A Link to the Past
Banned
At no point was it said that consumer products could not be criticized, so step way back with the strawman.
The point I'm making is that you're going to complain regardless of the reasoning presented before you because you have internally made up your mind that the Legend of Zelda series needs a Female Protagonist for reasons that are not aligned with the wishes of a private game developer who doesn't exist to fulfill your very specific whims.
Sorry I can't take the line of arguing in this thread seriously because the rumors were completely baseless and not at all anything to do with Nintendo's plans. I'm actually on the side of a lot of you who would find it cool to play as a female protag in Zelda (and I have a Samus avatar FFS) but I don't foolishly act like an entitled brat who was promised something. The absurd levels of angry demands and personal entitlement are embarrassing.
You do realize that until you show off a specific post of people being irrational, entitled, bratty, or any number of other ad hominems you've thrown around because video game discussions, it's a strawman argument, right?
If you are so unable to discuss this without making it about attacking other users, then I might suggest that you either try a little better or not try at all. This thread has enough people upset at each other because video game discussions. Really, there's nothing more frustrating than watching someone try to position themselves as being above all of the rabble while they make equally bad faith arguments (if not worse).