• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

MS marketing director: "We are going to kill Sony at E3!"

So much arrogance. They are setting their fans up for disappointment by setting expectations way too high.

Those 15 MS-published games better be AAAmazing.
 
How long can MS sustain the money hat business model, especially if the PS4 launches to impressive sales? At some point these third parties who were formerly multiplatform are gonna say "Fuck that, gimme some of those PS4 sales!"
 
So much arrogance. They are setting their fans up for disappointment by setting expectations way too high.

Those 15 MS-published games better be AAAmazing.

It's a stupid phrase for them to come out and say, and I don't think they'll deliver. But if they show a Conker, new amazing looking shooter IP from Black Tusk and a new RPG from Lionhead, I think they'll do good.

How long can MS sustain the money hat business model, especially if the PS4 launches to impressive sales? At some point these third parties who were formerly multiplatform are gonna say "Fuck that, gimme some of those PS4 sales!"


If they're gonna have anything amazing it's gonna have to come from them, thankfully they've been bulking up their first party but that willingly goes ignored around here for some people ..
 
Yeah because FF is at it's peak isn't it ..., it wouldn't do anywhere near that these days, the quality has damaged the brand too much.

Didn't Fallout 3 do about 5m in it's first 3 months??

FF at its peak did 9-10 million bro. FF13 did 6.6 million. I can easily see a well received FF surpassing that.

Fallout 3 shipped 5 million.

Fallout 3 sold 1.6 million in NPD meanwhile FF13 sold 1.3 million in its NPD. Thats where Fallout sells the best and it only managed to outsell FF by 300k. To put things into perspective FF13 sold 1.7 million in Japan in one week.
 
I personally think FF is greatly disminished in NA and will do little for them in that region. As for JPN, well they despised FF 13, but still could buy future games, just not in the sme quantity as 13. Europe I've no idea.
 
If FF (that is, mainline FF) is not "huge", then the only "huge" third party franchises are CoD and GTA. That's a very limited definition.
Final Fantasy isn't a system swaying franchise anymore , in fact I'd argue that most RPG lovers will already buy a ps4.
 
Calling it still like I called it before.

Exclusives out the ass.

Their focus isn't on "what can we create for our customers"

it's "what can we take away from the competition's customers"

It worked like a charm for them on 360, and it will work again. Expect insanity. Sony will be outgunned in terms of games, pure and simple.
 
So much arrogance. They are setting their fans up for disappointment by setting expectations way too high.

Those 15 MS-published games better be AAAmazing.

They'll be Viva Pinata and Kinect Sports god tier. Get ready to be blown
 
Sure it ain't. An exclusive that could sell 6-8 million is definitely not big lmao. Oh and FF is bigger than Fallout.
FF at its peak did 9-10 million bro. FF13 did 6.6 million. I can easily see a well received FF surpassing that.

Fallout 3 shipped 5 million.

Fallout 3 sold 1.6 million in NPD meanwhile FF13 sold 1.3 million in its NPD. Thats where Fallout sells the best and it only managed to outsell FF by 300k. To put things into perspective FF13 sold 1.7 million in Japan in one week.

Not this generation it hasn't been, going on general chart sales Fallout 3 has sold over 8m, FF13 over 7m. Fallout New Vegas over 7m, FF13-2 over 3m. Sales for Fallout on current generation consoles have outsold Final Fantasy by a few million, FF this generation across multiple consoles has barely kept up with Final Fantasy on one console last generation.

FF still gets a great number of sales, but it doesn't have the pulling power it used to, long development times along with just generally being considered to be sub-par titles hasn't helped the franchise.
 
Microsoft can kill Sony at e3 however they want, my only concern is the long time commitment to the console. Given their history, they might spend 1b for games and money hat and such for the first 2 years, will they continue to give us varied tittle throughout the whole console cycle?
 
I think PS4 will beat One and I think it'll have far better games that help it do that than FF, can you not hack someone saying FF isn't huge anymore?
If your idea of "huge" third party franchises is so restrictive as to only allow 5 entries, then yes, FF is not "huge".

Personally, I think few people would subscribe to such a definition.
 
Get over yourself and check what thread you're in, the only people that have an agenda are Sony fans littering One threads.

I think PS4 will beat One and I think it'll have far better games that help it do that than FF, can you not hack someone saying FF isn't huge anymore?

I gave you two examples and you can't even dispute it.
FF currently isn't as huge as it was, but a new mainline entry with good quality and marketing has the ability to sell 6m copies easily. That's not Elder Scrolls big, but not bad either.
 
I think people have to know that MS will be hitting hard and fast with money hats.
They do not want this gen to drag out, they saw what happened with this gen.
They had many advantages this gen and PS3 started at a huge disadvantage in the minds of the press and many people with the price and the line up and ms had better versions of 80% of all games that were released for both systems and many still say that PS3 will end ahead world wide.

Microsoft will buy every exclusive they can for early on, no matter what it takes.
I do expect them to try and tie up Kojima, I do expect them to tie up Bethesda for something, Mirrors Edge would not surprise me, and GTA would really not surprise me either (360, PS3, but only XBOX One for next gen).
They want people to look at the shiny in their one hand to forget that the other hand is working its way up your ass.
And for many of the masses it works.
 
Get over yourself and check what thread you're in, the only people that have an agenda are Sony fans littering One threads.

I think PS4 will beat One and I think it'll have far better games that help it do that than FF, can you not hack someone saying FF isn't huge anymore?

I gave you two examples and you can't even dispute it.

Funny how you, someone who started a thread about how ps3 still hadn't surpassed 360 a few months ago (because idc numbers weren't correct and whatnot), go around making quotes like "Hasn't FF always been exclusive to PS in Japan, where it does the bulk of sales??".
I figured someone like you would at least look these numbers up.
 
FF at its peak did 9-10 million bro. FF13 did 6.6 million. I can easily see a well received FF surpassing that.

Fallout 3 shipped 5 million.

Fallout 3 sold 1.6 million in NPD meanwhile FF13 sold 1.3 million in its NPD. Thats where Fallout sells the best and it only managed to outsell FF by 300k. To put things into perspective FF13 sold 1.7 million in Japan in one week.

If FF14 sells 4m in the west I'll say it's a huge deal for PS4, I don't see it getting back to that 6m+ range though.

Skyrim improved on Scrolls enormously, unlike FF which has just kept dropping this past gen (in sales and quality). You don't envisage a scenario, not unlikely that the same can be done for Fallout?

I mean, I don't think it's gonna be exclusive anyway.
 
Not this generation it hasn't been, Fallout 3 has sold over 8m, FF13 over 7m. Fallout New Vegas over 7m, FF13-2 over 3m. Sales for Fallout on current generation consoles have outsold Final Fantasy by a few million, FF this generation across multiple consoles has barely kept up with Final Fantasy on one console last generation.

FF still gets a great number of sales, but it doesn't have the pulling power it used to, long development times along with just generally being considered to be sub-par titles hasn't helped the franchise.

Where did you get these number from?

If FF14 sells 4m in the west I'll say it's a huge deal for PS4, I don't see it getting back to that 6m+ range though.

Skyrim improved on Scrolls enormously, unlike FF which has just kept dropping this past gen (in sales and quality). You don't envisage a scenario, not unlikely that the same can be done for Fallout?

I mean, I don't think it's gonna be exclusive anyway.

FF15 bro 14 is an MMO :)
IF FF13 could do 6+ I can see FF15. I think your underestimating how many FF fans there are. Its pretty much the biggest rpg name in gaming history.
No, Elder scrolls is a bigger brand than Fallout. Also you say Fallout can grow but why can't FF?
 
FF currently isn't as huge as it was, but a new mainline entry with good quality and marketing has the ability to sell 6m copies easily. That's not Elder Scrolls big, but not bad either.

IMO the current Square can't make a decent FF though. They're more likely to make another disappointing game in the series.
 

If they plan to spend $1 billion to get exclusive titles then they can back up what they are claiming. With $1 billion, you can ensure the vast majority of huge, big, and medium 3rd party titles are exclusive. From COD to Battlefield to GTA/RDR to Fallout/ElderScroll to MGS to FF and so on. I feel fairly confident that with $1 billion you can get all of the above, and more, exclusive to your machine.
 
Calling it still like I called it before.

Exclusives out the ass.

Their focus isn't on "what can we create for our customers"

it's "what can we take away from the competition's customers"

It worked like a charm for them on 360, and it will work again. Expect insanity. Sony will be outgunned in terms of games, pure and simple.

+1.
Though I don't like this practice, but no doubt is the most power weapon they have.
 
This better not mean MS have exclusive rights to a next-gen version of GTA V!!!

Exclusive rights to next-gen versions of games won't be enough to eliminate the PS4. If their strategy is to lock up a version of a game that's going to appear on PS3, then I hope they have a backup strategy.

Microsoft would need to buy 3rd-party studios and publishers in order to "Dreamcast" the PS4. That, or give the Xbox One for free.
 
FF at its peak did 9-10 million bro. FF13 did 6.6 million. I can easily see a well received FF surpassing that.

Fallout 3 shipped 5 million.

Fallout 3 sold 1.6 million in NPD meanwhile FF13 sold 1.3 million in its NPD. Thats where Fallout sells the best and it only managed to outsell FF by 300k. To put things into perspective FF13 sold 1.7 million in Japan in one week.

The difference is one franchise is clearly on a upward trend and the other has been spiralling down for over a decade.

MS has always been smarter about its moneyhats.
 
Microsoft can kill Sony at e3 however they want, my only concern is the long time commitment to the console. Given their history, they might spend 1b for games and money hat and such for the first 2 years, will they continue to give us varied tittle throughout the whole console cycle?

Long time commitment? You mean like 8 years? The longest any console has a been a company's primary console?

Like that?
 
Wow your posts in MS threads are funny, so much delusion. FF isn't huge and certainly not the biggest exclusive any of the big 3 could get if they wanted.

Not sure where the Fallout 4 rumours are coming from, don't think they'll be true, if they are that'd be huge.

FF13 sold 7 million, seems pretty huge to me. What were Fallout 3's sales like? I know FF13 did 882k in NPD on release on PS3 and 493k on 360. Fallout 3 did 375k on 360 on release, less than Resistance 2 on PS3 which came out the next month.
 
If FF14 sells 4m in the west I'll say it's a huge deal for PS4, I don't see it getting back to that 6m+ range though.

Skyrim improved on Scrolls enormously,
unlike FF which has just kept dropping this past gen (in sales and quality). You don't envisage a scenario, not unlikely that the same can be done for Fallout?

I mean, I don't think it's gonna be exclusive anyway.

Well now we're just in fantasy land now ;p
 
Funny how you, someone who started a thread about how ps3 still hadn't surpassed 360 a few months ago (because idc numbers weren't correct and whatnot), go around making quotes like "Hasn't FF always been exclusive to PS in Japan, where it does the bulk of sales??".
I figured someone like you would at least look these numbers up.

What's that got to do with anything (I was right as it turns out).

I'm not some master of sales knowledge .... I knew FF did well early in the gen but I'm looking at how I view the brand now.
 
Calling it still like I called it before.

Exclusives out the ass.

Their focus isn't on "what can we create for our customers"

it's "what can we take away from the competition's customers"

It worked like a charm for them on 360, and it will work again. Expect insanity. Sony will be outgunned in terms of games, pure and simple.

I think Sony's first party games will always make it a better choice for me :)
 
IMO the current Square can't make a decent FF though. They're more likely to make another disappointing game in the series.
That's why Sony is co-developing. At least that is what the rumours are telling us. If they do that and drop their shitty writer, FF can easily go back to quality.
 
Microsoft can kill Sony at e3 however they want, my only concern is the long time commitment to the console. Given their history, they might spend 1b for games and money hat and such for the first 2 years, will they continue to give us varied tittle throughout the whole console cycle?
Of course, just like the Xbox 360.
 
I predict Microsoft will have some big announcements (maybe fallout 4 timed excluisve). Sony has to make sure if promotes its own exclusives to people so that they can make a choice of what platform to get.
 
Calling it still like I called it before.

Exclusives out the ass.

Their focus isn't on "what can we create for our customers"

it's "what can we take away from the competition's customers"

It worked like a charm for them on 360, and it will work again. Expect insanity. Sony will be outgunned in terms of games, pure and simple.

It worked for Sony too. It works for both of them.
 
Not this generation it hasn't been, going on general chart sales Fallout 3 has sold over 8m, FF13 over 7m. Fallout New Vegas over 7m, FF13-2 over 3m. Sales for Fallout on current generation consoles have outsold Final Fantasy by a few million, FF this generation across multiple consoles has barely kept up with Final Fantasy on one console last generation.

FF still gets a great number of sales, but it doesn't have the pulling power it used to, long development times along with just generally being considered to be sub-par titles hasn't helped the franchise.

Fallout 3 has been out 2 years longer than FF13. Not a great comparison. Have you got links for your sources?
 
Calling it still like I called it before.

Exclusives out the ass.

Their focus isn't on "what can we create for our customers"

it's "what can we take away from the competition's customers"

It worked like a charm for them on 360, and it will work again. Expect insanity. Sony will be outgunned in terms of games, pure and simple.

I agree. But it's a precisely how Sony played the game with Sega. They took exclusives away from the Dreamcast and did it much more brutally than MS could ever do. Hell, they did it to the Saturn as well.

It would be irony/karma or whatever to see Sony fall victim to a strategy they practiced two cycles ago.
 
Why do I get Sony PS3 levels of arrogance vibe from MS recently?

MS had their successful generation, just like Sony did with the PS2. Success leads to arrogance. Arrogance leads to disappointment. Disappointment leads to.... suffering....

Yoda_SWSB.png
 
Their focus isn't on "what can we create for our customers"

it's "what can we take away from the competition's customers"

Eh, you guys and your strange ideas about exclusivity. Especially when it comes to MS. I don't see people riding Sony about it's recent slew of indie exclusives despite them also appearing on PCs, tablets, phones. Dat Sony arrogance and moneyhatting. Seriously, though, why isolate MS when all of them do it. You're going to see them at MS and Sony's show, so there's no reason to believe one is the gamer's saint and savior while the other is a blight upon humanity.
 
If they plan to spend $1 billion to get exclusive titles then they can back up what they are claiming. With $1 billion, you can ensure the vast majority of huge, big, and medium 3rd party titles are exclusive. From COD to Battlefield to GTA/RDR to Fallout/ElderScroll to MGS to FF and so on. I feel fairly confident that with $1 billion you can get all of the above, and more, exclusive to your machine.
Combined? What are you smoking haha :D GTA IV DLC cost MS $50m alone. GTA V in today's market would probably cost $300m. CoD easily more. For $1 billion you could probably buy CoD and GTA at most.
 
I'm so sorry but I love stuff like this. Companies calling each other out. It's like that at the start of the generation. All bets are off. Mud will be thrown. Fight each other to death.

As a multiplatform gamer that also likes following the industry, this stuff is gold!
 
Meh... Still not buying. Drop the DRM and I might consider it.

I'm betting it's very densely packed with Kinect family and sports titles. Even an exclusive Rockstar game won't sway me.
 
Where did you get these number from?

Turns out they come from VG Chartz, so ignore what I said about sales, about as reliable as a slinky in a waterfall.

I still stand by that FF as a brand doesn't have the same power it once did though, at least not on current consoles after FF13/-2 and going into LR, whether that will change next-gen will be interesting to see especially if the Versus Sony rumour comes to fruition.
 
If they plan to spend $1 billion to get exclusive titles then they can back up what they are claiming. With $1 billion, you can ensure the vast majority of huge, big, and medium 3rd party titles are exclusive. From COD to Battlefield to GTA/RDR to Fallout/ElderScroll to MGS to FF and so on. I feel fairly confident that with $1 billion you can get all of the above, and more, exclusive to your machine.

Im not so sure about that, to buy a franchise like that even exclusive for one game would cost alot of money, its not just based on what they would sell being on all platforms it would be the damage it would do to that brand in the future. People dont look at the full picture when they post things like that.
 
Top Bottom