you fucking serious???
even the wii menu was better.
the cross media bar sucks super hard.
PS4 vs Xbox One UI
PS4:
Xbox One:
I prefer the Xbox One UI, but to each their own.
I'm not a big fan of XMB either. I wonder if the people who call it functional have ever tried to reply to a message in-game. <.<;
Mostly likely because you pay for Xbox Live and you still are getting tons of ads.
XMB is the greatest thing ever so I'm not sure what your talking about
XMB is very good. You can access all the settings fast and without a barrage of graphics and slow windows popping up every turn. Certainly faster and more efficient than the 360 and Wii OS's.
I see them as space filler to make each page more filled out.
Store? Trophy syncing? Game and app updates? Constant firmware updates? Lack of cross-game chat?
Sure there isn't a pay wall, but 360+Live makes all those things not much of a hassle. Good to know Vita OS is awesome, though. Means PS4 should be solid.
They just love that kind of talk over at Microsoft.
When you have ads that spontaneously animate when you have to tile over them, then yes, they do tend to slow everything down, at least on my system.
ps4 ui looks nice for once unlike the bland xmb.Yes everything relating to online updates and the PSN store is terrible, but the actual menu layout and settings is excellent. It's too bad the PS4 OS and UI looks like a terrible website...
ps4 ui looks nice for once unlike the bland xmb.
its only slow in game.The XMB interface looks nice. Unfortunately, the performance is terrible.
XMB looks good visually but the functionality is just laughable--in particular the settings sub menu which brings up about a million things.
Customization is great and all, but my god
True story. PS3 OS is nice as long as it's not in-game or in-app. Xbox 360 has pins too which is nice. Sony needs to step it up for PS4.
The PS3 OS is horrible because it freezes constantly and once you start getting a good amount of content in the menu it takes forever to load.
Don't get me started on the newer apps like the store and youtube. Complete trash.
Resistance 3 is the only game that take that long to delete as far as i know, so its more of a issue with Resistance 3, not the general OS. Just out of curiousity, have you not tried to delete any other PS3 game except Resistance 3 to see the difference?Is it? I would think deleting files would be solely a function of the OS/file system.
To be fair, when you're arguing about 360 vs PS3 OS speed you're basically arguing if shit is better with corn in it or not. But are unacceptable in regards to speed.
That's part of the reason why I think the Ps4 having less dedicated memory to the OS is overrated--it's just going to guarantee another shit clunker of an OS where comparably speaking the XBO should be much much faster.
did this thread backfire ?
Disagree, 512MB-1GB should be plenty for a minimalist game system OS. More memory for the OS than the PS3 had total should be way more than enough.
Exactly. It's the lack of RAM that makes it clunky, not the design.XMB rules. The problems with the PS3 UI is not because of bad design, but bad hardware. If they had the exact same UI, but made it snappy, with no load-screens or waiting periods, then it'd be perfect.
Just another reason to ditch Microsoft, as it really bothers me that 2/3 of the content in the menu is just trying to sell me more shit. It never really bothered me much until the metro upgrade--when the ads get in the way of functionality, we have a big problem.The pins are so disappointing. It just puts them in a folder on the home screen. A pin should make something appear as a tile on the home screen, but they would take the place of Microsoft's precious ad and recommendation tiles.
Exactly. It's the lack of RAM that makes it clunky, not the design.
In my worthless opinion
Aesthetically, the PS3 UI is quite nice. Functionally, I feel it is quite awful.
Aesthetically, the Vita UI is quite awful. Functionally, I feel it is quite nice.