• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Anita Sarkeesian: 'What I Couldn't Say'

Status
Not open for further replies.
As an atheist, I see a great deal of wisdom in Biblical texts. Though I also see a great deal of wisdom in many religious texts. I'm simply most familiar with the Bible due to being raised Catholic.

That could apply to anything, really. There's probably wisdom in 50 Shades of Grey if you just cherry-pick one line away from the context of everything else.
 
That could apply to anything, really. There's probably wisdom in 50 Shades of Grey if you just cherry-pick one line away from the context of everything else.
There are more than a few passages in the Bible (and other religious texts) demonstrating the same tenet in as many words. But mentioning all of them would fill multiple pages and thus doesn't really contribute to the conversation. I doubt the same could be said of 50 Shades of Grey (or other books generally outside of Philosophy and Religion). Yes, it's moralism but much of the discourse around GamerGate is about moralism. The purpose of the statement was to encourage discussion but also realize support of certain ideas comes with consequence.
 
With just some adjustments to her tendency of negative generalization and somewhat combatant rhetoric I think she could've gotten "everyone" to join her side. I don't think she is that kind of self-aware though, and it's perhaps too late, which is a real shame because her cause is at the bottom a really good one.
 
With just some adjustments to her tendency of negative generalization and somewhat combatant rhetoric I think she could've gotten "everyone" to join her side. I don't think she is that kind of self-aware though, and it's perhaps too late, which is a real shame because her cause is at the bottom a really good one.

.... at the bottom?

That's her entire cause. Women representation is her entire cause.
 
With just some adjustments to her tendency of negative generalization and somewhat combatant rhetoric I think she could've gotten "everyone" to join her side. I don't think she is that kind of self-aware though, and it's perhaps too late, which is a real shame because her cause is at the bottom a really good one.
A lot of her points are more or less a dramatic reading of TVTropes entries for games that have probably been online for eons before TvsG even existed with little to no drama. While I agree she can be overly negative, seeing other YouTube personalities make a living off going far more full-blast on various games/movies/shows/whatever without the same levels of hate makes things look incredibly disproportionate disproportionate to what she's saying.
 
With just some adjustments to her tendency of negative generalization and somewhat combatant rhetoric I think she could've gotten "everyone" to join her side. I don't think she is that kind of self-aware though, and it's perhaps too late, which is a real shame because her cause is at the bottom a really good one.

Lol, people who are willing to send death and rape threat, and harass to that extent, aren't one hair removed to seeing another person's position.

That's the key thing about this whole debacle, as well as the GG thing.
I don't give a shit what you think about sexualization in games media, or what you think about ethics in games journalism, since this is the route this whole discussion has taken (and in the case of GamerGate, it actually started from a ridiculous premise to begin with), everything else is very much secondary.

The benefit of a civilized debate was thrown out the window, when people stopped acting civilized.

That's why, regardless of what you think about the issue at heart, if you have some brain you should just disassociate with shit like GG first and foremost.
 
With just some adjustments to her tendency of negative generalization and somewhat combatant rhetoric I think she could've gotten "everyone" to join her side. I don't think she is that kind of self-aware though, and it's perhaps too late, which is a real shame because her cause is at the bottom a really good one.

Or you know, maybe her tone isn't the problem.

Handling rampant misogyny with kid gloves is not a solution.

I understand you're trying to look at this dispassionately but you should know that tone policing is a way of diverting blame. "If only she had said it differently" does her work a disservice and underplays the vitriol and callousness of her abusers. These people would not have reacted any differently if she had wrapped her views in a non-confrontational bow.
 
.... at the bottom?

That's her entire cause. Women representation is her entire cause.

This is also kind of the thing I'm talking about..Just because I didn't arrange my words perfectly (perhaps because english isn't my native language, maybe becausr I'm posting from my phone..) there's an odd strong reaction that i can't reall fathom..
..Instead of f.ex. just acknowledging that I'm, at the bottom.. on your side.

"combative"
 
I completely agree with what she is saying as far as abuse women suffer online. But my question is and i really want to know this , is the abuse towards women stronger than towards any other sect (eg, homosexuals, other races, other countries, transgenders). Essentially the question I'm asking is . Is this a general more widespread problem of people attacking others due to anonymity/their (not mine at all) interpretation of gaming culture/immaturity etc or just particularly directed towards women?

And im sure women being in general not a majority of mainstream gamers plays a factor. But I'm just wondering how much of this is people who are just not nice in general. you know the type who would say horrbile things anyway if it werent women, then racism if not that then sexuality etc... its just bad seeds in the community maybe? Possibly we have too many of them but is the directionality towards women a symptom or a cause?

EDIT: and the reason i bring this up is in other unrelated threads ppl have brought this topic up and anita has her views in gaming and no gaming related things but in other areas she doesnt get attacked as often. Quite frankly if you did half an analysis of hollywood summer movies, women have similarly bad/one dimentional treatment (transformers hello) except for some reason those mediums have a more "normal" reaction. so I think this is more to do with the gaming community just being (not everyone, i'm stressing this again . not everyone or even the majority but some bad seeds) just horribly reactive.
 
I completely agree with what she is saying as far as abuse women suffer online. But my question is and i really want to know this , is the abuse towards women stronger than towards any other sect (eg, homosexuals, other races, other countries, transgenders). Essentially the question I'm asking is . Is this a general more widespread problem of people attacking others due to anonymity/their (not mine at all) interpretation of gaming culture/immaturity etc or just particularly directed towards women?

And im sure women being in general not a majority of mainstream gamers plays a factor. But I'm just wondering how much of this is people who are just not nice in general. you know the type who would say horrbile things anyway if it werent women, then racism if not that then sexuality etc... its just bad seeds in the community maybe? Possibly we have too many of them but is the directionality towards women a symptom or a cause?


General research on harassment seems to indicate that in online spheres women have it worse than men if you don't account for other variables.

(the only study I've seen that has more male harassment compared Piers fucking Morgan to people like J.K Rowling .. I think you can see the issue there.)


When it comes to stuff like race/homosexuality/transgender people you get the iffy situation of how those factors combine with gender.
(e.g. treatment of black women compared to white women or black men); I'm not sure if there's any particular studies regarding harassment on this but the general trend seems to be (female + transgender/racial minority = even worse treatment than someone who only belongs to one of those groups)

I'm sure someone else on here can provide actual research data on this though, I don't have any links ready at the moment.
 
That's why, regardless of what you think about the issue at heart, if you have some brain you should just disassociate with shit like GG first and foremost.
This cannot be stated enough.

Since we're talking about the abuse women get online, a look into what posting book reviews with almost no views on youtube will get you:

(Warning for all kinds of things)
http://i.imgur.com/NlrCIz8.jpg

From the literature board.
Jesus Christ
 
Since we're talking about the abuse women get online, a look into what posting book reviews with almost no views on youtube will get you:

(Warning for all kinds of things)
http://i.imgur.com/NlrCIz8.jpg

From the literature board.

I shouldn't have clicked that... I feel really awful for her. She should not have to go through something like that for just doing what she loved doing. No one should have to go through anything like that.
 
Since we're talking about the abuse women get online, a look into what posting book reviews with almost no views on youtube will get you:

(Warning for all kinds of things)
http://i.imgur.com/NlrCIz8.jpg

From the literature board.
Insecure dipshits living their dreams of self-importance, power and domination on 4chan.

How predictable.
 
This is a bad analogy. Civil rights legislation came through not because hardcore racists were convinced that their hatred was illogical, but by turning people who considered themselves moderate on the issues. The hardcore racists had their best tools for institutional prejudice taken away from them (often via the courts and not via legislation), which gave more room for a conversation, and through those conversations, those hardcore racists became ostracized as more and more of society was dissuaded from taking their positions as something reasonable.

Trying to follow that model in the case of GG would not mean trying to have serious conversations with people who remain in the movement. A similar tack here would be to get the judicial system to actually enforce penalties for the ongoing harassment, which might open up opportunities for conversation.

Well, that, or cause another spark of outrage in GG, whose actions are basically the best PR you could have to help defeat them.

There's an important lesson to be learned here, which may apply to gamergaters, misogynists and bigots in video game culture (and online).
 
Since we're talking about the abuse women get online, a look into what posting book reviews with almost no views on youtube will get you:

(Warning for all kinds of things)
http://i.imgur.com/NlrCIz8.jpg

From the literature board.
This does remind me that /co/ for a good year or so had Natasha Allegri (worked on AT and created Bee & Puppycake) pop in now and then and do requests in AT generals and drawthreads which went surprisingly well... buuuuuuuut eventually got pissed off and left when a few shitposters made it their mission to keep requesting stupid gross shit you shouldn't keep badgering a notable artist working on a popular show if you want them to stick around.

Same thing could easily happen to a male artist, but I think it's far easier to go straight for the proverbial jugular when it's a woman on a 'chan board and you're trying to intimidate them for whatever reason, and this was back when /co/'s reputation was relatively good in comparison to most other boards outside of 4chan.
 
Since we're talking about the abuse women get online, a look into what posting book reviews with almost no views on youtube will get you:

(Warning for all kinds of things)
http://i.imgur.com/NlrCIz8.jpg

From the literature board.

This shit pisses me off, and it pisses me off that I know some friends who go on 4chan and probably talk like this on there and say "oh we're just trolling man, it doesn't hurt anyone!"

Ugh, so disgusting.
 
Believe me, it has nothing to do with it.

Did you hear they are making an all-female Ghostbusters?

Given that there are plenty of people who dislike Anita exactly because of how she's choosen to go about fighting/talking about the issues she talks about, I would say you are wrong in saying it has nothing to do with it.

However obviously plenty of people are being vile assholes towards her because they are assholes and worse.

This shit pisses me off, and it pisses me off that I know some friends who go on 4chan and probably talk like this on there and say "oh we're just trolling man, it doesn't hurt anyone!"

Ugh, so disgusting.

You really think everyone that visits 4chan are like the subset people who post dumb shit there?
 
Since we're talking about the abuse women get online, a look into what posting book reviews with almost no views on youtube will get you:

(Warning for all kinds of things)
http://i.imgur.com/NlrCIz8.jpg

From the literature board.
Its seems strange to me to post something from 4chan as evidence.

Like I'm black, why would I go to a KKK website, 4chan's /pol/ board or white supremacist website and take a screenshot of what they're saying about blacks on the forum as proof of something? I mean its 4chan, are you really surprised people are saying vile shit there?
 
Its seems strange to me to post something from 4chan as evidence.

Like I'm black, why would I go to a KKK website, 4chan's /pol/ board or white supremacist website and take a screenshot of what they're saying about blacks on the forum as proof of something? I mean its 4chan, are you really surprised people are saying vile shit there?

People love to make the case that the video game board over there is better.

It isn't.
 
Its seems strange to me to post something from 4chan as evidence.

Like I'm black, why would I go to a KKK website, 4chan's /pol/ board or white supremacist website and take a screenshot of what they're saying about blacks on the forum as proof of something? I mean its 4chan, are you really surprised people are saying vile shit there?
Yeah 4chan is full of morons, being anonymous allows them to spout bullshit.
People love to make the case that the video game board over there is better.

It isn't.
vg is decent.
 
Given that there are plenty of people who dislike Anita exactly because of how she's choosen to go about fighting/talking about the issues she talks about, I would say you are wrong in saying it has nothing to do with it.

However obviously plenty of people are being vile assholes towards her because they are assholes and worse.



You really think everyone that visits 4chan are like the subset people who post dumb shit there?

No but I was talking about specific friends. I know that THEY do talk like that while on 4chan, and it pisses me off because they think it doesn't hurt anyone.
 
I don't agree with a lot of what she says (But I think she has many valid points), and I don't particularly like her either, but what she has been put through is absolutely terrible, and uncalled for, and she doesn't deserve the abuse she is getting.
 
Since we're talking about the abuse women get online, a look into what posting book reviews with almost no views on youtube will get you:

(Warning for all kinds of things)
http://i.imgur.com/NlrCIz8.jpg

From the literature board.

Anybody who acts like men don't have it easier on the internet is kidding themselves. All it takes to end a woman's online career is a bunch of creepy men finding her and that's absolutely sickening.
 
There are a lot of people giving examples of sexualised men as if this is something that makes feminism in games or in general moot

Men can and often are sexualised, and often in order to sell to a product, or to appease woman, this is true

But the scale in which this happens to women is staggering when compared to men, to highlight a few examples of the reverse and claim its the same for both sides, would be like saying racism doesn't exist because the president of America is black

Its an argument you can only make by being either disingenuous or ignorant, Magic Mike doesn't make up for decades and decades of women being used as nothing but eye candy
 
My partner wrote the following after viewing the video and reading the "Read the comments" section i showed her:

"The comments here are why I play very few games online
The comments here are why I search carefully for Guilds which will not tolerate abuse of women (also LGBT/ race etc)
The comments here are why men think it is OK when I use my mic in a Raid that is not with Guildies to:
Threaten to rape me when I do too well
Threaten to rape me when I make a mistake
Ask me if I am single within 1 minute of finding out I am female
Kick me off Raid groups when they hear I am female
Add me as a friend and start PMing me constantly when they hear I am female
Tell me women cannot play Tanks and are terrible at DPS, they should all be Healers.
All of these, and so much more has happened.
The comments are actually one of the most important parts of this page.
And every man who plays online games can do something about it when they see it happening.
Every man who does not think this is OK can speak up and help put a stop to this - if you see it happen and are silent, you are complicit in it. I have had private PMs saying "Sorry about my friends, but they don't get to speak to many girls you see" - like it's my fault. Don't do that, tell your friends to stop harassing women, not women to stop being women where they can be harassed.
You don't have to yell at them - tell them not to be an arse, not to be that guy, to stop. Because it is not worse to call your friend a misogynist than it is for them to be one"
 
With just some adjustments to her tendency of negative generalization and somewhat combatant rhetoric I think she could've gotten "everyone" to join her side. I don't think she is that kind of self-aware though, and it's perhaps too late, which is a real shame because her cause is at the bottom a really good one.

To be fair, Anita has never intended for her "academic" activity to be bidirectional. The way
she dealt with the Bayonetta situation is an example. Like a lot of people, she uses the internet but is ignorant about how the internet works. She did however open a can of worms that needed to be opened.

But the conversation about the merits or demerits of her analysis is now irrelevant. It's all about the harrassment now. It's become a black or white situation - either you are with her or you are with the harrassers, there's no middle ground left.
 
Isn't that what he's saying though? Just that her way of representing that cause is also part of why she get's the backlash that she gets.

No, it's not. I've seen the absolute nicest person on Twitter, who remained calm and polite to the bitter end, get harassed endlessly for months to the point of having to leave Twitter.

It's intuitive that "being nicer" would prevent harassment but it turns out it doesn't, at all.
 
But the conversation about the merits or demerits of her analysis is now irrelevant. It's all about the harrassment now. It's become a black or white situation - either you are with her or you are with the harrassers, there's no middle ground left.

This just isn't true, but nitpicking her analysis, or pointing out how a few of her examples are weaker than others, or in context make more sense, doesn't stop the fact that her general point is correct, unless you don't believe there is an issue with how women are represented and treated in video games and gaming culture

That doesn't magically go away because she gave one example that doesn't quite align with the subject title of one of her videos

The entire reason this has blown up, or that the narrative has shifted towards the level of harassment and abuse she has suffered, is pretty much more evidence that there is an issue with how woman are represented and treated in the gaming space, you can't make a solid case for Peach not being a damsel and then change that fact
 
No, it's not. I've seen the absolute nicest person on Twitter, who remained calm and polite to the bitter end, get harassed endlessly for months to the point of having to leave Twitter.

It's intuitive that "being nicer" would prevent harassment but it turns out it doesn't, at all.

I'm not saying that if she changed her tone or way of presenting her views, that it would completely stop the dislike, hate or harassment she receives. It's obvious that would still continue no matter what simply because of what she's talking about.

But a part of it, however much or little that may be, stems from how she presents her views and cause.
 
This just isn't true, but nitpicking her analysis, or pointing out how a few of her examples are weaker than others, or in context make more sense, doesn't stop the fact that her general point is correct, unless you don't believe there is an issue with how women are represented and treated in video games and gaming culture

That doesn't magically go away because she gave one example that doesn't quite align with the subject title of one of her videos

The fact you're trying to bait me proves that it's become a black and white issue and that the merits or demerits of her analysis have become irrelevant.
 
I'm not saying that if she changed her tone or way or presenting her views, that it would completely stop the dislike, hate or harassment she receives. It's obvious that would still continue no matter what simply because of what she's talking about.

But a part of it, however much or little that may be, stems from how she presents her views and cause.

No, it's not. Sorry, but it's simply not true. Her presentation is fairly mild as it is. It would be almost impossible to tone it down any. And yet she is met with death threats for even raising the subject.
 
I'm not saying that if she changed her tone or way or presenting her views, that it would completely stop the dislike, hate or harassment she receives. It's obvious that would still continue no matter what simply because of what she's talking about.

But a part of it, however much or little that may be, stems from how she presents her views and cause.
We had a thread about Anita's views and hopes for games. The vast majority agreed that they was extemely reasonable and uncontroversial.

What's the problem with how she presents her views?
 
To be fair, Anita has never intended for her "academic" activity to be bidirectional. The way
she dealt with the Bayonetta situation is an example. Like a lot of people, she uses the internet but is ignorant about how the internet works. She did however open a can of worms that needed to be opened.

But the conversation about the merits or demerits of her analysis is now irrelevant. It's all about the harrassment now. It's become a black or white situation - either you are with her or you are with the harrassers, there's no middle ground left.
Can you please clarify the bolded?

On a side note, not at you directly, but when has she ever been anything remotely combatant? Or even agressive. It's funny how so often those complaining about tone or niceness do so much harsher than anything she says.
 
I'm not saying that if she changed her tone or way of presenting her views, that it would completely stop the dislike, hate or harassment she receives. It's obvious that would still continue no matter what simply because of what she's talking about.

But a part of it, however much or little that may be, stems from how she presents her views and cause.

Agreed 100% if you by "how", you mean, female.
 
I'm not saying that if she changed her tone or way of presenting her views, that it would completely stop the dislike, hate or harassment she receives. It's obvious that would still continue no matter what simply because of what she's talking about.

But a part of it, however much or little that may be, stems from how she presents her views and cause.

It's interesting you'd say that because she mentions in this video how the style of her other videos changed.

I get the feeling there's no right answer for some people
 
It's a damn shame and it's embarrassing to me to lot myself in as a "gamer" with all the douchebags who think this behavior is okay.
 
The fact you're trying to bait me proves that it's become a black and white issue and that the merits or demerits of her analysis have become irrelevant.

I'm not trying to bait you

But you listing off a dozen examples of her being "wrong" in her videos does not undermine the point that there is an issue with how women are treated in the gaming arena

The non stop torrent of hate and rape threats is proof of that, if you don't like her or her videos or even her arguments, that's fine, but you can't argue that gaming is a fun place to be for women without being ignorant at best, disingenuous at worst
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom