snoopeasystreet
Member
Even more, nothing about Bioshock says "playstation" to me. I know there's the Bioshock Infinite Move Support and pack in but that's not even out yet. This seems more like 2K throwing Sony a bone than anything else.
Gemüsepizza;38537721 said:Yep. No software.
Rayman Legends is coming for Vita and for that I will hold on to mine. Not that I would sell it anyway.
This whole PSV has no games reminds me of the PSP launch which was getting it's ass kicked by the DS until they got their shit together.
Look at it now, not the biggest seller but it has a fantastic lineup.
Gemüsepizza;38537721 said:Yep. no software *snip*
Big Daddy confirms that that game isnt only about iconic characters in terms of 3rd party tho so its possible for any character to make it. Fat Princess isnt iconic either but she is one of the few PS female characters so she makes sense.
Doesn't that destroy the 3D effect though? I want both -_-, it's why I never used the feature for Ocarina of time.
I really don't understand the Vita hate when the 3DS had the exact same problem and isn't completely out of their situation just yet. I don't even own a vita.
Since when has Kingdom Hearts HD been official?
I am honestly surprised by his inclusion since I am not entirely sure he is iconic enough to be entered in an all-star character battle royale.
Someone like... maybe the Prince from the Prince of Persia would be a better fit, I think.
Well, those two are highly interconnected to one another so it kind of hard not to touch one subject when discussing the other. Can't reasonably expect developers to continue pouring resources making quality games for Vita if the platform itself is not selling well, now, can you?
I don't think you get it or are intentionally ignoring what I'm saying. The op was not about the vita not having games that will sell, it was about having good games. Pretty much 100 percent of posters in here were arguing about the vitas games, not in relation to sales, but the quantity of quality titles. When posters began posting how the statement is skewed especially so in regards to nintendos state which is pretty much in a similar situation, those bashing the vita switch their tone from being about the quality of games, to a games selling power. Do you not see how this is being disengenuous? Do you not see how you're simplY shifting the discussion to something else entirely to save face? If this was a thread about the lack of selling power of vita games, I wouldn't be calling you out as there would be nothing to suggest you weren't being disengenuous by changing the subject to fit your argument, unless you started talking about quality or something other than the number of games sold.
This shit is looking like blind fanboyism now.
Not everyone has a PS3/console who owns an 3DS/Vita so console ports shouldn't be dismissed imo
Well, pulling off more recognizable characters won't hurt, especially when this game is--whether anyone like it or not--going to be compared with the juggernaut that is Super Smash Brothers.
For the record I too can't pull off any female characters from Sony roster from memory.... except maybe Heavenly Sword's Nariko and the new girl from The Last of Us... Oh and probably Ico's girl (what's her name, Yoda?) and the girl from Shadow of the Colossus?
For whatever its worth, let it be stated on record that I am very tempted to buy Vita due to Persona 4 Golden (the original game gave me one of my fondest gaming memories in the ps2 era so having it in a portable system would be tremendously awesome) and Soul Sacrifice (if it has strong single-player component, though....)
The difference, at least for me, is that Nintendo made it very clear they will act to make sure the 3DS won't flounder. They went as far as doing an emergency price cut and instituting an ambassador program. Now, it's unrealistic to expect a Vita price cut this early given Sony's financial status. However, there is a lot more that they can do to instill confidence that they won't abandon the Vita. For Christ's sake, they didn't even bother to put up a shitty Vita montage. More time was spend on some Move AR game than their just released new handheld. These moves imply that Sony thinks Vita is an after-thought. And given the platform's precarious situation, that's the very last thing it needs. The Vita needs Sony pushing it as hard and as much as possible for it to survive. We got exactly the opposite of that last night.
Yeah, but OoT likes having 3D more than Revelations anyway for a number of reasons. I really preferred 2xAA, and I'm generally a fan of 3D.
You should download the demo and try it for yourself, if you haven't already.
Well my issue is that Nintendo focused quite a bit on new gameplay footage of big 3DS games back in E3 2011, and that helped reassure us. Sony looks like they've just forgotten/don't care. And I think we're mostly expressing disappointment, not hate.
Well, pulling off more recognizable characters won't hurt, especially when this game is--whether anyone like it or not--going to be compared with the juggernaut that is Super Smash Brothers.
For the record I too can't pull off any female characters from Sony roster from memory.... except maybe Heavenly Sword's Nariko and the new girl from The Last of Us... Oh and probably Ico's girl (what's her name, Yoda?) and the girl from Shadow of the Colossus?
For whatever its worth, let it be stated on record that I am very tempted to buy Vita due to Persona 4 Golden (the original game gave me one of my fondest gaming memories in the ps2 era so having it in a portable system would be tremendously awesome) and Soul Sacrifice (if it has strong single-player component, though....)
so much vaporware on that list
Well, in this case, what are the reason to purchase PSVita with PS360 costing less and with a far better line-up, given the fact that future PSVita line-up does not have so many exclusive?
Because it's a handheld... I can't lug my PS3 with me onto the bus or play while I'm out of the house.
Just from stuff announced today I'm looking forward to checking out Sine Mora (as I don't own a 360) and Need For Speed: Most Wanted (assuming this version is respectable, I'd love this kind of game on the go) neither of which are going to be available on the 3DS. They are both ports or multi-platform games but to me I'd like to play both on the Vita.
Why exactly is having the option of playing a game on multiple platforms a negative?
Rayman Legends is coming for Vita and for that I will hold on to mine. Not that I would sell it anyway.
This whole PSV has no games reminds me of the PSP launch which was getting it's ass kicked by the DS until they got their shit together.
Look at it now, not the biggest seller but it has a fantastic lineup.
Sony just announced some value bundles for the PSP in Japan, too! Maybe they feel the same way.Boasting PSOne support was surreal. Right now the PSP plays more games than the Vita. It plays all the Minis, all the PSOne games and all the PSP games. The Vita has the lesser version of Lumines and a comparable version of Hot Shots Golf. It has an inferior version of ModNation Racers and a very similar version of Katamari. If someone asked me today which Sony handheld to buy I'd tell them to grab a PSP. Honestly.
Well, now that you have called me a blind fanboy despite me having no ill intention whatsoever towards you, I think I should just quit this discussion.
I also think you "don't get it", but I wouldn't call you a blind fanboy or anything like that. Thanks anyway for bearing with me for a while, mate.
I don't think anyone here is denying that the Vita currently has some good games. The logic goes that if these good games aren't selling well now, we're less likely to see more good games in the future, which is a relevant point given that this thread is partially about the future of the Vita and the lack of good games seen in its future.
I'm not calling you one, but after two posts of deflecting and changing the subject, they come across that way. I get it, but like I said before, the discussion was premised on the quantity of good titles and not the selling power of said titles. You take away from the discussion by trying to change the subject to something else. How is it any different in threads of niche titles where someone will ask how much that game has sold, like it has anything to do with the discussion or it somehow affects its quality.
I don't think anyone here is denying that the Vita currently has some good games. The logic goes that if these good games aren't selling well now, we're less likely to see more good games in the future, which is a relevant point given that this thread is partially about the future of the Vita and the lack of good games seen in its future.
It was a really odd choice to show nothing - especially considering they supposedly have playable demos on the floor. Why not just throw in a few minutes featuring them? So strange.This was a shamefully pathetic E3 for Vita owners. I was expecting a Killzone demo at a bare minimum. There was like 10 seconds of footage from the AC3 spin-off but that was it.
I guess the system really is dead then.
Because it's a handheld... I can't lug my PS3 with me onto the bus or play while I'm out of the house.
Just from stuff announced today I'm looking forward to checking out Sine Mora (as I don't own a 360) and Need For Speed: Most Wanted (assuming this version is respectable, I'd love this kind of game on the go) neither of which are going to be available on the 3DS. They are both ports or multi-platform games but to me I'd like to play both on the Vita.
Why exactly is having the option of playing a game on multiple platforms a negative?
No worries, just try to present your point in clear and neutral logic that doesn't step on anyone's toes.. preferably like a math equation. It's hard in a fast moving thread with a lot of emotions and easy misunderstandings. You might have ended up trying to make a point as a reply to something else they were objecting to, so it's best to start from the beginning rather than making assumptions.Well now, I wish I have your ability to say things as concise as you, hahaha. It will save me a lot of trouble.
If a game is not played, is it still a game?
It was a really odd choice to show nothing - especially considering they supposedly have playable demos on the floor. Why not just throw in a few minutes featuring them? So strange.
Only people supporting VITA are the hardcore, the trophy double/triple whores, people who just wanted a PSP2
That list up there is such bullshit about VITA having games
You can knock out 35% due to them being PS3 ported titles, then another 20-25% that will come out in 2013 rather than this year
Doesn't help the fact most VITA games are shallow experiences, no ROI to keep the consumer busy
Look @ Resistance Burning Skies, most are just finishing it too fucking quickly and either flipping/trading it ASAP
Is this true? lol
Is this true? lol
I didn't wade through all 20+ pages of this thread, but is it at least possible that Sony might hold a Vita-specific roundtable or some equivalent during E3 like Nintendo is planning? I'm holding onto mine specifically for Persona 4. Hopefully more is coming soon!
I know that one of the general sentiment that all gamers must uphold is LOL "professional" reviews (heh), but the reviews so far for that game is not that good, isn't it?
I know that one of the general sentiment that all gamers must uphold is LOL "professional" reviews (heh), but the reviews so far for that game is not that good, isn't it?