Xaero Gravity
NEXT LEVEL lame™
"Switch has no games I want to play"
"Wtf why is this game I want to play exclusive to the Switch?"
"Wtf why is this game I want to play exclusive to the Switch?"
I'm sure it did, I bet those 30 people are REEEEing as we speak that there review "bombing" got overshadowed, there Resetera topic plans ruined, there dreams of getting a Polygon article praising them gone.I thought it would get review bombed cause you play as a cop.
I hope there weren't any Metacritic contract bonuses for P* as it seems many devs seem to be shafted by those arrangements. I too thought it was a mix of both it being exclusive as well as the negativity surround the police. Regardless I hope they do well through this as its a great game.
I feel like I'm missing the part where this is due to exclusivity. It seems like people are just making that assumption because "someone can't possibly give this game a 0". But user reviews all skew to the extremes. It's always 0/1 - "worst thing I've ever played" or 9/10 - "literally the best game ever."
Reading through a few of the negative reviews, it seems like people are taking issue with framerate drops, the graphics in general, and not liking the combat.
"918"Wrong game?
That doesn’t matter, the game designed around Switch, it’s one of best looking game on Switch.I don't understand the fake reviews at all but does suck having a cool game exclusive to incredibly underpowered hardware.
Do they have proof of "review bombing" because of exclusivity? What if they're all, or most of them, legit disgruntled users? I see a good number comparing it to Nier and Bayonetta, which they say are better games. They're also complaining about the 30fps (maybe lower?) in fast combat.
Also, can we call the 100s of 10s from people who either haven't played it, or plain hyping it, immature as well? If it's true, they're no different. Maybe we should call them review shiners or rocketeers. Duno.
Anyway, if true, this is nothing new anyway. To me, both cancel each other out, and we're left with proper non 10 and 0 scores. So maybe 6 is a proper fit? Maybe you're just mad it's a 6 because you think of it too highly? 6 is above average btw. That's not bad in my book. But many consider this equivalent to a 0.
Why are almost all user ratings concentrated in hundreds in positive or negative, while only a few in in mixed?Do they have proof of "review bombing" because of exclusivity? What if they're all, or most of them, legit disgruntled users? I see a good number comparing it to Nier and Bayonetta, which they say are better games. They're also complaining about the 30fps (maybe lower?) in fast combat.
Also, can we call the 100s of 10s from people who either haven't played it, or plain hyping it, immature as well? If it's true, they're no different. Maybe we should call them review shiners or rocketeers. Duno.
Anyway, if true, this is nothing new anyway. To me, both cancel each other out, and we're left with proper non 10 and 0 scores. So maybe 6 is a proper fit? Maybe you're just mad it's a 6 because you think of it too highly? 6 is above average btw. That's not bad in my book. But many consider this equivalent to a 0.
Yeah, and they're totally comparing it to Nier for all the "right" reasons.Do they have proof of "review bombing" because of exclusivity? What if they're all, or most of them, legit disgruntled users? I see a good number comparing it to Nier and Bayonetta, which they say are better games. They're also complaining about the 30fps (maybe lower?) in fast combat.
Also, can we call the 100s of 10s from people who either haven't played it, or plain hyping it, immature as well? If it's true, they're no different. Maybe we should call them review shiners or rocketeers. Duno.
Anyway, if true, this is nothing new anyway. To me, both cancel each other out, and we're left with proper non 10 and 0 scores. So maybe 6 is a proper fit? Maybe you're just mad it's a 6 because you think of it too highly? 6 is above average btw. That's not bad in my book. But many consider this equivalent to a 0.
I'm still hopeful someone will say something in rage that beats the "I'm so mad I'm going to punch a dolphin in the vagina" comment someone rage tweeted out when Bayonetta 2 was announced as a Wii-U exclusive.It's gonna get Bayonetta 3 too, so they better organize for that one.
that doesnt make it 60 fps, and in no way shape or form it would look worse on pc, ps4 or xb1.That doesn’t matter, the game designed around Switch, it’s one of best looking game on Switch.
If they feel that entitled then they should be the one to pitch and fund the game. This entry was supposed to be a fantasy setup but Ninty called it to become a sci-fi. Such a dumb thing to say. Why not all games comes out on PC then? Bloodborne for example, was stuck on an underpowered console with crappy and more unstable framerate than AC.that doesnt make it 60 fps, and in way shape or form it would look worse on pc, ps4 or xb1.
Lots of game is not 60FPS on PS4/X1, doesn’t make those games bad. The combat system for Astral Chain made 30FPS in mind and it works out great.that doesnt make it 60 fps, and in way shape or form it would look worse on pc, ps4 or xb1.
Well for what it's worth this is by far and away the most accessible character action game Platinum have ever made.This makes me want to buy the game even though i suck at this genre and i have yet to play anymore than the first few stages of Bayonetta
yeah but most games that are multiplat run worse on switch. Its not like the game is using anything switch specific. I applaud nintendo for sticking with platinum games. But lets be real, all nintendo exclusives games from platinum would look and perform better on ps4/xb1 and pc.Lots of game is not 60FPS on PS4/X1, doesn’t make those games bad. The combat system for Astral Chain made 30FPS in mind and it works out great.
This! And why stop at Platinum?yeah but most games that are multiplat run worse on switch. Its not like the game is using anything switch specific. I applaud nintendo for sticking with platinum games. But lets be real, all nintendo exclusives games from platinum would look and perform better on ps4/xb1 and pc.
And all console exclusives will perform better on PC, with that logic console shouldn’t have exclusive because all games will perform better on PC.yeah but most games that are multiplat run worse on switch. Its not like the game is using anything switch specific. I applaud nintendo for sticking with platinum games. But lets be real, all nintendo exclusives games from platinum would look and perform better on ps4/xb1 and pc.
Are you seriously this dumb. Read the negative reviews. They are obviously not worth their salt.Do they have proof of "review bombing" because of exclusivity? What if they're all, or most of them, legit disgruntled users? I see a good number comparing it to Nier and Bayonetta, which they say are better games. They're also complaining about the 30fps (maybe lower?) in fast combat.
Also, can we call the 100s of 10s from people who either haven't played it, or plain hyping it, immature as well? If it's true, they're no different. Maybe we should call them review shiners or rocketeers. Duno.
Anyway, if true, this is nothing new anyway. To me, both cancel each other out, and we're left with proper non 10 and 0 scores. So maybe 6 is a proper fit? Maybe you're just mad it's a 6 because you think of it too highly? 6 is above average btw. That's not bad in my book. But many consider this equivalent to a 0.
And every PS4/XB game would run better on PC. Cut the shit dude, this is console fanboyism. Not concern about the actual game.yeah but most games that are multiplat run worse on switch. Its not like the game is using anything switch specific. I applaud nintendo for sticking with platinum games. But lets be real, all nintendo exclusives games from platinum would look and perform better on ps4/xb1 and pc.
That doesn’t matter, the game designed around Switch, it’s one of best looking game on Switch.
It's sad to see sony engaging in anti-consumer policies and buying exclusives. i should have the choice to play bloodborne on the goIt's sad to see Nintendo engaging in anti-consumer policies and buying exclusives. Gamers should have the choice to where they can play their games.
It's sad to see sony engaging in anti-consumer policies and buying exclusives. i should have the choice to play bloodborne on the go
First of all, do not call me dumb.Are you seriously this dumb. Read the negative reviews. They are obviously not worth their salt.
That just tells me they're not happy with the performance issues and limitations.Yeah, and they're totally comparing it to Nier for all the "right" reasons.
So you've played it then?Like I said, just as much as there are people giving a game a 0, there are those others who give it a perfect 10 when it's far from it.
To be fair it's one of the best looking games this year period... Gorgeous taken in as a whole. Prettier than nier anyhow... High resolution or not. Prob their most cohesive looking game? Those colours and particle effects can be breathtaking at times!That doesn’t matter, the game designed around Switch, it’s one of best looking game on Switch.
It's funny too, because Astral Chain was in development before Nier: Automata.Yeah, and they're totally comparing it to Nier for all the "right" reasons.
No I haven't played it. Not until it's on sale. So I can't judge now.So you've played it then?
Not being on the console they want it on is not a limitation, and a game built around being 30FPS instead of 60FPS is not performance issues.
Do they even need to? PlatinumGames already makes most of the exclusive for Nintendo. In fact I don’t think PlatinumGames ever made exclusive games for PlayStation or Xbox.I hope Nintendo buys Platinum.