MGS4 still deserves GOTY 2008 even today. And I mean that wholeheartedly.
Come at me.
I think you were looking for this thread.
MGS4 still deserves GOTY 2008 even today. And I mean that wholeheartedly.
Come at me.
Between this and the MGS4 love the last few posts have really highlighted why this voting process is highly flawed: people with awful opinions can take part!
Between this and the MGS4 love the last few posts have really highlighted why this voting process is highly flawed: people with awful opinions can take part!
I would think grossly undeserving games winning here each of the last ~4 years or so (probably longer but that's as far as my memory goes) proved that already.
Rayman Origins is going to come out on top where it belongs, I can feel it in my bones.
.
Rayman Origins is going to come out on top where it belongs, I can feel it in my bones.
.
.
.
.
.
.
It seems to me that it's either going to be Dark Souls or Portal 2.
MGS4 still deserves GOTY 2008 even today. And I mean that wholeheartedly.
Come at me.
After looking at this thread more closely, I think it will be Portal 2 by quite a margin (seriously, the game is like on everyone's list, often around the top too) followed by Skyrim. Dark Souls has a chance for third spot but no way is it beating Portal. Which saddens me greatly, I thought GAF would have finer taste.
Rayman Origins is going to come out on top where it belongs, I can feel it in my bones.
.
.
.
.
.
.
It's a two horse race between Portal and Skyrim, afaik. So you'll get your no Dark Souls wish at least.At this point I'll take anything as long as Dark Souls doesn't win. I'd like to have one year here where I can look at the result and just go "hmm...ok whatever" instead of just furiously shaking my head and wondering what the majority of you people were doing during voting time.
I saw lots of high Deus Ex votes. I'll be very pleased if that places top 3.
New rule for 2012, only GAF members with 10,000 posts + can vote.Between this and the MGS4 love the last few posts have really highlighted why this voting process is highly flawed: people with awful opinions can take part!
I think one of my favorite things about these threads is I always find a few games that I would not have discovered otherwise, usually "buried" at slots 7-10 of somebody's list.
It's just a passionate vocal minority.
New rule for 2012, only GAF members with 10,000 posts + can vote.
let me check the Skyrim thread real quickI say over 150 posts in the OT of the clear GOTY.
I already played The Stanley Parable thanks to Kabouter's inclusion of it in his list, so it's working for me!
This thread inspired me to pick up Ghost Trick. Good call, GAF.
New rule for 2012, only GAF members with 10,000 posts + can vote.
New rule for 2012, only GAF members with 10,000 posts + can vote.
Lol, yea that's a good idea. Lets have people who spend more time posting than playing games vote for GOTY.
It'll be a crime if it doesn't at least break the top 10. At least on GAF, of all places.I'm feeling pretty hopeful about it breaking the top 30.
Seems like it crept into a lot of the later submissions in this thread, and often pretty high up on the list. I like to think once people were able to get over the price hurdle after it bombed they finally realized how great it actually is. Too bad it took failure at retail for the game to start getting its dues. The "lol 2D, should have been a DD" crowd can suck it.No one, not even Ubisoft, gives a shit about the game :|
And I salute you.I gave it my #1 Game of the Year spot. I did my part.
Lol, yea that's a good idea. Lets have people who spend more time posting than playing games vote for GOTY.
Yay, making the list was worth the effort!I already played The Stanley Parable thanks to Kabouter's inclusion of it in his list, so it's working for me!
Not that I want that rule in place, but I think there's something to be said for the people who actually participate most in the community defining the GAF GOTY more so than those who passively take it in.
For all the praise the excellent Bastion narrator got, The Stanley Parable secretly had the best narration work this year. Real talk.I already played The Stanley Parable thanks to Kabouter's inclusion of it in his list, so it's working for me!
Not that I want that rule in place, but I think there's something to be said for the people who actually participate most in the community defining the GAF GOTY more so than those who passively take it in.
Exactly.For all the praise the excellent Bastion narrator got, The Stanley Parable secretly had the best narration work this year. Real talk.
I wouldn't be opposed to giving posters with over 10k posts double vote scores, but honestly I'm sure that would cause uproar.
Everyone in the 10K+ club should be allowed to invalidate one vote. For example, if a poster makes a list I don't like, I can PM a mod and have his or her post permanently deleted.
Everyone in the 10K+ club should be allowed to invalidate one vote. For example, if a poster makes a list I don't like, I can PM a mod and have his or her post permanently deleted.
Everyone in the 10K+ club should be allowed to invalidate one vote. For example, if a poster makes a list I don't like, I can PM a mod and have his or her post permanently deleted.
For all the praise the excellent Bastion narrator got, The Stanley Parable secretly had the best narration work this year. Real talk.
Not that I want that rule in place, but I think there's something to be said for the people who actually participate most in the community defining the GAF GOTY more so than those who passively take it in.
In no way am I suggesting that anything like this actually take place. Let me make that clear. I like that everyone has a vote.
All I'm saying is that when I post here, I usually see a pretty huge range or voices on a consistent basis. There are people I come to recognize putting effort into articulating themselves all year round. I love that. That's why I post on GAF. So, when it comes time to vote, I kind of have to take the results with a grain of salt. The final tally doesn't represent the GAF that I interact with on a day-to-day basis. And maybe that's appropriate, it's just not the list I'd find most interesting.
Again, I'm not saying the voting should be changed. The current system works because it's a super set of the people I'm interested in. I can just sift through and find recognizable faces and see what they voted for. That's cool!
In my defence, I was drunk when I wrote my list and couldn't articulate myself.In no way am I suggesting that anything like this actually take place. Let me make that clear. I like that everyone has a vote.
All I'm saying is that when I post here, I usually see a pretty huge range or voices on a consistent basis. There are people I come to recognize putting effort into articulating themselves all year round. I love that. That's why I post on GAF. So, when it comes time to vote, I kind of have to take the results with a grain of salt. The final tally doesn't represent the GAF that I interact with on a day-to-day basis. And maybe that's appropriate, it's just not the list I'd find most interesting, because it includes those who don't put any effort into articulating themselves. I don't know who they are. They could be awesome, they're just not GAF to me.
Again, I'm not saying the voting should be changed. The current system works because it's a super set of the people I'm interested in. I can just sift through and find recognizable faces and see what they voted for. That's cool!
Yeah, I can see your point there.In no way am I suggesting that anything like this actually take place. Let me make that clear. I like that everyone has a vote.
All I'm saying is that when I post here, I usually see a pretty huge range or voices on a consistent basis. There are people I come to recognize putting effort into articulating themselves all year round. I love that. That's why I post on GAF. So, when it comes time to vote, I kind of have to take the results with a grain of salt. The final tally doesn't represent the GAF that I interact with on a day-to-day basis. And maybe that's appropriate, it's just not the list I'd find most interesting, because it includes those who don't put any effort into articulating themselves. I don't know who they are. They could be awesome, they're just not GAF to me.
Again, I'm not saying the voting should be changed. The current system works because it's a super set of the people I'm interested in. I can just sift through and find recognizable faces and see what they voted for. That's cool!