ego.

The reality is never say never in life.

I think we can assume that Microsoft will still keep supporting Xbox Series for the rest of the generation, but by the end of the year they'll largely be a 3rd party publisher, with maybe some of their highest profile games coming to Xbox before PS5 and Nintendo systems.
different.

these devs have too much ego/pride. the original statement is just a wet dream
 
So, imo, this makes perfect sense. It is dumb they have waited until now.

They need to recoup dev cost on games that are more experimental or older games that allow Microsoft to gauge if new versions should be allowed to make a new game in a series.

Pyschonauts 2 is a great example. Banjo Kazooie HD collection is another example.

Then you have the opportunity to expand potential massive revenue streams brining World of Warcraft to all consoles, mobile, etc. Look at FFXIV. It has helped keep Suare Enix afloat.

Microsoft has another problem with Halo. They have dramatically damaged the value of the IP. (Even though Infinite is improving). I would consider bringing the original trilogy to all systems with cross platform multiplayer for the Halo 2 anniversary and remind children and younger audiences what Halo “can be”. This is true of Fallout as well.

Killer Instinct is another. I would bring Killer Instinct 2013 to all platforms and try to create a 2d fighter to compete with Smash, SF, and MK.

Personally, i would like to see Blue Dragon, StarCraft II and Goldeneye XBLA (the cancelled version) come to all platforms.

I think there is a big opportunity for Full House Poker and 1v100 for a GAAS also. MS has a lot of interesting opportunities ahead of it.
 

Pelta88

Member
Poor TimDog..I get so much joy seeing these shilling bitches get a reality check. All that whoring and shilling for a brand that has delivered nothing substantial or moved the market has gotten them nothing.

Facts.

Also Jez is click farming for add revenue. He’s increasingly talking about PS because the audience he leans towards isn’t viable.
 
Last edited:

Daneel Elijah

Gold Member
Throughout the years, there have been numerous instances of a video game console manufacturer publishing games for competitors' consoles.

During the period from 1982 to 1984, the three biggest console makers were Atari, Mattel, and Coleco. All of them published games for rival consoles, as well as for home computers.
And then they died. Quantity instead of quality was the cause of their downfall. Or at least Nintendo believed so. Now Nintendo and Sony have a healthy business and don't need or want to do so. Xbox needs to do so, or at least think it have to. Not the same situation at all.
 
Top Bottom