better fps with RTX on? I think you misunderstood. Maybe you are talking about DSLL.
yeah...raytracing matters.
dlss quality mode rtx 3070 i7 9700k RT psycho mode 1440p ultra settings
"name": "AntiAliasing",
"type": "string_list",
"is_dynamic": true,
"value": "Off",
"index": 0,
"default_index": 1,
"values": [
"Off",
"High"
]
},
Pretty sure I have posts in my history about issues with Pascal drivers. One relating to Doom stuck out. Fixed one annoying issue from a previous driver set, but bollocked up Doom with Vulkan in that next set. Rarely upgraded drivers without a specific need since then, and always noted down a last "good" driver. Less of a problem with Pascal being 2 gens old now... and yet this issue.
Swap your 1080Ti for mine?Thanks for the heads up
So far I haven't experienced this issue personally.
are you using dlss?
What other settings? My exact setup but won't have game till weekend.
I have most everything on high/ultra, 1440p, and DLSS on balanced I believe.
I’m on a i3-10100 (4 core) gaming locked at ~60 FPS. Performance is acceptable. Drops below 60 have my 2080 TI at 99% usage so it’s not really held back by my CPU.Interesting CPU results
It looks like CP scales up to 12 cores and 6/12 cpus outside of fastest overclocked models from Intel and 5600X suffer
Cyberpunk 2077 im Technik-Test - CPU-, GPU- und Raytracing-Benchmarks [Update]
#Cyberpunk2077 im Liveticker: Wir benchen für euch Grafikkarten und CPUs und analysieren die schicke Raytracing-Implementierung.www.pcgameshardware.de
Nah it averages 40-45 sometumes up to 53 fps though at times
It's a setting you can adjust under Controls. I think I changed the 'curve' for horizontal and vertical to 0. Edit: Or maybe it was the turning bonus that R reektann mentioned.
I have as well. I am running a 1660 ti, with 16GB of ram. My processor is a i5-9400F and the game is stored on my PCIe WD 256GB boot drive.
IDKFA
as promissed - maybe that RX6800 is not that bad.
Cheap AND performant
uh it seems my CPU is bottlenecking the GPU. Shit. If it goes like that I'll be able to put together a second PC.
Ryzen 5 2600
16GB ddr4 @3200
RX6800
3440x1440p
I use high preset with SSR bumped up to ultra. I can get anything between 30 fps and 70 fps. Anything above 45-50 feels nice smooth thanks to the freesync.
But here is the curious thing:
The biggest frame drops, and I mean those which I can feel, happen when GPU is far from 100%. It can be even 30fps and GPU at 60%. Usually they happen when there is a big crowd. I just got out of my apartment, so I didn't see a lot, but it starts to look consistent. I got massive frame drop (55-60 -> 28 for a sec, then 30-40) when exiting the building to that square, and had around 40 fps in lizzies bar where there also are a lot of people.
Am I right to assume it is actually the CPU not up to the task? Could even be that I would be able to increase the settings with a better CPU? Even if not and it would just give me more stable FPS, this is kind of surprising for me tbh.
If the reflected objects are in view of the camera, then it saves performance to use SSR instead.
I don't know man... If I had a working g-sync monitor I'd take 3070. But I don't, and I know it can have problems with 3070 so I bought 6800. That is the main reason, I don't think 8GB will be problem with this resolution any time soon.Wow. Thanks.
Certainly gives me something to think about. I can budget a 6800 or a 3070. I was thinking of the 3060ti, but if I have the money why not go for something with a little more power.
Not that it matters at the moment anyway with most of these new cards being out of stock
But I don't think it's using whatever costs less in any given scenario. It's using them both on top of each other. So wouldn't it be best to just disable SSR if you're using ray tracing?
It wasn't aimed at you specifically, but the general sentiment that is seen pretty much everywhere.
Nope. These cards are actually still too weak to run RT decently, unless you're targeting 1080p, maybe 1440p native in certain cases.
