What was he banned for?
Probably his edit lol
What was he banned for?
Based on the value of the colts balls and how close they were to each other; statistically (and this was pointed out on page 9); it would have been very unlikely that the other Colts balls would have differed much. Also, they ended up testing 12 Patriots balls (the one that was intercepted and also tested to be under 12.5; but wasn't put into the table).
Note; they did have a professor (and the old head) of Physics at Princeton also doing the scientific analysis. I promise you none of us are going to point out an issue the prof hadn't already seen.
But Ted Wells and co. didn't just ask Brady to hand over his cell phone. They offered him the opportunity to go through the records himself, with his own lawyers, and produce only the messages relevant to the investigation. Instead he gave them nothing at all. False equivalencies in that article.
Incognitos dumbass thought he wasn't in the wrong.Brady would have been a total moron to give up his phone in any capacity and would have been rightfully excoriated by the Player's Union. Look at what it did for Incognito when he 'cooperated'.
But Ted Wells and co. didn't just ask Brady to hand over his cell phone. They offered him the opportunity to go through the records himself, with his own lawyers, and produce only the messages relevant to the investigation. Instead he gave them nothing at all. False equivalencies in that article.
The key word there is recalls. The fact remains that the data was not actually logged. Also it presumes the refs were infallible in this instance where elsewhere in the report it shows instances where they had made mistakes, i.e. the Jets game and the K-ball from the Colts game.
widely recognized as exceedingly meticulous, diligent and careful.Multiple witnesses noted that Anderson is one of the few referees who personally tests the inflation levels of game balls prior to the game
The key word there is recalls. The fact remains that the data was not actually logged. Also it presumes the refs were infallible in this instance where elsewhere in the report it shows instances where they had made mistakes, i.e. the Jets game and the K-ball from the Colts game.
The fact that they didn't have a decision ready before they released the report is ridiculous in and of itself.Waiting for the NFL to make a decision is getting annoying. I want real talk, not just speculation.
What was he banned for?
What was he banned for?
Waiting for the NFL to make a decision is getting annoying. I want real talk, not just speculation.
The fact that they didn't have a decision ready before they released the report is ridiculous in and of itself.
The fact that they didn't have a decision ready before they released the report is ridiculous in and of itself.
Waiting for the NFL to make a decision is getting annoying. I want real talk, not just speculation.
Reading comprehension would help here. I said actually having an official judgement would be nice. This is my first post on the issue since FebruaryMeh, doesn't matter. We're gonna sit our starters til Brady's back and win out the rest of the season once he is. If the NFL wants to extend our preseason then it's not like we gotta count it either.
The result at the end is gonna be the same anyways, we're gonna go undefeated (in every real game) and all the haters will continue wishing they were us.
Stay salty. <3
I agree, which is completely unfair and weak of course.I suspect they are gauging public reaction to the report and basing the punishment on that.
I agree, which is completely unfair and weak of course.
This group used science to definitively prove that second hand smoke doesn't cause cancer too. They're a shop that one typically goes to when you need science to show a predetermined result, not when you are trying to determine what actually happened. Amongst various other things in the report, it's a bit of a head scratcher why that agency was chosen.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponent_(consulting_firm)#Questioned_neutrality
There's also the issue with the way wet footballs were tested in the report. The report is relatively flimsy science just applying the Ideal Gas Law and saying QED. The fact of the matter is that you won't be able to replicate the conditions exactly, so to make a claim that you definitely prove the PSI drop was impossible is not reasonable.
The fact that they didn't have a decision ready before they released the report is ridiculous in and of itself.
It was an independent report done by someone outside of the NFL. I would've been more concerned with the report's independence if they already had a decision ready by the time it got released.
Consulting firm is criticized by an opposing party. News at 11.
Consulting firm is criticized by an opposing party. News at 11.
It was an independent report done by someone outside of the NFL. I would've been more concerned with the report's independence if they already had a decision ready by the time it got released.
That doesn't mean Wells wasn't keeping Goodell updated on his findings/progress. I know this is all conjecture, but i do think Goodell knew the conclusion and perhaps some details prior the publishing of the report.
Ted Wells transmitted his report to Commissioner Goodell and the New England Patriots earlier today.
They've been criticized for years though. LA Times article is from 2010
It was a commissioned report. I don't think there's any reason they couldn't have held off releasing the report to the public until they knew what punishments they might pursue.
He did, Schefti reported as much after it was released to the public:
But we're talking hours here, not days or weeks.
I am suggesting that Wells was keeping Goodell updated on the progress of the report during the 100 days. I'm not suggesting that Goodell received the full report earlier, only that he was most likely aware what the conclusion, and perhaps some details, was going to be.
EDIT: In regards to Exponent: I'm really surprised they choose this firm considering its history.
They probably wanted the engineering / physics background that Exponent had when it came to air pressure and such. It's a good card to have to be able to say "NASA hired these folks to investigate the Shuttle disasters".
Or they are probably good at cover-ups
/jk
What was he banned for?
If only; we wouldn't have all these shenanigans going on if they were better at cover ups.![]()
Nah, they're probably breaking a dozen other rules that they haven't been caught for yet.
I figure the entire NFL does it; sort of like pot. They say getting caught for pot is about passing an intelligence test (actually getting caught) more so than them caring about whether players actually smoke it or not. Feel like it is the same thing - the Patriots are getting punished for being dumb enough and arrogant enough to keep cheating brazenly and dumb enough to get caught (again).
"Filed to ESPN: Tom Brady suspended four games, Pats lose 1st round pick in 2016 and a 4th in 2017, and team fined $1 million, per source:" - @AdamSchefter
Oh
"Filed to ESPN: Tom Brady suspended four games, Pats lose 1st round pick in 2016 and a 4th in 2017, and team fined $1 million, per source:" - @AdamSchefter
Oh
"Filed to ESPN: Tom Brady suspended four games, Pats lose 1st round pick in 2016 and a 4th in 2017, and team fined $1 million, per source:" - @AdamSchefter
Oh
"Filed to ESPN: Tom Brady suspended four games, Pats lose 1st round pick in 2016 and a 4th in 2017, and team fined $1 million, per source:" - @AdamSchefter
Oh
"Filed to ESPN: Tom Brady suspended four games, Pats lose 1st round pick in 2016 and a 4th in 2017, and team fined $1 million, per source:" - @AdamSchefter
Oh
"Filed to ESPN: Tom Brady suspended four games, Pats lose 1st round pick in 2016 and a 4th in 2017, and team fined $1 million, per source:" - @AdamSchefter
Oh