• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Digital Homicide is seeking Legal Action aganist Valve

1311526.jpg

No, no, dig up stupid. Dig up.
 
If they lose and Valve counter sue they are done as a company.

What would they counter sue for? I assume DH will use some business practice law. Like if a shop in a mall had its window smashed, and security/management refused to help. Since its pretty clear Valve never cared about there steam forum trolls.
 

Bigrx1

Banned
This guy is seriously going to be on his death bed blaming Jim Sterling and everyone for ruining his life. But it's like the guy who loses money at the casino, then sells his car, pawns all his stuff, loses his house, and destroys his whole life continuing to gamble and then blames the casino for ruining his life. When any sane person could look at it and go "you're the one who chose to sell all that crap and keep gambling". Rovine has brought all of this on himself and has destroyed his own life because his ego has refused to just move on, ever, since Jim Sterling's original video years ago. Imagine the difference in his life if he just said "ah whatever" to Jim's original video and moved on? lol
 

Solaire of Astora

Death by black JPN
They should rebrand themselves as "Digital Suicide".

...I really wish they hadn't chosen the name Digital Homicide.

That joke was funny the first few times I read it, but since then, we cannot go a single DH topic on an Internet discussion, without at least five people cracking that same joke, all thinking they were the first to do so. Just look in this thread alone. Beaten several times.
 

poodaddy

Member
...I really wish they hadn't chosen the name Digital Homicide.

That joke was funny the first few times I read it, but since then, we cannot go a single DH topic on an Internet discussion, without at least five people cracking that same joke, all thinking they were the first to do so. Just look in this thread alone. Beaten several times.

Hahaha do ya get it?? Cuz it's like Homicide but I said Suicide due to their questionable business decisions! It's a play on words! Oh I know I know I'm just such a nut rofllmaolollmfaololz!!!
 

SZips

Member
So DH was found to be tied to the doxxing and threats made against Jim Sterling, and now they're crying fowl over the same things happening against them? That's... interesting.

Sorry, but these guys need to fuck off already. I'm legit starting to feel bad for their families.
 

Trojan

Member
This case will be thrown out faster than yesterday's trash. These guys are unbelievable.

Valve has Steam agreements with devs that totally favor Valve, so I have no doubt they can easily kick DH out of Steam. For DH to try and play the harassment card against Valve is the biggest red herring ever.
 

Bigrx1

Banned
I feel sorry for the Rovine's families - they have likely destroyed their lives along with their own. And they have kids, my god, what an example. Good luck to those kids not coming out as trash like their fathers with examples like them.
 
I'm Now sad for their families that have to go through all this mess because their idiots husband and father are too proud and stupid to let go and swallow pride
 

MUnited83

For you.
The most hilarious claim is that Facebook allows you to block people and make them "not post on your page", as if somehow they couldnt make that on Steam too. Mind you, devs can ban anyone they want from their Steam forum, something that Digital Homicide know quite well since they used that function frivolously hundres upon hundreds of times at anyone slinging them any criticism.
 
Thanks for the link. So Valve removed their games as a consequence of the subpoema granted by the court. At this point, lets the court also enstablish whether Valve had the right to do such a thing.

Of course they do, it's their hosted service. If a store doesn't want to serve a product, you can't force them.
 

martino

Member
Thanks for the link. So Valve removed their games as a consequence of the subpoema granted by the court. At this point, lets the court also enstablish whether Valve had the right to do such a thing.

Really curious to see that.
Steam is not public, don't know the contract between them and DH but in the end it's steam platform and they can handle most of it as they see fit.(outside general laws)
 

Maximo

Member
Thanks for the link. So Valve removed their games as a consequence of the subpoema granted by the court. At this point, lets the court also enstablish whether Valve had the right to do such a thing.

They own the digital store, why would DH they have a leg to stand on?
 
They own the digital store, why would DH they have a leg to stand on?

Because I guess you sign a contract to have your games distributed on steam and there should be specific conditions under which a game can be removed. So it all comes down to what are the terms of the Steam distribution agreement.
 

Tainted

Member
This news story prompted me to go back and listen to DH's 'interview' with Jim Sterling again...one of the most craziest things I've listened to. He raises the most illogical arguments, it's almost surreal at times.
 

Bluth54

Member
If they lose and Valve counter sue they are done as a company.

I doubt Valve will counter sue them. They wont need to, between suing Jim Sterling, the 100 Steam users and Valve it's going to take a lot of time and money (even if they continue to represent themselves). With their primary source of income cut off by Valve removing their games from sale they're going to go bankrupt quickly.

Because I guess you sign a contract to have your games distributed on steam and there should be specific conditions under which a game can be removed. So it all comes down to what are the terms of the Steam distribution agreement.

I don't know for sure but I wouldn't be surprised if there was a clause in the contract you sign with Valve saying that Valve can remove your game from Steam at any time and for any reason.
 

_Ryo_

Member
Next they'll sue computer company's for supplying Steam users with hardware, which allowed the users to speak against them. Then they'll sue power company's for supplying the power to use them.
 

Steroyd

Member
Because I guess you sign a contract to have your games distributed on steam and there should be specific conditions under which a game can be removed. So it all comes down to what are the terms of the Steam distribution agreement.

Doubt it, usually they throw in a line that they can delete your shit and have a right to refusal at their discretion just like any forum or online account.

That said Valve want your business so it's on them to not be dicks and have the platform people want to do business on, meaning you really done fuck up if you prod the beast called Valve into action like this.
 
Doubt it, usually they throw in a line that they can delete your shit and have a right to refusal at their discretion just like any forum or online account.

That said Valve want your business so it's on them to not be dicks and have the platform people want to do business on, meaning you really done fuck up if you prod the beast called Valve into action like this.
Yeah it's really rare for Valve to take action like this. You have to really fuck up to get booted from Steam.

DH has fucking upon down to an art though.
 
Good god, those guys will be billionaires when this is over!

If you think these arrogant bumblefucks have any chance of winning...well you haven't been paying attention.

OT: I gotta say this, but these two are going on a self destructive path that won't end well for them. Sure it was hilarious at first for me, then I learned that they had families? Then it's got depressing. For the families, not these bozos I mean. They are seriously going to hurt the people around them the most after this is over and done with, and that saddens me. If it was only the brothers, then they could get wrecked by counter suits all the live long day, but when wives and children are in the mix, it makes things truly bittersweet.
 
What would they counter sue for? I assume DH will use some business practice law. Like if a shop in a mall had its window smashed, and security/management refused to help. Since its pretty clear Valve never cared about there steam forum trolls.

Malicious prosecution or abuse of process is an option.
 

cyress8

Banned
I feel for you, Jim. It must hurt like lemon juice in your eye that you cannot make a video about this. Holy fuck! Stay strong!
 

MuchoMalo

Banned
J2oGpiN.gif


In this case, it's a grave. I hope his wife divorces him and takes the kid(s) before they get hurt by this.

Wait, shit, I just got myself sued didn't I?

So I'm confused here. Digital Homicide is clearly in the right aren't they?

Two wrongs don't make a right. This is just "Well, they did it first!" but with lawyers. Plus, no matter what those users did it doesn't entitle DH to people's personal information. The only way I think they could be in the right is if every one of those 100 steam users sent death threats. Other than that, welcome to the internet. It's not a nice place.
 
Two wrongs don't make a right. This is just "Well, they did it first!" but with lawyers. Plus, no matter what those users did it doesn't entitle DH to people's personal information. The only way I think they could be in the right is if every one of those 100 steam users sent death threats. Other than that, welcome to the internet. It's not a nice place.

Actually, that I would disagre with. Generally speaking; when there are valid claims of Defamation anonymously posted on the internet, the law is replete with cases in most jurisdictions that allow third party discovery to discover the identity of those individuals. Death threats aren't the qualifier here.
 
The thing is that their entire business model was basically a sham to begin with. Their best option was staying quiet and making as much money as possible before getting delisted. Instead, they went Tony Montana.

Who knows? Maybe Peter Thiel will come rescue them.
 

MuchoMalo

Banned
Actually, that I would disagre with. Generally speaking; when there are valid claims of Defamation anonymously posted on the internet, the law is replete with cases in most jurisdictions that allow third party discovery to discover the identity of those individuals. Death threats aren't the qualifier here.

Sure, but is there any actual defamation here? I wasn't denying that defamation would justify the lawsuit, but nothing in that post qualifies as defamation as far as I can see, and that likely means that few of the 100 Steam users have actually done something they can justifiably be sued over.
 
Top Bottom