How is it that many/most of the prominent publications have "spent about five hours with the game" and have reviews in progress but the mid-smaller size sites have full reviews.
This is supposedly a 40 to 50-hour game (per the dev).
As much as I'd love to, I just can't trust the reviews of those who haven't even had the game code for 30 hours, MINUS download/installation time and the time it took up to actually type up a review.
You really shouldn't trust any review from the press, then, as they all have deadlines and will shove a review out the door--game finished or not--when they hit their deadline, and call it a day.
It's how Mass Effect 3 and all its backlash happened. Fans actually finished the game and found out that it flopped all over the floor and keeled over and died while the press kinda faffed around with it for a bit until they felt they had played enough of it to churn out a 4000 word essay on what they thought about it, with an arbitrary score on the end so people wouldn't have to read their essay anyways.