Is this really true?
yes.
I knew this guy who tried a thing called Radical Honesty. He lost all his friends.
Is this really true?
Yes, I was the cashier.
Is this really true?
I was the security guard
It's a copypasta.
Is this really true?
Murray's definition of the meaning of the word "find" is different than most people's though.
Still not low enough, we need to go deeper.
Is this really true?
So then....maybe?
Sup bbyI was one of the milky-way bars
Is this really true?
If I were to give Sean Murray and Hello Games the biggest benefit of the doubt, I'd say they don't want to detail what is going on because they want meeting people in the game to be related to some sort of in-game surprise/event.
Why do so many people think that anyone charging for goods they've created is automatically some cartoonish hand-wringing miser only concerned about money?
Server problems on day 1? Maybe...seems logical
But anyways, carry on.
U riteFTFY
Probably not. Even if we find out it's technically possible it's probably something you'll never experience.
Is this really true?
What is your actual, official belief on the state of multiplayer and this game, laid out plain and simple?
Like let me just try to lay it out and you can correct me if I'm wrong.
- Sean said there was multiplayer in the past many times, despite it not being a focus
- "Multiplayer" in the context of this game means naming discoveries, and being able to see other players online, though this would be extremely rare
- No real interaction with others, just literally look at them, you can both move around and see the movements each other are making, you can't attack each other or chat or anything
- The box art lacking the online icon and saying 1 player and Steam saying 1 player are erroneous or otherwise simply downplaying the multiplayer since it's such a mild form of it
- The Wireshark packet scan showing no transmitted location data is erroneous because local instances are only spun up when two players get really close, so someone doing the test by themselves won't see anything
- The two players not being able to meet despite both being online at once are due to launch networking difficulties, and/or being in different real world locations, and/or not being in the same local instance
- In other words, in the future, maybe tomorrow for all we know, two people will actually see each other and move around near each other and see that movement and be like "whoa neat"
- Therefore Sean never lied, everything he said in the past is actually true, you never see what you look like until you see another real player etc. etc.
Is that about right?
Anyone else who can safely say this is their viewpoint?
hahahaha without fail.Is this really true?
It's a meme that you into which you insert any remotely famous person -- Sean Murray, Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump, you name it.
Please stop spreading mis-information. The servers are not overloaded, NMS simply does not have multiplayer. See Sean's own tweet:
https://twitter.com/NoMansSky/status/762688708764135425
Can humanity see anything at all though? Is our very own vision not just one big lie? We think we understand what we perceive, but is that really so?
Why are we hating so much on a game, simply for not being able to see others? I used to see my wife every single day. I thought I knew her. Her smile is still burned into my retina. I thought I would never have to miss that smile. But now I do.
My wife cheated on me with another man. Left me. I lost everything. I am now alone. I now see the true reality of our lives. The solitude. Knowing that, in the end, we'll always be on our own. It's sad, pathetic even. But it's a reality many of us will one day have to face.
I see nobody now, even though people are all around me. Besides me, even. Still, I do not see them. Even when they are right in front of me. However, this does not create hatred within me. On the contrary, I feel relieved. Like I am a new person, someone who is able to see the truth for once. I can see the weakness of humanity and it makes me stronger.
So no, I do not think two players meeting in No Man's Sky who are unable to "see" eachother is a bad thing. It's a reality many of us face each day. And I think it's cool a game as ambiguous as NMS has the guts to show that aspect of humanity.
Do you go through life missing the point all the time or just today?
The enjoyment of the game or its quality are not in question here. We're talking about deceit.
This post is too rational for this thread. You shouldn't be here.
What is your actual, official belief on the state of multiplayer and this game, laid out plain and simple?
Like let me just try to lay it out and you can correct me if I'm wrong.
- Sean said there was multiplayer in the past many times, despite it not being a focus
- "Multiplayer" in the context of this game means naming discoveries, and being able to see other players online, though this would be extremely rare
- No real interaction with others, just literally look at them, you can both move around and see the movements each other are making, you can't attack each other or chat or anything
- The box art lacking the online icon and saying 1 player and Steam saying 1 player are erroneous or otherwise simply downplaying the multiplayer since it's such a mild form of it
- The Wireshark packet scan showing no transmitted location data is erroneous because local instances are only spun up when two players get really close, so someone doing the test by themselves won't see anything
- The two players not being able to meet despite both being online at once are due to launch networking difficulties, and/or being in different real world locations, and/or not being in the same local instance
- In other words, in the future, maybe tomorrow for all we know, two people will actually see each other and move around near each other and see that movement and be like "whoa neat"
- Therefore Sean never lied, everything he said in the past is actually true, you never see what you look like until you see another real player etc. etc.
Is that about right?
Anyone else who can safely say this is their viewpoint?
What is your actual, official belief on the state of multiplayer and this game, laid out plain and simple?
Like let me just try to lay it out and you can correct me if I'm wrong.
- Sean said there was multiplayer in the past many times, despite it not being a focus
- "Multiplayer" in the context of this game means naming discoveries, and being able to see other players online, though this would be extremely rare
- No real interaction with others, just literally look at them, you can both move around and see the movements each other are making, you can't attack each other or chat or anything
- The box art lacking the online icon and saying 1 player and Steam saying 1 player are erroneous or otherwise simply downplaying the multiplayer since it's such a mild form of it
- The Wireshark packet scan showing no transmitted location data is erroneous because local instances are only spun up when two players get really close, so someone doing the test by themselves won't see anything
- The two players not being able to meet despite both being online at once are due to launch networking difficulties, and/or being in different real world locations, and/or not being in the same local instance
- In other words, in the future, maybe tomorrow for all we know, two people will actually see each other and move around near each other and see that movement and be like "whoa neat"
- Therefore Sean never lied, everything he said in the past is actually true, you never see what you look like until you see another real player etc. etc.
Is that about right?
Anyone else who can safely say this is their viewpoint?
True but the point is, the fact you may never ever experience doesn't mean that being able to see someone else is impossible. It's rare but can in fact happen. As in, you will stand next to someone else and look at them like you would in any other game...right? I think it is a pretty simple yes/no question.
I get that reference since two days ago
This post is too rational for this thread. You shouldn't be here.
Let me rephrase, its DEFINITELY not possible at the moment. Whether or not thats because the developer lied and didnt actually create that part of the game or because the serves were down or some other technical issue remains to be seen.
The big commotion is...if its a technical issue why doesn't the developer say that instead of remaining uber vague.
There has been mention that you can grief other players.
IF the wireshark test is false, how would the servers know that two people are nearby? After all, location data isn't sent to create an instance. Please explain to me how it is possible to generate an instance for two players that are near each other when the data to know that an instance should be generated isn't available as you would need to know what their proximity is by comparing the two distances. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW IT CAN BE DONE OTHERWISE.
There has been mention that you can grief other players.
IF the wireshark test is false, how would the servers know that two people are nearby? After all, location data isn't sent to create an instance. Please explain to me how it is possible to generate an instance for two players that are near each other when the data to know that an instance should be generated isn't available as you would need to know what their proximity is by comparing the two distances. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW IT CAN BE DONE OTHERWISE.
- The Wireshark packet scan showing no transmitted location data is erroneous because local instances are only spun up when two players get really close, so someone doing the test by themselves won't see anything
There has been mention that you can grief other players.
IF the wireshark test is false, how would the servers know that two people are nearby? After all, location data isn't sent to create an instance. Please explain to me how it is possible to generate an instance for two players that are near each other when the data to know that an instance should be generated isn't available as you would need to know what their proximity is by comparing the two distances. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW IT CAN BE DONE OTHERWISE.
Then how do you explain his posts from today?
See Sean's own tweet:
https://twitter.com/NoMansSky/status/763270512277594112
What is your actual, official belief on the state of multiplayer and this game, laid out plain and simple?
Like let me just try to lay it out and you can correct me if I'm wrong.
- Sean said there was multiplayer in the past many times, despite it not being a focus
- "Multiplayer" in the context of this game means naming discoveries, and being able to see other players online, though this would be extremely rare
- No real interaction with others, just literally look at them, you can both move around and see the movements each other are making, you can't attack each other or chat or anything
- The box art lacking the online icon and saying 1 player and Steam saying 1 player are erroneous or otherwise simply downplaying the multiplayer since it's such a mild form of it
- The Wireshark packet scan showing no transmitted location data is erroneous because local instances are only spun up when two players get really close, so someone doing the test by themselves won't see anything
- The two players not being able to meet despite both being online at once are due to launch networking difficulties, and/or being in different real world locations, and/or not being in the same local instance
- In other words, in the future, maybe tomorrow for all we know, two people will actually see each other and move around near each other and see that movement and be like "whoa neat"
- Therefore Sean never lied, everything he said in the past is actually true, you never see what you look like until you see another real player etc. etc.
Is that about right?
Anyone else who can safely say this is their viewpoint?
Imagine if this really is just a bug lol
What is your actual, official belief on the state of multiplayer and this game, laid out plain and simple?
Like let me just try to lay it out and you can correct me if I'm wrong.
- Sean said there was multiplayer in the past many times, despite it not being a focus
- "Multiplayer" in the context of this game means naming discoveries, and being able to see other players online, though this would be extremely rare
- No real interaction with others, just literally look at them, you can both move around and see the movements each other are making, you can't attack each other or chat or anything
- The box art lacking the online icon and saying 1 player and Steam saying 1 player are erroneous or otherwise simply downplaying the multiplayer since it's such a mild form of it
- The Wireshark packet scan showing no transmitted location data is erroneous because local instances are only spun up when two players get really close, so someone doing the test by themselves won't see anything
- The two players not being able to meet despite both being online at once are due to launch networking difficulties, and/or being in different real world locations, and/or not being in the same local instance
- In other words, in the future, maybe tomorrow for all we know, two people will actually see each other and move around near each other and see that movement and be like "whoa neat"
- Therefore Sean never lied, everything he said in the past is actually true, you never see what you look like until you see another real player etc. etc.
Is that about right?
Anyone else who can safely say this is their viewpoint?
IF the wireshark test is false, how would the servers know that two people are nearby? After all, location data isn't sent to create an instance. Please explain to me how it is possible to generate an instance for two players that are near each other when the data to know that an instance should be generated isn't available as you would need to know what their proximity is by comparing the two distances. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW IT CAN BE DONE OTHERWISE.
He said it during the Colbert interview.Sean's idea of "finding" each other means they've found each other's planets and discoveries. They can see the things another player found and named. And that's what the game's "multiplayer" has always been. Seeing an avatar of another player isn't the only definition of multiplayer.
Has he ever confirmed you could physically see another player if you find them?
This all sounds like it could happen, though doesn't that seem so complicated to the point of improbability? Occam's Razor, right?
This what we know:
Two players tried to meet in game at the same place and could not see each other.
Sean Murray goes on Twitter and says how incredible that is (leaving us to imply what he could mean, since at this point when a game has launched, it's a yes or no question, because it's either on the disk/been patched to happen or it has not.)
In my eyes, his version of "meeting somebody" is that in all the different planets and places you can visit in the game, it's incredible to be somewhere that somebody has been. And that sounds about it. I do think it's incredible to run into another player in a game as massive as this, but clearly this thread shows that Shaun messed up the communication on this feature big time on what he meant by multiplayer, and it's left a lot of players upset.
It's up to the individual to determine if it was a misunderstanding or was cut content he wasn't transparent about.