-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
College Football 2010-11 Bowls: *
- Thread starter Cyan
- Start date
- Status
Gamecocks625
Member
ConfusingJazz
Member
KingGondo said:
For fuck's sake Big 10, you already had a billion and a half rivalry trophies, now your adding this shit?
crowphoenix
Banned
What do you have against history and tradition?Meier said:
Next year they'll add Most Improved Legends and Most Effort Leaders.ConfusingJazz said:
eznark said:
I just googled fields and punter ... can't be right ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandon_Fields
BertramCooper
Banned
I'd say it's at least better than the Big 12 logo, which has a giant "XII" on it even though the conference is very strict about the conference being called the "Big 12" and not the "Big XII" or the "Big Twelve."
ConfusingJazz
Member
Cyan said:
Suck it! I am still younger!
by less then a month 
bucknuticus
Member
krzy123 said:
They needed another name for MSU, they dont have tons of legendary players.
bucknuticus
Member
I see the headlines already, OSU leads Leaders, OSU leader leaders upsets legends leader.
devildog820
Member
Subitai said:Yeah, the secondary logo should be the only logo.
Divisions should have just been yin northwest, and yang southeast - simple and self explanatory. Leaders and Legends tells you nothing.
I wonder what unintended consequences will arise from the division split? When they split the SEC, I remember reading (years later) that it was assumed that Georgia/Tennessee would always challenge Auburn/Alabama for the Championship, which is why they were in different divisions. Florida was lumped in with South Carolina and Kentucky as also-rans, despite the fact we had already won one (legitimate) SEC title.
I think the Big 12 split was pretty much what people expected, mostly Nebraska, OU, and Texas. When they split the ACC (and placed the championship game), it was assumed that FSU and Miami would be in the game every year.
Looking at the B1G, I still see OSU/Michigan championship games each year with the occasional MSU or Wisconsin interloper.
ConfusingJazz
Member
devildog820 said:
Actually, no. They expected the North to dominate with Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas State to always be in the National Championship hunt, with Texas A&M typically winning the south.
You are forgetting how crappy Texas and Oklahoma were in the 90s.
devildog820
Member
eznark said:
Glad you got the subtle snark.
Yeah, it's like he hasn't been watching the last few seasons of Wolverine football. Right now I don't see anything that would make me want to make those kind of predictions. OSU, MSU, Wisconsin, Michigan (won't stay down forever), Nebraska... basically all of the Big 1Ten2 are passable. I could see any of them contend for the title (the Big 1Ten2 title to be clear) any given year with the sole exclusion of Purdue. Even Northwestern has been showing up lately.eznark said:
devildog820
Member
ConfusingJazz said:
You're right, I did mean to write TAMU and I screwed up on Oklahoma. Texas is on my mind now, obviously. I forgot Stoops only got to Oklahoma in 1998. I didn't think KSU was considered alongside Colorado/Nebraska though.
devildog820
Member
Meier said:
Not really that much of a surprise, it's a career killer. Like Duke. You can win a big game every so often, but you're not going to compete for a SEC East title more than once or twice.
devildog820
Member
eznark said:
Iowa because they seem like a Big 12 team, PSU, dunno. I always forget PSU is in the Big 10.
devildog820
Member
Meier said:
Too ambitious.
ConfusingJazz
Member
Meier said:
Malzahn's father just got paid.
crowphoenix
Banned
*high five*Dali said:
- Status