Why do I need to dislike something about the game for it to not be worth $60?
Items don't start at $60 of worth then have $$$s deducted for elements I don't like.
Same for you. You're acting like a marketing man and asking me to check a load of boxes of negative-features to justify a dislike of a price tag. This is ridiculous.
And you.
Why are you all acting like I have to hold a certain amount of negative points about a game to justify each $ less than $60 I feel it is worth? Not only is that absolutely ridiculous, I also get the feeling you'd then move to refute any negative points I had in order to claim I was wrong and it was worth $60.
How about this:
"I could find no obvious flaw with the product. It was solid, well put together and brought a big stupid grin to my face. However, the total amount of goodness contained in the game did not equal $60 worth of value to me"
?
There is nothing wrong with Rayman. No bad points about it. I have not a single criticism. It just isn't worth $60. It doesn't present to me $60 worth of fun. How else can I express this?
Do you just dislike the game? It's not an inquisition, I think they're just asking why you don't feel it's worth $60. Clearly you have an opinion on how much it is worth, and to come to that opinion, you should have a reason that can be put into words. If not, then your opinion is irrational.
Justify why the worth of Rayman Origins is $60 to me with your opinion. Exactly $60, by the way, not a dollar more or less. Use positive or negative points about the game, assign dollar values to each and then add it all together. I want you to do this sincerely, without an ounce of mockery, deceit or assumption. I want empirical records for the methods you used to translate your opinion into dollar points.Do you just dislike the game? It's not an inquisition, I think they're just asking why you don't feel it's worth $60. Clearly you have an opinion on how much it is worth, and to come to that opinion, you should have a reason that can be put into words. If not, then your opinion is irrational.
Thankyou.The perceived value of something isn't directly correlated to intrinsic qualities of the item. His example a few posts back about a hand towel is a good one. You could have the greatest video game of all time with zero flaws and have it provide immense and sustaining entertainment and still not believe the sum of its parts is worth spending $60 on.
It still doesn't answer your question why I thought Rayman wasn't worth $60. Nothing I say can answer that question because that question is preposterous. Rayman just wasn't worth $60 to me. There is nothing hard I can give to reason that. Even if I absolutely hated the game and had a ton of bad things to say about it, I still wouldn't be able to reasonable justify a specific price point. If we're not talking in a market trading sense of material cost, worth and value are gut feelings.That's all you had to say.
Gotta agree with Sairyu here. Not on the game specifically, but on the narrow way people insist one justifies their valuation of a game.
Can you not imagine enjoying a game, finding no particular flaws with it, but reflecting upon the amount of enjoyment you derived from it, concluding that it was not really worth the asking price? Perhaps you can remember games that you had more fun with that cost less?
I kind of feel this way. To those who played it in its entirety, does it get better than the demo? It seemed like a collect-a-thon with loose, floaty platforming... That demo did nothing for me besides want to stop playing it. If that was an accurate representation of the game, then I'll have to pass because it isn't for me. =\Demo didn't impress me outside of the visuals. Still a pass.
wooooow.
I was just interested in his opinion.
I 100% get his stance and never said that there was anything wrong with him feeling that way.
I'll be sure to never ask for someone's opinion again on these forums (lol).
That implies you believe he thinks something is wrong with the game which is why he thinks the game is worth less than $60. Now you say you 100% get what he's saying. Make up your mind!I was just asking what you didn't like about the game for you to say that.
Do you just dislike the game? It's not an inquisition, I think they're just asking why you don't feel it's worth $60. Clearly you have an opinion on how much it is worth, and to come to that opinion, you should have a reason that can be put into words. If not, then your opinion is irrational.
Justify why the worth of Rayman Origins is $60 to me with your opinion. Exactly $60, by the way, not a dollar more or less. Use positive or negative points about the game, assign dollar values to each and then add it all together. I want you to do this sincerely, without an ounce of mockery, deceit or assumption. I want empirical records for the methods you used to translate your opinion into dollar points.
Because if you can actually do that, you will have done something as ridiculous as the task you are asking me to perform here.
It's sad to me that people somehow think this isn't worth full price just because it's 2D. Easily one of the best games of 2011, and definitely the best platformer by far.
It's sad to me that people somehow think this isn't worth full price just because it's 2D. Easily one of the best games of 2011, and definitely the best platformer by far.
It's sad to me that people somehow think this isn't worth full price just because it's 2D. Easily one of the best games of 2011, and definitely the best platformer by far.
It is sad, especially on places like GAF where I expect more from people. =\It's sad to me that people somehow think this isn't worth full price just because it's 2D. Easily one of the best games of 2011, and definitely the best platformer by far.
Damn, no Toys R Us near me.
It is sad, especially on places like GAF where I expect more from people. =\
That was exactly what you asking me to do by requesting I justify why the game wasn't worth $60 and to list bad points in support of it. All I did was get a bit more specific about proposed methodology.lol really?
So "why?" means to do exactly what you stated in that post?
My goodness.
I don't understand why you're acting like the victim here. You're the one who came in here posting brash stuff like this at the news of it dropping to $20:Justify why the worth of Rayman Origins is $60 to me with your opinion. Exactly $60, by the way, not a dollar more or less. Use positive or negative points about the game, assign dollar values to each and then add it all together. I want you to do this sincerely, without an ounce of mockery, deceit or assumption. I want empirical records for the methods you used to translate your opinion into dollar points.
Because if you can actually do that, you will have done something as ridiculous as the task you are asking me to perform here.
And then making it even clearer by disagreeing with others who thought the game was worth $60:Suairyu said:You kidding? The game is finally at the launch price it should have had. Now we gotta wait a few weeks for the first price drop.
It's not like you just wandered in here and were all, "I don't know guys, I mean, the game is fun and there isn't really anything wrong with it but I just don't think it's worth $60." No, your opinion was much stronger than that (you even sincerely disagreed), and expecting no one to challenge your strong opinion is a little much, don't you think? And heck, most people aren't even challenging it, they're just asking you to back it up a little. It just seemed like you really had it figured out that this game was only worth $20.Suairyu said:I've played it start-to-finish with a friend. I sincerely disagree.
You said:
That implies you believe he thinks something is wrong with the game which is why he thinks the game is worth less than $60. Now you say you 100% get what he's saying. Make up your mind!
Free shipping.
It is sad, especially on places like GAF where I expect more from people. =\
Again, usually when a person feels that a product isn't worth it's full price, it's usually due to a certain problem that they have with the product and that can include them just not feeling that they spent too much due to the product's nature.
Has anyone said "I don't think this is worth it because it's 2D." Or is that merely your speculation?
Same for you. You're acting like a marketing man and asking me to check a load of boxes of negative-features to justify a dislike of a price tag. This is ridiculous.
Ok, I guess the problem is you're making an assumption here that other do not agree with.
Think Amazon will price match?
That was exactly what you asking me to do by requesting I justify why the game wasn't worth $60 and to list bad points in support of it. All I did was get a bit more specific about proposed methodology.