Caayn
Member
I wish that more interviewers/journalist dare to ask these kind of questions.
I wish that more interviewers/journalist dare to ask these kind of questions.
Truth!! Especially about NMS.It worked perfectly fine by the time I played it around a year or so after release. I don't know what the fuck your're talking about, OP. Scam? Christ, talk about hyperbole. They had issues that lots of over games have had.
You wanna talk scams? Talk about No Man's Sky.
Certain Affinity only made the remastered H2A maps and had literally nothing to do with the faulty networking/UI layer. Those were made externally, but not by CA and regardless it was 100% our responsibility. The issues were caused by a cascading combination of problems including faulty assumptions about code behaviors in retail rather than test environments, bad "ticket" tracking information and a number of other even more baroque issues. And yes I still owe people a technical explanation and I will provide the best one I'm able/permitted to at some point. That point, for a number of reasons beyond my control, is not now.
lol I have not seen that, thats savage
It worked perfectly fine by the time I played it around a year or so after release. I don't know what the fuck your're talking about, OP. Scam? Christ, talk about hyperbole. They had issues that lots of over games have had.
You wanna talk scams? Talk about No Man's Sky.
I do hope that a actual fully working version is relaunched at some point (at no charge to current owners of the collection). I think that would help gain support and fans back after that fiasco.Certain Affinity only made the remastered H2A maps and had literally nothing to do with the faulty networking/UI layer. Those were made externally, but not by CA and regardless it was 100% our responsibility. The issues were caused by a cascading combination of problems including faulty assumptions about code behaviors in retail rather than test environments, bad "ticket" tracking information and a number of other even more baroque issues. And yes I still owe people a technical explanation and I will provide the best one I'm able/permitted to at some point. That point, for a number of reasons beyond my control, is not now.
Absolutely it was a scam. How anyone disagrees with this is baffling to me. The game simply DID NOT WORK at launch. This is not hyperbole, it literally didn't work.
Broken product, false advertising, half a dozen updates that did nothing or made it worse. Finally it works ok after like 6 months but is still unacceptably riddled with bugs.
How is this anything but a scam? What other product but a video game can ship broken without there being a recall or mass refund? Imagine a company shipping a phone that doesn't make phone calls! This is the situation, they shipped a Halo game where the multiplayer didn't work.
Not to mention when it did work, it's not even halo 2 for Xbox, it was the PC port. Huge fucking difference. I could go on and on.
Jesus Christ I get so heated talking about MCC.
???To be fair 343 didnt do too hot with Halo 5 either.
Also their name is on the box of MC Collection.
It's not a scam per say but it was a disappointment at launch with how much of a mess it was. There are still issues with the game but overall it is definitely worth a purchase today as matchmaking is fairly consistent and the game rarely crashes.
I do hope that a actual fully working version is relaunched at some point (at no charge to current owners of the collection). I think that would help gain support and fans back after that fiasco.
Less a scam, more a colossal fuck up that severely damaged the series reputation.
Terrible campaign/story and lots of features missing at launch (Forge/FireFight/BTB etc.)
Dont forget features still missing, like Assault, oddball, 1 flag, etc.
Assault exists along with oddball in the ball game systemDont forget features still missing, like Assault, oddball, 1 flag, etc.
I just have higher standards for $60 products from MULTIBILLION dollar companies.
Really bad campaign with an OK multiplayer, but the game suffers from aiming issues that haven't been resolved.
--
Also, just because you bought it for campaign and not MP doesn't mean it's not a scam anymore. Half the product "working" isn't some excuse.
It was DriveClub bad. Seriously. Matchmaking was flat-out broken for a long time.
Yeah. And probably for the Scorpio launch as well.Some tinfoil hat theory but the only reason imo why MCC is not fixed yet if ever is because it doesn't have microtransactions
They need to find a way to add MTs so it will get approved by higher ups within MS and release the game for free obviously so they can get something back for fixing it
Every major AAA game released from MS has them:
Halo 5 req packs
Gears 4 loot crates
Forza 6 and horizon 3 have multiple car packs + more (expansions etc)
Killer Instinct seasons/skins
So if they ever find a way to add skins or more customization options then they will probably fix it and release it on PC too
And i bet Sea of thieves/Crackdown/State of Decay will have MTs aswell this year
Yeah. It's sad when a straightforward question about an extremely obvious industry problem is considered "savage".It's not that savage, it is just not sugar coating.
Its a fucking scam, any one who says otherwise is a 343 shill
The game was advertised to have online matching matchmaking; if you bought the game for that reason you were deceived. Comments like "well i bought it for campaign so no" are pointless. I bought it primarily for online mulitplayer which remains unplayable. I really only bought the xbox one for the MCC collection, I was so salty over the garbage mcc release that I never bought halo 5 and eventually sold my xbone. I disliked reach (despite logging hundreds of hours and having a l33t pwnage level kd ratio) and absolutely hated halo 4 so im totally out on the series. maybe one day if 343 drops it.Definition of scam
: a fraudulent or deceptive act or operation an insurance scam
The entire game didn't work as you're implying? Of course not. A portion of the game was broken. I played with a friend via co-op just fine at launch.Absolutely it was a scam. How anyone disagrees with this is baffling to me. The game simply DID NOT WORK at launch. This is not hyperbole, it literally didn't work.
Broken product, false advertising, half a dozen updates that did nothing or made it worse. Finally it works ok after like 6 months but is still unacceptably riddled with bugs.
How is this anything but a scam? What other product but a video game can ship broken without there being a recall or mass refund? Imagine a company shipping a phone that doesn't make phone calls! This is the situation, they shipped a Halo game where the multiplayer didn't work.
Not to mention when it did work, it's not even halo 2 for Xbox, it was the PC port. Huge fucking difference. I could go on and on.
Jesus Christ I get so heated talking about MCC.
Yeah. And probably for the Scorpio launch as well.
lol at the "I guess I just have higher standards than all of you" comment. Stop jerking yourself off, you're not better than anyone else.
There is nothing wrong with having high standards. You should have high standards for a $60 halo game(s). Everyone had high hopes for this game, and we were all very disappointed in how it launched and how long it took 343 and Microsoft to bring the game's multiplayer to a playable state. MCC got railed hard and it deserved all of the criticism it received.
This thread isn't about whether or not MCC was a let down. It absolutely was. It's pretty much a fact. Instead this thread is about whether or not the MCC was a scam. A scam would have intent, and I can't imagine that 343 or Microsoft intended to release MCC in a broken state as a quick "take the money and run" scheme. They're too big and the PR hit would be too bad.
So how long exactly did you suffer this "scam" before getting a refund?
lol at the "I guess I just have higher standards than all of you" comment. Stop jerking yourself off, you're not better than anyone else.
There is nothing wrong with having high standards. You should have high standards for a $60 halo game(s). Everyone had high hopes for this game, and we were all very disappointed in how it launched and how long it took 343 and Microsoft to bring the game's multiplayer to a playable state. MCC got railed hard and it deserved all of the criticism it received.
This thread isn't about whether or not MCC was a let down. It absolutely was. It's pretty much a fact. Instead this thread is about whether or not the MCC was a scam. A scam would have intent, and I can't imagine that 343 or Microsoft intended to release MCC in a broken state as a quick "take the money and run" scheme. They're too big and the PR hit would be too bad.
Yeah. It's sad when a straightforward question about an extremely obvious industry problem is considered "savage".
The entire game didn't work as you're implying? Of course not. A portion of the game was broken. I played with a friend via co-op just fine at launch.
I don't think I've ever seen an OP work so hard to defend himself even though it's proven time and time again the word scam is used incorrectly in this example. Shipping a game with a part of it not working is not intentionally deceiving people and committing some type of fraud. The games been working fine for me and my friends for a long time now.
Tinfoilhatsron
Member
(Today, 07:23 PM)
I guess you agree
From Merrian Webster
The game was advertised to have online matching matchmaking. I bought it primarily for online mulitplayer which remains unplayable. I really only bought the xbox one for the MCC collection, I was so salty over the garbage mcc release that I never bought halo 5 and eventually sold my xbone. I disliked reach (despite logging hundreds of hours and having a l33t pwnage level kd ratio) and absolutely hated halo 4 so im totally out on the series. maybe one day if 343 drops it.
Assault exists along with oddball in the ball game system
343 does not have reproduce every game type that has ever existed in halo
Good for them too because otherwise I would be more upset at the loss of juggernaut