they at least have first-party IP to fall back on and had the sense not to overengineer the system to the point where a first-year price cut was impossible.
On its own, this nicely summarizes Nintendo's current hardware strategy.
they at least have first-party IP to fall back on and had the sense not to overengineer the system to the point where a first-year price cut was impossible.
I think this makes the platform Nintendo's first sustained loss leader.
I do feel it's definitely the right move though if they want the thing to get above ho-hum sales in the West. Game pricing should probably be their next major consideration.
Huh, that's probably relevant to bring up as the iPod Touch DID take the spot I mainly used the PSP for (playing music) while being able to do other things. It may well have been that a not-insignificant chunk of the PSP userbase was in a similar position, and unlike me they may have failed to find more to keep them interested. The Vita could obstinately carry the media player torch, and it actually is probably the most desirable non-smartphone video playing device that could reasonably fit in a pocket (assuming nothing's in it), but most people who want to watch videos will either do it on a bigger screen or a device they'd carry with them anyway. At least it doesn't have the embarrassing misstep of trying to treat the game format as a legitimate movie delivery format.* This sounds like I'm suddenly moving the goalposts. I'm not immune to that practice anymore than others. Nonetheless, that was my intent of meaning when I wrote "handheld", though. Obviously, the iPod Touch is a handheld, generally speaking, and by that meaning alone it would shatter my case.
Isn't this why we have the eshop?is there really a confirmed MSRP drop?
This.
39.99 is a ridiculous base price for some of the games on the handheld.
Too bad most "mainstream" stores don't stock niche and unique games that really fill out the 3DS selection.
Isn't this why we have the eshop?
I already have an XL, but they should drop the XL to $150ish.
It's a great system, the vanilla 3DS is actually pretty terrible.
I bought the original and XL at launch and I still have both. I've got pretty big hands.
After some time with both I find I prefer the original for several reasons.
1) Far better IQ
2) Easier pocketability
3) Feels Lighter
4) More comfortable (although both are uncomfortable after a while, the XL starts hurting my hands almost immediately. I am a "gripper" and the thin rounded base of the XL digs into my palms)
Edit: After having more time to review the info I got with another person, I have decided to remove the part of my post suggesting this is a MSRP. The $139.99 is legit and will happen in 2 weeks from at least one retailer but the info I have is kind of confusing on if it is a MSRP drop or just a retailer discount.
From CAG
Nintendo twisting the knife
No, this is Nintendo waking up. This has nothing to do with the Vita and is about the iPod and iPad competition.
Really, when it comes to the Vita it's more like the attempted hostage situation in Firefly's pilot episode: shoot and move on to the real problem. But in many ways it seems more like Nintendo and Sony have a mutual interest in creating a strong gaming based for dedicated handhelds, even if they'll turn around and fight with one another afterwards.No, this is Nintendo waking up. This has nothing to do with the Vita and has everything to do with the iPod and iPad.
agreed. though I'm still not sure how much audience overlap there is. or, I'm not sure if someone looking to buy an iOS device is going to be content taking a one-trick-pony gaming device in its place. You don't get an iOS device to game. You get one because gaming is one of the many, many things you can do.
Maybe for Japan. But they've really dicked around way too long. If you have any children in your life, it's amazing the foothold iOS has with them. Apple is to them the way Nintendo was to previous generations.
3DS needs to be $99, 3DSXL - $149 for it to start to sell really well in the west.
Clearly you haven't experienced the eShop if you think a shitty low-spec Nintendo phone with $40 games would compete with the endless free/99c games of iOS or Android.all you need is a nintendo phone that runs on android and the iphone is fucked.
iphone isn't even that popular compared to android phones, android is eating their lunch
all you need is a nintendo phone that runs on android and the iphone is fucked. the iphone is still leagues behing the DS when it comes to games
agreed. though I'm still not sure how much audience overlap there is. or, I'm not sure if someone looking to buy an iOS device is going to be content taking a one-trick-pony gaming device in its place. You don't get an iOS device to game. You get one because gaming is one of the many, many things you can do.
Kids buy iOS devices just to play games on them.
It's probable that games are THEY key factor, with everything else ensuring that it's worth it. If you eliminated games though you probably would see numbers comparable, possibly lower, to other handhelds, and likely mainly being of interest to enthusiasts who are fascinated with something new and novel as the iOS platform once was.Really? Is their any evidence to back up that if there were no camera, apps besides games, web browser, or connection to iTunes people would still buy the devices?
An iPad Mini.
Really? Is their any evidence to back up that if there were no camera, apps besides games, web browser, or connection to iTunes people would still buy the devices?
is there really a confirmed MSRP drop?
This.
39.99 is a ridiculous base price for some of the games on the handheld.
Yeah, some genres work on touch but others are just a disaster.If my iPad was a gaming machine, I would throw it in the trash.
Don't know about MK, but Street Fighter and KOF on iPhone are pretty cringe-worthy to me. Touch gaming should stick to games that can be done well within the limitations, really.Yeah, some genres work on touch but others are just a disaster.
My mate showed me Mortal Kombat on the iphone the other day. He loves it. I was like 'oh yeah, looks alright, pity about the lack of buttons - how do you do a special move?'
"just hit the 'S' button at the bottom"
WHAT.
Also, I agree about that extra stuff adding value, but Nintendo are just so behind the curve with browsing/internet/messaging etc compared to Google and Apple that I really think they wouldn't be selling points.
So, where's my second helping of ambassador games?
you can't blame Nintendo for trying to sell it for $250 initially
I didn't pay $250 for mine, I have to admit. I had to pay $346~ and it was a great deal, since it launched at $461~ around here. And I honestly, un-fanboy-ish-ly don't regret my purchase, but that's just me being used to the awful pricing here I guess.Of course you can. They gambled and lost.
(And they actually found some idiots like me who were willing to pay that price at launch.)
I didn't pay $250 for mine, I have to admit. I had to pay $346~ and it was a great deal, since it launched at $461~ around here. And I honestly, un-fanboy-ish-ly don't regret my purchase, but that's just me being used to the awful pricing here I guess.
Clearly you haven't experienced the eShop if you think a shitty low-spec Nintendo phone with $40 games would compete with the endless free/99c games of iOS or Android.
Anecdotal time : every. single. family i know with young kids use iOS for their kids' games. Not a single one owns a dedicated handheld. If you think a Nintendo phone would suddenly turn the tide on something that has completely flipped handheld gaming on its head, you're deluded.
If my iPad was a gaming machine, I would throw it in the trash. I love it for web browsing, maps, contacts, applications, mail, and its overall multifunctional aspect.
If my iPad was a gaming machine, I would throw it in the trash. I love it for web browsing, maps, contacts, applications, mail, and its overall multifunctional aspect. If Nintendo had that for a future console it would definitely add more value to it.
Steetpass for the 3DS was a function I never really expected, but I ended liking it A LOT. I also like the function that tracks gaming times, last played, first played, and average experience. Little features like that add a lot to the gaming experience. Having a legitimate web browser that works with most websites and mp4 video functions would only add to the experience.
So you're talking about Nintendo going third party? Or you want them to create a phone that runs Android? Neither of which are going to happen, but just curious.of course it would. it's all about content. Regardless of price (and they would have to cut it for some of the more throwaway content in order to compete) the nintendo phone would make a killing.
An android phone with proper gaming controls and decades of nintendo content would bury the iphone, which has been losing marketshare anyway. Nintendo has more cache with kids, nintendo has more recognisable characters, nintendo has a vastly superior library of games