The other not dead guys werent brought back either... Depends I think. Maybe when Masters of Evil really become a thing.If they were one and done with Zemo he would've shot himself
The other not dead guys werent brought back either... Depends I think. Maybe when Masters of Evil really become a thing.If they were one and done with Zemo he would've shot himself
If they were one and done with Zemo he would've shot himself
We'll find out when we get to the end..The other not dead guys werent brought back either... Depends I think. Maybe when Masters of Evil really become a thing.
If they were one and done with Zemo he would've shot himself
If they were one and done with Zemo he would've shot himself
The other not dead guys werent brought back either... Depends I think. Maybe when Masters of Evil really become a thing.
They had a funny Ralph and Sam relationship..the "job" being Cap's best friend. Was great stuff. Subtle, for the most part..Perfection. Biggest laugh in the whole film.
Perfection. Biggest laugh in the whole film.
Brühl also stated that Zemo may also appear in future MCU films, with Moore adding that, while Zemo has a purpose in this film, it is more to set up a future film.
Oh?It's been known for some time now that Zemo would be back.
That scene where Tony sees the video is perfect. It's one thing to be told that Bucky murdered his parents, but to actually see it? The whole final conflict is really well done. Bucky is Cap's best friend and wasn't in his right mind, but...
"I don't care. He killed my Mom."
You really do completely empathise with both sides. Stark just watched that fucker beat his Dad to death and strangle his Mum.
That scene where Tony sees the video is perfect. It's one thing to be told that Bucky murdered his parents, but to actually see it? The whole final conflict is really well done. Bucky is Cap's best friend and wasn't in his right mind, but...
"I don't care. He killed my Mom."
You really do completely empathise with both sides. Stark just watched that fucker beat his Dad to death and strangle his Mum.
It's been known for some time now that Zemo would be back.
Civil War Producer, Nate Moore: Both Bruhl and Freemans characters serve a purpose in this film, but, like Black Panther, theyre setting up a future film.
They havent figured out how to balance their storytelling with the TV storytelling yet. They dont want to interfere with TV shows and vice-versa.
Do it Marvel.
![]()
Edit:
Civil War Producer, Nate Moore: Both Bruhl and Freemans characters serve a purpose in this film, but, like Black Panther, theyre setting up a future film.
They havent figured out how to balance their storytelling with the TV storytelling yet. They dont want to interfere with TV shows and vice-versa.
Did they ever explain why Pepper Potts wasnt in the beginning when Tony was at MIT?
Did they ever explain why Pepper Potts wasnt in the beginning when Tony was at MIT?
Did they ever explain why Pepper Potts wasnt in the beginning when Tony was at MIT?
Do it Marvel.
![]()
Edit: Quotes from a Collider article
Also:
Cause she dumped his simp ass once she realized how fucking awesome she was when she had Extremis
Stahp
it's implied that they had a falling out. someone was supposed to remove her name from the teleprompter but didn't. Tony was upset about seeing her name
I really hope Paltrow cameo's in the future, she doesn't even have to get back with Tony.
How pissed would YOU be if you had superpowers and your boyfriend took them away?!
![]()
![]()
Absolutely savage.
Oh, I'm not saying it wasn't true to his character (or the arc he's been on through his films). My point was Cap was all against the Accords and oversight in general, then did a pretty good job of showing why that very oversight might be necessary in the first place. And that undermines his stance / made him appear hypocritical etc.
Edit: Quotes from a Collider article
Civil War Producer, Nate Moore: Both Bruhl and Freeman’s characters serve a purpose in this film, but, like Black Panther, they’re setting up a future film.
The Lagos explosion clarified this difference. Cap felt that the collateral damage was not due to negligence or abuse of power, but the fact you can't always save everyone. Stark viewed it as more deaths from the actions of the Avengers and they need a higher power to be ultimately responsible.
What giants do.T'Challa basically told Clint to go fuck himself and his stupid bow staff
Zero patience for a peasant
His line to witch wasn't just a general "you can't save everyone", he was telling her that if a situation like that happened again, maybe she doesn't have to save him. Remember when jumped on the grenade to save his teammates?
Remember when jumped on the grenade to save his teammates?
Wouldn't the grenade have killed not only cap and crossbones, but also Wanda and a bunch of other bystanders?
She did the right thing, but she wasnt ready for "minimizing" deaths rather than "avoiding" deaths.
Oh man, now I remember the only glaringly stupid part of CW. When Black Widow somehow manages to survive being sealed into an armoured truck with a grenade. The explosion was enough to blow the armoured doors open, but she just walks it off.
I think it just means his role in Cap3 is to cause the breakup thus setting new status quo for future films.It's been known for some time now that Zemo would be back.
Oh man, now I remember the only glaringly stupid part of CW. When Black Widow somehow manages to survive being sealed into an armoured truck with a grenade. The explosion was enough to blow the armoured doors open, but she just walks it off.
Doesnt she knock out a guard immediately and places his body on top of the grenade?
That's a great summary.One way to view the ideological differences between Cap and Stark is what events have most shaped their stances.
For Stark, Ultron/Sokovia weighs heaviest on his mind. He feels personally responsible and probably doesn't trust his own leadership any more. Everything in Ultron was his doing, and the deaths and damage were on him.
For Cap, the events from Winter Soldier would be most pressing. At the start of the film, he was seriously questioning being SHIELD's errand boy, never knowing the real reason of why he was doing each mission and hated being lied to. Then when SHIELD and the World Security Council was shown to be a front for Hydra, his distrust of agencies/governments/committees would be massive.
The Laos explosion clarified this difference. Cap felt that the collateral damage was not due to negligence or abuse of power, but the fact you can't always save everyone. Stark viewed it as more deaths from the actions of the Avengers and they need a higher power to be ultimately responsible.
I totally missed that, good pick up.Btw I've talked about this with my friends, but I haven't seen it discussed here.
My favourite "Cap" moment in this movie is when stark tells him to stay down and he replies he "can do this all day", which then leads to bucky giving him the opening he needs.
Complete parallel to the alley fight with the bully in first avenger.
Just to be sure .... there are just 2 post credits scenes right ?
Yup. Mid credits and Post credits.
Red Skull, Zola, and Zemo will all return when it is time for Hydra to be reborn.
Well, Rumlow and Zola survived their initial debut film. They're both dead in the next sequel though.
Oh and Abomination technically still alive somewhere. Same with Trevor
They did kill Crossbone though.
Nebula in Guardians? She wasn't the main antagonist but you could argue Thanos and her were explicitly villains in the movie.
I wouldn't be surprised if villains like Red Skull, Ronan and Malekith were just pocketed into infinity stones and Thanos brings them out during Infinity War tbh
I am kinda traumatized because when Avengers started showing before the EUA the first month the copies didn't had the Shawarma scene ....