Sibersk Esto
Banned
You don't really need hugo
To be honest they could get away with a different actor, especially is he is alive and been in space for 70 something years.
I remember thinking Robert Redford was gonna end up being red skull in TWS
nah it was only meA looooot of people had that theory
Still waiting for MODOK
Me too thonah it was only me
where is this from?
Still waiting for MODOK
OeeehCan't remember if there's been any rumours but since Thor: Ragnarok is supposed to be the "Oh shit" moment of Phase 3, much like Winter Soldier was for Phase 2, I wouldn't be suprised to see him in Ragnarok.
That's Zola's android suit
![]()
I can see them working towards some sort of happy ending in Ragnarok... Then about 5 minutes before the end we just get Thanos arrive and utterly destroy Asgard.Oeeeh
I can see it now;
Loki: "Moehahaha brother, you cherish your Midgard, but I have claimed the throne! And as the Allfather, I banish you to Niffleheim. Say hello to Hela for me!"
Thor: "Loki you biiiiiiiii-"
*Loki fends off Lady Siff, the Warrior Three and other Asgardians while he smugly sits on his throne"
Loki: "Ha, everything I ever wanted. Finally things are going my way"
"Ah, you have such small ambitions Asgardian. Just like the time you wanted to take over the Earth" *Thanos walks in* "Give me the cosmic cube. And the staff you borrowed"
Yeah... I can see this happening.
That's Zola's android suit
![]()
How dare you say such things about Tony StankTony is the Eternal L Holder
But after actually seeing it and how everything played out, I got both their perspectives but just couldn't agree with where Cap was in this.
I won't debate it (because i'm sure the same circular arguments have gone around the thread), but I'll just say that Cap wasn't really doing himself any PR favours for his case against oversight considering how much damage he was prepared to cause for personal reasons. The safest hands aren't your own when you are as willing to move for your own agenda as anyone else is for theirs.
I went in not fussed, came out of it #TeamIronMan.
My biggest regret about this film is that Fox and Marvel couldn't work a way to get at least 5 seconds of the airport scene appearing to be a cinema screen with Deadpool munching on popcorn and turning to the audience with a team Spidey flag and cheesy one liner.
Oeeeh
I can see it now;
Loki: "Moehahaha brother, you cherish your Midgard, but I have claimed the throne! And as the Allfather, I banish you to Niffleheim. Say hello to Hela for me!"
Thor: "Loki you biiiiiiiii-"
*Loki fends off Lady Siff, the Warrior Three and other Asgardians while he smugly sits on his throne"
Loki: "Ha, everything I ever wanted. Finally things are going my way"
"Ah, you have such small ambitions Asgardian. Just like the time you wanted to take over the Earth" *Thanos walks in* "Give me the cosmic cube. And the staff you borrowed"
Yeah... I can see this happening.
lolwat, your biggest regret is you didn't get some tailor made scene you dreamt up as being cool that would involve two studios at odds to strike some sort of expensive deal?
This is clearly a joke right?
No joke, I like Deadpool and it would make me laugh. Problem?
Ah yeah, I thought it looked more Zola like. Still a hint that he could be back with a dumb suit![]()
No problem, just hilarious you walked out of the theater going "oh man I liked this movie, but what really really sucked is how deadpool didn't look at a screen that showed the fight while delivering some line. Aside from being totally impossible because fox and marvel hate each other, and it's a super specific request and it would take all the momentum out of the fight, I sorely disliked that about this movie; why didn't you make it happen russos! *shakes fist*"
lmao.
If he's talking about Infinity War, he should blame that misconception on, you know, their titles.The movies are very very different from one another, said Anthony Russo. Its not a part one and part two scenario, necessarily. Theyre just two different expressions. I think it creates a misconception that were shooting them at the same time.
You just described Cap, he's not a PR guy, he never was, he has beliefs and follows them, especially if that means preventing a friend getting killed. When bucky was "safe" he surrendered.
I actually came out of the cinema pretty pumped, it's by far one of the best yet. That was Friday. I was thinking about Deadpool just now and the thought popped in so I thought I'd share.
And nothing is impossible where money is involvedIf there's a character who can get away with hopping between universes it's Deadpool. I know it's unlikely at this stage but I did read a Russo interview where they talked about the possibility so who knows? Four years ago it was impossible for Spidey to show up.
I'm glad you find it hilarious though, you have a very strange sense of humour.
Here's a link if you want a read of the article I mentioned: http://geektyrant.com/news/captain-america-civil-war-directors-want-deadpool-in-the-mcu
Oh, I'm not saying it wasn't true to his character (or the arc he's been on through his films). My point was Cap was all against the Accords and oversight in general, then did a pretty good job of showing why that very oversight might be necessary in the first place. And that undermines his stance / made him appear hypocritical etc.
Also I felt like there was no real sense of "lets talk about this Tony" regarding the accords, it all felt very "Your wrong Tony" / "We are like this now because of you" etc.
I can't remember the exact wording for it though but it was during their talk in the glass room where he refuses to sign and again when Tony is trying to convince him before they fight at the airport. I remember Tony was relatively jovial about it up until Cap said that and then he flipped.
[does anyone remember the rough or exact wording?] Tony says something along th lines of trying to stop the team from breaking apart and Cap is like "you did that when you signed".
The point was moreso that your biggest regret was some highly specific scene as if it was to be expected; as if everyone shared that view, or the russos could look inside your brain.
That is indeed incredibly funny to me
Oh, I'm not saying it wasn't true to his character (or the arc he's been on through his films). My point was Cap was all against the Accords and oversight in general, then did a pretty good job of showing why that very oversight might be necessary in the first place. And that undermines his stance / made him appear hypocritical etc.
Also I felt like there was no real sense of "lets talk about this Tony" regarding the accords, it all felt very "Your wrong Tony" / "We are like this now because of you" etc.
I can't remember the exact wording for it though but it was during their talk in the glass room where he refuses to sign and again when Tony is trying to convince him before they fight at the airport. I remember Tony was relatively jovial about it up until Cap said that and then he flipped.
[does anyone remember the rough or exact wording?] Tony says something along th lines of trying to stop the team from breaking apart and Cap is like "you did that when you signed".
The oversight you mentioned wanted bucky dead on sight, ofcourse cap is going to be against that, there's nothing hypocritical about this.
And he only refuses to sign because he finds out stark put wanda on house arrest, he was literally on the verge of signing before that.
The movies these 2 characters have been in put them exactly where they need to be for this fight.
Tony, eschewing any oversight or sharing with the team in AoU creates a pyschotic robotic AI. HE is absolutely ready (and needs) oversight.
Cap, has seen the oversight he worked for be infiltrated and taken over by those who wanted to kill millions at a time. He is absolutely against being controlled by a group that could be like that again.
I can see why people are Team Cap or Team Iron Man, but I don't think either team was portrayed as being 100% correct in the movie.
Steve was ready to sign the accords until he found out that Tony basically put Wanda under house arrest. I thought that exchange was pretty powerful because it showed how desperate Tony was to make this work at all costs with Steve on the other side not willing to compromise on his ideals.
You didn't pick that up during the first viewing? It was pretty neat.They recreate the cover of the Civil War comic during the final fight. I was wondering why they lingered on it so long the first time.
The orders for DoS are because he's a known ultra dangerous combatant with special abilities. From their PoV a regular police/swat force can't really afford to go easy against someone like him.
An Avenger-tier force can go in and get him without needing to be prepared to kill but can regular forces? As I said, its not out OoC for Cap to want to protect his friend Bucky, but in the same way Cap isn't happy about acting under anyone else's orders or agendas anymore - he has no more right to impose an agenda of his own on anyone else. Its all about perspective.[Sidenote:] As for killing in the movies in general, I've always felt thats kind of a moot point as its not like the heroes themselves have a no-kill policy
Also in the news they were calling out for Wanda specifically for the Lagos thing - What other options do they have for her?
(Anyway I don't think we are going to agree - I'm sure these same comments are things others have stated earlier in the thread in the same cyclical arguments)
They did kill Crossbone though.
Oh shit Zemo confirmed for dead next time he shows up
Just saw it again. Didn't think any more of it.
Well, Rumlow and Zola survived their initial debut film. They're both dead in the next sequel though.
Oh and Abomination technically still alive somewhere. Same with Trevor
When does he impose his own agenda on anyone else? He doesn't berate widow or anyone else for signing, nor does he ask her for help.
Sam and Sharon help him because they believe in the same things, heck he even warns Sharon that they will come for her. She's cool with it because she believes the same things, heck she's the one that delivered the speech that solidified Cap's resolve.
He's pretty much sitting on the sidelines/mourning peggy until the kill order, the motivations of oversight don't matter, Cap will never let a friend die.
He intervenes from getting bucky killed and chases after him to stop him, and surrenders when he feels bucky is safe.
Sam and Cap even discuss calling tony to deal with what bucky told them about the 5 other winter soldiers, but come to the conclusion that stark won't believe them, and he's right, stark brushes that shit off like nonsense and has spider-man grab his shield.
Cap is as straightforward as they come and does anything but impose his agenda on others.
Sat watching Age of Ultron again, and it's making me kind of wish Thor was in this.
I mean, it's got pretty much everyone else involved. Poor Thor. He's been given fuck all to do in the entire MCU, I hope Ragnarok is good.
Protecting Bucky is his agenda. To us on the outside it's obvious there is a larger game being played, but all he knows at that point is there was a bombing at the UN and the footage shows that "The Winter Soldier", a known Hydra assassin, was the cause.
He knows the authorities are going to go after "Winter Soldier" and he decides that he is willing to use his own force (against advice from fellow avenger BW) to stop them from doing that because he wants to save his friend. If it was Crossbones or one of his team or some other random villain, would Cap have gone out of his way to for them? As you said, Cap isn't the type to let a friend die — but is that not a personal agenda? And is he not imposing it?
It's not until after Cap + Bucky beat the ship of out a swat team, steal a car and bike, Bucky blows up the roof of a tunnel, they all get stopped by War Machine and more cops and Bucky is brought in for psych eval that Cap / Sharon realise that its possible Bucky might not be behind it.