IGN video shoots compared:
one delicious crow for you
We can put this "PS4 version is blurry" into "bullshit" folder.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
DF/JF: Battlefield 4 PS4 vs XB1 videos/screens (900p PS4, 720p XB1)
- Thread starter shinobi602
- Start date
IGN video shoots compared:
one delicious crow for you
We can put this "PS4 version is blurry" into "bullshit" folder.
Maninthemirror
Banned
So is bf4
The "blurry" version almost always seems only blurry because its compared to a more sharpened version, but that doesnt matter actually as people can add sharpening all they want. However, this comparison does a good job at showing the difference in resolution that people can expect for the graphical fidelity.
That PS4 shot is post processed by a user with added sharpening and saturation, so its not directly the IGN shots, but yeah, considering you can get a similar effect like that on your TV with the TV settings, I dont think anyone will think that the PS4 looks "blurry" once they actually play it.
GribbleGrunger
Dreams in Digital
You seem to be under the impression the consoles are already out. If you were a gamer who played games like Ghost or Battlefield constantly, which console would you choose? Remember, there are other people who haven't chosen yet too.
phosphor112
Banned
Jesus fucking christ man. There is a giant fucking plume of dust. Is it that hard to figure out nuances in picture comparisons?If you look at the dirt road ahead in this pic comparison, the XO version actually has a tremendous amount of added detail...
In the end we could argue on an on about this. What it comes down to ultimately is choice.
I personally think that the PS4 version looks best to my eyes, but the XO version looks far from crap...they both look excellent...I am actually surprised at how good XO version looks, I expected it to be night/day with PS4, but I simply cant say it is...really just different shades of gray.
Again, thats my opinion, and I am sure others will have their own opinion on the matter.
What matters is that you are happy with what you buy/use. If that is the case, dont let anyone tell you that you shouldn't be happy, and having fun playing games
Canis lupus
Member
Sorry shinobi, not mine, found it on twitter :/
Bye Bye Junior.
They're a direct capture feed that's not a part of Digital Foundry. Goes to show how bad DF messed up.
Here's the raw pictures:
PS4- http://i.imgur.com/G0ygZ8Y.jpg
XB1- http://i.imgur.com/bGczeDp.jpg
ConteZero76
Member
Wonder how XBox one will perform with AO.
Man get a load of this junk frame rate on PS4 that's embarrassing
both versions hold 60 pretty well at least in SP
posted yet
Wait, what is going on here?
Nastrodamous
Member
pc wins again, but neither version look bad, a great step up from the 360 and ps3 versions, fun times.
Maninthemirror
Banned
Ps4 version looks cinematic, x1
Version looks like someone dialed the sharpness level to 11
It never drops to 30fps in DF's comparison and is for the most part rock solid 60 fps. Average is not give, but I would think high 50s with a framecap at 60. AFAIK Killzone's target started as 30fps while BF4's has been 60fps. More importantly though, where is a framerate analysis of Killzone?
Edit: The biggest BF4 (PS4) drop was like 45 in a cutscene. Re-edit, it dipped to 40 when something big exploded.
IGN video shoots compared:
one delicious crow for you
We can put this "PS4 version is blurry" into "bullshit" folder.
Sorry but that ps4 screenshot has been edited by a neogaf member (added sharpen filter)
This is the original shot
http://i.imgur.com/G0ygZ8Y.jpg
Showing how you can make the PS4 version look with TV settings if you prefer the oversaturated and sharper X1 look.
I'm pre-ordering an Xbox One and probably won't be getting a PS4.
I think the PS4 probably looks a little better, and seems to preform better.
That said, I'm perfectly happy with the XBO quality on these images. Looks really good.
I'm sure the gap could widen as the gen goes on (or MS could close it a bit given that it seems their ESRAM support is having issues at the moment).
I think to your average non-GAFer they will see these systems and see rough equivelency. That's good news for MS given that there is a raw power disadvantage.
I think the PS4 probably looks a little better, and seems to preform better.
That said, I'm perfectly happy with the XBO quality on these images. Looks really good.
I'm sure the gap could widen as the gen goes on (or MS could close it a bit given that it seems their ESRAM support is having issues at the moment).
I think to your average non-GAFer they will see these systems and see rough equivelency. That's good news for MS given that there is a raw power disadvantage.
apperently you can:
Here is same shot from IGN video showing that it is Xbone version that is blur not PS4.
Broder Salsa
Banned
People really should stop comparing screenshots of fucking compressed ass video.
posted yet
This shit needs to be included in the OP, it's the most accurate comparison yet in terms of what people will see on their TVs.
Are there any proper (correct levels/no added sharpening) xbox one screenshots around? I know there are video captures, but the compression in those destroys detail.
I really hope this is not what people will see on TVs.
I really hope this is not what people will see on TVs.
fluffydelusions
Member
KZ looks great but again, smaller maps, less players, less destruction etc etc
Read my responses above.
Maybe he's talking about the ground near the player? XB1 version looks to have some added bump mapped/tessellated dirt going on.
Ouch, yeah I take back what I said before about the "blur filter" on the PS4 version. DF just fucked up the capture. I don't think they should have put this out knowing how compromised their footage was.
PS4 version is obviously head and shoulders over the Xbone here.
WoolyNinja
Member
Looks the same/very similar to the PC version, no?
Still comes down to how you value kinect IMO. The kinect and price seem like far bigger differentiators than resolution and graphic fidelity, at least IMO. I was prepared for dissapointment as a 1200p PC gamer but, at least for BF4, the drop in resolution didn't bother me. Still cautious about MP though and will look forward to more details as Xbox one launch approaches.
ConteZero76
Member
This run stable at 60fps.
Game will be added before launch.
and since when sharpen add texture detail ? Look at textures. They are the same. Same as here:
i am not talking about sharpen filter.
Portugeezer
Member
Anyone disappointed forgot about early graphics of last gen.
All these were 30fps on top of that. And I will do a favour and not even include PDZ. 2006, 2007, 2008.
All these were 30fps on top of that. And I will do a favour and not even include PDZ. 2006, 2007, 2008.
Broder Salsa
Banned
No they're not, look at his sleeve!
Ok this seems pretty fair then. They just contrasted it a little more cause the actual raw can seem a little washed out and appears less defines, but it's actually not true. It's just less contrasted.
Even though any of the multiplatform games will probably also be on PC and I have that option, this is very discouraging.
If of course the 'unoptimised tools' and learning curve etc means greater parity in the future as with the last era (after 2/3+ years though) then this would not be as much of an issue, but this seems unlikely.
The only reason I'd keep the bone preorder now if for additional media purposes like local video streaming or future HEVC/4k video decoding, which also is totally unknown and probably unlikely considering poor 360 codec support.
Exclusives? Hmm not sure there are any/many titles that I must have to make it worthwhile. If a game like MGSV was just on both consoles and the PS4 one was a lot better, that would be annoying.
If of course the 'unoptimised tools' and learning curve etc means greater parity in the future as with the last era (after 2/3+ years though) then this would not be as much of an issue, but this seems unlikely.
The only reason I'd keep the bone preorder now if for additional media purposes like local video streaming or future HEVC/4k video decoding, which also is totally unknown and probably unlikely considering poor 360 codec support.
Exclusives? Hmm not sure there are any/many titles that I must have to make it worthwhile. If a game like MGSV was just on both consoles and the PS4 one was a lot better, that would be annoying.
GribbleGrunger
Dreams in Digital
posted yet
Can you slow that switch down a little. It's hard to take it in before it flicks to the next shot ... and visa versa ... and visa versa ...
DenogginizerOS
BenjaminBirdie's Thomas Jefferson
The graph at the bottom clearly shows the X1 version about to tank.
maabus1999
Member
First off, IGN is hte one using ElGato, DF used there own custom box...
Second off, stop showing the GIF with user-modified images (aka not accurate) please.
Maninthemirror
Banned
Ps4 has the explosion sequence already in flow while x1 version has not begun yet and you can see it tanking in the graph below . Nice try tho
LabouredSubterfuge
Member
The camo uses procedural (sort of) texturing bb.
It's almost a if the PS4 image has a HUGE FUCKING EXPLOSION in the middle of the screen that isn't on the XB1 footage.
heh yeah. Point is PS4 was supposed to be "blurry". Those shots state otherwise.
NTIETS13A_Superiority
Banned
Looks way better without sharpen.Why would someone rape the pic with sharpen filter.
Can Crusher
Banned
An explosion is happening on the PS4 version there.
TheCanisDirus
Member
That's the random camo generation... no?
So people stop saying X1 has the superior look and showing that people who prefer it can emulate it easily on their TV.