Glass Rebel
Member
Wish they censored out all the sexual jokes too.
Why? Most of the stuff is pretty harmless.
In fact, I can't think of a single "bad" sexual joke.
Wish they censored out all the sexual jokes too.
According to the article and some people who've played the game posting in this thread, it's big thigh jokes and an old man propositioning an underage girl that got cut. Sounds like nothing will be affected other than some people's level of titillation.
Jesus christ people they look like children, how can you be against any sort of censoring of which amounts to something that literally has no effect on the gameplay. Those of you cancelling your pre-order over this need to reassess your self-identified moniker as "gamers" and need to ask the deep question of "why does putting clothes over characters that look like little girls enrage me so much?".
So apparently you can't even see Ringabel's speedo outfit even through a friend summon, like you can with the other Japan only outfits. It was completely removed. :/
I know it seems like a petty complaint, and I still and gonna get the game, but it really is quite silly that Nintendo and/or Square think we need to be "protected" from this. It's even weirder because Ringabel was the only character that was always an adult. (It also shows a weird dichotomy of how sexuality is displayed depending on gender. They'd go through the effort to "fix" the ladies' costumes, but can't be bothered to include the one sexy male costume at all? Such a bizarre double standard.)
Looks like you're only seeing what you want to see:
Why you would compare this to LIghtning Returns is beyond me.
It's not like the same complaint couldn't be lobbied against just about females in any game with armor. Not that that makes it okay, but it seems odd to single out Japanese developers on something like this.
Because I'm against censorship, this is one of the few times I'll let it slip because I want the game so much, I've already not bought games in the past over censorship.
Technically it's not censorship. The same company that is selling the game is the one that is making these changes.
Because I'm against censorship, this is one of the few times I'll let it slip because I want the game so much, I've already not bought games in the past over censorship.
Just cancelled my preorder. this sucks
And people who choose to murder what looks like humans......?
What it accomplishes is earning a sale from those of us who were grossed out by sexualized children and wildly out of place fetish elements. The usual response you get to this kind of thing is JUST IGNORE IT, DAT GAMEPLAY or DON'T BUY IT YOU LAMER, STOP CENSORING MY BEAUTIFUL CHILDREN'S THIGH ART, but it's pretty clear that just ignoring it hasn't really been working these past few years now that lazy pervy shit is encroaching in out of place ways on high budget games that are otherwise designed to recall charming PSX era RPGs.
Let me state it for the record since this thread and the RPG fanbase on messageboards in general seem to be ridden with pervos with an insatiable desire to cater to their needs in every effing game, for once, this censorship catered to my needs and the needs of people like me, directly leading to my impending purchase of the game. So good job Nintendo! Here's my tiny bit of positive reinforcement.
Don't get me wrong, anyone is free to express their desires for weirdo fetishes in their cartoon character videogames if they want. I'm just expressing my desire for these kinds of pervo elements to be lepered out of my sight into the dank parts of stores people are ashamed to go to, and out of my marquis RPG releases. It would be nice to have a future where the "sensuality" of children's thigh art is ghettoized to PSP visual novels for the fetish brigade to get their rocks off to while the rest of us can enjoy not watching our favorite genre decline further into niche oblivion.
Anyways, sorry for ranting at you in particular, was just holding that one in too long!
Couldn't you also turn that argument upside down? If they hadn't censored the outfits we probably would have seen one or two "pre-order canceled" posts as well.Jesus christ people they look like children, how can you be against any sort of censoring of which amounts to something that literally has no effect on the gameplay. Those of you cancelling your pre-order over this need to reassess your self-identified moniker as "gamers" and need to ask the deep question of "why does putting clothes over characters that look like little girls enrage me so much?".
I thought they all were really bad and awkward. I'd rather not have another joke about women in revealing clothing, they're never funny.Why? Most of the stuff is pretty harmless.
In fact, I can't think of a single "bad" sexual joke.
I have very little issue with fantastical designs that include armor platings or chain mail. I'm not asking for realism.
From a previously posted picture in this thread:
I do however have a problem with 15 year olds wearing thongs into battle. I'm not sure where you are getting confused with the distinction between the two.
Because I'm against censorship, this is one of the few times I'll let it slip because I want the game so much, I've already not bought games in the past over censorship.
Jesus christ people they look like children, how can you be against any sort of censoring of which amounts to something that literally has no effect on the gameplay. Those of you cancelling your pre-order over this need to reassess your self-identified moniker as "gamers" and need to ask the deep question of "why does putting clothes over characters that look like little girls enrage me so much?".
Love it when people bring up this argument. Violence in games is often justified. Dressing up, again, what looks like 8 year old girls in fetish gear? Nope.
"Hey look, you can kill humans!" isn't exactly a promotional tool for games, yet sadly, especially in Japan "Hey look, there are pre-pubescent girls in revealing outfits!" is. There's a reason it's so prevalent in niche games. It's to ensure it sells, at the very least, to the creeper otakus.
I guess you shouldn't buy very many English versions of games, anime, etc. because the act of localization is in of itself (sometimes) a form of censorship/non-censorship modification.
Got it, so you're okay with any an all instances of games and media that portray models of literal children in skimpy outfits with the intent of sexualizing that underage image. That is what you're saying when you blanket state you're against censorship.
I thought they all were really bad and awkward. I'd rather not have another joke about women in revealing clothing, they're never funny.
"Hey look, you can kill humans" isn't a selling point??Love it when people bring up this argument. Violence in games is often justified. Dressing up, again, what looks like 8 year old girls in fetish gear? Nope.
"Hey look, you can kill humans!" isn't exactly a promotional tool for games, yet sadly, especially in Japan "Hey look, there are pre-pubescent girls in revealing outfits!" is. There's a reason it's so prevalent in niche games. It's to ensure it sells, at the very least, to the creeper otakus.
Couldn't you also turn that argument upside down? If they hadn't censored the outfits we probably would have seen one or two "pre-order canceled" posts as well.
You're complaining about women wearing miniskirts into battle like that's some thing exclusive to Japanese developers. You said this looks closer to something like Lightning returns than archetypal FF based on the art you've seen when the screens I've posted have a few of those archetypes you posted chibi'ed down for this game. If your impression of this game is that the art is similar to Lightning Returns, then you just haven't seen very much of the game.
So you're okay with censorship as long as it's the things you're against.Got it, so you're okay with any an all instances of games and media that portray models of literal children in skimpy outfits with the intent of sexualizing that underage image. That is what you're saying when you blanket state you're against censorship.
Got it, so you're okay with any an all instances of games and media that portray models of literal children in skimpy outfits with the intent of sexualizing that underage image. That is what you're saying when you blanket state you're against censorship.
"Hey look, you can kill humans" isn't a selling point??
Mortal Kombat and Fatalities.
GTA and killing hookers.
These were huge selling points.
Censorship imposed by governments are shit.
Censorship imposed by private business looking to appeal to more customers is just logic.
Screw costume censorship, that stuff is minor, same with age change, but at least keep the text intact.
I hope the changes in text do pop up on the internet somewhere. Only censored part I am really bothered with.
I like both versions of the outfits, but I hate pushed censorship/modification. Why don't give us a choice in the options menu?
I can't help but laugh at the choice of wording.
Putting aside for the moment any arguments about "what is worse violence or sex" the majority of violent video games do at least do something to contextualize what is happening on screen.And people who choose to murder what looks like humans......?
I'm generally against censorship, but I'm not terribly bothered by the slight costume change... As long as we still get that super revealing costume for the cute boy character ; )
And so what if they look like children, they aren't real. Maybe you need to ask yourself, "why does skimpy clothes over fictional characters that look like little girls with big ass heads enrage me so much?".
.