Question: Can I say Microsoft is the first-mover in iterative consoles and Sony was reactionary with Neo?
Scorpio alongside Xbox+Win10 integration looks more planned out and cohesive, while Sony's Neo specs suggests a hasty half-step.
Don't think so. There was nothing particularly well-planned about announcing a Xbox One slim and Scorpio in the same presser.
In the eyes of the average joe, yes, Microsoft may as well have been the initiator of this new cycle since they've officially announced theirs first.
But I don't know that they actually are.
I think Sony was wise to let them announce their hardware update first. They might appear reactionary without any of the drawbacks of actually being reactionary.
In the end I don't think it matters tho, this is a thing they both want so they'll happily play ball. Only way this would've been truly interesting is if one of them decided play it more traditional and just waited until 2018 to announce a full-blown successor.
This is where things get kinda funny and Scorpio could've easily been that 2018 system, as the later they launch the more it starts to take the shape of next-gen console that was pushed up and Neo (if it launches this year) was the planned mid cycle update with proper breathing room from the beginning.
I think Microsoft was caught a little off guard by Sony's early move on this (as we all were,) because it didn't make the most sense for them to do it.