• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Captain America: Civil War SPOILER Thread - #TeamThanos

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am not sure what you are trying to argue here. Tony was 100% correct and there was no reason for Peter to feel threatened?

Stark is currently the only person in the universe that knows his identity, he is/has to go along with whatever Tony said if that is going to remain a secret. Tony made his threats known during their conversation and forced Peter to show/admit to his identity

He never actually made any threats, you know? He bluntly asks if she knows and Peter is all "no she doesn't know. She'd freak out! I'd freak out!" and Tony just leaves it at that.

Even at the end Tony simply goes "come on, just come with me to Germany. I'll just tell Aunt Hottie we're going on a field study."
 
Go to work for a few hours and Iron Man fanatics take over the thread, wth?

At the end of the day, the only two heroes that are pro-accords are Rhodey and Vision.

Tony - already broke them when he went to help Cap, because the accords suck, you know.

BP - protects Bucky from those that would hunt him (due to accords) and is on good terms with Cap.

As far as spidey is concerned he was never asked to sign the accords, but he tells Tony something like "someone with my powers should do something when they can" (variant on the great power speech); not "someone with my powers should do something when they can if approved by sub-committee 1a after form 24C has been submitted in triplicate."
 
I thought it was obvious that both time, Tony was bluffing/"blackmailing" about telling Aunt May that he's Spiderman. Like especially in the apartment, where he was asking Peter who knew, and Peter said May would freak out if she knew what he was doing
 
I thought it was obvious that both time, Tony was bluffing/"blackmailing" about telling Aunt May that he's Spiderman. Like especially in the apartment, where he was asking Peter who knew, and Peter said May would freak out if she knew what he was doing

Yeah that's what his tone while saying it made me think, like more of a "what will he do if I threaten him with this?"
 
I thought it was obvious that both time, Tony was bluffing/"blackmailing" about telling Aunt May that he's Spiderman. Like especially in the apartment, where he was asking Peter who knew, and Peter said May would freak out if she knew what he was doing
As a viewer it was obivious to me but Peters reaction seemed like he really got worried.
 
Yeah that's what his tone while saying it made me think, like more of a "what will he do if I threaten him with this?"

But he never actually does it, yar? I mean, I guess we could argue whether he actually has the intention, or that if he'd eventually resort to it. But people have been throwing words like "bluff", "threat" and "blackmail" whereas he never actually does or even implies any of those things.
 
Question though - what was Cap supposed to do then? What would have been the correct call and keeping in character? Mainly as I can't see any that don't end with Bucky's death and the death of many others in the raid with not only the kill squad but with Black Panther more or less ensuring that Bucky dies.

And with Ross in there if you step outta line your doing time.

That is the crux for me. There is no definitive solution or answer. I can understand both sides, both fucked up (despite making the right calls far more often).
 
But he never actually does it, yar? I mean, I guess we could argue whether he actually has the intention, or that if he'd eventually resort to it. But people have been throwing words like "bluff", "threat" and "blackmail" whereas he never actually does or even implies any of those things.

You can tell a bluff from someone's tone.
 
Spidey's involvement overall is just messy. While I love him in it, it's clear that there really wasn't much of an excuse for him to be in other than "let's have Spider-Man appear". Which is fine, but just comes off as ridiculous as Tony choosing this kid for help out of nowhere.

Would have been nice to get maybe a mention or something of Tony being rejected by a couple other heroes around New York, some sort of nod to the TV shows.
 

And that's why you need to see these movies on opening weekend. Not that its a huge spoiler, but with an ensemble movie, it shows when certain players interact.

Like with the final fight between Cap, Bucky and Iron Man. I knew it was coming from the trailers, but they did a nice piece of misdirection by having a truce between Cap and Iron Man at the end and made it look like they were going to fight the 5 super soliders. That was ruined by the trailers since I knew Cap, Bucky and IM still had to have their epic battle.
 
Bitch I'll make you care

tumblr_n1nt9y5cy51tpu2ywo3_500_by_captainpengusama-d8gc0kv.gif
 
After watching that airport scene again, yeah, it's completely useless for the entire movie. It's like they needed to add a scene in CIVIL WAR about them fighting for 15 minutes in goofy choreography and quips. Should have been a deleted scene or demo reel for the Avengers.

What am I reading here? None of these words make any sense together. Am I having a stroke?
 
I honestly don't believe that Tony wanted to follow the Accords to the letter. Hence his explaining that once they signed them, they could make changes afterwards.

I don't disagree. The marketing for this movie was catchy but there is no binary here for me - I like all these characters and enjoyed the way the movie set things up so that you can empathize with them all.

In the end, I think Tony got dealt the losing hand though as the accords, which started the whole team rift have been pretty much ignored by all but a very few by end of story.
 
What's the bluff there, though? "If you're not coming with me to Germany, then I'll ask for your hot aunt's permission to take you on a field trip?"

I don't remember what is exactly and when during that scene, I remember him saying he would tell his aunt about him being Spider-Man.

Either way it still works as a bluff if that's what he said, he wanted to see what Peter would do.
 
This was my gut reaction after watching the movie.

Before the movie came out I was #TeamCap all the way. Then the movie came out, I saw it and now I understand why Cap couldn't lift the hammer in AoU. #TeamIron-Man

Here's a prediction: We'll have a reversal of status between Vision and Cap in Infinity War. Vision, becoming more human and acquiring some flaws along the way, will try to lift the hammer and fight Thanos but he will be shocked to discover that he is not worthy anymore. Cap, having grown as a character from his mistakes, will lift the hammer and bash Thanos' face with it. It's the only way for that moment to have the desired impact after the events of AoU.

After some thought I am sure that Tony was right. The Avengers are fighting to protect people but they should not be without any sort of supervision, checks and balances. Had they ignored the will of all these countries then they wouldn't be the earth's protectors, they would be the earth's oppressors. Even if an extreme situation might sometime force them to break the law, it doesn't mean that the law is unnecessary or wrong just for being there. Every legal system has clauses that negate the illegal part of an action if that action is being taken to protect an even greater good than the law. Tony's side put up a reasonable argument and Cap rejected it because he didn't want to compromise.
 
I don't remember what is exactly and when during that scene, I remember him saying he would tell his aunt about him being Spider-Man.

Either way it still works as a bluff if that's what he said, he wanted to see what Peter would do.

The conversation basically goes like... Tony asks Peter to come with him to Germany. Peter doesn't want to because he can't just go willy-nilly. Tony says that he'd ask Aunt May's permission under the cover of taking Peter on a field trip.

Then Peter goes "waiiit"

*webs Tony hand*

"Don't tell Aunt May".


I guess one could interpret that scene as Tony pushing Peter's buttons? Wanting to see him react to his threat of asking Aunt May's permission?

But I think there's a big room for the interpretation of Tony just being a pushy guy that goes "come on, come ooon. I'll take care of everything" and then Peter just relents but reminds Tony to stay hush-hush about the whole Spidey thing.
 
And that's why you need to see these movies on opening weekend. Not that its a huge spoiler, but with an ensemble movie, it shows when certain players interact.

Like with the final fight between Cap, Bucky and Iron Man. I knew it was coming from the trailers, but they did a nice piece of misdirection by having a truce between Cap and Iron Man at the end and made it look like they were going to fight the 5 super soliders. That was ruined by the trailers since I knew Cap, Bucky and IM still had to have their epic battle.

After the Avengers trailers spoiled the Hulk grabbing Tony in mid-air I've taken to just not watching trailers, commercials, or sneak peaks for movies I know I'm already going to go see.
 
This was my gut reaction after watching the movie.



After some thought I am sure that Tony was right. The Avengers are fighting to protect people but they should not be without any sort of supervision, checks and balances. Had they ignored the will of all these countries then they wouldn't be the earth's protectors, they would be the earth's oppressors. Even if an extreme situation might sometime force them to break the law, it doesn't mean that the law is unnecessary or wrong just for being there. Every legal system has clauses that negate the illegal part of an action if that action is being taken to protect an even greater good than the law. Tony's side put up a reasonable argument and Cap rejected it because he didn't want to compromise.

I think in our world yes, they would need supervision if superheroes started showing up everywhere. In their world with Shield/Hydra situation just happening Cap does not trust government supervision.

Like Cap said they are shifting the blame of the consequences of their actions and he does not want that, he feels they are the best decision makers for protecting peoples lives.
 
This was my gut reaction after watching the movie.



After some thought I am sure that Tony was right. The Avengers are fighting to protect people but they should not be without any sort of supervision, checks and balances. Had they ignored the will of all these countries then they wouldn't be the earth's protectors, they would be the earth's oppressors. Even if an extreme situation might sometime force them to break the law, it doesn't mean that the law is unnecessary or wrong just for being there. Every legal system has clauses that negate the illegal part of an action if that action is being taken to protect an even greater good than the law. Tony's side put up a reasonable argument and Cap rejected it because he didn't want to compromise.

Except we're dealing with a universe where -

1) A think-tank was secretly a terrorist organisation and managed to manipulate the Vice President in such a way that he allowed them to take the President of the United States hostage.
2) SHIELD, the premier spy group, was infiltrated by a terrorist organisation and corrupted from the inside out.
3) The World Security Council threatened to nuke Manhattan not even an hour after an alien invasion WHILE The Avengers were holding said alien invasion to as small a pocket of the island as possible.

And the solution? Get the UN involved.

Not to mention how Thunderbolt Ross, US Secretary of State, is leading the charge and is the guy who experimented on one of his soldiers and turned him into a gigantic ID monster because of his irrational hatred of Bruce Banner, a guy who left America. Ross's campaign ended up in an illegal field manouver when he invaded a fucking university to try and capture Banner, who wasn't even Hulked out at the time.

But hey, it's the UN. I'm sure they'd sort it out. I mean IT'S THE UN.
 
Is Tony going to fuck Aunt May or what? They were about to hop on each other's lap before Peter walked in.

More like Tony was turning up the charm to make May as comfortable and in a good a mood as possible.

I really love that when the camera POV was mostly from Peter's that you could see both Tony and May trying to get Peter to do something/react with their eyes.
 
Except we're dealing with a universe where -

1) A think-tank was secretly a terrorist organisation and managed to manipulate the Vice President in such a way that he allowed them to take the President of the United States hostage.
2) SHIELD, the premier spy group, was infiltrated by a terrorist organisation and corrupted from the inside out.
3) The World Security Council threatened to nuke Manhattan not even an hour after an alien invasion WHILE The Avengers were holding said alien invasion to as small a pocket of the island as possible.

And the solution? Get the UN involved.

Not to mention how Thunderbolt Ross, US Secretary of State, is leading the charge and is the guy who experimented on one of his soldiers and turned him into a gigantic ID monster because of his irrational hatred of Bruce Banner, a guy who left America. Ross's campaign ended up in an illegal field manouver when he invaded a fucking university to try and capture Banner, who wasn't even Hulked out at the time.

But hey, it's the UN. I'm sure they'd sort it out. I mean IT'S THE UN.

Yep, yep and yep. In the world that they live in the only government we can trust is Wakanda...
 
Can't believe the Tony hate. :(

He is a billionaire philanthropist, Mr Avenger himself. His contribution to the MCU society FAR outweighs the rest. He fucking self-lessly took a nuclear arrow to his knee. You gotta forgive him for his stress, and the fact that he is the most remorseful among his peers for their collateral damage, shows how real a hero he is.

Unlike Steve, who simply brush aside and psychopath Wanda that collateral damage is part and parcel of their job, they have lost 1 but saved a 100. But of course by the end of CW, it shows up Capt as a fucking hypocrite. In his desire to save his old war buddy, he gives the L to society, brings his loyal friends along down the hell hole. Capt asking Hawkguy out of retirement is far far worse than Tony recruiting Spidey. Im sure Tony has tons of super-hero viewfinder cams across the globe. He can see Spidey stopping a flying car in mid air, and all he asked of Spidey is to stay back and webbed down Capt. How about Hawkguy? He is just mere mortal family man, with bows and arrows, and a newborn kid, why did Capt want him along to fight against the UN, cross path with Ironman, and then duke it out with 4 deadly Winter Soldiers? Cos' he is a selfish hypocrite, weakling and coward to do it himself.

Tony did not draft the accords, it is the world governments and they are coming right up the Avengers doorsteps(funded by Tony btw). A wise hero would think through and true, while a selfish daft would choose to punch his own ways around. Tony did the smart and right thing. He knows it is something that needs to be done now, but his character in MCU was never going to give away the Avengers rights. The ending of CW, Tony gave the middle finger to Ross, while the shitty Captain tried to take the higher ground by writing a snarky letter to Mr Stank.

Tony did not send out his Iron Men to hunt down Winter Soldier did he? If the tables were turned and Tony had killed WS, would Capt really decapitated Tony? I feel based on his MCU character arc, Capt would have done so and then.

Why did Tony and Capt acted this way? We just need to look at their growing up days. Tony lost his loving parents, he had to continue the Stark legacy on his own. He learnt of compassion and grief. What about Steve? He grew up being bullied and trolled, and his only relief was his BFF Bucky. No wonder he has that passive-aggressive streak, and his ingrained conscious is forever indebted to Bucky. In this way, he would rather save 1 Bucky and doomed the 100 others, which is what he went with. :/

People just loved Steve because of how prominent his passive side is during peace-talky times. However his actions are just of a selfish soldier out of his times. Capt is the hero the fans loved but do not deserved.

Tony might have a starky mouth, but the golden warmth of his heart keeps everyone snugly at night. #wubTony

Underrated post btw. Just quoting because it's better than yet another string of Bronson-centered posts!
 
Cap have never followed authority blindly. It's been established in Cap1 that he thinks he can make judgement calls and in Cap2 that he had trust issues with authority. It makes total sense why Cap was hesitant to sign with the Sokovia Accords. Learning that Wanda was basically under house arrest, stripping away her FREEDOM, solidified his position against signing.

That's true. Everything Cap has been through reinforces his belief that the powerful do not care about the little guy. Cap has been fighting bullies his entire life.

Erskine: Do you want to kill Nazis?
Rogers: Is this a test?
Erskine: Yes.
Rogers: I don't want to kill anyone. I don't like bullies. I don't care where they're from.
Erskine: Well, there are already so many big men fighting this war. Maybe what we need now is a little guy. I can offer you a chance. Only a chance.
Rogers: I'll take it.
 
Except we're dealing with a universe where -

1) A think-tank was secretly a terrorist organisation and managed to manipulate the Vice President in such a way that he allowed them to take the President of the United States hostage.
2) SHIELD, the premier spy group, was infiltrated by a terrorist organisation and corrupted from the inside out.
3) The World Security Council threatened to nuke Manhattan not even an hour after an alien invasion WHILE The Avengers were holding said alien invasion to as small a pocket of the island as possible.

And the solution? Get the UN involved.

Not to mention how Thunderbolt Ross, US Secretary of State, is leading the charge and is the guy who experimented on one of his soldiers and turned him into a gigantic ID monster because of his irrational hatred of Bruce Banner, a guy who left America. Ross's campaign ended up in an illegal field manouver when he invaded a fucking university to try and capture Banner, who wasn't even Hulked out at the time.

But hey, it's the UN. I'm sure they'd sort it out. I mean IT'S THE UN.

I understand all that, but you can't reject any sort of supervision based on the belief that everyone is corrupt by default. In the First Avenger Cap himself disobeyed orders, rescued prisoners of war and then surrendered himself for disciplinary action to his commander. Cap knew back then that the chain of command and the existence of a certain hierarchy is important for accountability.

Cap said that the accords are only shifting the blame, but when did the Avengers accept any blame for their failings or misjudgements?
 
I understand all that, but you can't reject any sort of supervision based on the belief that everyone is corrupt by default. In the First Avenger Cap himself disobeyed orders, rescued prisoners of war and then surrendered himself for disciplinary action to his commander. Cap knew back then that the chain of command and the existence of a certain hierarchy is important for accountability.

Cap said that the accords are only shifting the blame, but when did the Avengers accept any blame for their failings or misjudgements?

When does Tony?

And yes, the Accords shift the blame. It's that stupid 'Superman/Thor are to blame' logic. The circular nonsense Vision spouts, where heroes create their own enemies. Ignoring that Red Skull and Hydra existed before Captain America in this universe.
 
I understand all that, but you can't reject any sort of supervision based on the belief that everyone is corrupt by default. In the First Avenger Cap himself disobeyed orders, rescued prisoners of war and then surrendered himself for disciplinary action to his commander. Cap knew back then that the chain of command and the existence of a certain hierarchy is important for accountability.

Cap said that the accords are only shifting the blame, but when did the Avengers accept any blame for their failings or misjudgements?
That street could also go both ways. There was nothing saying that the Avengers couldn't hold a lens to the U.N. or the U.S. government either. What better group to keep those guys honest, or to further root out the corrupt/dregs of HYDRA?

EDIT: Hell, doesn't the world still think Fury is dead? There's your best guy for getting dirt on the institutions that manage the Avengers, right there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom