Looks fine to me. The standards some of you guys have is fuckin jarring considering most of you have probably never even seen a real vagina before.
You don't need to be with somebody (or have been with somebody) in order to have a standard, necessarily. But that's not even the point. Lindsay is "okay" looking because her body isn't overly skinny or fatty, but overall there's something "off" about her. Unhealthy. In her face, and in her body. The knowledge that she's done heavy amounts of drugs probably creates a prejudice, but it's not unreasonable to not desire an unhealthy body regardless of its looks.
People in this thread look at her and continue to say things like "I still would" and "great tits" but you could pull many random girls of Lindsay's age right off the street and they'd be just as good looking if not more so. Basically, the average girl is more appealing than Lindsay. If you're standard is "average" then it isn't a high standard, and Lindsay certainly isn't even worth calling "average" anymore since it's not typical to be a drug addict and to look 8-10 years older than you are.
Plus, a lot of Lindsay's observers are just comparing. When this girl was younger she had an amazing body and looked well-balanced and healthy. Now there's a contrast; I hate to say it but she looks almost like a zombie in some of these photos, just not fully decayed.
Not being attracted to current day Lindsay Lohan is not equatable to having an unjustified high standard. It just means that you don't desire to be with a shell of a woman.