Xbox is 6, ps4 is 10.
NX is 5.
5 is between 6 and 10 no other interpretation.
NX could be a negative -4 on your scale, and it'd still be "closer" in terms of power to XB1 than PS4.
Xbox is 6, ps4 is 10.
NX is 5.
5 is between 6 and 10 no other interpretation.
She isn't.
Context makes the "oh its weaker than X1" statement even more nonsensical. Why is an even HIGHER bar being brought in for direct comparisons?
"Bikes are more like cars than they are airplanes. From what I know they won't directly compete with intergalactic cruisers."
What sort of nonsensical comparison is this?
She wrote her comparison perfectly well.
The obvious statement is that it is in some murky middle-ground, and due to architectural differences there simply is no 1:1 comparison, and, hence, why she later says the specs will be a thing of arguments and debate. If it were clearly weaker than even the weakest console, there would be no debate.
Xbox is 6, ps4 is 10.
NX is 5.
5 is between 6 and 10 no other interpretation.
No, it makes perfect sense to mention PS4 because those are the two main consoles out now. She even goes on to add that people were claiming it was 2x more powerful than the PS4 and then clearly states that was false so there is a lot of sense to mention PS4. Again, why is it 'clearly" meant to be inbetween the two, when the word isn't even used? How are you assuming its meant to be a linear comparison bookended by XB1 and PS4?
Emily keeps referring to the console in question as just NX, not NX handheld or NX home console. Maybe she has confused her source for the handheld instead of the home console?
No, it makes perfect sense to mention PS4 because those are the two main consoles out now. She even goes on to add that people were claiming it was 2x more powerful than the PS4 and then clearly states that was false so there is a lot of sense to mention PS4. Again, why is it 'clearly" meant to be inbetween the two, when the word isn't even used? How are you assuming its meant to be a linear comparison bookended by XB1 and PS4?
NX could be a negative -4 on your scale, and it'd still be "closer" in terms of power to XB1 than PS4.
My mathetically correct intepretation of her words, assuming that she means what said literally.
Suppose these are the general power levels.
PS4k is a 20
Ps4 is 10
Xb1 is 6.
NX is closer to Xb1 than Ps4.
That could mean Nx is 5 or 7.
But that would be stretching according to her.
So 4, 6 or 8?
Can cross out 8 since thats in the middle, why not just start with middle / somewhere in the middle to begin with. Like wise, can cross out 6.
4 is closer to 6 than 10. It doesn't compete with a 20.
/shrug.
Your analogy makes no sense in the context. 5 is closer to 6 than to 10, but nobody cares about this beyond kindergarten. Even so, if you want to clarify how big 5 is, you wouldn't say "5 is closer to 6 than to 10" (because that would place 5 anywhere from -∞ to 7.999999999), you would just say "5 is right before 6".
If it's less powerful than XB1, it's very clear where it is in comparison to PS4. It wouldn't need to mention PS4 for that. "NX is close to XB1 in terms of raw power". End of story. Everybody except you would understand where it sits compared to PS4.
Anything below 6 is closer to 6 than to 10. Maybe NX is -∞ in terms of power.
My mathetically correct intepretation of her words, assuming that she means what said literally.
Suppose these are the general power levels.
PS4k is a 20
Ps4 is 10
Xb1 is 6.
NX is closer to Xb1 than Ps4.
That could mean Nx is 5 or 7.
But that would be stretching according to her.
So 4, 6 or 8?
Can cross out 8 since thats in the middle, why not just start with middle / somewhere in the middle to begin with. Like wise, can cross out 6.
4 is closer to 6 than 10. It doesn't compete with a 20.
/shrug.
But that won't blow out the Wii U.
/drops mike.
Why are you assuming she wrote it perfectly?
Seems that most people care about small power differents with nx. Looking at all posts it would be:
80% power of nx
10% 3rd party support
5% first party support
2% other stuff
1.9% network support/ui
0.1% innovation
Not that I dont care, but would it make allot of differents. Isn't innovation and netwotk/ui more important for them?
But only on true next gen systemsI think Doom came out already.
My mathetically correct intepretation of her words, assuming that she means what said literally.
Suppose these are the general power levels.
PS4k is a 20
Ps4 is 10
Xb1 is 6.
NX is closer to Xb1 than Ps4.
That could mean Nx is 5 or 7.
But that would be stretching according to her.
So 4, 6 or 8?
Can cross out 8 since thats in the middle, why not just start with middle / somewhere in the middle to begin with. Like wise, can cross out 6.
4 is closer to 6 than 10. It doesn't compete with a 20.
/shrug.
Why are you assuming she wrote it perfectly?
Seems that most people care about small power differents with nx. Looking at all posts it would be:
80% power of nx
10% 3rd party support
5% first party support
2% other stuff
1.9% network support/ui
0.1% innovation
Not that I dont care, but would it make allot of differents. Isn't innovation and netwotk/ui more important for them?
Hay guyz whats goin' on in this... ohwtf are you doing guys lol
wtf are you doing guys lol
So it doesn't matter that it might have sub par graphics as long as it's cheap. Is that it?At least this means NX will be sub $300, assuming it has no disc drive or hard drive. Maybe $250. Maybe. That'd be nice.
So it doesn't matter that it might have sub par graphics as long as it's cheap. Is that it?
Is this a tweet? A rumour? A 3D printed argument? Too much tech discussion here.So it doesn't matter that it might have sub par graphics as long as it's cheap. Is that it?
But even that might be stretching it. Therefore, more comparable to a potato.Trying to figure out how close the NX is to the Game&Watch. I've heard its closer to the Gameboy Color than it is the X1.
But it really blows the abacus out of the water.
Then they would of said the Nx's = plural.
They said the NX would replace, which is singular. Every time Nintendo mention Nx recently its in the singular, still think its a mobile + docking station
For all those who think Nintendo cares about wanting to be directly competitive with hardware power, let's be reminded of what Shigeru Miyamoto said back in a June 2015 interview:
So it doesn't matter that it might have sub par graphics as long as it's cheap. Is that it?
She wrote it so far from perfectly that it's not even funny. She was more focused on shutting down high hopes and adding spice to the post than on giving accurate information. I wish that someone would call her out on it. She acts like she wants people to focus on games instead of specs, but whenever she talks about specs she leaves a bunch of questions on the table so there's more talk about it. She then goes on to mock people for not just saying that she's right and leaving it at that.
SuperMetalDave64/Trev already called her out twice:
Nintendo NX "insiders" wasting your time
Nintendo NX Not Polaris and Low Specs?
The first video caused one of the main rumor folks to have a total meltdown on twitter, which was pretty funny.
I think Trev's probably a little too hung up the console having to be AMD, but he makes pretty good points, as usual.
It's not being competitive, it's cheap hardware leading to instances like this:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2...t-developer-calls-the-wii-u-cpu-horrible-slow
SuperMetalDave64/Trev already called her out twice:
Nintendo NX "insiders" wasting your time
Nintendo NX Not Polaris and Low Specs?
The first video caused one of the main rumor folks to have a total meltdown on twitter, which was pretty funny.
I think Trev's probably a little too hung up the console having to be AMD, but he makes pretty good points, as usual.
Trev has said that PS4 Neo won't get a Polaris because Polaris is too power efficient and that's why it must be NX who gets it. That's how fixated on Polaris he is.
Most of his spec stuff is speculation that Blu / Thraktor can 4 teraflops better.
I think Doom came out already.
Is that a stretch to say that they could do 6?
Edit: lol too late, you edited it and made it better.
It's not being competitive, it's cheap hardware leading to instances like this:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2...t-developer-calls-the-wii-u-cpu-horrible-slow
SuperMetalDave64/Trev already called her out twice:
Nintendo NX "insiders" wasting your time
Nintendo NX Not Polaris and Low Specs?
The first video caused one of the main rumor folks to have a total meltdown on twitter, which was pretty funny.
I think Trev's probably a little too hung up the console having to be AMD, but he makes pretty good points, as usual.
Cant wait to buy this NX thing. I hear it will play games and be fun. (=
Unless Sony reverses a decision, the PS4.K will not receive exclusive games. So any game that comes out will be in the same ball park as the NX if it does sit in between the two current gen system. The only thing that will stop games appearing on the NX is bad relationships between Nintendo and third parties, or the NX getting off to a really poor start sales wise.
People are really overplaying this.
It's not being competitive, it's cheap hardware leading to instances like this:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2...t-developer-calls-the-wii-u-cpu-horrible-slow