• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Atlus USA bringing Dungeon Travelers 2 to North America this summer

Status
Not open for further replies.

Marche90

Member
Would love to see the original pictures and the censored ones to see how bad they were that the localization team found themselves in the need to actually censor them. If there are characters here that look underage and have fanservice CGs, I'm all in for censoring or outright removing them.
 

Parakeetman

No one wants a throne you've been sitting on!
I'll have to have a look at the 4 pics first before I make a final judgement on how I should react.

You shouldnt really care. Since truthfully with how the US and the West for that matter is with moral values, it makes perfect sense that they have to censor it. The bottom line is regardless of what you think, they needed to edit specific images which their localization and quite possibly legal team would have considered problematic as the images would be considered a "nude / nearly nude" underaged character. They need to make their targeted age rating which is already M and even then the game potentially could not be approved if non-censored content was deemed inappropriate for "regional standards". Which in this case would be the US as its for an ESRB rating. Has to be done or no game basically.

Plus it is appreciated that they decided to man up and tell everyone straight up ahead of time. Instead of either not saying anything knowing that not a lot of the consumers would have played the original so they wouldnt know any better or trying to toss it out there right before launch when the majority of pre-orders are already in.

Honestly them speaking up would do more potential damage than not saying anything really. Since folks would not have known otherwise and its not like there was some large number of people who played the import copies either.

Would love to see the original pictures and the censored ones to see how bad they were that the localization team found themselves in the need to actually censor them. If there are characters here that look underage and have fanservice CGs, I'm all in for censoring or outright removing them.

You just answered your own question.
 

-Horizon-

Member
You shouldnt really care. Since truthfully with how the US and the West for that matter is with moral values, it makes perfect sense that they have to censor it. The bottom line is regardless of what you think, they needed to edit specific images which their localization and quite possibly legal team would have considered problematic as the images would be considered a "nude / nearly nude" underaged character.

Plus it is appreciated that they decided to man up and tell everyone straight up ahead of time. Instead of either not saying anything knowing that not a lot of the consumers would have played the original so they wouldnt know any better or trying to toss it out there right before launch when the majority of pre-orders are already in.

Honestly them speaking up would do more potential damage than not saying anything really. Since folks would not have known otherwise and its not like there was some large number of people who played the import copies either.



You just answered your own question.

Darn moral values -.- lol

But yeah, if what was censored was for things that were "too much" then I'm fine.
 

Parakeetman

No one wants a throne you've been sitting on!
Darn moral values -.- lol

But yeah, if what was censored was for things that were "too much" then I'm fine.

In the US in particular things that would be deemed as nude underaged characters have been an off limits matter for quite some time now. Its why things like the early episodes of Dragon Ball Z they went and put pants on Goku which looked like they went and awkwardly pasted underpants graphics in MS paint onto him so it just animated hilariously bad at the time.

While the topic of scrutiny is different CERO for example is super picky as fuck to the point of it being irritating in regards to things like gore and violence.

Its just regional differences with standards and such. But within both regions if companies do not abide by these standards then the game will not be allowed to be released. Which means D: for everyone.
 
BMX XXX is bike game with stripper videos

M rating

The Guy Game is a spring break party game with girls losing their tops

M rating

This is a cutesy looking dungeon game with a few fanservice pictures that don't show any nudity

AO rating before censors

good job, ESRB
 

Prelude.

Member
Kinda sad they have to do this on an m-rated game but still, I'm more bothered by this

dt2-censorship-minimuf0ueq.jpg

what's up with the text placement?
 

dallow_bg

nods at old men
BMX XXX is bike game with stripper videos

M rating

The Guy Game is a spring break party game with girls losing their tops

M rating

This is a cutesy looking dungeon game with a few fanservice pictures that don't show any nudity

AO rating before censors

good job, ESRB

Yeah. Just cutesy little girls...

If the images edited are anything like the ones edited/removed from Monster Monpiece then it's easily understandable.

We'll find out soon enough I suppose.
 
Yeah. Just cutesy little girls...

If the images edited are anything like the ones edited/removed from Monster Monpiece then it's easily understandable.

We'll find out soon enough I suppose.

The thing I don't get is that by making it AO, the ESRB is saying its okay for adults to see half naked little girls but teens can't. I've never gotten that... its either legal or its not, why should ESRB change their ratings based on the age of the characters?
 

Tohsaka

Member
The thing I don't get is that by making it AO, the ESRB is saying its okay for adults to see half naked little girls but teens can't. I've never gotten that... its either legal or its not, why should ESRB change their ratings based on the age of the characters?

AO is basically them saying "censor this or don't bother localizing it" because none of the big three console makers will allow AO games on their platforms.
 
And at the same time, you can watch anime like High School DxD or Strike Witches with underage girls naked through the services provided on the systems.

Hypocrisy everywhere.
 

dallow_bg

nods at old men
The thing I don't get is that by making it AO, the ESRB is saying its okay for adults to see half naked little girls but teens can't. I've never gotten that... its either legal or its not, why should ESRB change their ratings based on the age of the characters?

M is not teens either. And context is key. Just look at MonMonpiece.

AO is "fine, we have to give you a rating" and has been mostly used for intentionally pornographic games for PC.
I'm not sure the ESRB would have even rated the game at all without the 4 edits.
 

Curler

Unconfirmed Member
And at the same time, you can watch anime like High School DxD or Strike Witches with underage girls naked through the services provided on the systems.

Hypocrisy everywhere.

I've always wondered how anime itself gets a free pass. Then again, they are not rated through the MPAA or whoever the tv division of that is. ESRB/PEGI is different with all their regulations.


Edit: Then again, anime is on Hulu/Netflix etc...
 

autoduelist

Member
You shouldnt really care. Since truthfully with how the US and the West for that matter is with moral values, it makes perfect sense that they have to censor it. The bottom line is regardless of what you think, they needed to edit specific images which their localization

But for people who have an issue with censorship, that's the point. I'm sure they know 'why' it has to be done for western markets, but the fact that art 'needs' to be censored at all is the problem. It's not like you need to explain why it's being censored, everybody knows that.

It's like violent images being censored in, say, Germany. Everybody knows why (at least in theory, even if it doesn't make that much sense). That doesn't mean Germans need to like it nor abide by it.

Censorship, as a principle, conceptually means the belief that some ratings board somewhere 'knows what is best for you' because our collective minds couldn't take the original source material without breaking or corrupting - never our own minds, of course - we could handle whatever it is... it's always some fictional person 'out there' with the fragile mind that couldn't handle it that must be protected. [just like some people who go check out the source image because they know 'they' can handle it, then go 'oh, I see why that needs to be censored for others'... what?] That idea that others need to gate what we experience for us is counter to the principles of many, many people. Unfortunately, many others want everything worse that 'oh crud' censored.

edit -- basically, you're taking a practical look at it -- "it has to be done to localize at all". Those with an issue with it are taking a theoretical approach to it -- the act of censorship is not in line with their principles, period. That's the clash. It's unresolvable in the long run, because there will always be people on both sides of the issue and another group that doesn't care enough to care.
 
I've always wondered how anime itself gets a free pass. Then again, they are not rated through the MPAA or whoever the tv division of that is. ESRB/PEGI is different with all their regulations.


Edit: Then again, anime is on Hulu/Netflix etc...

And Crunchyroll is on Vita, which airs most of the current anime including all kinds of fanservice stuff that makes Dungeon Travelers look tame.

Makes it seem really pointless to not allow games with fanservice when Sony doesn't force other stuff to be censored to be on their system. They're already allowing people to see this stuff if they want to.
 
I'm not surprised at all. The only reason I wrote this off coming out here was the fanservice I've heard this game has. I mean if they were bad enough to push it into an AO rating then I fully understand. I'm here for the gameplay and not the 'plot'.
 

FluxWaveZ

Member
Of course this is turning out to be a big thing in certain circles.

Meanwhile, I look up some of this game's CGs on Sankaku Complex and... good riddance. Holy crap this is gross; and a game that presents itself this way is supposed to be good? More than a bit surprising.
 

Hubb

Member
I'm not surprised at all. The only reason I wrote this off coming out here was the fanservice I've heard this game has. I mean if they were bad enough to push it into an AO rating then I fully understand. I'm here for the gameplay and not the 'plot'.

Yup. I'd much rather play the game than not play it because 4 pictures I don't care about have been altered.
 

Prelude.

Member
I just checked and this is PEGI 12 in Europe, think about that.

It'd be nice if the decisions surrounding an anachronistic rating system wouldn't be pushed onto another region but I doubt NISA will do anything about it.
 

Ryuukan

Member
Of course this is turning out to be a big thing in certain circles.

Meanwhile, I look up some of this game's CGs on Sankaku Complex and... good riddance. Holy crap this is gross; and a game that presents itself this way is supposed to be good? More than a bit surprising.

The Persona 5 protagonist was thrown in jail for owning this game
 

Hugstable

Banned
I'm fine with the censoring. Only 4 images? Thats not a big deal at all. After I saw one of the possible pics on Twitter earlier, it's not surprisng that it happened either
 

Tohsaka

Member
There's some more clarification from Atlus here.

I want to stress again that the changes to the images are just minor edits. A lot of people are quick to assume that it’s nudity-related, when even the Japanese version had no full-nudity images. As a company, we looked at all the game’s content and identified the images that we assumed would be the most difficult to get by ratings boards. Through consultations, we were made aware of what images would have pushed the game to an AO rating, a classification that would prevent the game from being releasable in the US, period.

So what did we do? We tried to do right by our fans: we took the feedback about the images and worked with the developer to keep the images in question as close to the original as possible, but reduce their objectionable nature. We do not plan on releasing the unedited images, but the changes are so minor, we are confident that it’s as close to the Japanese release as possibly allowed.
 
Quite frankly, one of those images I would have been happier never seeing, so there is no way I'm going to complain about a minor edit to it.

That's a lot to be thankful for really.


I'm think I'm going to be all right with the fanservice content and the game seems to play fast enough, so I'm going to ask this one question. On a difficulty scale compared to many of our newer DRP games, where would this game roughly fall? Is there a decent range or game comparison?

Most of my true experience is with Wizardry 1-5 and the Etrian Odyssey series, but that doesn't mean I don't have other older games under my belt. Besides, that one level in Wiz 2 and most of Wiz 4 just wasn't that fun anyway. :(
 

cj_iwakura

Member
ESRB have strict rules about that kind of content. It's a surprise the game is being localized period.

I have no interest in it, just saying.
 

Prelude.

Member
It's pretty funny that people are searching those pictures on imageboards that feature pornographic content, I wonder what's popping up.

Where do you see that? If its true it makes this censoring even more ridiculous.
In the NISA trailer.

12: "videogames that show nudity of a slightly more graphic nature", 16: "sexual activity reaches a stage that looks the same as would be expected in real life" and 18 is basically only "gross violence". But these things are obviously evaluated on a case-by-case basis so who knows? Generally, I bet that in part it's just that they want to avoid being Kotaku'd.

NISAs excuse about why Criminal Girls had to be censored was because of certain Europe regions would force the game to be unrated by PEGI. I don't know whos offended by what anymore.
Are you sure they said that about Europe?
 

-Horizon-

Member
In the US in particular things that would be deemed as nude underaged characters have been an off limits matter for quite some time now. Its why things like the early episodes of Dragon Ball Z they went and put pants on Goku which looked like they went and awkwardly pasted underpants graphics in MS paint onto him so it just animated hilariously bad at the time.

While the topic of scrutiny is different CERO for example is super picky as fuck to the point of it being irritating in regards to things like gore and violence.

Its just regional differences with standards and such. But within both regions if companies do not abide by these standards then the game will not be allowed to be released. Which means D: for everyone.

Very good points.
 
I'll just print those 4 pics in the highest res I can find them, I'll admit that it doesn't sound THAT bad but still... sigh.

I guess I'm at least glad they are being honest about it, and it seems like they tried to get them in but got the AO rating crap. Still disappointed about it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom