• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
  • The Politics forum has been nuked. Please do not bring political discussion to the rest of the site, or you will be removed. Thanks.

GAF insider KennyLinder says Switch carts require $10 upcharge. Matt (IGN) disagrees.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cerium

Member
Mar 25, 2015
9,789
2
0
This discussion has consumed the RiME thread and has bigger implications than one game so I thought a new thread was warranted. Not only because the subject is important, but also so that individuals can be held accountable one way or the other.

KennyLinder is apparently a developer and got something right about The Last Guardian still being in development when everyone thought it was dead. He says that the price of Switch cartridge media justifies (in fact, requires) a $10 premium on physical Switch releases.

Nobody believed me about this. It's the cart prices, they are ridiculously expensive for publishers/devs to buy.
The price is the same so not to piss off retail. And you'd be surprised how much the carts cost.
PS4, Xbox One and PC use cheap discs so manufacturing costs are less.
The cost of the Switch carts (which, by the way, are fucking outrageous) means that devs/publishers HAVE to increase the price of the game so they can return a profit. Remember, on a £50 game, the dev doesn't see £50. It's much, much less. Then take into account the additional cost of the manufacter (in this case, Switch carts), margins are much tighter. Then on top of this is the added risk of releasing on a new platform with a small user base, and you have a challenging situation.

Meanwhile Matt of IGN fame disagrees.

The game cards are obviously more expensive than disks.

But they aren't THAT much more.
A $10 up charge can't be explained away by manufacturing costs.

Discuss.
 

NOLA_Gaffer

Banned
Jun 15, 2015
12,235
1,329
730
Flash memory has progressed to that point where I doubt the Switch carts are massively more expensive, especially in large numbers.

This isn't 1997 anymore.
 

GamerJM

Banned
May 19, 2013
11,839
2
0
California
They could both be right and just have different ideas of what "ridiculously expensive," is in regards to what the manufacturing costs of a game should be.
 

LordRaptor

Member
Aug 20, 2015
9,768
579
520
 

Living Proof

Member
Aug 15, 2014
1,924
8
305
Detroit
Whether he works for IGN or not, Matt makes more sense. I don't doubt that the carts cost more, albeit slightly if so, and I think we'll games coming out that prove the disparity is insignificant through their digital/retail pricing. There's just not enough so far to conclude anything.

If more and more devs charge $10 extra for the Switch version of their game, that seems like a quick way to lose consumer interest. It's a bad situation to be in if it is somehow true (again, though, $10 no matter what the game is?)
 

Glix

Member
Jan 28, 2008
10,359
5
955
New York
Need info.

Does Nintendo still control the whole supply chain? Their policies concerning disk/cart pressing/manufacture have always been pretty crazy and oppressive

I would not be surprised if matt is right in the sense of "pubs have to charge more to make a similar amount per copy as they do on the other platforms."
 

Coreda

Member
May 27, 2013
7,732
5
0
GAF poster Cerium says forum member Matt is an IGN employee. GAF disagrees.
 

Stumpokapow

listen to the mad man
May 21, 2006
17,232
4
0
That's not what KennyLinder said, and congratulations, you just made sure that he'll never participate in a conversation about development issues again because you took an off-handed comment and made it into a thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.