-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Digital Foundry vs. Dead Rising 3
- Thread starter Hanmik
- Start date
- Status
It could be taken from a Youtube video, which has ugly compression.
Especially when you are plunking down that amount of money.
5 years down the line, on Black Friday, for $200 and a few games is a different matter.
I actually thought the AA solution looked fairly good for a console game.
Zatoichi's Cane
Member
720p and sub 30FPS is a disaster. In what universe is this remotely acceptable. This game should clearly be delayed.
spookyfish
Gold Member
Maybe because personally I'm interested in the XBone some day, and this is one of the games I wanted for it?
WarMacheen
Member
Like GTAV you say, do please post up a comparison.
miDnIghtEr20C
Banned
Today we are believing Digital Foundry right?
In other news...they should of delayed this game if it's hitting that low like that. It'll still be fun for people, but that's piss poor to have it dip that low. The X1 has plenty of games at launch coming.. should of delayed this one.
In other news...they should of delayed this game if it's hitting that low like that. It'll still be fun for people, but that's piss poor to have it dip that low. The X1 has plenty of games at launch coming.. should of delayed this one.
Lord Error
Insane For Sony
I've seen frame drops in the super HQ videos of Ryse released earlier last week. It's pretty solid with keeping the 30FPS, but for example, when your guy jumps over that wooden structure in the siege video, and the arrows are flying towards the bridge he's about to walk on, you can see frame drops clear as day.
Of course we all want the best performance. That is stating the obvious. I'm simply saying that it still looks like a fun game to me and I want to play it. I enjoy many games with flaws. That's it.
Super Mario is still a fun game besides it's resolution and framerate. What's the insight here exactly? This thread is a thread dedicated to tech, so please stay away with those "but itz all ze gameplay that countz!!!111". There are plenty of great and fun games worth our time which run with great framearate and native resolution. Gameplay and great tech do NOT suspend each other. Plesase understand.
Try watching the actual video,
Its quite funny how someone has cherry pciked that imagine when a few seconds later a much better texture loads.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=v2neFwBuRUQ#t=508
Does not look great, they should have kept it on the 360 like it was intended. MS have said they are still supporting the 360 for a few years but they pull this game... which would have people keeping their 360s to play it.
Regarding the screenshots ... I liked this one the best ...
Regarding the screenshots ... I liked this one the best ...
Come on. Source? Don't just say bullshit and expect not to get called out.
Brerlappin
Member
Vs DR2 PC
I think this games 360 roots are starting to show
Chobel
Member
Wait, what? Where did you heard/see that?
They were probably highlighting how the textures load into the world, something that they covered quite heavily in the article.
Vs DR2 PC
I think this games 360 roots are starting to show
DR2 on PC looks very clean. Looks like you are comparing generations almost.
SEGAvangelist
Member
He got that from a Beyond3D poster who looked at a youtube video.
It is a thread about I game I am interested in, so I'll chime in all I want. All I said is that at least it still looks fun, despite the technical issues. If that bothers you, then oh well. That's your problem.
staticneuron
Member
Yep, I am getting a PS4.... but I also plan on getting an XBone later on. I have put this title from a possible purchase to a rental..... maybe, I might skip this title entirely.
Believe? Can't dispute real test results.
Well, you are not just chiming in, you are being an apologist. We have those in every thread as soon as we talk about technical shortcomings. We really don't need it in a thread which foucses on tech.
Duxxy3
Member
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=89281282&postcount=355
It may turn out to be nothing, but I didn't see any further information.
Maybe they were,
it would have been better to do a gif or put a 2nd pic showing the loaded texture.
People are using that picture now as if that is what loaded textures look like.
It seems the person who originally posted that pic is trying to make the game seem worse then it actually is?
MaximusPayne
Member
you won't
His ass..
Absolutely? I'm sure people would rather have top of the line graphics and stellar resolution/frame rate, but at the end of the day, I play games to have fun. Can poor technical performance impede on a game's fun factor? Yes. Should we lambaste developers who put out games in this state? Definitely. But if a game ain't pretty to look at, and its far from a technical darling, but is still fun to play - then it's not the end of the world for me. I'd rather play something like Earth Defense Force or Deadly Premonition, which are technical messes but a damned good time, than something like Crysis 3 which is technically lights out but about as fun as chipping rocks.
I am not apologizing for shit, buddy. I fully acknowledge the issues and never disputed them. I simply said that it is fortunate that it still looks like a fun game. Nothing more.
Brain of J
Banned
So DF is back in good graces with GAF? Game looked fun during the Giant Bomb play thru. Who knows, resolution doesn't matter to me but crappy frame rate drives me nuts.
plagiarize
Banned
SECONDS later. And the texture loads in really obviously.
These are not good things. These are not problems Dead Rising 1 had.
It's not like you'd blink and miss that horrible texture. Its taking way too long to load in. Anything that ugly that lasts for a few seconds should be highlighted, especially if its a common problem.
You did what? Your post was:
That's are TWO apologies in ONE post. This is stuff that could be straight from MS PRs dept., just worded differently.
Killroyskbg
Member
I can´t believe MS and Xbox allows this to be sold in it´s current state. Sony at least had the guts to delay one of their games when it was not ready to be launched.
Yes a strong launch line up was one of the few advantages they had with potential buyers but seeing the performance of this game they should have pulled it regardless.
I am no fan of the series but would this have been the case on any of mine I would have canceled on the spot just to send a message that this should not be acceptable.
Yes a strong launch line up was one of the few advantages they had with potential buyers but seeing the performance of this game they should have pulled it regardless.
I am no fan of the series but would this have been the case on any of mine I would have canceled on the spot just to send a message that this should not be acceptable.
KillerMan91
Member
Going from Killzone trailer to this. Damn that difference.
Telephoto999
Member
This is absolutely atrocious. The performance.... the visuals. It literally looks like something that could have been done on last gen with relative similar performance. Hell GTA looks better than this and performs about the exact same.
uncledonnie
Banned
Ugh. Dreams shattered of finally playing a DR game on console with good performance.
Still going to marathon the shit out of this on launch day but this is a major letdown.
Still going to marathon the shit out of this on launch day but this is a major letdown.
Wishmaster92
Member
Twitch stream capture. Wasn't even full screen either.
For as long as I can remember; you are different?
FaintColt388301
Member
I don't really care what you say on here but if you come in to a thread where people are discussing the tech behind a game and you diminish what they say and their discussion of it you are going to get ruffle some feathers. You are basically coming in here and telling them who cares about the shortcomings that you are discussing (you know the topic at hand) it'll be fun. There are plently of other threads where you can talk about how fun DR3 will be.
Hopefully you and the other people buying it will enjoy it. I will not waste my money on a substandard game. Especially not at full price
Chobel
Member
Framerate are considered big part of fun.
SwiftDeath
Member
Most disappointing bit for me
will still play it at some point but pretty much expected the framerate to be ass
staticneuron
Member
It depends on the story and the reviews. I liked the RPG elements of Dead rising but wasn't a fan of the building weapons part. Didn't do anything for me in DR2 or Dead island and doesn't win me over for the new stuff. I have been keeping an eye peeled to how things are handled and I am going to base my choice off of reviews because I have a large backlog, several consoles and a PC to play on. I have no qualms about skipping a title entirely.
I probably won't.... I have poor self control
I am not being an apologist for merely stating that the game looks fun, despite the issues. And oh no! I must surely work for Microsoft because I am interested in one of their games. Good thing they did not fire me for all of the venom I have spewed at them over the past year.
At any rate, if you want to talk tech so much, why are you wasting your time dragging the conversation further off topic over me simply saying the game looks fun? Sorry if it bothers you that some people can acknowledge the game having problems, while still having interest in playing it. With that, I am done indulging you and your obvious issues with that.
Good day.
Listen, I never disputed the issues. I just said the game still looks fun. Apologies if that ''ruffles your feathers."
Ryu Hayabusa
Member
Day One
SlasherJPC
Banned
Hot damn that is attrocious... Still looks fun though. Could have used some more time in the cooker. Still my most awaited game this next gen launch though.
- Status