So I decided to check their "sale" and What in the name of Gawd is this?!
They're funding their frivolous lawsuits by flinging poo. Fitting.
So I decided to check their "sale" and What in the name of Gawd is this?!
Thats the beautiful thing about defamation law. Truth is an affirmative defense. However, truth is not a shield from having the aggreived party finding out who you are. Truth doesn't shield you from the lawsuit. You have to prove your case in a court of law. The burden of proof is on the declarant. That is why you have to "be prepared to defend yourself". That is how the law works. If you don't want to be dragged in front of a court in the future, it may be wise not to make factual assertions against companies or individuals.
Partially correct. They certainly had to submit affidavits to each and every user they claimed committed some kind of tortious act against them. I'm sure they did. I actually read their pleadings, and their pleadings have excerpts of those they are seeking to discover. The judge did not mess up, this is how the law is supposed to work. That does not mean that DH will win.
In some ways it seems like a legit case. What do you do when you get bullied, and everyone trashes your work to the point where it sabotages your business?
In some ways it seems like a legit case. What do you do when you get bullied, and everyone trashes your work to the point where it sabotages your business? Seemed like all he wanted to do is try to make a living for himself. How is the guy supposed to defend his self? One thing I don't get is that people left hate trails on his games. Why not disable comments? Seems like Valve has a failed system in place. I wouldn't sue for comments or Jim Sterling though.They are just using loopholes in a poorly implemented abuser friendly system that a company should be professional enough to curate.
I see Youtube as the same dystopia. I try to watch a live stream of Apple's event, then see a wall of racist internet graffiti.People think its all a big joke, but when the internet gets censored from the extended abuse, you guys are to blame for not being able to contain your hatred.
All because they actually think their games are good. This shit is too funny.
Yeah, that page sums up Digital Homicide nicely:So I decided to check their "sale" and What in the name of Gawd is this?!
They don't, at least I don't believe.
I was told once by a concrete company: There's not a lot of money in concrete, but there's a lot of money in a lot of concrete.
I believe this is the modus operandi of DH. Throw everything at the wall, pretty much.
In some ways it seems like a legit case. What do you do when you get bullied, and everyone trashes your work to the point where it sabotages your business? Seemed like all he wanted to do is try to make a living for himself. How is the guy supposed to defend his self? One thing I don't get is that people left hate trails on his games. Why not disable comments? Seems like Valve has a failed system in place. I wouldn't sue for comments or Jim Sterling though.They are just using loopholes in a poorly implemented abuser friendly system that a company should be professional enough to curate.
I see Youtube as the same dystopia. I try to watch a live stream of Apple's event, then see a wall of racist internet graffiti.People think its all a big joke, but when the internet gets censored from the extended abuse, you guys are to blame for not being able to contain your hatred.
Im sure this has been linked many times but for the people who haven't listened to Digital Homicide talking with Jim Sterling.... it's actually insane how completely stupid this guy is
like holy shit I'm an hour in and everything he says is just completely wrong. he has no grasp on reality at all.
I, for one, am greatly entertained. I feel bad for the guys' families--imagine being married to them in all this mess...
But imagine them suing GAF next. I guess the real question is who comes after Valve. lel
I guess the real question is who comes after Valve. lel
Man this guy doesn't seem to understand that Jim doesn't have an issue with developers buying assets. He keeps bringing it up over and over again.
In some ways it seems like a legit case. What do you do when you get bullied, and everyone trashes your work to the point where it sabotages your business?
So I'm confused here. Digital Homicide is clearly in the right aren't they?
Don't think that analogy fits... here.
Anyone else want to take a shot at an ELI5 for me?
Jim is often rather soft on their games. He gave them way more chances then they deserved.Remember that time they made a game that Jim Sterling said was actually alright?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zPZIRPTeu4
Remember that time they made a game that Jim Sterling said was actually alright?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zPZIRPTeu4
There's a simple solution to this, though: start trying to make good games. They want to put in the minimum effort and then bitch and moan when people call them out on it.
I know your playing devils advocate, but no. There is no legitimacy here. This is just another frivolous lawsuit they are filing that will waste people's time and money.In some ways it seems like a legit case. What do you do when you get bullied, and everyone trashes your work to the point where it sabotages your business? Seemed like all he wanted to do is try to make a living for himself. How is the guy supposed to defend his self? One thing I don't get is that people left hate trails on his games. Why not disable comments? Seems like Valve has a failed system in place. I wouldn't sue for comments or Jim Sterling though.They are just using loopholes in a poorly implemented abuser friendly system that a company should be professional enough to curate.
I see Youtube as the same dystopia. I try to watch a live stream of Apple's event, then see a wall of racist internet graffiti.People think its all a big joke, but when the internet gets censored from the extended abuse, you guys are to blame for not being able to contain your hatred.
I know your playing devils advocate, but no. There is no legitimacy here. This is just another frivolous lawsuit they are filing that will waste people's time and money.
Their actions put valve well within the right to remove their content from its services. Valve wasn't the one making negative comments. Their customers were.
There is no legal compensation for customers hating your product.
So I just caught up with this and HOLY SHIT dude, what are these guys doing?!
So wait, their "legal action" against Steam isn't even related to them pulling their games off the store? It's about moderation?
Welp, enjoy another serving of fail. It's the same thing as if I joined Stormfront and didn't like the racist moderation, so I sued. Or if I joined a LARPing group and didn't like their rules, so I sued.