rollingstart
Banned
I'm a bit pissed that I just recently got a GTX 275 now. Oh well, that was only an upgrade. In a year or two I'll start from scratch with new CPU and all, and hopefully then things will be even better.
pestul said:Yes you can put a II in that motherboard. Get a Black Edition 940 3GHz and overclock the heck out of it.
Linkzg said:I'm a bit pissed that I just recently got a GTX 275 now. Oh well, that was only an upgrade. In a year or two I'll start from scratch with new CPU and all, and hopefully then things will be even better.
Ikuu said:I kinda want to get a 5870 (got a 4870 atm), not sure why as I'm happy with my current performance and I'd probably want to upgrade my CPU first (Q6600 currently). Doesn't help I just got my student loan in.
AMD expects the 5850 to perform at approximately 80% the performance level of the 5870, and is pricing it at $259.
No_Style said:
fistfulofmetal said:So whens the release date of the 5870 again?
FirewalkR said:"minus crysis", "except crysis"...
It's so funny to read these sentences almost in 2010. :lol
And so sad at the same time.![]()
TouchMyBox said:They're shipping today. (in Canada at least)
nib95 said:On average, does a 5850 beat out a GTS275/285?
jett said:People buying these cards sure must love replaying Crysis.![]()
techPowerUp simulated its performance with a 5870, and it beat the 285 on average at all resolutions. We'll see if that holds with the retail card, but chances are pretty good.nib95 said:On average, does a 5850 beat out a GTS275/285?
rohlfinator said:techPowerUp simulated its performance with a 5870, and it beat the 285 on average at all resolutions. We'll see if that holds with the retail card, but chances are pretty good.
I'm also glad to see the 5850 debuting at $260 instead of $300.
rohlfinator said:techPowerUp simulated its performance with a 5870, and it beat the 285 on average at all resolutions. We'll see if that holds with the retail card, but chances are pretty good.
I'm also glad to see the 5850 debuting at $260 instead of $300.
That was just a rumor, everything official out of AMD said sub-$300.Xdrive05 said:I thought it was supposed to debut at under $200 though? I would bite at ~$199 personally, but not $259. Will wait for benchies on it though...
Kaako said:6 months to 1 year hopefully?
But by that time something more amazing shall be released...hmmm.
Durante said:I just read in the techreport review that they stopped using their adaptive semi-trilinear filtering on the 58xx series. IMHO that's actually a more important improvement than the completely angle-independent filtering.
Rabid Wolverine said:Will a 3.2GHZ Core2Duo E6750 be a bottleneck for the 5850 or 5870?
Currently running a 4870 1GB.
Im looking to upgrade to a 5870x2 4 GB next year with a 6 Core AMD CPU when released.
JudgeN said:SO whats the odds of the 5890 being shorter then the 5870? Don't know if it will fit in my case and that makes me a sad panda.
Q6600 is a fine processor especially if you have it overclocked around the 3.2-3.6 area. There isn't going to be a need to upgrade it for a long time. Now my personal option as someone with a Q6600/HD4870, I think its showing its age already. I can't lock 60 FPS at 1680x1050 with NO AA in most of the games I own. I'm looking to upgrade but I'm wait for the 5890, it should be cheaper/more powerful and hopefully smaller :lol
5870 was bottleneck in one review by 3.7ghz i7 ...Rabid Wolverine said:Will a 3.2GHZ Core2Duo E6750 be a bottleneck for the 5850 or 5870?
Currently running a 4870 1GB.
Im looking to upgrade to a 5870x2 4 GB next year with a 6 Core AMD CPU when released.
Released last year and still on top of my list. Again we have all the eye candy enabled in BIA. Look at the 111 entries... yep, that's a CPU bottleneck. The GPU is too fast for the processor and as such is waiting on the CPU. Quite funny when you realize we use a Core i7 965 that is clocked at 3.75 GHz.
That didn't take very long. I wonder how much longer the i7 has left in it before it starts bottlenecking at below 60fps.Deus Ex Machina said:5870 was bottleneck in one review by 3.7ghz i7 ...
http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon-hd-5870-review-test/23
nubbe said:Crysis run perfectly fine on current gen cards if you drop geometry, shadows and shades one notch
Deus Ex Machina said:5870 was bottleneck in one review by 3.7ghz i7 ...
http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon-hd-5870-review-test/23
marsomega said:
Macattk15 said:O NOES. It will kill my Q6600 then!
Ugh. After some more reading on B3D it seems they are still undersampling, but not as much as before.Durante said:I just read in the techreport review that they stopped using their adaptive semi-trilinear filtering on the 58xx series.
Crysis already bottlenecks an i7-975 right around 60fps, but in most cases you'll be GPU-bottlenecked long before that. It'll be a while before that's widespread at all, though. It would be suicide for a developer to design a game engine that chokes a CPU that much and not scale it down to work on a larger majority of machines.zbarron said:That didn't take very long. I wonder how much longer the i7 has left in it before it starts bottlenecking at below 60fps.
zbarron said:That didn't take very long. I wonder how much longer the i7 has left in it before it starts bottlenecking at below 60fps.
Crysis and Warhead handle their settings very differently.Technosteve said:gamer level compared to enthusiast is like night vs day.
FoxSpirit said:Oh great... will the 5850 even be worth a thought on my oced E4400@2.9Ghz or will it bottleneck?
rohlfinator said:Crysis already bottlenecks an i7-975 right around 60fps, but in most cases you'll be GPU-bottlenecked long before that. It'll be a while before that's widespread at all, though. It would be suicide for a developer to design a game engine that chokes a CPU that much and not scale it down to work on a larger majority of machines.
Linkzg said:I'm a bit pissed that I just recently got a GTX 275 now. Oh well, that was only an upgrade. In a year or two I'll start from scratch with new CPU and all, and hopefully then things will be even better.
marsomega said:
x3sphere said:Stock? I've seen some Crysis benches at low res with Physics set on enthusiasts they got around 80-90FPS. Still a lot of room there.
I think in terms of price/performance the 275 is a MUCH better buy. Seeing as you can pick up a 275 for $200 after rebate, is it really worth $180 more for 30-40% more performance? Especially considering Crysis is the only game that stresses a 275, that makes the value proposition even lower.
Off course it is. I'd much rather game on a single monitor than look at big ass black gaps in the middle of the picture. An acceptable way would be if you use the other screen as a map (especially for RPGs and MMOs).LabouredSubterfuge said:Genuine question to you lovely self-regarding image-conscious PC types:
Things like the wrong type of AA and Micro-stuttering are a problem but having FUCKING GREAT BLACK BORDERS IN THE MIDDLE OF YOUR PICTURE is not?
Please explain.
LabouredSubterfuge said:Genuine question to you lovely self-regarding image-conscious PC types:
Things like the wrong type of AA and Micro-stuttering are a problem but having FUCKING GREAT BLACK BORDERS IN THE MIDDLE OF YOUR PICTURE is not?
Please explain.