lol
jumpingtoconclusions.gaf
Single player in halo 4 was only like 5 hours.
No one cared cuz it had multiplayer.
I was joking, was the sarcasm not obvious?
lol
jumpingtoconclusions.gaf
Single player in halo 4 was only like 5 hours.
No one cared cuz it had multiplayer.
I sure hope it is this. I never played 4, loved the lore in the first 3, so looking forward to this if that is the case.
Why is this forum so pessimistic lately? It really seems like everyone takes and runs with the worst possible interpretation of every bit of information we're given on a game...
Lol, well then, I was presuming that it showcases that there's more neat story details off the beaten path in the game (which I really enjoy) rather than it meaning "Game's super short, everything's told through terminals" like many are thinking here.
If you have never played Halo 4 it has by far the best campaign lore wise. First three aren't even close.I sure hope it is this. I never played 4, loved the lore in the first 3, so looking forward to this if that is the case.
Yeah I kind of wish mods would ban people that are very obviously shit posting.And this is going to be literally every Halo topic on this forum. Kinda feel bad for anyone on here that is actually a Halo fan.
Don't even talk good about it or be positive, else you work for 343
Yeah, I'm sure there was tons of Halo discussion going on!
Come on. You know it wasn't just that thing that got the OT shut down.
Read my edit captain343
And this is going to be literally every Halo topic on this forum. Kinda feel bad for anyone on here that is actually a Halo fan.
Don't even talk good about it or be positive, else you work for 343
It's bigger and longer and nobody "warned" anyone and the thread title is comically misleading and everyone will ignore this post or scold me for not being clear enough and the bolded is spot on. It's about replayability and surprise.
Feel sorry that you have to read some of this.It's bigger and longer and nobody "warned" anyone and the thread title is comically misleading and everyone will ignore this post or scold me for not being clear enough and the bolded is spot on. It's about replayability and surprise.
Oh, you're in for a very rude awakening if you liked the lore in Halo 1-3
If you have never played Halo 4 it has by far the best campaign lore wise. First three aren't even close.
Its not Halo the brand's fault. Its the shit 343 has done to it. If a broken, lying, shit company was slowly ruining your favorite franchise, you'd be pissed too.And this is going to be literally every Halo topic on this forum. Kinda feel bad for anyone on here that is actually a Halo fan.
Don't even talk good about it or be positive, else you work for 343
Read my edit captain343
It's bigger and longer and nobody "warned" anyone and the thread title is comically misleading and everyone will ignore this post or scold me for not being clear enough and the bolded is spot on. It's about replayability and surprise.
There are a lot of people that have never played Halo (or played it very little) just here to talk crap about it. It sucks but it is what it is.Threads like these make me glad I have no investment in this series/franchise. Cause holy it feels like there's no middle ground. Everyone's furious or blissful ecstasy/hope, and hard to get a good read between the two.
@_@
I'm a huge Halo fan, I've even got a life size statue of Master Chief, but it's hard for me to be positive of 343i. I've yet to enjoy their work on the games in the franchise so I remain sceptical. Not every Halo fan is positive or an optimist when it comes to 343i.And this is going to be literally every Halo topic on this forum. Kinda feel bad for anyone on here that is actually a Halo fan.
Don't even talk good about it or be positive, else you work for 343
Gonna give Ready at Dawn a run for their money.
Halo 4 is the whole universe lore.Which one is it?
Or is it somewhere in between these statements with 4?
I will find out this Fall.
yep I'll do that too
heck it too me 7 years to finally lock up during halo 3's warthog scene and see the Ark in full glory
Which one is it?
Or is it somewhere in between these statements with 4?
I will find out this Fall.
Halo 4 is the whole universe lore.
Halo 1 to 3 isn't. In fact in a lot of ways Master Chief is even different in the first three games. Halo 4 John is much closer to expanded universe John and I like that John more.
If you haven't been following the extended lore past Cole Protocol (which is what I did), and based all of your understanding of the universe on Halo 1-3, you're going to be completely lost and confused.
I hope that's not publicist speak for 'It's really short, please don't tell anyone'
The last proper Halo game by 343? Key plot details/motivations were just either missing or glanced over for the immediate story that they were telling unless you bothered to go after the terminals. Felt like lazy storytelling especially compared to Bungie's efforts. At least they ensured that all the relevant knowledge you needed was already given to you. This yet again sounds similar to what they did in 4, and 4 was a shorter experience than 3 and Reach (check howlongtobeat, on average people beat halo 4 an hour faster than they did halo 3).What previous experience applies this to Halo campaigns?
Halo has always had short campaigns. Halo 3 was one of the best shooter campaigns I've played, and it was 5 hours long?
First thing I thought of.
I was going to wait on purchase given how badly they fucked up MCC anyway. If this turns out to be short on the campaign then I'm going to wait for it drop significantly in price as well.
It's bigger and longer and nobody "warned" anyone and the thread title is comically misleading and everyone will ignore this post or scold me for not being clear enough and the bolded is spot on. It's about replayability and surprise.
Go ahead and show me how 343 has improved the Halo franchise since Bungie left it. You want to discuss the game and protect 343's image. Go ahead. Prove me wrong instead of having smartass remarks.Okay, regardless, that has nothing to do with 3/4's of the people in that OT. Anyways, go look at any other community thread.
Wow, you're a nice person.
"Captain343" apparently
Ah come on. Patently untrue.Its not Halo the brand's fault. Its the shit 343 has done to it. If a broken, lying, shit company was slowly ruining your favorite franchise, you'd be pissed too.
If Nintendo decided to make a Zelda collection, and a sequel that they sold to fans for $60, hyped it up as the second coming, and then disappeared when you couldnt even load the main menu, Nintendo fans would be pissed off too
Let's actually have a productive discussion on what we know of the campaign. Hopefully it can bring the thread to track.
Do we know any of the following:
1) How much, if any, of the story will rely on the Halo Channel, terminals, and other things of the sort? In absolute terms and relative to Halo 4?
2) Do we know if there will be any differences in areas, collectibles, and setpieces between playing single and co-op?
3) Do we know if we will get 8-10 missions like previous games, even if they are longer and bigger?
4) Do we know the details of the split between the two groups in the campaign?
5) The E3 demo suggested a move towards more real-time storytelling (even in "custscene-y" events) -- is the split more in favor of real-time action this time?
Go ahead and show me how 343 has improved the Halo franchise since Bungie left it. You want to discuss the game and protect 343's image. Go ahead. Prove me wrong instead of having smartass remarks.
Yep that's the real John which is also the John 343i portrays.I only read the original trilogy of books too, so is he like those? (I liked him in those)
Gotcha. I will have to read up then.
It's bigger and longer and nobody "warned" anyone and the thread title is comically misleading and everyone will ignore this post or scold me for not being clear enough and the bolded is spot on. It's about replayability and surprise.
Making excuses for why the sp is 5 hours long 4 months early? Jesus 343 is a mess.
The last proper Halo game by 343? Key plot details/motivations were just either missing or glanced over for the immediate story that they were telling unless you bothered to go after the terminals. Felt like lazy storytelling especially compared to Bungie's efforts. At least they ensured that all the relevant knowledge you needed was already given to you. This yet again sounds similar to what they did in 4, and 4 was a shorter experience than 3 and Reach (check howlongtobeat, on average people beat halo 4 an hour faster than they did halo 3).
Oh you're that guy.I already posted my history with 343. Ill also include the fact that 343 blocking of a refund for halo mcc for its fans who couldnt access any part of the game, which led to my xbox account being banned because apparently asking for a refund for the same game to 2 different xbox reps is grounds for a ban.
Oh no. Damage control this early?
This is going to be a very corridor heavy 6 hour campaign isn't it?
It's bigger and longer and nobody "warned" anyone and the thread title is comically misleading and everyone will ignore this post or scold me for not being clear enough and the bolded is spot on. It's about replayability and surprise.
No it didnt load at all for some people(includig myself).Ah come on. Patently untrue.
Up until June they patched it pretty much every month.
TMCC was too much of a mess for any community interacting company to run from, and they didn't.*
*They've been too quiet about it in the last month and there are still issues.
I've criticised them plenty.
If Nintendo decided to make a Zelda collection, and a sequel that they sold to fans for $60, hyped it up as the second coming, and then disappeared when you couldnt even load the main menu, Nintendo fans would be pissed off too
And this is going to be literally every Halo topic on this forum. Kinda feel bad for anyone on here that is actually a Halo fan.
Yep that's the real John which is also the John 343i portrays.
People are jumping on this because it's weird PR speak. A normal response would have been "it's got a deep story mode so please enjoy!" or "there's lots to explore!", not "you might miss a lot of story if you don't go out looking for it." It's a passive suggestion of poor level design and/or length, which is exactly what people are concerned about. There's pretty much zero trust on GAF toward 343 after last year. There's an extremely good reason for that.lol
jumpingtoconclusions.gaf
Truly a non-biased source! And wow you're taking this personally. Why the worries?It's bigger and longer and nobody "warned" anyone and the thread title is comically misleading and everyone will ignore this post or scold me for not being clear enough and the bolded is spot on. It's about replayability and surprise.
Threads like these make me glad I have no investment in this series/franchise. Cause holy it feels like there's no middle ground. Everyone's furious or blissful ecstasy/hope, and hard to get a good read between the two.
@_@