• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Digital Foundry - Assassin's Creed Unity patch analysed

stryke

Member
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/d...er&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=socialoomph

http://youtu.be/v3UEkBx-FHQ

This week, Ubisoft released a massive update to Assassin's Creed Unity, fixing an enormous range of bugs and promising higher frame-rates. Performance optimisations specifically noted were as follows:

Improved general frame-rate on PS4 by lowering the priority of the online services thread
Fixed FPS drops while Arno climbs on the RHP building of Palais de Justice
Fixed FPS drops when in climbing and pressing the Left Stick towards somewhere that is not climbable in certain areas
Fixed FPS drops in Sainte Chapelle

Three of the four optimisations are clearly going to have highly localised effects and they are not platform-specific, but the first intrigued us - could the PS4 version of Assassins Creed Unity see genuine improvements to the performance level, and thus the game's playability, simply by tweaking the netcode? We decided to find out.

The results? While we fully believe that Assassin's Creed Unity sees certain boosts to performance in specific scenarios, what's clear is that overall frame-rates only see a small improvement overall across the run of play. In our clips this amounts to a 1.95 per cent boost in single-player (25.07fps average vs the pre-patch 24.59fps) and only 1.6 per cent in co-op (24.29fps vs 23.90fps). As gameplay isn't absolutely matched, we consider this to be within the margin of error.
 
What a joke. Should've sorted things out before releasing the game. I kinda feel bad for the people who actually put their hard work into this game.

They were on the national news on Dutch television, the more bad publicity for Ubisoft the better imo.
 
In our clips this amounts to a 1.95 per cent boost in single-player (25.07fps average vs the pre-patch 24.59fps) and only 1.6 per cent in co-op (24.29fps vs 23.90fps). As gameplay isn't absolutely matched, we consider this to be within the margin of error.

Sounds similar to something I said in the Far Cry 4 thread.

I disagree somewhat with their reasoning about not showing averages for games close to their FPS cap but I responded to that article with an idea which I will repeat here.

Why don't they take the most strenuous 120 seconds on the PS4 and compare it to the same section on Xbox One and not any differences and then do the same the other way around by comparing the most strenuous 120 second on Xbox One and comparing it to the PS4.

To take GTA:V as an easy example that would be 120 seconds of free driving through the heavy intersections vs 120 seconds of shootouts. They can then see which platforms performs worse relative to the other in the most intense sections and along with their general game play information it gives you a pretty rounded picture of performance.
 
25 FPS average in SP and 23 FPS average in Co-op

Jesus H .. this is easily the worst game from a AAA publisher in my recent memory.
 
25 frames per second? What the fuck?

Learn to read a graph and what is an average fps ;)

While playing the game the framerate doesn't feels different from previous AC.
Really good game with big improvments comparer to AC3.
And graphics are amazing, first time since Infamous That i'm surprized by graphics.
 
I highly doubt this game will ever run good. Or ever *was* going to. They were asking too much.

They weren't asking too much per se, they just didn't bother to find out how to get it from the hardware available. I mean even the PC version is CPU bottleneckked like a motherfucker.
 
Pretty clear this game needed another 3-4 months of dev time, but the missing the holiday season wasn't an option for Ubi executives.
 
25fps? That's some mighty fine cinematic gaming right there.

A frame above the standard 24fps. I think they were on track pre-patch :P

--

This patch was pretty pointless. I realize they're trying to get this fixed as soon as possible but they shouldn't rush them out the door.
 
They weren't asking too much per se, they just didn't bother to find out how to get it from the hardware available. I mean even the PC version is CPU bottleneckked like a motherfucker.
PC version is quite possibly a different sort of CPU bottleneck, dealing with excessive draw calls.

Anyways, its entirely possible that the game, as is designed, was never going to run well on the consoles. You cant always magic your way into optimizing a game and having it run brilliantly. They might well have needed to go and make some cuts to things. Things that might not be 'cuttable' at this stage.
 
Learn to read a graph and what is an average fps ;)

While playing the game the framerate doesn't feels different from previous AC.
Really good game with big improvments comparer to AC3.
And graphics are amazing, first time since Infamous That i'm surprized by graphics.

What the hell are you saying? FPS is below 25 almost all the time in Unity. And it really does feel different when I can boot up PS4, start up AC4 run around in smooth jungles and towns and then try to run around in Paris with huge dips in framerate all the time. And it is running it in 1080p.

There are improvements compared to AC3 as there should be since it was an awful game that performed average at best. But this games improvements are mostly in the game mechanics section, not in the graphics section because it runs with a lower framerate than AC3.
 
PC version is quite possibly a different sort of CPU bottleneck, dealing with excessive draw calls.

Anyways, its entirely possible that the game, as is designed, was never going to run well on the consoles. You cant always magic your way into optimizing a game and having it run brilliantly. They might well have needed to go and make some cuts to things. Things that might not be 'cuttable' at this stage.

If that is the case it is terrible design from the top down. It is not like they are incapable of bringing out games that are very good technically. AC:IV was and so is Far Cry 4 so why did they miss the mark so badly here?

In honesty I think it is more that they did not have time to complete their rounds of optimisation prior to release and they wanted it out for the holidays.
 
In our clips this amounts to a 1.95 per cent boost in single-player (25.07fps average vs the pre-patch 24.59fps) and only 1.6 per cent in co-op (24.29fps vs 23.90fps)

b027_bush_mission_accomplished_2050081722-7750.jpg
 
This framerate in Unity is the same as in older AC titles on consoles besides Black Flag on PS4. I don't really get the shitstorm now (why didn't it happen before?). Obviously this game is too ambitious for current gen.
 
Can't wait for pics of next year's assassin's creed game to leak in four months or so. On to the next one with this same shit ass engine and rushed for holiday goodness! Why stop and fix shit?! People keep on buying this shit up.
 
Because weirdly enough i enjoy Assassins creed and want to explore the game.

Well get it used then. Dont reward this kind of shit man. I enjoy AC as well but at least make a stand or something. You gonna new buy this your letting Ubisoft know its okay to launch a broken gane.
 
They are almost there. 1fps is within the margin of error, but an extra 2fps is a significant game changer.

It is an extra 0.5 FPS but as the article states they cannot 100% match gameplay so it is not like for like putting it well within the margin of error for such a test. They would have to do 100's of gameplay sessions, average them out and then see if there is a sustained advantage to nullify the run to run variance.

On the bright side while it did say there should be FPS improvements for this patch they also said the big gains are in the next one and this one does fix a lot of bugs so it is still a step forward. That is not to say that this state of affairs is acceptable though as this should have been done prior to launch.

This framerate in Unity is the same as in older AC titles on consoles besides Black Flag on PS4. I don't really get the shitstorm now (why didn't it happen before?). Obviously this game is too ambitious for current gen.

Last gen it was quite common so while it was not the best it came to be accepted.

This gen there is a greater effort being made to sustain a locked frame rate and the majority of games are locked or practically locked to their target. In essence the competition has improved so Ubi need to step it up.
 
Well get it used then. Dont reward this kind of shit man. I enjoy AC as well but at least make a stand or something. You gonna new buy this your letting Ubisoft know its okay to launch a broken gane.

if you enjoy AC then you should be used to this as well. it's only been going on for 7 years.
 
PC version is quite possibly a different sort of CPU bottleneck, dealing with excessive draw calls.

Anyways, its entirely possible that the game, as is designed, was never going to run well on the consoles. You cant always magic your way into optimizing a game and having it run brilliantly. They might well have needed to go and make some cuts to things. Things that might not be 'cuttable' at this stage.

At this point I do agree that the game will be shit graphically and performance wise, no matter what they will do. I just hope people won't buy what is at best a broken product, because it is the only way shit like this will stop with Ubi, AC and industry in general.
 
Patch wasn't meant to improve general performance. It seems to fix some of the bad dips though.

Anyway, just got my copy and will enjoy it at 25fps, sounds like a great framerate to me. We Europeans are accustomed to 50hz TVs anyway, so 25fps is our 30fps (never understood how 30fps is a great framerate for most games while 25fps is absolutely unplayable).
 
Well get it used then. Dont reward this kind of shit man. I enjoy AC as well but at least make a stand or something. You gonna new buy this your letting Ubisoft know its okay to launch a broken gane.

I know it's unacceptable but i just really want to play the game after really enjoying black flag.

"There's a great game underneath the huge pile of shit. Trust me."
^This

I just want to play the game.
 
Anyway, just got my copy and will enjoy it at 25fps, sounds like a great framerate to me. We Europeans are accustomed to 50hz TVs anyway, so 25fps is our 30fps (never understood how 30fps is a great framerate for most games while 25fps is absolutely unplayable).

what age are you living in?
 
Patch wasn't meant to improve general performance. It seems to fix some of the bad dips though.

Anyway, just got my copy and will enjoy it at 25fps, sounds like a great framerate to me. We Europeans are accustomed to 50hz TVs anyway, so 25fps is our 30fps (never understood how 30fps is a great framerate for most games while 25fps is absolutely unplayable).

No it isn't, 30 FPS is our 30 FPS. 25 FPS is choppy at best of times.
 
At least tell him to buy used. Christ I cant understand some people like to get screwed by a shitty company such as this.
Folks simply don't care enough. Just like with the past AC games...

Just like they, and I, don't care what you think of them buying AC.
 
I know it's unacceptable but i just really want to play the game after really enjoying black flag.

"There's a great game underneath the huge pile of shit. Trust me."
^This

I just want to play the game.

I really enjoyed Black Flag as well but its hard earned money you are putting down for a broken shoddy product. At least buy it used from somebody.
 
What a joke. Should've sorted things out before releasing the game. I kinda feel bad for the people who actually put their hard work into this game.

They were on the national news on Dutch television, the more bad publicity for Ubisoft the better imo.

Could you tell me what program and the time of broadcast please?
 
Patch wasn't meant to improve general performance. It seems to fix some of the bad dips though.

Anyway, just got my copy and will enjoy it at 25fps, sounds like a great framerate to me. We Europeans are accustomed to 50hz TVs anyway, so 25fps is our 30fps (never understood how 30fps is a great framerate for most games while 25fps is absolutely unplayable).

18mbktnwkgn97gif.gif
 
At least tell him to buy used. Christ I cant understand some people like to get screwed by a shitty company such as this.

Yeah there's no way i'd pay full price. I'll look for a reduced or preowned copy. Probably thousands of them floating around in the shops.
 
Please don't do that, the only way shit like this will stop is if people simply wont buy sub-par products.


The message has already been sent to Ubisoft loud and clear. They're already losing money due to low launch sales of AC Unity. Not to mention, they are getting raked through the coals throughout gaming media. I hadn't seen a company get this amount of scrutiny, since the launch of the DMR featured Xbox One.

Trust me, Ubisoft will have to change course. The fact they're already giving out for free, two of their new titles (Far Cry 4, The Crew) to season pass owners, speaks volumes.
 
Top Bottom