Wait. What the fuck is this? A knock off? It's fucking identical and amazing looking.For those who don't like the ground textures of MH4 can play this instead since it's going to be release internationally.
Wait. What the fuck is this? A knock off? It's fucking identical and amazing looking.For those who don't like the ground textures of MH4 can play this instead since it's going to be release internationally.
The issue with the KZ thread was that the topic was technology, and someone trolled the gameplay. This is a screenshot thread, so the idea is to evaluate the screenshots. Saying 'MH is fucking boring' would be shitting up the thread, expressing surprise at the level of graphics on this top-tier 2013 title seems fair. It is a very, very ugly game. Noticeably ugly. If it was on any other platform, all you'd see is posts saying 'what the fuck is that?!'.
Wait. What the fuck is this? A knock off? It's fucking identical and amazing looking.
Oh. So you think a 3DS game should look as good as the vita?The issue with the KZ thread was that the topic was technology, and someone trolled the gameplay. This is a screenshot thread, so the idea is to evaluate the screenshots. Saying 'MH is fucking boring' would be shitting up the thread, expressing surprise at the level of graphics on this top-tier 2013 title seems fair. It is a very, very ugly game. Noticeably ugly. If it was on any other platform, all you'd see is posts saying 'what the fuck is that?!'.
Maybe put 'positive impressions only' in the title next time?
I really don't think so, i still have my psp where i tried all the monster hunter games demos and everytime i said WTFITS!?!? I don't understand what's good about it, the only thing i liked was the freedom of exploration.
I didn't buy soul sacrifice because i really don't like long fights but i really loved everything of the demo, magic system, story, setting, design, combat etc.
Everyone who says that soul sacrifice is not even a good alternative to monster hunter is only a blind fanboy imo.
Commissioned by Capcom?It's a chinese made MH Online f2P game currently announced for PC.
Commissioned by Capcom?
A)imo ss is better than mh(and i'm not the only one) but i understand that people can prefer mh so i don't push my opinion like an undeniably truth unlike mh fans that pretend people to accept their opinion that mh is miles better than ss.That's cool. You don't like MH and seem to genuinely prefer SS over it and that's fine. The game is not for everyone. Still, there's a reason why MH is so popular. Besides, I don' think anyone in this thread said SS isn't a good alternative to MH, just that it's not a better game than MH. Big difference there, mate.
If you've beaten the fish thing with legs then you've been through one of the mid difficulty monsters in 3U (at least I consider it mid). The demo lacks mainly the resource hunting and armor crafting bits. It's definitely a very action oriented game, after this I'm scared I'll find it hard to do a Zelda game, the battles here are all very engagnig.I've tried the WiiU demo and got quite what I expected (only other MH game I ever played, for a couple of hours, was that on PS2 years ago). In fact, on a superficial look, games look similar and I'm still wondering about this dreaded learning curve, whereas I see mostly a fairly basic action game. Is there something big I'm missing about the game I can't see from the demo? Should I think getting into the game, considering I like skill based action more than rpg elements?
What's this new 'purpose' you speak of?Just look at MH3 Ultimate on 3DS, it looks way better than this and any MH on PSP. MH4 looks that bad thanks to a different "purpose" for the game.
I'm interested in MH.. Always have been.Or maybe some people should keep OFF threads they are not interested in.
What loli(?)/moe characters?Should everyone in this thread go into the Panopticon thread and start bashing the loll/moe characters for pages?
Most ps3 games don't have pc versions.in every PS3 game thread do 20 people need to point out that the PC version has higher IQ?
RightOk then, I thought the idea was to discuss the new information from the screens, and not wether or not they're fucking ugly; like the new monsters, areas and stuff. But thank you for your contribution!
Edit: Upcoming Vita qame:
Away from Sony as fast as possible?
Should everyone in this thread go into the Panopticon thread and start bashing the loll/moe characters for pages? How about that OlliOlli game for Vita? It looks like dogshit no? Should a bunch of people go into that thread and point out that it looks like a Colecovision game? (Even if they have no interest in the game to begin with)
3DS screenshots always look bad - that's the nature of the device. Pointing that out is fairly pointless and belaboring it really smacks of sour grapes of the worst kind.
"PSP was 2004 and this is 2013." Is it new info that the PSP had a nice high res screen for it's time and the 3DS does not? in every PS3 game thread do 20 people need to point out that the PC version has higher IQ?
Yeah, it's not a weird knockoff, it's with Capcom's graces but not direct involvement apparently.
Edit: Upcoming Vita qame:
I'm going to go out on a limb and say this doesn't look super great. That thread is mostly people saying "cool, a neat looking game for Vita."
It could be "wow, this game looks like hot garbage" and "Vita is saved? LOL" and I guess that wouldn't be out of bounds...but it also would be pretty lame. Let Vita owners looking forward to quirky indie games have their fun, I don't care about the game so I don't see the point in repeatedly bashing it.
That's why I only read the news from the OP and close it out, because the rest of the people whine about ground textures and stifle discussion on the rest of the game.Another MH4 thread down the drain.
3DS: 2011 Hardware
PSP: 2004 Hardware
NextGen graphics!
And still no second stick
Wow, you really take this "Us vs Them" sentiment way too much to heart.
In the Panopticon thread I'm praising the game and defending it against people saying it looks bad!
Did you miss the "...but it also would be pretty lame" part of my statement?
I just jumped in this thread now, but looking at the OP my original impression was that it looks really good - especially for 3DS.
Then I saw the rest of the posts on that page and got confused.
Are people seriously thinking this looks bad? Or is there some kind of Sony fanboy salt going on here, like when Square jumped ship to Playstation??
For those who don't like the ground textures of MH4 can play this instead since it's going to be release internationally.
Why does it always have to be some other reason behind a person's comments?
Whoa seriously? Got a link mate? I know they have to make money some way for it being f2p. But still.Stop it. You do not want that game. Trust me. Your gear breaks. You buy insurance to reduce the risk of your gear breaking. It can still break. You buy this insurance with REAL MONEY.
But hey, looks great in stills, right?
I'm sure that just the monster intro mate.What's with the DOF blur? In what instances does that activate? Is that some kind of lock on system? Like you lock on to the monster and the background blurs. Some screens have it, some don't
I just jumped in this thread now, but looking at the OP my original impression was that it looks really good - especially for 3DS.
Then I saw the rest of the posts on that page and got confused.
Are people seriously thinking this looks bad? Or is there some kind of Sony fanboy salt going on here, like when Square jumped ship to Playstation??
What's with the DOF blur? In what instances does that activate? Is that some kind of lock on system? Like you lock on to the monster and the background blurs. Some screens have it, some don't.
The screenshots in the OP look like total shit, it's that simple. Yes it's MH so it doesn't matter because the gameplay delivers, but this is a screenshot thread.
Thanks for the links.Some vids
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_mTJtX5geE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLpwszCE18k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7wz4GOVXFM
The game is a lot faster than the previous iterations, and even though the zoned maps are back there's almost zero load times.
...Intredasting.
Stop it. You do not want that game. Trust me. Your gear breaks. You buy insurance to reduce the risk of your gear breaking. It can still break. You buy this insurance with REAL MONEY.
But hey, looks great in stills, right?
Back to 4.
What's with the DOF blur? In what instances does that activate? Is that some kind of lock on system? Like you lock on to the monster and the background blurs. Some screens have it, some don't.
Fucking hell that's ugly. Fitting for a game about monsters, I guess.
Monster Hunter threads are like Dragon Quest threads. 90 percent of the complainers are console warriors who are only there because the game positively/negatively impacts their platform of choice.
Good riddance.my only complaint so far is about the lack of water areas
What are the people that only care about it cause it's on their platform of choice.
I think that math is off.The other 10%
Lol, I laughed.
By the way I gather this is going to be a lot of fun; my only complaint so far is about the lack of water areas, but I am looking forward to reading first hands-on impressions and reviews.
What are the people that only care about it cause it's on their platform of choice.
Good riddance.
I honestly expect them to come back on the G version.I hope they don't.