spyroflame0487
Member
To be fair, I don't think Nintendo and/or their fans are really going to miss EA.
Real gamers don't play games, they just moan about them on the internet.
There was a Sims game. They were also working on My Garden but it got cancelled.Apart from FIFA & madden has EA made any 3DS games at all?
What does that make a hardcore gamer?
EA doesn't make children's games. Why would they have Nintendo listed?
this is just sad for nintendo. well. good knowing you big N
Chû Totoro;90604915 said:I have the ability but I don't like their games so I won't buy something I don't like.
Skate (even if the last one was shit), Mirror's Edge or Titan Fall are the games I could buy (maybe Fifa because I like football but I'd rather play for real than play with a controller so) but I'm the customer and my budget is not unlimited so I can make my arbitrary decisions like I want.
I prefer Nintendo games so even if I miss some very good games I can wait a little to play on other systems (I can buy a PS4 or an Xbox One but not both atm for example so I'm surely going to miss some good games but who can play everything anyway?).
The problem here is that EA's job is to make money so I can be ridiculous (if you think so) but EA can't ! They are a business. They need sales, so they need to adress the maximum of people and skipping people who bought a Wii or a NDS is really like skipping a lot of people. That's my point and that's just it. Nothing more. I hope people could read what I'm posting and stop thinking I'm trying to say EA is bad Nintendo is good here.
Do you really think that if EA could make money on the Wii U that they wouldn't support it? Nintendo fans need to accept the fact that these companies aren't skipping the system because they "hate Nintendo" or want to see it die, their simply aren't selling and since it's not up to the standards of the new systems, that's more work that they would have to put in for something that won't come close to the sales they would get on other platforms.
That's a great argument for now. The problem, though, is that EA was canceling development well before the system's release. They had no clue how it was going to perform, and many analysts were saying it would do really well.
I thought Star Wars was that series set in space with the beam swords and the robed people and the little green man.
Well, EA probably did the smart thing and ignored what videogames analysts were saying because we all know that they have a successful history in being completely off with their predictions. I'd worry for any publisher that's using these analyst predictions to decide whether or not to develop for a console.That's a great argument for now. The problem, though, is that EA was canceling development well before the system's release. They had no clue how it was going to perform, and many analysts were saying it would do really well.
I'm not going to sit here and say something inane like "Nintendo is better off without EA" or "EA will regret this move." Those dwell too much on fanboyism and discourage discussion.
But I am going to propose that maybe EA is narrowing its focus in a dangerous way. Just because EA did not make money on mature, M-rated titles on Wii U (not that they always went about it in the correct fashion; see Mass Effect 3 launching alongside ME Trilogy on other platforms) does not mean that was they only way they could capitalize on Wii U's market. Could EA not have sold their titles on the Virtual Console catalog? What about mid-range family-friendly titles like EA Sports Playground and Facebreaker KO that were, I imagine, at worst modest successes on Wii? Medal of Honor Heroes 2 also must have done reasonably well on Wii and that was not their AAA product, either.
EA couldn't make big bucks on simply porting their AAA titles near launch, so they abandoned the ship altogether. Doesn't this seem like throwing the baby out with the bathwater? Although EA's mobile business is succssful, why does that mean they have to ignore the 3DS? Again, even if they don't have much luck with packaged goods, they could still release eShop content like Virtual Console, or even porting their mobile titles with lots of DLC options.
They have all sorts of revenue options available that could supplement their risky AAA sales and they ignore nearly all of them. Diversity is a healthy business approach as long as you can afford it. Why ignore Wii U, 3DS, and even Vita just because you can't toss out the easiest solution and make a profit? Just like in life, you can't always take the easy route and walk away a winner. This sort of narrowed focus on iOS/Android and AAA(A?) budget titles is a dangerous and precarious path IMHO, and I wonder how well it will suit them in the long run.
To be fair, I don't think Nintendo and/or their fans are really going to miss EA.
EA doesn't make children's games. Why would they have Nintendo listed?
Do you really think that if EA could make money on the Wii U that they wouldn't support it? Nintendo fans need to accept the fact that these companies aren't skipping the system because they "hate Nintendo" or want to see it die, their simply aren't selling and since it's not up to the standards of the new systems, that's more work that they would have to put in for something that won't come close to the sales they would get on other platforms.
Chû Totoro;90629941 said:Please read my posts... all of them. I won't bother answering again because for the last time : I'm not talking about EA / Wii U !!! I'm talking about a specific gaming demographic !!!! People who bought Wii, NDS or Vita (you can include Wii U but it's not the specific point). These people deserve some attention too, there is a market here. A whole casual market that made the big Wii success we all remember. But maybe EA think that only with mobile or browser gaming they can reach and satisfy them. They sure know how to please gamers, all of them... look at all the controversy thread they have in NeoGAF (NFS on PC just on the 1st page for example)
Edit : and to be clear I've said I won't buy their games because that won't be a big sacrifice for me and it's a way of showing that I don't like their policies regarding DRM, online, DLC, f2p, money hats for exclusive content etc. But I'm not important for them and I know that (and it's 100% normal). I'm not someone they could sell a lot of games or they should start making very different games. But people who bought Wii can become more broad gamers playing Fifa, Cod, NFS etc. These are games that can please a lot of people both gamers from ages (who enjoy these games) and passed gen casuals. The smartest thing would be to make them play more and more different and complex games. But I must be part of the few in this thread who are trying to understand what was in their mind when doing this (and of course we know it's not trolling to Nintendo so... they must be stupid or don't care... kind of the same if you speak about business and market shares).
EA have been pretty clear in showing that they don;t have the capability to make non-sports, non-'dudebro' style games. They tried with the DS and Wii, but were unable to make any software that the audience found compelling. It's entirely EA's own fault.
Boom Blox was good though.
EA have been pretty clear in showing that they don;t have the capability to make non-sports, non-'dudebro' style games. They tried with the DS and Wii, but were unable to make any software that the audience found compelling. It's entirely EA's own fault.
Boom Blox was good though.
Chû Totoro;90631403 said:Yeah you're right though. I haven't thought about this. It seems that both Nintendo and EA have the same problem then... why are they stupid to the point of failing a partnership that could help them both. This I really don't understand :/
EA probably think that what they could win by doing their best to reach Nintendo's audience is too small.
Like always this will be Nintendo games who are going to sell Nintendo systems... I'm ok with this because like I said I'm playing Nintendo games mostly. I'm playing games, I want a toy system. I'm adult enough the whole day... even GTA is not as fun as before for me (GTA V has the taste of the game of the forever but I played 10 hours and I'm bored...).
I'm repeating myself here and I don't have anything interesting to add so I'm going to play a little bit of Zelda on 3DS
I am continuously amazed at the joy people get from making people feel bad.
lol, last EA game I bought was Dead Space used. Before that... Time Splitters 3?
EA can't make money with PS / Xbox either, considering their losses in the last few years.Those platforms don't make them money, totally understandable they omit them.
That being said, screw EA.
Well he's right. Real gamers buy every system out there and have a competent gaming PC so that they can play every game available.
EA doesn't makechildren'squality games. Why would they have Nintendo listed?
I understand you're getting dogpiled on, but I would like to just show you that Nintendo produces a surprising breadth of franchises that both don't fit into your narrative and don't involve fantasy elves beating pigs/tradespeople throwing fire at turtles.
As for EA? It is a bit odd (Not so much considering it's a MoH survey), but aren't they still making Spore titles? Surely the companies involved (Sony/Nintendo) would be considered for at least that, right?
All I ever hear about from Nintendo is more Mario, more Zelda, more Smash Brothers, and more undeniably cutesy games like Pikmin. On the rare occasion that they advertise a remotely new title, it's either an uninspired grab (Zombie U) or an anime epitome of fun, where fun is the only thing that matters.
Nintendo is so bad at recognizing games that may appeal to more experienced gamers that it takes movements, such as Operation Rainfall, to get things rolling.
For whatever reason, Nintendo has made these convolutions essential, whereas other companies have not.
Nintendo's primary IPs have not undergone significant change or progress, which has resulted in the apathy of some, myself included. For others, this is cause for celebration--and that's called personal preference. For me, it's cause for disinterest. I play modern Nintendo games as a last priority, if I get to them at all, and when I do play them I typically find that I haven't missed anything--because little has changed. Some Nintendo fans dismiss the notion that Nintendo veers away from change, but when change is suggested they often go into a frenzy, desperate to preserve "tradition". At the end of the day, one can take a decade-long break from Nintendo without missing much.
In conclusion, I'll point out that EA's income is not reliant on their shovelware games. If it was, Nintendo would be on that survey.
If you honestly think Zombie U is an uninspired grab, you've either never played it or survival games just aren't your thing. Nintendo makes a lot more games than "fun" games, but the problem is: They don't sell well. People aren't used to buying games from Nintendo that don't have "fun" written all over them.
Also, you talk like every Mario/Zelda/Metroid game is always the same, and that in no way corresponds to reality, unlike other franchises, that really have very small changes because everyone already likes the formula. Those have no real changes... ever.
First thing which came to mind.
Ducking out before the debate has even begun or perhaps before a counter point can be made? Why bother posting such ill-informed opinions if you won't even stick around to back them up?Our opinions/observations differ to a degree where I can't debate with you. I'll leave you to it.
Battlefield 4 is amazing fun when it's not crashing.Again I wonder what ilk of people actually buy EA games. Who are these menacing faceless hordes that buy this arcade-soccer dudebro shooters shovelware by the truckload? The sooner EA goes bankrupt this generation, the better off we all will be.
Again I wonder what ilk of people actually buy EA games. Who are these menacing faceless hordes that buy this arcade-soccer dudebro shooters shovelware by the truckload? The sooner EA goes bankrupt this generation, the better off we all will be.
Real gamers don't play games, they just moan about them on the internet.