• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Diablo 3 Game Director to Diablo 1/2 Project Lead: F**k that loser [Jay apologizes]

Status
Not open for further replies.
ElyrionX - you are making the same mistake Jay did. You are taking this stuff way too personally. What he said is true: teams and talent matter. Jay posted the first words that entered his brain and that's a stupid thing to do in any heated situation. You cannot lose your cool like that as a very public figure for a well-known game company.
 

duckroll

Member
For the record, Hellgate London is a much worse game than Diablo 3. It's been ages, but I still remember how horrifying the game was. But that doesn't mean Diablo 3 is good!
 

graywolf323

Member
someone updated the cast list for the Facebook comments

r1y1k.png
 

pachuco

Member
I think these trashy People magazine type stories are good for the industry. It helps give a face to some of the developers and it keeps them in the spotlight for a little while.

But, I'm sure Blizzard/Activision is pissed off!
 
I think you're analysis is correct, but you're projecting venom onto Breivek's statements that simply aren't there. It's not "shitting on". It's harsh criticism that might be a bitter pill for Wilson to take, but Wilson's an adult who should be able to handle it.

I don't think anyone is denying that Wilson's response was ill conceived. He really should have said nothing at all. But people should see that it wasn't an unprovoked reaction... that guy was trash talking the entire D3 team, even if he did do it "politely".
 
All the Blizz employees in the conversation are acting like dumb asses. They took the comments Brevik made and responded with insults, middle school level burns, and arrogance. Brevik did make some arrogant statements himself, but he did the whole interview like a gentlemen as opposed the fucking comments by the Breakfast Club here. Also about the talent statement, he said that Blizzard Irvine didn't have the talent "for the genre Diablo falls under." Know why? Because everyone that was a part of Blizzard that had a big part in creating Diablo and Diablo II bailed when they were told themselves to scrap their vision of Diablo III and fuck off by Vivendi.

He never said Blizzard Irvine wasn't talented, he said they didn't have the talent in making Diablo games, which is 100% true. However you have people in here spinning that statement to make him sound like the Anti-Christ. All in all, this is not "one man" making a stupid comment. This a several Blizzard employees turning a non situation into a raging fire because they can't keep their fucking mouths shut. Everyone involved with that Facebook wall should be fucking ashamed of themselves for making such jack asses of themselves when all they needed to do was go offline.

But hey, always online is a bitch ain't it.
 

ElyrionX

Member
ElyrionX - you are making the same mistake Jay did. You are taking this stuff way too personally. What he said is true: teams and talent matter. Jay posted the first words that entered his brain and that's a stupid thing to do in any heated situation. You cannot lose your cool like that as a very public figure for a well-known game company.

I've already said here that I believe Jay Wilson was unprofessional in his response and it was a clear PR mistake.

And no, I am not taking it personally. I just find it ridiculous that people are not seeing the clear underlying intent behind David Brevik's words and painting him as "polite" and "articulate" in here.

If I was Jay Wilson, I would definitely have taken it personally. How can he not? The guy basically just insulted him and his entire team.
 

Perkel

Banned
I disagree simply because I think Diablo 3 is an amazing game and is a worthy successor to Diablo 2. I know many people don't share this view and the disappointment with Diablo 3 is certainly palpable on these forums and elsewhere.

David Brevik obviously knows that many people are disappointed with Diablo 3 and so when he says this:



He's implying that only now (after the disaster of Diablo 3) are people realizing just how "talented" and "special" he and his team were.

I don't think anyone would deny that the Diablo 2 team is talented. How can anyone doubt that given how incredible that game was and how long it lasted. But why is it that it has only "come to light" now after Diablo 3 was released? Obviously, he's saying that Diablo 3 is shit compared to Diablo 2 and then he says:




Here, he is saying that Diablo 3 changed (for the worse) because of the people (him and his team) who left and given the reception that Diablo 3 has had, he's implying that the current team couldn't do it because his team isn't around anymore.

If that's not shitting on the D3 team, then I really don't know what is.

You completely missed point. HE was saying about how people matter and how people define games they make and how different they are because different people work on them.

Diablo 3 fail has nothing with this quotes.

Even if he would say that B North was better he would be a dick but he would be absolutely right. B North created Diablo and created D3 succes even if not anyone of original team is present in comparition to new studio with ARPG noobs who proved that experience (lack of) matter (loot system various fuckups) and we have constantly this debate.
 
He never said Blizzard Irvine wasn't talented, he said they didn't have the talent in making Diablo games, which is 100% true. However you have people in here spinning that statement to make him sound like the Anti-Christ.

No, no one is doing that.

But some of us are saying that the interview does comesacross as arrogant, and that we can understand that the Blizzard folk are annoyed at that, even though some of their responses are not ok.
 

danmaku

Member
I've already said here that I believe Jay Wilson was unprofessional in his response and it was a clear PR mistake.

And no, I am not taking it personally. I just find it ridiculous that people are not seeing the clear underlying intent behind David Brevik's words and painting him as "polite" and "articulate" in here.

If I was Jay Wilson, I would definitely have taken it personally. How can he not? The guy basically just insulted him and his entire team.

What's the difference between an opinion and an insult?
 

derFeef

Member
No, no one is doing that.

But some of us are saying that the interview does comesacross as arrogant, and that we can understand that the Blizzard folk are annoyed at that, even though some of their responses are not ok.

I am sure it was not the first time they read some "insults" about the team. Sure it's weirder because it is the D1/2 director, but come on. Your game sold millions.
 
I also love how people are comparing interview answers and facebook comments and uses that comparison as a judgement of people. Nothing wrong in that, eh?

I am sure it was not the first time they read some "insults" about the team. Sure it's weirder because it is the D1/2 director, but come on. Your game sold millions.

You mean that you should take just take anything being thrown at you because the game you worked on sold well?
 

Data West

coaches in the WNBA
Erm, no shit? Isn't that what Facebook and other social networking tools are for? You use them to interact with friends. Their mistake seems to be having it public as well.

Just because I'm friends with people doesn't mean I pat them on the back everytime someone says something bad about them. Is that what you use network tools for?
 
I've already said here that I believe Jay Wilson was unprofessional in his response and it was a clear PR mistake.

And no, I am not taking it personally. I just find it ridiculous that people are not seeing the clear underlying intent behind David Brevik's words and painting him as "polite" and "articulate" in here.

If I was Jay Wilson, I would definitely have taken it personally. How can he not? The guy basically just insulted him and his entire team.

He is polite and articulate because he is doling out tough criticism without saying "Jay Wilson is a talentless boob". Wilson's a big boy who should be able to articulate his emotional responses just as well, especially over social media. It doesn't really matter if he took it personally - of course he did. Criticism should be taken personally.

But yeah. The "polite" part is finding a way to give brutal criticism without going for the throat. Harsh and polite are not mutually exclusive.

"Yo ya tiny dick's hangin' out" vs "Excuse me, your fly is undone."

"You suck at guitar" vs "I think you still need to practice more."
 

MrDenny

Member
I've already said here that I believe Jay Wilson was unprofessional in his response and it was a clear PR mistake.

And no, I am not taking it personally. I just find it ridiculous that people are not seeing the clear underlying intent behind David Brevik's words and painting him as "polite" and "articulate" in here.

If I was Jay Wilson, I would definitely have taken it personally. How can he not? The guy basically just insulted him and his entire team.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wT_XiT2mifo

But if you watched the video interview, he does come off as polite and articulate.
Given the questions he was asked in the interview, at least he answered them honestly.
 

ElyrionX

Member
Erm, no shit? Isn't that what Facebook and other social networking tools are for? You use them to interact with friends. Their mistake seems to be having it public as well.

Precisely. People are taking Jay Wilson's remarks as if he posted them on the Blizzard website. But that was on FB, a social networking site where I presume he didn't open his account up as a public figure.

The mistake wasn't in making the remarks he made. The mistake was in believing that the remarks he made were made completely in private and would have remained so.
 
They should have set their profiles to friends only, private, etc. Then they can talk all the shit they want without any repercussions.
 

duckroll

Member
Precisely. People are taking Jay Wilson's remarks as if he posted them on the Blizzard website. But that was on FB, a social networking site where I presume he didn't open his account up as a public figure.

The mistake wasn't in making the remarks he made. The mistake was in believing that the remarks he made were made completely in private and would have remained so.

But did he really believe they were being made in private? He can't be that dumb right?
 

JimmyRustler

Gold Member
Polite? You call this shit polite?

He may have tried to sound polite and politically correct on the surface but just read between those lines and you can tell what he really thinks of himself ("special" and "talented") and what he thinks of the D3 dev team (utter shit).
You'Re reading too much between those lines.

What he says is that the old Blizzard North team is more talented when it comes to games like Diablo, thanks to the experiance they have with the series. And he is completely right.

And I think this Hellgate London comparrison should stop. Neither did that game have as much budget nor as much development time. So of course we can't about the same level of quality.
 

Smash88

Banned
God the guy didn't even bash D3 he just stated what he thought they did wrong.Why did they become so hostile?

Simple my dear Watson, why would anyone get hostile from some opinion? Because they know it's bad.

I would get all butt hurt if I made a game that sucked and people talked poorly/down on it.**

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

McPSQ.gif


Anyone hear that?

Can't wait until the day starts, a shit storm is about to start.


**
I wouldn't, I have more brains than the ones portrayed, who are 30/40 year old's in the gaming industry, which is sad in itself.
 

ElyrionX

Member
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wT_XiT2mifo

But if you watched the video interview, he does come off as polite and articulate.
Given the questions he was asked in the interview, at least he answered them honestly.

I did watch the video interview. Sure, he does come across as polite and articulate. But are you really that naive to take everything that is thrown at you at face value? Just because he came across as polite and articulate, does it not matter that his words contained a subtle undertone of arrogance and ill intent? I only wish all human interactions were so simple and blunt. My life would certainly be a lot easier if it were like that.
 

StuBurns

Banned
It's a little childish to say fuck that loser, but it's only really bad if it's based solely on his feedback for D3, if guy is actually a dick, and the lead knows that, then it's different. There's too much personal influence that could be involved to really be miffed about this.
 

ghst

thanks for the laugh
that brevik interview was a glimpse of what gaming as a genuinely artistic creative medium would look like, the blizzard reaction is a reminder of the petulant incestuous corporate snake pit it has become.
 

ElyrionX

Member
But did he really believe they were being made in private? He can't be that dumb right?

Well, considering that he would need to be even more stupid to have made that post while knowing that it could potentially go public, I am assuming that he thought otherwise.
 

Smash88

Banned
that brevik interview was a glimpse of what gaming as a genuinely artistic creative medium would look like, the blizzard reaction is a reminder of the petulant incestuous corporate snake pit it has become.

So corporate has sex with each other.....

This is what I meant with my earlier post.
 

maladroit

Member
I did watch the video interview. Sure, he does come across as polite and articulate. But are you really that naive to taking everything that is thrown at you at face value? Just because he came across as polite and articulate, does it not matter that his words contained a subtle undertone of arrogance and ill intent? I only wish all human interactions were so simple and blunt. My life would certainly be a lot easier if it were like that.

so what if there was subtle undertones of anything? he's got an opinion on the recent (shitty) entry in a franchise he helped build. he's not setting a kindergartener's finger painting on fire and cackling in the kid's face. "fuck that loser" is like what, 35 years old? he should be able to have some self-control.
 

isual

Member
All the Blizz employees in the conversation are acting like dumb asses. They took the comments Brevik made and responded with insults, middle school level burns, and arrogance. Brevik did make some arrogant statements himself, but he did the whole interview like a gentlemen as opposed the fucking comments by the Breakfast Club here. Also about the talent statement, he said that Blizzard Irvine didn't have the talent "for the genre Diablo falls under." Know why? Because everyone that was a part of Blizzard that had a big part in creating Diablo and Diablo II bailed when they were told themselves to scrap their vision of Diablo III and fuck off by Vivendi.

He never said Blizzard Irvine wasn't talented, he said they didn't have the talent in making Diablo games, which is 100% true. However you have people in here spinning that statement to make him sound like the Anti-Christ. All in all, this is not "one man" making a stupid comment. This a several Blizzard employees turning a non situation into a raging fire because they can't keep their fucking mouths shut. Everyone involved with that Facebook wall should be fucking ashamed of themselves for making such jack asses of themselves when all they needed to do was go offline.

But hey, always online is a bitch ain't it.

this right here. people should learn criticism, especially if it's from the creator of the game they just developed, which in turn became a let down.
 
that brevik interview was a glimpse of what gaming as a genuinely artistic creative medium would look like, the blizzard reaction is a reminder of the petulant incestuous corporate snake pit it has become.

You get that from their Facebook comments?

Wow, I hope you can live up those standards yourself, and never in your life overreact to anything. :)
 

BigDes

Member
I did watch the video interview. Sure, he does come across as polite and articulate. But are you really that naive to take everything that is thrown at you at face value? Just because he came across as polite and articulate, does it not matter that his words contained a subtle undertone of arrogance and ill intent? I only wish all human interactions were so simple and blunt. My life would certainly be a lot easier if it were like that.

Ok, so say I agreed with your comment that this interview comes across as arrogant, how does this make their response any less childish?
 

forrest

formerly nacire
They obviously care very much about something they have worked so hard on. It's easy to see how emotion can take over, but we have to remember they are simply posting to peers on Facebook. I'm not sure who posted that image, but it was kind of a shitty thing to do.

Also, so D3 isn't D2, it's still not a bad game by any means. There are just some fundamental differences that simply change the dynamic of the game itself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom