I just noticed that Spidey's gloves have black fabric between the fingers.
I just noticed that Spidey's gloves have black fabric between the fingers.
I just noticed that Spidey's gloves have black fabric between the fingers.
He said as much in the movie. Even lied the first time Tony asked..that's when he lost me.Right, thanks! I keep getting confused over it, because I do think Steve has known the whole time but then someone pops up with an argument as to why he didn't know.
Why are all of you still wasting words with spatula?
Yeah, I admit I was a bit confused because Tony even calls him out on his bullshit and later I was like smh at Steve thinking he could actually lie his way out of that.He said as much in the movie. Even lied the first time Tony asked..that's when he lost me.
Yeah, I admit I was a bit confused because Tony even calls him out on his bullshit and later I was like smh at Steve thinking he could actually lie his way out of that.
Isn't there literally a line in winter soldier where he tells Natasha "I'm always honest" after she asks him about his last kiss?
Damnit Steve!
![]()
Thing is, if he didn't know it was Bucky, why would he keep it a secret?Maybe he knew they were murdered, but didn't know it was specifically Bucky? Like, not 100% for sure?
The accident was implied to be a murder in Winter Soldier, but it's not like Cap saw the video back then.
You're not actually writing anything that counters what I said. Do you even know why Ant-Man is at the airport? Neither do it. I guess to go Big or Go Home?
Thing is, if he didn't know it was Bucky, why would he keep it a secret?
Steve has known they were murdered, definitely and with the file Widow gave him at the end, it's likely he knew it was Bucky too.
Isn't there literally a line in winter soldier where he tells Natasha "I'm always honest" after she asks him about his last kiss?
Damnit Steve!
![]()
Why did Auntman turn to Scarlett and say "and I know you too!" during the Auntman reveal? Didn't he just ride with her in the same van, receive the same briefing, etc?
Yeah. He knew. Folks keep claiming it was only "implied" for some reason. Not sure why..
Yeah. He knew. Folks keep claiming it was only "implied" for some reason. Not sure why..
Why did Auntman turn to Scarlett and say "and I know you too!" during the Auntman reveal? Didn't he just ride with her in the same van, receive the same briefing, etc?
He was probably asleep the whole trip. Yes, even on the plane.
I think he put 2+2 together and strongly suspected Bucky but was afraid to confirm directly. Then he finally asked during the flight to Siberia.Thing is, if he didn't know it was Bucky, why would he keep it a secret?
Steve has known they were murdered, definitely and with the file Widow gave him at the end, it's likely he knew it was Bucky too.
He was likely asleep the entire time. "What time zone is it?"
To be fair, Tony is also responsible for building an AI that ended up nearly destroying Sokovia and killing hundreds of citizens. If people give Cap flak for saying that collateral damage is part of the job (which I disagree with, just because people recognize realities, doesn't mean they're reckless because of it), then that fact about Tony should not be ignored. He is completely responsible for the crap at Sokovia and yet he expects people to side with the Sokovia Accords out of something that Tony himself is completely responsible for. It's hypocritical of Tony Stark.
As for Cap, Like I mentioned before, he's not brushing it off. He recognizes that there will be collateral damage, but the whole idea as you mentioned is that saving 100 lives and losing 1 is better than losing all 101 lives. It's unrealistic to expect that you will always save everybody, even if you have the most OP of powers at your disposal. Also, how is Cap a hypocrite? He refused to sign the Accords after what happened to S.H.I.E.L.D., so how could anyone be comfortable with signing your rights over to an entity that could have very sinister motivations and interests? Even if Ross's office was clean, you'd still be forced to work under an entity that deems certain events as relevant to them, while disregarding others as irrelevant and not needing heroes, even if it means more people are getting killed.
Stark was angry that the Winter Soldier killed his parents, but how is eye-for-an-eye the right way to go about things? Stark doesn't take into account that the Winter Soldier was brainwashed and a completely different persona when given the Hydra Code words. For a genius, he is completely ruled by his emotions. In essence, there's an irony about fighting Bucky when you realize that he was essentially Hydra's version of Sokovian Accords, where Bucky was a weapon to be used on anything that Hydra deemed in conflict with its interests. That Stark doesn't realize this is very telling of his character.
From what I interpreted in the movie, it seems like the logic in Hawkeye's return is to pay a favour to Wanda after what happened to Quicksilver in AoU, so I can't see how that's bad. And even then, he had a choice. Unlike Stark selfishly going after a teenaged boy to fight a man's war, knowing full well that he doesn't have the power or combat capabilities of the other Avengers. You even see the remorse in Tony's face when he sees Spider-Man getting injured and thinking that he was dead. Stark continues to showcase his reckless disregard for others.
Tony didn't draft the Accords but why is that relevant? The problem is he's pushing other Avengers to sign it, in spite of the fact that it was his complete recklessness in building Ultron that caused the mess in the first place. Also, I find it ironic that you'd use the smart/daft hero dichotomy. A smart hero would also be wary of what the Sokovia Accords mean for not only their job description(s), but also in terms of the third party/governmental interests. What if the government decides that you cannot help people in turmoil because stupid political squabbling between two countries? Is it right to let politics override basic morality? Tony Stark did the same thing in Iron Man 1 by destroying a group of terrorists using his weapons in Afghanistan. He didn't care about political nonsense, just do the right fucking thing and defeated terrorists to save Gulmira. Also the letter was snarky? Did we watch the same movie? Cap basically said "I'm sorry for not telling you the whole story, but I want you to know I'll always be available if you need me", coupled with the burner phone.
I'm amazed people think Tony have a heart of gold, when he's pretty guilty of his own transgressions and doing things that are emotional but have no basis in rationality (such as desperately forcing Cap to sign the Accords in the 2nd Act). This is the same guy who said "you started a war" in response to Cap's "we don't need to fight." That's not a smart hero, he's as punchy daft as you describe.
Because of this scene with Zola: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62cjheqv-nw
Heavily implied but not outright stated.
Zola confirmed that the Starks were assassinated but Hydra has/had so many different ways of killing people that I don't think there's any very compelling reason for Cap to think Winter Soldier killed the Starks.
Basically I believe Cap when he says he knew the Starks were killed but that he didn't know Winter Soldier did it.
All it needs are webpits.
What does it matter when you're incapable of reevaluating your position?
Ant-Man is there thematically as a parallel to Peter. Both are relatively inexperienced, both are swept up by their admiration for Steve and Tony respectively. Both show that their respective leaders are willing to take advantage of that naivety to accomplish their own goals.
Ant-Man is there from a narrative stand point because Steve needed more muscle, because it would be much easier for Wanda, Clint, and Scott to get into Germany than for Steve to smuggle Bucky out. If you bothered to pay attention, you'd have picked this up when Steve and Sam are discussing how to get Bucky out of Germany. Steve says "We're on our own," and Sam responds with "Maybe not. I know a guy," referring to Scott Lang.
Ant-Man is there from an entertainment point of view because he's fucking awesome and a great way to leave an impression on an audience.
Does that adequately answer your question? Why did you you see this movie twice when all you do is whine about it?
I assume the official concept art of Zemo hadn't been posted.
You can watch the Zola clip again, the sequence is different.That scene shows Winter Soldier using a sniper and Howard's dead body. I bet Cap figures that out pretty quick.
The implication is pretty damning.
I'm thinking if Fury was slightly less lucky, HYDRA goons would have killed him before Bucky needed to step in.So we know they used Bucky to assassinate anyone who got in their way and we know Bucky was the one who shot Fury...
It doesn't adequately answer my question. The muscle part is pointless because the movie only gives the quinjet as an out therefore making the scene necessary. There was no options, it was designed from the start to get them all there and they needed to back it up with half-baked ideas. Scott Lang has considerable resources with Hank Pym and the best idea that can ever be conceived in a long run towards the quinjet? It makes TWS evasion aspect seem almost useless. Sure, there's urgency but it all plays into, "gotta make them ALL fight". You can make any reason sort of stick but it doesn't mean the reason is good.
Huh.I assume the official concept art of Zemo hadn't been posted.
It doesn't adequately answer my question. The muscle part is pointless because the movie only gives the quinjet as an out therefore making the scene necessary. There was no options, it was designed from the start to get them all there and they needed to back it up with half-baked ideas. Scott Lang has considerable resources with Hank Pym and the best idea that can ever be conceived in a long run towards the quinjet? It makes TWS evasion aspect seem almost useless. Sure, there's urgency but it all plays into, "gotta make them ALL fight". You can make any reason sort of stick but it doesn't mean the reason is good.
You seem to have missed that the Quinjet was the contingency plan. Cap predicted that Tony would intercept but he didn't know it for sure. If Tony never shows, they just take a regular jet. Since he did show, Cap knee they would have had to use a Quinjet to get everyone there.
Learn to read thread (and pay attention at the movie) FFS!
He was there to be the 6th person required on Steve's side to fight the Winter Soldiers that Zemo plan to activate. The original plan wasn't for #TeamCap vs #TeamIronMan brawl. It was for Cap to get to the Quinjet and get to Siberia and face off with the Winter Soldiers. Cap realises that he can't do it with just Falcon and Bucky and needed reinforcement. That's why Wanda, Hawkeye, and Ant-Man were recruited. They needed the extra muscles. That plan went sideways when they got intercepted by Tony so they changed plan.
It's the illusion of choice. If they wanted to go the TWS route they'd head to ANY private airstrip and just hi-jack a private jet. The problem is nothing is discussed or shown except, "we have to get to this airport quickly to (1) fly out on a plane or (2) fight to the quinjet." They are good choices to make but they're still stupid options because (1) the jet will be covered and (2) it's a massive airport, it'd be watched.
Are you saying the preceding events weren't designed by the writers and director to set up that big set piece and no other options available in the MCU were available to TeamCap?
Who'd let them hire private airstrip? They are wanted criminals! And they are not exactly low-key when it comes to appearance.
They were easily recognizable internationally wanted suspects who were trying to get to Zemo BEFORE he activated an entire team of Winter Soldiers that were even more powerful than Bucky. They did not have time to weigh other options that all would be problematic. They needed to go NOW. So they chose the quickest route.
It's the illusion of choice. If they wanted to go the TWS route they'd head to ANY private airstrip and just hi-jack a private jet. The problem is nothing is discussed or shown except, "we have to get to this airport quickly to (1) fly out on a plane or (2) fight to the quinjet." They are good choices to make but they're still stupid options because (1) the jet will be covered and (2) it's a massive airport, it'd be watched.
Are you saying the preceding events weren't designed by the writers and director to set up that big set piece and no other options available in the MCU were available to TeamCap?
Hire? No. Take. I don't think Cap and Co have any qualms about stealing a private jet.
Just because a series of events makes sense doesn't make them particularly interesting or good. All it means is you were able to make the situation make sense. Quality is a factor as well.
Their urgency is just smoke, though, as Zemo was already there (whether they knew or not). Sure, time was of the essence but not one of them is smart enough to think, "The psychiatrist had over a day's head start, we could probably come at this from a different angle."
This.
Also, am I the only one who wished they'd do this whenever his spider-sense is tingling?
![]()
Hire? No. Take. I don't think Cap and Co have any qualms about stealing a private jet.
Just because a series of events makes sense doesn't make them particularly interesting or good. All it means is you were able to make the situation make sense. Quality is a factor as well.
Their urgency is just smoke, though, as Zemo was already there (whether they knew or not). Sure, time was of the essence but not one of them is smart enough to think, "The psychiatrist had over a day's head start, we could probably come at this from a different angle."
https://youtu.be/E486XjhYHh8
Zola: "When history did not cooperate, history was changed."
*image of Bucky with a sniper rifle*
Widow: "That's impossible. SHIELD would have stopped you."
Zola: "Accidents. Happen."
*Images of newspaper photos of Howard Starks car accident and then a file photo of Nick Fury with the word "Deceased" on it*
So we know they used Bucky to assassinate anyone who got in their way and we know Bucky was the one who shot Fury... So those two things with Starks death in between is about as heavy an implication as there can be without Zola outright stating Bucky killed them or showing a photo of him doing it
It doesn't adequately answer my question. The muscle part is pointless because the movie only gives the quinjet as an out therefore making the scene necessary. There was no options, it was designed from the start to get them all there and they needed to back it up with half-baked ideas. Scott Lang has considerable resources with Hank Pym and the best idea that can ever be conceived in a long run towards the quinjet? It makes TWS evasion aspect seem almost non-existent. Sure, there's urgency but it all plays into, "gotta make them ALL fight". You can make a movie make sense in that the dialogue reinforces the choices made but you can still question whether those choices are good or good. Hunger Games makes choices that fit well within the universe but it's not like they're not criticized for being dumb.
It's subpar being a dingus. All he does in this thread is try his hardest to nitpick the movie and then either change his argument or become petulant once refuted.
I believe the Russos, new MCU directors as of TWS, left it open-ended and vague enough to not drag down Whedon's Avengers 2 with a plot hole.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQgDLaj6jFI
Nat: "That thing you asked for. I called in a few favors from Kiev."
"Be careful, Steve, Might not want to pull on that thread."
I assume the official concept art of Zemo hadn't been posted.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQgDLaj6jFI
Nat: "That thing you asked for. I called in a few favors from Kiev."
"Be careful, Steve, Might not want to pull on that thread."
This hurts.
I assume the official concept art of Zemo hadn't been posted.
Dude is still alive. We can still get him.