privitsan02
Member
Assuming this stuff is true, they wanna get rid of Chief?
Lol.
Chief is Halo.
Well, we had ODST and Reach without Chief and they were fine. Did better than Halo 4 and 5 anyway.
Best wishes.
Assuming this stuff is true, they wanna get rid of Chief?
Lol.
Chief is Halo.
Someone did something gross in the third floor bathroom!
It all sounds plausible.
Except there is alot of bullshit like his comments on splitscreen even though 343i have stated it never got that far in development.It all sounds plausible.
You can't make him live forever either.
I consider Halo 5 campaign to have the best feeling gameplay/gunplay out of all the Halo games for sure.Halo 5's campaign had the best gameplay of any halo campaign. It was the story that kind of sucked but that holds true for a lot of Halo games.
Halo 5 had much better level designs than Halo 4 which was mostly a corridor crawl.I consider Halo 5 campaign to have the best feeling gameplay/gunplay out of all the Halo games for sure.
But I also consider the Halo 5 campaign to be the worst campaign out of all the Halos. I didn't mind the story. I just didn't like the level design and the enemy encounter scenarios at all.
You may feel that way but it wasn't to me. I had a far better impression of the Halo 4 campaign when I finished it for the first time than for Halo 5, despite preferring Halo 5's gameplay/gunplay and actually liking some of the promethans more. That's how bad I found the level design/enemy encounters. Don't even get me started about the multiple warden fights. So poorly done.Halo 5 had much better level designs than Halo 4 which was mostly a corridor crawl.
If the goal is to have a product that evolves to maintain/grow its audience, rather than catering to an "old guard," I'd say switching main characters twenty years later is justifiable.
How is that anymore reliable when people have have frequently made and released fake images of Smash Bros to even the fake NX controllers on "more reputable" websites to leak to.
Well, we had ODST and Reach without Chief and they were fine. Did better than Halo 4 and 5 anyway.
Best wishes.
Read through all the messages yea.....still don't believe it. However, it would be more believable if Master Chief fucked Cortana and had a holo/human hybrid baby.
I mean, that is what 343 has been leading up too, right gaf?
Original story of Halo 5 involved chief essentially running around the Galaxy destroying the remaining Halo rings and Locke being sent out to stop him. Cortana is basically communicating to him like she does in Halo 5 to get him to do this because if the Halo rings are gone, the reclemation essentially gets jumpstarted by AI as a safely measure. The cloak was just a cloak, mostly just to symbolize loneliness. Yeah it's kind of cheesy.
No, they finally made better multiplayer than Bungie. They just need to improve their campaigns.343 should make a new IP.
No, they finally made better multiplayer than Bungie. They just need to improve their campaigns.
No, they finally made better multiplayer than Bungie. They just need to improve their campaigns.
Besides the warden fights, H5 easily has the best on foot combat in the series.I consider Halo 5 campaign to have the best feeling gameplay/gunplay out of all the Halo games for sure.
But I also consider the Halo 5 campaign to be the worst campaign out of all the Halos. I didn't mind the story. I just didn't like the level design and the enemy encounter scenarios at all.
The major issue is MS forcing devs to make old IP over and over and over. There's no need for more Halo games, it was what it was and that time has passed. I honestly don't think that the originals ever had a narrative or characters worthy of so many sequels, Master Chief himself is probably the most bland and uninteresting protagonist you could possible imagine.
The idea of going back to the Combat Evolved style of game is nice but I think 343 would make much better games if they were allowed to let their creative juices flow and create the story and the world and characters from the ground up according to their own personal interests, rather than being shoehorned onto Bungie's, that even Bungie wanted to move away from in the end.
Halo 5 selling over 5 million copies says otherwise. Also, please tell me how Master Chief is anymore bland than other big name characters from Sony or Nintendo? Compared to other FPS franchises that are popular today Halo has a far more expansive cast of memorable characters than anything else.The major issue is MS forcing devs to make old IP over and over and over. There's no need for more Halo games, it was what it was and that time has passed. I honestly don't think that the originals ever had a narrative or characters worthy of so many sequels, Master Chief himself is probably the most bland and uninteresting protagonist you could possible imagine.
The idea of going back to the Combat Evolved style of game is nice but I think 343 would make much better games if they were allowed to let their creative juices flow and create the story and the world and characters from the ground up according to their own personal interests, rather than being shoehorned onto Bungie's, that even Bungie wanted to move away from in the end.
I don't think that will stop them. But yeah, people shouldn't expect a developer named after a Halo character (343 Guilty Spark) to be creating a new IP."Forcing?"
Okay do you know why 343 is called 343i?
People don't go to work for 343i to make new games. Microsoft isn't "forcing" them to make more Halo. The men and woman of 343i went to work there with the intention to MAKE more Halo.
I swear that needs to be posted in the main post of every Halo thread so people would stop suggesting it.
"Forcing?"
Okay do you know why 343 is called 343i?
People don't go to work for 343i to make new games. Microsoft isn't "forcing" them to make more Halo. The men and woman of 343i went to work there with the intention to MAKE more Halo.
I swear that needs to be posted in the main post of every Halo thread so people would stop suggesting it.
Anonymous said:What do halo 5 population numbers look like? How many still play?
EquivalentExchange said:Halo 5 hovers between 10-15K. On some weekends when a new DLC drops, it hits around 20-25k.
I think the point people are trying to make when they say this is that even the most avid of Halo fans probably don't want to make Halo for their entire career and the structure of 343 (and MGS in general really) doesn't offer a great deal of creative freedom outside of their major tent pole franchises.It's called 343 yet people post this every time.
a longer campaign with impressive enemy AI and a less story-in-your-face approach to experiencing the levels, possibly akin to Combat Evolved.
Halo 5's campaign isn't perfect, but it much better than Halo 4's.I'm gonna say fake but...
This is what I wanted from Halo 5. Haven't played it myself yet but I know that's not it.
Okay do you know why 343 is called 343i?
Read through all the messages yea.....still don't believe it. However, it would be more believable if Master Chief fucked Cortana and had a holo/human hybrid baby.
I mean, that is what 343 has been leading up too, right gaf?
Almost assuredly bullshit, but damn do I want to believe.
That sounds sick.
Whoops. This is verifiably wrong.
Team Arena alone sees at least 35k+ unique players every day. It's also not the most popular playlist/game mode.
#TeamFake
Except he no longer works at 343 Industries, so how would he know that?Thats over the course of a day(24hrs). The leaker is talking about the current population playing not the cumulative over 24hrs.
#TeamReal
Thats over the course of a day(24hrs). The leaker is talking about the current population playing not the cumulative over 24hrs.
#TeamReal
He's emblematic of Halo and is actually a character with some depth if you're into the expanded universe. He's the most badass guy in the entire extended fiction bar none and almost absolutely no one could keep up with him.
Noble 6 was great because we knew that the SIIIs were well trained and capable of awesome shit. The notion that the character was a "hyper-lethal vector" that performed black ops for Ackerson was a neat idea, even if the character themselves purposefully lacked depth. They made up for it with Reach's ending, which was awesome. ODST has Buck, who continues to be Nathan Fillion, which is always acceptable.
The introduction of Locke as an alternative to Chief is somewhat problematic because the original narrative of his reveal is oppositional which directly generates an analogous opposition between 343's new lore (which hasn't exactly been well received, though certainly not absolutely panned) versus Bungie's old lore, which was more classic sci-fi. Outright replacing Chief with Locke evokes a sort of "OUR MASTER CHIEF IS SO MUCH BETTER THAN THIS OTHER DUMB MASTER CHIEF" feeling. Instead of Locke merely being a character that the players could have some interest in, his character is actively built in opposition to that of the Chief's. It's made even worse with the fact that Nightfall was poorly written and, instead of establishing Locke as an interesting character that's capable of feats of badassery that could rival the Master Chief, established him as an incompetent leader that lost almost his entire team on what should have been a simple mission.
For what it's worth the Gamestop trailer actually did a way better job of making Locke a badass. He looked like he was in fucking Vanquish or something.
I mean, really this analysis could go towards any of 343i's newer characters. Sarah Palmer? Kind of an asshole, actually antagonistic, somewhat incompetent. She didn't get fleshed out until she got her own spinoffs and comics, and at that point everyone was mortified that they were going to try and replace the Chief with her. Thorne and the rest of Majestic weren't even real people. You could give them any other faces, names, armor, and series of character traits and they would be wholly indistinguishable from what we got. The SIVs, the new generation that's supposedly much more advanced than the SIIIs and SIIs with their new armor compensating for their relatively weaker augmentations gave birth to a generation of dude-bro super soldiers that lack discipline and character as a whole.
It's probably harder to capture that SII and SIII lightning in a bottle again, though. SIIs are a group of super soliders raised since childhood to be the most advanced combat unit in the history of humanity. The books provide ample examples to show their cunning, discipline, and character depth through their interactions within their tiny family. The SIIIs do as well, but to a slightly lesser extent. The SIVs unfortunately have no such story. Helljumper, maybe, but it's mostly about Buck, who was already pretty much one of the best soldiers in the UNSC.
I hope this is included in a future post mortem of Halo 5!Someone did something gross in the third floor bathroom!
Depends on what your definition of "shit" is. Those saying it's one of the worst of all time and absolutely horrible can indeed fuck off since it's nowhere near either. However, it was a very disappointing entry in the series with a nonsensical story and very questionable design decisions (things that look like hub worlds being used as 30 second levels)This 'Halo 5 SP is shit' idiocy needs to fuck off.