• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

USgamer on a rape allusion in Castlevania: Lords of Shadow 2

AppleMIX

Member
2014-01-1322_05_57-tw98ctm.png
wgDJReA.gif
 
Since when did video game journalists start to think that they're a part of the creative process? Is this where their incestuous relationship with publishers has gotten us?
 

Mesoian

Member

Everyone involved in this conversation is using very bold words.

We'll see how adult your game is when it's released.
We'll see how sexualized this game is when it's released.
We'll see who has egg on their face when this game is released.

Since when did video game journalists start to think that they're a part of the creative process? Is this where their incestuous relationship with publishers has gotten us?

It's always been this way dude. I remember reading stuff like this in the 90's when DN3D was the big news. And the articles surrounding Mortal Kombat? Forget it.
 

Phatcorns

Member
I need to see the scene myself. The fact the vampire just kills the father and drinks the mother's blood instead I guess is sexual because he chose the woman, but I'm not sure I see it just from the description either.
 

Kinyou

Member
I still have some confusion because it appears at one time it showed the child being fed upon, whereas now it doesn't.
Did a journalist describe it? I only read that bit that Cox himself said that they had this in at some point but already removed it because it was too much for the marketing department. It would be weird if the journalists all saw different builds.
 
Did a journalist describe it? I only read that bit that Cox himself said that they had this in at some point but already removed it because it was too much for the marketing department. It would be weird if the journalists all saw different builds.

The other three previews all said all 3 were fed upon but the child wasn't shown being fed on. The author in OP article claims she only saw woman fed upon. So, either she didn't see it all, or they changed it.

You're right about that version being removed, but it's not clear if anyone saw it.
 
there's a clockwork orange video game?

No, not as far as I know. My comment comes from the fact that Kat seems like the attack on the family scene shouldn't be happening from a perspective of a protagonist (her remarking something about how it'd be better if it wasn't first-person, or whatnot), and A Clockwork Orange was the first thing that crossed my mind with a terrible and villainous protagonist.

I guess I (childishly) included Jeremy in my previous comment because of his disrespectful, kneejerk-shitting upon towards one of the users commenting with a well-reasoned rebuttal in the comments section of that editorial.
 
ITT: People think Bram Stoker created vampires or something.

I don't think people think that. I think they know that dracula/vampire lore has evolved over hundreds of years. Initially a metaphor for a blood-thirsty tyrant (blood-thirsty in the metaphorical sense) that had people tortured and killed in the most gruesome of ways, the seductive, sexualized version of dracula is actually a few notches toned down from the lore's even darker origins.
 

Griss

Member
It's bizarre, but it's also standard - killable children mean a refused classification, blood is T but urine is M and semen is AO (and thus effectively refused classification), killing American soldiers except when playing German or Chinese soldier means refused distribution even if you're classified, and so on. Why is catering to her sensitivities worse than catering to these sensitivities? If it isn't, why don't we have multiple threads going on GAF about these assaults on artistic integrity?

It's especially striking because the killing of a child in the very same scene WAS cut by the publisher, and no one in this thread seems to mind.



This is important, too. Drac having the option of meta-raping everything he can get his hands on is honestly way less potentially offensive, IMO, because it pushes him further toward being an elemental force of pure evil instead of focusing on that thinly-veiled Mina Harper metaphor.

I actually comment on that stuff all the time. I have a huge problem with the current classification system, and what our society considers acceptable / unacceptable. I agree that it isn't discussed here too often.
 
So he feeds on all three, but he treats the woman a little differently? I want to know how differenf. Did he touch her in certain body areas?

I want to know how her feeding is "sexualized" goddammit!

Yeah, this. Throwing out her initial belief that Drac only feeds on the wife, which turned out to be wrong, all you're left with is the fact that it takes place in first person view, which doesn't really...I mean, that inherently doesn't seem like it'd be sexualizing the murder of the woman alone, if anybody at all.

We won't know either way until we actually see the scene in question, but I definitely get the feeling that Kat missed something, wrote about what she thought she saw, and then called for censorship.

Not very good journalism, but then, you know.
 

zeldablue

Member
Hopefully she never played Silent Hill 2.
W-why?
Oh...Pyramid Head?

Hmm well in Rapeplay the player is supposed to be aroused and excited by the box art.

In this game I think they want the player to fell bad and ashamed...?

So it's not bad? If Rapeplay was designed to make Japan question it's "rape culture" instead of encourage it then I don't think it'd be as harmful as it is.

In this instance, the player is suppose to feel some sort of morality...right?
 

Mman235

Member
Of course. I never said otherwise.

The wording of your posts made it sound like you were specifically focusing on the male-on-female part of things, but apparently I misinterpreted that. We're basically agreeing on the general point though so whatever.
 

Mona

Banned
Everyone involved in this conversation is using very bold words.

We'll see how adult your game is when it's released.

i just want to point out, and i hope im not putting words in your mouth that you didn't mean, but adult is not the same thing as mature, its not hard at all to make a game that should only be played by adults
 
Yeah, a big part of this rests on whether or not the Very Serious Moment animation for the other characters is just "press button, people dead" but a sexy long bodice-ripping neck kiss for the woman. I'm not really gathering a clear picture from any of the articles.
 

CalebW

Banned
Good that they're not changing anything. I'm buying the game now. Not because of this "controversy" but because the first game gave me the God of War title I was looking for that GoW3 never did.
 

Valnen

Member
I'm all for artistic integrity, maintaining it and all that stuff. They have made Castlevania into their own derivative. Some might love them for that others might hate them for it. Consider me in the latter.

I just want to play good games. The LOS games are good games (in my opinion of course), so I will play them.
 
Yeah, it could totally be that way around. It just seems like, in the way the first article was framed, that the writer said "this is uncomfortable because rape undertones" and the developer agreed with that assessment. I could've read this totally the wrong way, though. I could be giving them way too much credit for their writing for a God of War clone.

That being said, regardless of how smart or dumb the writers of Castlevania actually are, people getting defensive out of hand on the game's behalf because they don't think vampire fiction plays on rape are completely missing the point and are obfuscating what's actually worth debating here.


"Did you feel uncomfortable playing that scene?" Castlevania: Lords of Shadow 2 producer Dave Cox asks me.

I'm sitting in a roundtable interview with a handful of journalists after having just spent more than an hour playing Lords of Shadow 2...

...Yes, I told Cox. That scene did in fact make me uncomfortable. His reply is so swift that I can barely even get the word "yes" out of my mouth: "That's what we wanted. That's exactly what we wanted." [Cox continues to talk]

That sounds, to me, like Cox posed a question to a roundtable, Bailey said "yes," and then Cox immediately went off on how it was all his artistic vision. The subsequent comments related to this (as related by this and the other articles) all seem to Cox pointing to Dracula's need to kill and the violence as the central point of discomfort here (see: him claiming that the marketing department forced them to censor the image of a young girl's corpse after Dracula feeds on her).

It sounds like Bailey never actually tells Cox outright why the scene made her uncomfortable, but the article is framed in such a way that implies that Cox is agreeing with her assessment and claiming that her specific take on it was intentional.
 

Kinyou

Member
The other three previews all said all 3 were fed upon but the child wasn't shown being fed on. The author in OP article claims she only saw woman fed upon. So, either she didn't see it all, or they changed it.

You're right about that version being removed, but it's not clear if anyone saw it.
oh, I see. That's rather weird.
 

casmith07

Member
TV and movies have rape scenes and are considered "powerful," "thought-provoking," etc.

Video game has a "rape" scene that's 100% implied through hyperbole of the interviewing journalist and people want to be up in arms.

But I guess that's the whole "movies are art, games are not" argument that we all hold near and dear to our hearts, too.

Oh well. :(
 

Tenrius

Member
Play Beyond, lol.

I'm actually going to, in a few weeks or so. That scene in Heavy Rain was uncomfortable to watch and funny at the same time (because of how ridiculous all those space ninjas coming for you looked in that apartment). I hope I'm not spoiling the fact that Heavy Rain is really a game about space ninja rapists for anyone here lol.
 

BocoDragon

or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Realize This Assgrab is Delicious
It's always been this way dude. I remember reading stuff like this in the 90's when DN3D was the big news. And the articles surrounding Mortal Kombat? Forget it.
The outcry back then was very little from the press itself (such as it was). It tended to be driven by the likes of concerned parents groups, politicians, Joseph Lieberman, Jack Thompson, etc.

There has definitely been a sea change lately in the way that "progressive" views have been used to criticize and try to shape games, with journalists themselves, with the incentive to bait clicks, often leading the charge.
 

ezekial45

Banned
Why don't you try asking the other writers of the previews on twitter about the scene? There seems to be some confused about what exactly happens to the man.
 

Tenrius

Member
That sounds, to me, like Cox posed a question to a roundtable, Bailey said "yes," and then Cox immediately went off on how it was all his artistic vision. The subsequent comments related to this (as related by this and the other articles) all seem to Cox pointing to Dracula's need to kill and the violence as the central point of discomfort here (see: him claiming that the marketing department forced them to censor the image of a young girl's corpse after Dracula feeds on her).

It sounds like Bailey never actually tells Cox outright why the scene made her uncomfortable, but the article is framed in such a way that implies that Cox is agreeing with her assessment and claiming that her specific take on it was intentional.

The way it sounds, I think it might have been a purely rhetorical question, even. Which would only support your point.
 
Yeah, a big part of this rests on whether or not the Very Serious Moment animation for the other characters is just "press button, people dead" but a sexy long bodice-ripping neck kiss for the woman. I'm not really gathering a clear picture from any of the articles.

Judging by the fact that this is the only article that says the father did not get its blood sucked, it's entirely possible that it's actually player controlled and it could be a "press A to kill instantly, press B to suck blood" QTE affair. Either way, the other previews have satisfied me in the belief that the article we're discussing is making a mountain out of a non-existent molehill.
 

Sn4ke_911

If I ever post something in Japanese which I don't understand, please BAN me.
I'm all for letting devs make the game they want to make. If it's too extreme they will get cut down by the publisher but Journos should just shut the hell up and stop complaining about this kind of stuff.

God, i can't even imagine how much shit Kojima will get for MGSV.
 
That sounds, to me, like Cox posed a question to a roundtable, Bailey said "yes," and then Cox immediately went off on how it was all his artistic vision. The subsequent comments related to this (as related by this and the other articles) all seem to Cox pointing to Dracula's need to kill and the violence as the central point of discomfort here (see: him claiming that the marketing department forced them to censor the image of a young girl's corpse after Dracula feeds on her).

It sounds like Bailey never actually tells Cox outright why the scene made her uncomfortable, but the article is framed in such a way that implies that Cox is agreeing with her assessment and claiming that her specific take on it was intentional.

Ah, ok, I see what you're saying. It's easy to imagine a developer jumping to the ~no it's my vision~ defense immediately, but if Bailey never actually said her piece it's hard to gauge what's actually going in in the article.
 

Eknots

Member
How about people just let them make the game they want, if people get offended it's not the greatest but it's their choice to put the content they want in the game, not yours.
 
Why am I not surprised Far Cry 3 isn't on the list? No one really seemed to have made an issue of it when happened.

http://youtu.be/yh6mgHgOJhE?t=3m28s

The only difference between this game and others is that the man was the victim of rape.
The media in general is very selective when it comes to making an outrage. Tomb Raider's outrage was insane pre-launch, then when the game actually shipped no one made a comment about it, because it turned out to be pretty harmless. Beyond has a scene that clearly depicts attempted rape against a 16 year old girl, yet no one made a comment.
 
The article could have done a better job expounding on the imagery and maybe referenced the past metaphors in older Dracula stories. I guess I feel I missed the point. The producer says he was going for an emotional reaction from the player and seemingly got it. If something makes me feel uncomfortable, I'd probably put that forward as a discussion piece for the audience, instead of what honestly feels like a soapbox rant.

I mean, I like Kat Bailey's work, but I just don't feel like there is a lot to go on here.

I'm honestly more annoyed by the few journos who have already gone the "snark at folks and talk down to them" route over any discussion.
 

Tenrius

Member
I'm all for letting devs make the game they want to make. If it's too extreme they will get cut down by the publisher but Journos should just shut the hell up and stop complaining about this kind of stuff.

God, i can't even imagine how much shit Kojima will get for MGSV.

He'll probably get a free pass, because Japan is weiiiiiiird. At least I've seen arguments like that in gaming press in the past.
 

EvaUnit02

Neo Member
I can't believe the offense is that a vampire feeding on a woman and not her other two family members is being perceived as an allegory for rape. The sheer level of WTF is off the chart.
 

IvorB

Member
Gaming commentary never ceases to amaze me. People can see this:

Poseiden Death Scene (God of War 3)

and not bat an eye-lid but Dracula drinking a woman's blood or Lara getting groped by some thug and everyone is up in arms. WTF? That's the real question here for me.

I really hope the devs stand their ground on this. It's just ridiculous.
 
I read the article before coming across this thread or seeing any of the twitter backlash against Kat and US Gamer.

My takeaway after reading is that this is not what I want from "Castlevania". Can Konami please bring back Iga?!

I'm looking forward to LoS2, but hell yes I can get behind that. I would be all over a new Igavania like white on rice, screw the haters. Put it on PS4 and get all new art.

...what if Vanillaware made a Metroidvania? *drool*
 

AHA-Lambda

Member
That sounds, to me, like Cox posed a question to a roundtable, Bailey said "yes," and then Cox immediately went off on how it was all his artistic vision. The subsequent comments related to this (as related by this and the other articles) all seem to Cox pointing to Dracula's need to kill and the violence as the central point of discomfort here (see: him claiming that the marketing department forced them to censor the image of a young girl's corpse after Dracula feeds on her).

It sounds like Bailey never actually tells Cox outright why the scene made her uncomfortable, but the article is framed in such a way that implies that Cox is agreeing with her assessment and claiming that her specific take on it was intentional.

That's exactly how it sounds, just shitty games journalism once more.
 
Top Bottom