• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Crytek wants 8GB of RAM in next-gen consoles

So consistently scoring 8/10 or over in all of your games is considered 'mediocre' now?
Where are you getting a consistent 8/10??

Several reputable gaming publications gave C3 7's and lower. Polygon and Edge to name a couple. Sesslers review was pretty middling as well.

Aside from the visuals there's nothing particularly remarkable about C3, at least that was the consensus I came away with.
 

strata8

Member
Where are you getting a consistent 8/10??

Several reputable gaming publications gave C3 7's and lower. Polygon and Edge to name a couple. Sesslers review was pretty middling as well.

Aside from the visuals there's nothing particularly remarkable about C3, at least that was the consensus I came away with.

Average scores from Metacritic and Gamerankings. Is there a better way to gather that?

Metacritic:
Far Cry - 89%
Crysis - 91%
Crysis Warhead - 84%
Crysis 2 - 85%
Crysis 3 - 80%

Gamerankings:
Far Cry - 89%
Crysis - 90%
Crysis Warhead - 85%
Crysis 2 - 85%
Crysis 3 - 79%

Looks pretty consistent to me, unless you think a single below average game means they're going to start churning out mediocre games in the future.
 
Ok Crytek, I'm ready to eat.

eat-crow.jpg

I probably said stupid not in this thread but in others im really shocked and hyped 8gb gddr5.
So im gonna eat too can i have the legs?
 
Average scores from Metacritic and Gamerankings. Is there a better way to gather that?

Metacritic:
Far Cry - 89%
Crysis - 91%
Crysis Warhead - 84%
Crysis 2 - 85%
Crysis 3 - 80%

Gamerankings:
Far Cry - 89%
Crysis - 90%
Crysis Warhead - 85%
Crysis 2 - 85%
Crysis 3 - 79%

Looks pretty consistent to me, unless you think a single below average game means they're going to start churning out mediocre games in the future.

The only consistent thing here is the games quality has gotten poorer with each subsequent release.
 

strata8

Member
The only consistent thing here is the games quality has gotten poorer with each subsequent release.

How the slightly declining quality of sequels in a series means that Crytek's future games will be forever tainted with mediocrity is beyond me, but alright.
 

Corky

Nine out of ten orphans can't tell the difference.
So crytek wants consoles to be as powerful as top of the line pcs, so they can make better games for these top of the line pcs...errr I mean consoles?

Don't know what to make of this quote, but if I was belittling the prospect of 8gb consoles then serve me up a nice dish of freshly cooked crow.
 

Red

Member
I'm loving this crow guys. Join in, there's enough for everyone.

I am glad to see the way Sony has mixed things up this go around.
 
I feel vindicated now. I didn't post in this thread because I figured assuming anything about the specs of next gen was asking for trouble.
 
They might be thinking way down the line. For example, if Sony and MS's next console hit in 2013, they'll last maybe up until 2019-2020.

Who knows what kind of memory games that far down will take...

Aha! Looks like I did try to save my ass a bit somewhat a few posts down.
 

diamount

Banned
Where are you getting a consistent 8/10??

Several reputable gaming publications gave C3 7's and lower. Polygon and Edge to name a couple. Sesslers review was pretty middling as well.

Aside from the visuals there's nothing particularly remarkable about C3, at least that was the consensus I came away with.

Lol, no offense but a publication being 'reputable' is a completely subjective thing. It's all opinion in the end, don't get insulted if people don't agree with your opinion and vice versa.
 

plainr_

Member
Hmm. According to my subscriptions page, I replied in this very thread. Can't seem to find my post though. Will be interesting to see what I posted.
 
Top Bottom