Matsuchezz
Member
Probably not mismanaged but they are greenlighting "hot fire".And Ninja Theory and Double Fine and Compulsion and inXile and Obsidian and Playground and Undead Labs.
Cuz all the games they made were mismanaged right?
Right?
Probably not mismanaged but they are greenlighting "hot fire".And Ninja Theory and Double Fine and Compulsion and inXile and Obsidian and Playground and Undead Labs.
Cuz all the games they made were mismanaged right?
Right?
Im not from your neck of the woods.Probably not mismanaged but they are greenlighting "hot fire".
I don't blame her one bit.
I don't blame her one bit. I think 343i did an amazing job in a challenging set of circumstances, one of which the incredible pressure to launch with the console or bust. Once that initial delay happened, a 2 year delay simply would have demolished the Xbox brand and seriously hurt Game Pass. The decision to launch when they did was the correct one.
Bonnie Ross made sure Halo: Master Chief Collection lived up to its full potential. They didn't abandon it on her watch, which many would have forgiven them for doing. That isn't just an ordinary game collection. It's the best ever game collection of its kind ever with so many additional connecting features and enhancements across the entire slat of past Halo games. Shame when Halo Infinite ends up proving just how wrong some people truly were the entire time, likely by the end of 2023, Bonnie won't be there to celebrate that huge turning of the corner. Everybody is free to have their opinions, but to me 343i under her leadership saved Halo as a franchise. Under Bungie it wasn't being treated in those last few games like the massive juggernaut I felt it was. It was a great game, but it seemed stuck in so many original xbox paradigms, especially with relation to how the campaigns were done. Halo just didn't feel like as big a sci-fi epic as it should be.
Mass Effect 1-3 and COD 4 had me feeling like, "Halo needs to feel like it's this grand, like the stakes are this big." For me Halo 4 did that, bringing more of the Halo novels into the games than ever before, and for that I will forever be thankful to Bonnie Ross and 343i for making THAT Halo a reality, and for bringing the type of depth to the Master Chief that had always been there in the best books. Halo 5 didn't stick the landing on story, but I sure loved what it attempted to do, and it dramatically improved Halo's core gameplay and the amount of verticality to be expected in the games.
What Halo 4 and 5 did right is they weren't afraid to dive headfirst into more of the Halo Universes' mysteries, more of the ancient civilization or secrets of the universe that were responsible for the Halo rings. We got shield worlds, prometheans, the didact, the librarian, Blue Team, a badass team of Spartan IVs led by Locke (a character I'm still a huge fan of), we got Laskey, we got deeper, more up to date Halsey stories, we got the UNSC Infinity, the forerunner domain, Zeta Halo, Atriox, the Banished, Jega 'Rdomnai, Escharum (best main Halo game villain to date), The Weapon, we got more RPG elements in Halo, an open world, way more boss fights, mini-bosses via high value targets, outposts assaults, forward operating bases.
What I love most about 343i under Bonnie Ross is they NEVER play it safe, love it or hate it. And going forward I hope that mentality does not change. I even loved the squad commands of Halo 5, and hope they eventually make a return. So, all in all, for 343i's body of work, the metacritics of what they've done under her watch is there for all to see, and it's an impressive body of work they should be proud of. I may not like how Bonnie Ross was dealt with, but I will always respect what she has done for Halo, and I'm as excited for 343i and the future of Halo as I've ever been, and that Halo Infinite Campaign is what makes me so damn confident. That ambition in the campaign was meant to be the "dialed back" vision. I can't wait to see the full fledged plan when everything is coming together for them right with timing.
Is this the same brad sams that people here say is an unreliable source when it suits them? Yeah, ok... Sure!Hey bud, you should tweet this Bradley Samms and tell him he’s full of shit!
Is this the same brad sams that people here say is an unreliable source when it suits them? Yeah, ok... Sure!
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Hot fireIm not from your neck of the woods.
What does "hot fire" mean?
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Hot fire
I must confess I have been watching a lot of Dave Chapelle specials on Netflix.
100%. 343i has not released a single bad game in her entire time at the helm. Results speak for themselves.
100%. 343i has not released a single bad game in her entire time at the helm. Results speak for themselves.
She had to have seen it coming.
Irredeemable? Really?I will just say that Infinite is irredeemable. Sunset it. Start afresh. No more pandering. No more agency staff. Jettison the Xbox One and in 2026 we may have a Halo to be proud of.
Lol MCC was literally broken. For years. Only showing how much these scores worth.100%. 343i has not released a single bad game in her entire time at the helm. Results speak for themselves.
Fair enough... not a Halo super fan but hope they can turn things around ... I played MCC and was starting to like halo when things went to shit ... its a fun franchise to keep aliveNah. I'm in corporate America. I see this shit all the time, whether it's a man or a woman, black, white, etc.
Why not? They hired her and stuck with her fuck up after fuck up. The buck stops with them.Bonnie Ross is / was in charge of Halo was she not?
Ultimately the buck stops with her. You can’t blame Spencer or Booty, they had given her the responsibility and it’s on her and her team to deliver. The only blame any superiors should have is for diversity hiring when millions, if not billions are at stake.
This is shit stirring and it does Microsoft no favours. Not sure why everyone is so excited that she may have been fired instead of stepping down for the reasons she stated.
I mean...isn't getting fired a "family issue"?Wait, so you're telling me that the whole having to leave because of family issues reason was all BS?
100%. 343i has not released a single bad game in her entire time at the helm. Results speak for themselves.
Even if true, what kind if manager doesn't check in on the progress of their flagship product?well according to some 343 employees there was one higher up in the studio (forgot his name) that constantly lied about the state and progress of the game to management at Microsoft.
the Studio is simply a hot mess
MS problem is that they have too much money. All of that moneyShe had to go. Phil should have done it after MCC launched - that’s all I mean. Infinite could have been avoided if Phil was more decisive earlier.
Gee, let me see.What are you talking about? They're doing great work. Curious to know where the issues are in your opinion
More than likely MS will run them into the ground.Yiuk!! No wonder why they bought Bethesda and Activision.
You mean a shitty ugly woke cancel purple ugly people in a forum acting like fucktards and can’t accept truth ? Shocking
So if Sams is right then Phil Spencer is in the wrong for firing her? Please....no more bullshit paragraphs. Yes or no.
Is this supposed to be a parody of ResetEra?No. It was scheduled for she to leave in November but some family matter expedited the process.
That is the truth. No speculation, no nothing, staph.
EDIT: and by the way if you say otherwise, you will get banned for such insensitive comments.
Yeah I actually think the problem was the ancient coding systems in Halo's engineI really don't blame Bonnie Ross for any of this crap.
So these are B grade scores too thenAll B-grade scores. One an amalgamation Halo game consisting of all 90+ A-grade games still got a B under 343.
Why we argue about "what could have been" is exactly the point your own post makes for us. Halo under 343 is not the pinnacle of gaming nor Halo entries themselves. Halo Infinite should have been a 95+ game and expanded on what Halo has to offer, not contract it.
So these are B grade scores too then
Weak broIs this the same brad sams that people here say is an unreliable source when it suits them? Yeah, ok... Sure!
In my opinion? Yes. None of those games are genre defining. A lot of them play it very safe. B is bang on.So these are B grade scores too then
It's funny how games in that list are not held to the same standard as Halo infinite. People say it's because true hardcore halo fans want the best, but if they really wanted the best they would realise just focusing on the negatives does more harm then good.By definition yes they are, generally accepted anything 80-89 range is B grade.
I think when you get to the higher end of the review scale, the line becomes so thin that quantifying quality becomes nonsensical.In my opinion? Yes. None of those games are genre defining. A lot of them play it very safe. B is bang on.
Some A games? OOT, Breath of the Wild, Mario 64, TES V & The Witcher 3.
I gotta keep it real. That same thing happens over here, too. You showcase a tiny bit of backbone in a response to somebody or call it it as you see it, and you're getting a warning over inappropriate behavior. Seems kinda tame and out of step for the kind of discourse I see commonly allowed on here, and I'm certain I never step to deeply into disrespect when having discussions, but the way it's moderated you seem like you have to really cater to specific poster's feelings here or you're pretty much hit with a ban.
But when a certain type of user who maybe has a different set of preferences gets abused and disrespected, there's a higher degree of tolerance and acceptability for that. So neither side is flawless on moderation, and that's just me being honest. And attempts to directly address it with moderation never seems to generate a response or any discourse that doesn't come off seeming like a direct threat of shut up or you're gone. So yea.
I don’t think many people would argue that The Last of Us Part 1, Gears 5, Halo Infinite, Spider-Man or Horizon should be in the same category as Breath of the Wild, Skyrim or The Witcher 3. However you are correct that it all comes down to opinions, and you’re entitled to yours.I think when you get to the higher end of the review scale, the line becomes so thin that quantifying quality becomes nonsensical.
For example there are plenty of 90-100 games which I think should be in the 80s and vice versa, I mean the difference between a 90+ and a 80+ meta game is that portion of people gave it 9 instead of an 8 and vice versa.
Correct.Its easy not to get in trouble lmao
That’s a little sad if reading 5 paragraphs is too much work.
Kinda beyond the point, but yeah, sure.I don’t think many people would argue that The Last of Us Part 1, Gears 5, Halo Infinite, Spider-Man or Horizon should be in the same category as Breath of the Wild, Skyrim or The Witcher 3. However you are correct that it all comes down to opinions, and you’re entitled to yours.
Sorry, I thought we were ranking games. My mistake.Kinda beyond the point, but yeah, sure.
Correct.
There’s a recurring theme on GAF where the people who complain the most about the mods are usually the ones who do deserve to be moderated because of the way they conduct themselves.
Sorry, I thought we were ranking games. My mistake.