• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Guy Says Rude Thing to Person, Gets Fired From Destructoid, Says More Rude Things

Yagharek

Member
So f*** them before they even try, right? And you talk about how the gaming industry is perceived by the rest of the world. What message does it send that you're willing to self-censor all content because it may not be to your liking?

And we really are way off topic now. Apologies to all. I'm out unless more tweets from the mad tweeter ignite a larger fire.

Games can't (or haven't) really done any subject tastefully. So it stands to reason that some of the more touchy subjects should be given a wide berth in the medium until there are actually some competent writers in the industry.

Hell, for well written female characters alone you have to go back 7/8 years to get to Jade and Alyx Vance before you find any good examples. As if they are going to be able to develop well written characters who go through a particular trauma.
 
You haven't played the game, so you don't know that. Not that a niggling problem like that would stop you from complaining about it.

Yeah how dare I speak up about these issues, if you have some real issues with me maybe you should PM me instead of being passive aggressive about it.
 
You can't apologize for your own flimsy reasoning AND give yourself a convenient out at the same time.

It's a damn good thing I didn't apologize for my reasoning then, isn't it?

Games can't (or haven't) really done any subject tastefully. So it stands to reason that some of the more touchy subjects should be given a wide berth in the medium until there are actually some competent writers in the industry.

So the answer is 'never try'?
 

Dan Yo

Banned
Yeah excuse me if I'm doubtful given how females are represented as characters in general that they can tackle such a complicated and sensitive topic.




You haven't encountered Rape Revenge plot lines in films or fiction?
Not very often. The only one that immediately comes to mind is the Girl With The Dragon Tattoo. I have not seen it, but I thought it sounded pretty controversial and shocking that they went there. I don't recall thinking "oh, that old story".

Aside from that, and I know there are at least a couple others whose names escape me, I wouldn't call it a tired or overused story element. And in the case of gaming, it most certainly isn't.
 

Margalis

Banned
You haven't encountered Rape Revenge plot lines in films or fiction?

You mean like Ingmar Bergman's "The Virgin Spring"?

Why don't you create a list of concepts that just should never be used in fiction and I'll create a list of great works that use those concepts?

Sounds like fun.
 
This isn't your workplace or profession, but certainly civility is appreciated, yes.

I should have phrased it differently, since this exit remark shows that my view wasn't clear.
(not surprisingly though)

To me, the disconnected discourse of professionalism has nothing to do with the function role of the professional (which is neatly defined, and so on). Rather, it is one of or several strands of discourse that permeates all other forms of discourse and (real-world) communication.

which is to say that all forms of discussion and debate are influenced, regardless of whether or not we are "in uniform." The reason I frame it in terms of labor and not 'civil sensibilities', is because they are specifically being reinforced and exploited by managerial capitalism, not just 'neutral' changes in our sense of what civility means.

Just to rephrase that a little. Hopefully clearer. It doesn't matter much to the discussion though.
 

rdrr gnr

Member
I'm taking Opiate's contribution to this discussion as tacit approval for this tangent.
It's tacky and overused. It's not empowering in the way they seem to think it is.

I want escapism and adventuring not their heavy handed emotional appeals that are exploitative with terrible writing to boot.

Can't have male gamers project themselves onto a female protagonist? Just show her in a compromising position to force sympathy. It's shitty.
1. That's just, like, your opinion, man. It wasn't tacky when I saw it in Sons of Anarchy. I consume a fair amount of media: movies, books, television, games. And that SoA scene along with a certain movie/book released recently (
Dragon Tattoo
) were both excellently done. Both the episode and the film were well-received, iirc.

2. That's a different matter. I, too, agree that the focus is on the wrong thing.

3. Too many assumptions here.
 
You mean like Ingmar Bergman's "The Virgin Spring"?

Why don't you create a list of concepts that just should never be used in fiction and I'll create a list of great works that use those concepts?

Sounds like fun.

Oh hark another strawman about a tired and overused trope when it comes to female subplots and story lines. God forbid fiction of any type ever undergo criticism for trite and shitty writing.
 

Danny Dudekisser

I paid good money for this Dynex!
Yeah how dare I speak up about these issues, if you have some real issues with me maybe you should PM me instead of being passive aggressive about it.

pot-kettle-black.jpg
 
Just because people create things you don't personality enjoy doesn't mean they don't contribute anything. I'm not a massive fan of The Guild either but it's got a HUGE following so it must be doing something right. There are people who enjoy it.

Whether you like Felicia Day, Jessica Chobot, or Veronica Belmont or not doesn't matter. They're entertaining people in their own way. Just as Jeff Gerstmann, Geoff Keighley, or Angry Joe do.

I do think it's unfair to value someone's knowledge based off of their gender though. Chobot gets a lot of flack but she actually knows what she's on about. Same with Belmont and Day. Geoff Keighley has never had to prove himself to you so why does Chobot have to?
 
Sure, but that's not really an answer.

I think most people would say that the likely answer is no. Nathan Drake is a powerful character because of his strength and his depth. Showing a male rape scene would by perception make him lose much of his power with the way our culture is socialized to think about male rape.

In the case of Lara Croft it seems that this is more about exploiting the fact that she's a female character and it's "ok" for them to face being raped.

If it played out like Lara's video (he kicks the shit out of the gay and shoots him in the face, after his advance), even if Drake didn't killed the guy, it would work.
I can't list from the top my head but I do remember a few Villain-Hero sexual tension (and cues to "rape") in movies, even if unwarranted by the hero.
If anything I believe that an actual attempt of rape in Uncharted, if Nathan Drake as the victim, it would be played out with humor. Maybe as an attempt to make that villain tension work, or just a crazed thug that felt he had the time to humiliate/enjoy Drake.

A serious tone rape (or attempt), as seen on American History X and other movies, would be assumedly more complicated. Generally, sad or not, male to male rape is taken lightly. So how to fit it in the narrative style from Uncharted (if not a reread)? This emotional trauma would have what type of leverage to the character or influence in his journey? I honestly can't think in a worthy construction right now, but will try.

Lara's event is actually (exploitative or not) well placed. Rape is a common occurance in those situations. Having her kill her first person and deciding she cannot weaken at challenges (as she doesn't in the video of that scene) is not actually a character building event, but a character demonstration one. Her friend is still kidnapped, this alone sets fear and determination, because again, they could kill/torture/rape her friend. They are not being willingly fictious there. The necessity or choice can be questioned and/or objected. But it is not far-fetched or "played out" as many try to paint it.
Again, we have to wait and see. The concerns may prove real when you actually play the game, and the event ends up feeling loose to the rest of the narrative.
But no one knows, assuming things based on the backpedalling is naive at best.
 
Not very often. The only one that immediately comes to mind is the Girl With The Dragon Tattoo. I have not seen it, but I thought it sounded pretty controversial and shocking that they went there. I don't recall thinking "oh, that old story".

Aside from that, and I know there are at least a couple others whose names escape me, I wouldn't call it a tired or overused story element. And in the case of gaming, it most certainly isn't.

One of the most famous rape-revenge stories involves a man being raped. Deliverance. Great movie.
 
Not very often. The only one that immediately comes to mind is the Girl With The Dragon Tattoo. I have not seen it, but I thought it sounded pretty controversial and shocking that they went there. I don't recall thinking "oh, that old story".

Aside from that, and I know there are at least a couple others whose names escape me, I wouldn't call it a tired or overused story element. And in the case of gaming, it most certainly isn't.

I spoke about The Girl with Dragon Tattoo in a previous Lara Croft thread. Its a beautiful film and if you haven't seen it, get on it.

In addition if Nathan Drake was raped in the style that Edward Norton was raped in American History X that I mentioned on the previous page. I don't think that would disempower him at all. Especially if its something savage and barbaric. I don't think he would be looked at, as "less of a man". He would be sympathised with, especially his female demographic, and the player would be out to kill someone. That is because rape doesn't disempower you, it is what you do afterwards that shows if you are strong or if you have been broken. That is where the loss of power comes from, not from the act, because anyone can be a victim. Its how you get back up and deal with life after that makes you a hero.
 

Harlock

Member
The funny thing is that I don´t knew Felicia Day before. Looked today at all that discussion thinking "what, who are Felicia and why she have a day for her?" :)
 

Margalis

Banned
Oh hark another strawman about a tired and overused trope when it comes to female subplots and story lines. God forbid fiction of any type ever undergo criticism for trite and shitty writing.

So...I assume you haven't seen the Virgin Spring, but you're willing to dismiss it as trite and poorly written because according to me it's rape-revenge story and those must be bad just by definition? Or are you saying that Tomb Raider has trite and shitty writing - despite having not played it?

There is no strawman here, it's a real movie, and a good movie, that uses as a central concept the very thing you are arguing simply cannot work.

It's fair to say that some concepts are hard to pull off and may be overused, sure. But you can't go from that generality to claiming that a specific work that uses that concept, and that you are not even familiar with, is automatically bad for using it. Or that it's wrong to even attempt to broach certain material.

God forbid fiction of any type ever undergo criticism for trite and shitty writing.

You are not producing criticism. Criticism is examining a specific work, not throwing out vague statements about how you find some constructs inherently offensive.
 

Akainu

Member
Everyone knows who Felicia Day is. I don't understand why people pretend not to. Is it to convince GAF that you're cooly detached and above such things?
I don't know who most game journalists (hell game developers even) are what would make her any different?
 

Yagharek

Member
So the answer is 'never try'?

Based on the available evidence, there is a very very very small group of people who should even entertain the thought.

Pretty much any serious attempt at discussing something serious in games comes across as crass, shallow or amateur. (eg the morality of war in pretty much every game from Metal Gear, to CoD, to Splinter Cell etc).
 

rdrr gnr

Member
Based on the available evidence, there is a very very very small group of people who should even entertain the thought.

Pretty much any serious attempt at discussing something serious in games comes across as crass, shallow or amateur. (eg the morality of war in pretty much every game from Metal Gear, to CoD, to Splinter Cell etc).
So, you would preempt any chance of that happening? Look, I agree. I would remove 90% of video game plots after the fact. But I would never suggest or consider those things to cease before they begin. And, besides, you and I may find those games/topics to be shallow, but there are a few people out there who appreciate some MSG4 themes. I may not care for that group, but I wouldn't take it away from them.
 

Kinyou

Member
I though Alpha Protocol did an awesome job of twisting the concept of gender security by having one of the sex scenes actually be one of the mercs raping your character.

It went to blackout but that's exactly what happened.
Wait what?

I guess I made the right choices because I don't remember that part.

Is that the chick who jiggles her cans in that gif?
It's kind of sad that I subconsciously questioned Belmont's journalistic skills for a second when I discovered that she's attractive.
That stuff is pretty rooted in our society I guess.
 

Yagharek

Member
So, you would preempt any chance of that happening? Look, I agree. I would remove 90% of video game plots after the fact. But I would never suggest or consider those things to cease before they begin. And, besides, you and I may find those games/topics to be shallow, but there are a few people out there who appreciate some MSG4 themes. I may not care for that group, but I wouldn't take it away from them.

I wouldn't pre-empt it from happening. I'd just prefer that if they were going to do it then they get writers from outside the industry who have already demonstrated they can do a good job. And don't compromise on their work.
 
D

Deleted member 47027

Unconfirmed Member
Well, it's not "really rape" because it's not violent (you're tied down), and you have the option to be into it, I guess. It's the Russian Merc romance scene.

Would it be considered really rape if the genders were switched?

EDIT: I want to know why people automatically dismiss a nearly voluntary actual rape scene. Why even I mentally wanted it, playing the game as well. I sought that out. Why? I don't know. Hands down it is actual rape, and I went for it, and I'm curious why, and why there's a more dismissive attitude around it.
 
Up until one minute ago I had no idea a Felicia Day even existed.

I only knew about her because she was playing those shitty games based off of smartphone games at one E3. Like irl? Trying to eat foods quickly or something... looked like it belonged on a game show. Ah, watching E3 on G4...
 

rdrr gnr

Member
I wouldn't pre-empt it from happening. I'd just prefer that if they were going to do it then they get writers from outside the industry who have already demonstrated they can do a good job. And don't compromise on their work.
I'm going to make another tangent. That strategy doesn't work and I wish people would get that out of their heads. Writing for games is exceedingly difficult. You aren't just juggling themes and character, you are directly combating gameplay most of the time. It's a different beast that most authors underestimate. Look at Richard Morgan and R.A. Salvatore. In my eyes, they both failed to write/create something compelling; they are both highly respected in their genre. Game writers need to "get good" on their own. Bleh.
 

Sean

Banned
See, this is exactly why I hate this whole thing.

Everything you listed, ALL OF IT... none of it has been beneficial to gaming. Yet here you are saying she's done something for gaming, and when someone disagrees with you, you go on a tangent about sexism, because she's an attractive female.

I'm not jealous of her popularity, but I feel like there's no reason she can't be criticized, which seems to be almost offensive to some folk.

Claiming that Felicia Day hasn't contributed a single thing to this industry is factually incorrect. She's been an active part of the gaming industry for years now and has an extremely large fanbase.

Why does she need to do anything more than simply being an entertainer/personality like everyone else in this industry? It feels like you (and some others) are holding her to some ridiculously high standard that can't possibly be met. Where she has to single-handedly make a huge contribution in order to prove her worth and gain acceptance. I can't think of any other gaming personality/journalist who's made a massive contribution to the industry, so why demand that out of her?

People are certainly free to criticize Felicia Day (I've done so myself), but I feel this particular complaint is silly.
 
So essentially:

- Stupid intern insults semi-attractive woman, who's job is to be a figurehead spokesperson, on her Twitter fanpage

- Followers on the site get pissed and start assaulting him

- Stupid intern accuses them of white knighting, even though they are likely defending her due to the fact of well they are her twitter followers so they must care about her to some degree.

- Stupid intern gets fired.

- Stupid intern not only says more things but he attracts a bastion of anti-feminist blowhards who act as if they are fighting for freedom against the evil feminist oppressors enslaving the natural order of the human race.

- Internet goes crazy.

- People forget that this is linked to fucking Destructoid. A site that is so irrelevant that when one hears it they think to themselves "Oh THAT site...who goes their anyway?"

Vidya Gayme Journalism!!!
 
- Stupid intern accuses them of white knighting, even though they are likely defending her due to the fact of well they are her twitter followers so they must care about her to some degree.

That's pretty much the definition of white knighting. Why do they feel the need to defend her? As Jaffe pointed out, she doesn't want them to or need them to. She handled it in a very classy way. Much respect to her.
 
I'm going to make another tangent. That strategy doesn't work and I wish people would get that out of their heads. Writing for games is exceedingly difficult. You aren't just juggling themes and character, you are directly combating gameplay most of the time. It's a different beast that most authors underestimate. Look at Richard Morgan and R.A. Salvatore. In my eyes, they both failed to write/create something compelling; they are both highly respected in their genre. Game writers need to "get good" on their own. Bleh.

I agree, it concerns other mechanisms to reach an efficiency in storytelling and overall experience/entertainment (in games). And these attempts to produce a material that can be as efficient as good (Good, not materpieces. At least not yet.) books or film, are needed in my opinion.
Not to forget or move past the idea that games are well, games. They can be simple, they do not need complex stories or stories at all.
There is room for everything and those who create games are as capable or even more (due interest) of quality writing. They just need time to develop it.
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
See, this is exactly why I hate this whole thing.

Everything you listed, ALL OF IT... none of it has been beneficial to gaming. Yet here you are saying she's done something for gaming, and when someone disagrees with you, you go on a tangent about sexism, because she's an attractive female.

I'm not jealous of her popularity, but I feel like there's no reason she can't be criticized, which seems to be almost offensive to some folk.

What do you mean "beneficial to gaming"? What does that even mean to you (because obviously, it's completely subjective). In the post you quoted, you can see that she has millions of followers. Obviously, lots of people like her and the things she's done. Who are you to say, in objective terms, that none of that is beneficial. Get real.

This has nothing to do with her not being able to be criticized. If you think that what the idiot intern did on Twitter was "criticism" in any way, then I see why video game journalism is in the state it is. It was nothing but unprovoked shit-talking by some random jerk who somehow got it into his head that working for a Gawker-type video games blog means you have to whatever it takes to earn that snark-captain title.

It has nothing to do with her being female, either. Although everyone saying that she "exploited her gamer girl persona" to get ahead is being sexist, in my opinion.

I don't get why people can't understand this.

Destructoid didn't want 2 million Felicia Day "fans" not going to Destructoid because of the comments of one writer. Its called Public Representation.

There were other ways to fix the issue. Destructoid decided to wipe themselves clean. Its not rocket science.

(Ive been lurkin on GAF for a while now, and I finally get approved to post my first reply in this shitty thread. Lol Shaking my head.....)

What makes you think people don't understand it? I don't think anyone is under the impression that Destructoid is some kind of upstanding blog who experienced a moral dilemma here.

Destructoid:
If you work here, you can't think for yourself on your own time. We will fire you.
Unless you're Jim Sterling, because controversy = page hits.

Think all you want. Twitter is a completely public forum!
 
I assume someone said that the employee's behavior -- directed at anyone -- should be considered inappropriate?

For example, let's say I worked at a grocery store, and I called a black customer a "Fucking homeless loser." Now, that may be racist, but most importantly, it is incredibly crude and mean spirited. I shouldn't be fired for racism, I should be fired for being rude and inappropriate to customers.

Similarly, this man is an online journalist, by trade. He is held to a special standard that random-guy-on-GAF would not be. If he's crude and mean spirited to another member of the gaming community in public on the internet, he deserves to be fired for that, whether she happens to be a man or a woman.

Seconded.
 
Wow. I'm surprised this is still going. No one on Dtoid has really given it a second thought since last night, save for the one or two editors who are responding to messages sent directly their way. Even then, no one wants to get into much detail anymore. In truth, we are all just bummed out about the whole situation. Nobody on staff disliked Ryan, and this whole mess was a shock to us all.

I'm disappointed that Jim Sterling keeps getting brought up in such discussions. We already went through that episode and resolved it, and it shouldn't have any bearing on the Felicia Day incident. I always have a good chuckle when Jim Sterling gets badmouthed, by the way. He can defend himself, so I'm not doing that for him, but people's opinions of him always stem from one or two situations taken completely out of context. Knowing the guy personally, it's quite amazing how the image people paint of Jim is so unlike the real guy.
 
Top Bottom