• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Google Voice Search for iOS

Status
Not open for further replies.
Damn, this reminds me that I am still waiting for the Jelly Bean update for the Galaxy S3 so I can get in on this Google Now action.
 
Far more likely it's a large Bayesian network.

Even if it is a Bayesian Network, are you saying proposing to store all of it on your device instead of the cloud? That would'nt be very practical, would it? I'm sure the database must be a monster.
 
This was the first time I've clicked "Install" in the App store and when it finished it changed to "Update" instead of "Open". Peculiar.

EDIT: after using it I think the biggest difference is that it is processing your words on the fly, something that Apple desperately needs to do with their Siri/Dictation. As it is now it always waits until you're completely done before you see any results, which is brutal when using dictation in ML
 
Even if it is a Bayesian Network, are you saying proposing to store all of it on your device instead of the cloud? That would'nt be very practical, would it? I'm sure the database must be a monster.

Depends on how they do it, grammatical comprehension isn't so much different than machine translation. Frankly I'm not so convinced there's even that much processing that needs to go on though. To parse "today" and "weather", or "Obama" and "birthday" to get you 90% of the way there is stuff search engines have been doing since the 90s. Granted those last 10% of queries may not work but hey it's better than it not working at all.
 
I thought the cool thing about Siri was that it was integrated at the OS level. Does this Google app have the same access to do the same stuff that Siri does? I really don't know anything about Siri though, just curious.
 
Does this Google app have the same access to do the same stuff that Siri does?

No so you will never be able to use it to set the alarm or anything like that in IOS (pretty sure Apple would never allow that kind of integration as it would directly compete with Siri)
 
When Google releases core services like this, YouTube, and maps, that shit on what comes with iOS, the complete failure to set application defaults becomes that much more apparent.
 
When Google releases core services like this, YouTube, and maps, that shit on what comes with iOS, the complete failure to set application defaults becomes that much more apparent.

Or the complete genius....


maruseesu2.png
 
When Google releases core services like this, YouTube, and maps, that shit on what comes with iOS, the complete failure to set application defaults becomes that much more apparent.
Actually if they release all their great stuff on ios Apple is somewhere like "These mofos fell into our trap" lol
 
It's very slick and fast, but Siri has the advantage of being built in at the OS level.

This may return results a second or so faster but you're wasting just as much time (longer if it's in a folder) to launch the app and press the voice button etc.
 
It's very slick and fast, but Siri has the advantage of being built in at the OS level.

This may return results a second or so faster but you're wasting just as much time (longer if it's in a folder) to launch the app and press the voice button etc.

It is much faster than 'a second or so'.
And of course it's faster to access Siri from the OS, but that isn't what people are talking about.

If Siri could talk back to me this quickly, set up my reminders, notes, or events this fast. I'd be so happy.
I sometimes find it taking Siri several seconds to "think" about my speech before finally reacting, even on good connections.
Sometimes it never responds, and I close out and try again.

Plus, being able to interact with the results was pretty awesome. (such as weather)
 
So this is basically just for searching? I was kind of hoping for richer results like Siri has started to providing. Sure, it does weather correctly but asking about sports stuff it seems to just take me to a search page. That's not really Siri's aim. Definitely fast, though.
 
Just tried it. Works great on my iPhone 4 and fast too. Still not sure how much I would use it but it's good to know that Google cares about giving me Siri like functionality on my original 4 more than Apple does.
 
It is much faster than 'a second or so'.
And of course it's faster to access Siri from the OS, but that isn't what people are talking about.

If Siri could talk back to me this quickly, set up my reminders, notes, or events this fast. I'd be so happy.
I sometimes find it taking Siri several seconds to "think" about my speech before finally reacting, even on good connections.
Sometimes it never responds, and I close out and try again.

Plus, being able to interact with the results was pretty awesome. (such as weather)

I've only found it to be about a second faster in my limited testing of a few voice searches, but I'm not trying to downplay that or anything. A second in this case often means twice as fast. It's noticeably faster than Siri.

I was just pointing out that the speed advantage is somewhat offset by the steps/time it takes to launch the app.
 
as an iOS user, I will say this is very slick. Very solid-love it. It still doesn't recognize everything I say clearly, but neither does Siri, so I'm chalking that up to me being a mumblemouth.
 
It's impressive, that's for sure.

EDIT: I won't ever move to Android, nothing is consistent..

Most things are now. No platform is perfect.

from the software updates, to the icons.. most phone's don't even have 4.0 and even fewer have 4.1.. I can't imagine how long it's going to take to get to 4.2.

You can get a Nexus.

not to mention each phone's ability to use apps.

New phones can use almost all apps.
 
Google is innovating at a much faster rate that Apple in almost every aspect of mobile software development. I can't get over how much better Google now/voice search is than Apple's Siri.
 
This is just voice search with a swish interface, the underlying voice recognition has been in Android for years. Google Now is like a generation beyond that and starts to provide you information you want before you even search for it. It's probably the most impressive thing I've seen on a smartphone.
 
I don't have any talking person in my app :( (downloaded off Ireland store)

But holy crap, it's picked up every query perfectly so far - a lot better than siri here - and it's super fast. Really nice to see it spell out what you are saying as you say it too, and correct itself as it goes.
 
What was the answer?

It shows this:

But verbally it just says "Apple Computer was founded by Ronald Wayne, Steve Wozniak, and others." I dont think they are being funny though. Ask it who founded Oracle, or who founded Johnson & Johnson. It seems any company founded by more than two people only have the first two names read aloud, then it just says "And others" but displays the extra names on screen.
 
If I could just "switch out" siri for this, I'd be all up on it. But if it's not integrated, I'm never ever going to use it. The convenience of it being 1 hold away or for dictation is why I use it, the accuracy and speed is usually good enough for me.

But hopefully this prods Apple to speed up Siri too!
 
Much of the speed seems to come from uploading word-by-word thereby taking the more intensive process of getting word hypotheses and parallel processing them while you're still talking. Would be an easy enough update for Apple to make if they were up for it.
 
I asked both Siri and google voice to sing me a song,

Siri: I can't sing

Google voice: actually sings. 2 verses but she does
 
Much of the speed seems to come from uploading word-by-word thereby taking the more intensive process of getting word hypotheses and parallel processing them while you're still talking. Would be an easy enough update for Apple to make if they were up for it.

Google's voice to text implementation is local, apple's requires the web. That's where a big chunk of the speed is at.
 
It's impressive, that's for sure.

EDIT: I won't ever move to Android, nothing is consistent.. from the software updates, to the icons.. most phone's don't even have 4.0 and even fewer have 4.1.. I can't imagine how long it's going to take to get to 4.2.

not to mention each phone's ability to use apps.

I feel the same way man.
 
Presidents need phones too.


Do people actually think the iPhone is actually a 700 dollar phone, and not simply priced that way to discourage people from not locking themselves into a contract?

The original iPhone was priced around $700 without a contract. Last year's iPhone model on cricket without a contract is at $500. I bet a 5 would be $700. I don't think contract has anything to do with the price.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom