So 3 of those games has done it.. And it's the rule now? Ummm no?
Im not defending EA for doing this but if that's all there is, this isn't a standard practice. Overwatch is a new game, TF2 isn't going to get 16 maps in its lifetime the same way the TF1 didn't, the Seige is barely a blimp and what part of Halo was a huge map expansion when they were mostly new added features? I may be wrong but how many maps has been released since it been out?
I'm just saying, this has been done since BF3 and it gives far more content than at least three of those except Overwatch right now.... I'm just not seeing the standard process in this or these large amount of games that's not doing paid map expansions. I only give BF the benefit of the doubt because it's not a yearly release,so the incentive for longevity makes sense. Splitting up the user base however is the only problem I see with this.
I dont know. You asked wich games do it.